Well, in my view its not enough that someone comes after 15 years and says: "hey! Im still interested" and then goes away again. If I own a house, it's my house. If I want it to sit there unused then that's my choice. Maybe I just like the idea of having a house that I could always live in, in an emergency. The point is, I might want to use it someday and that's all that matters. Let's say that I already own a house that I live in and I buy another house for $50,000. I have it there for 15 years doing nothing with it. Then, you come along and move in to it claiming it's unowned. The next day, the house I was living in burns to the ground and I'm homeless. Do you think that's fair? /trolling absolutly fair! |
|
|
|
|
yes. BUT first in about 10-30 times the age of the universe.
|
|
|
|
So getting rid of all those pesky food safety regulations and like?
yes any drug-laws, income taxes, trading regulations, governement inforced embargos. that kind of stuff. |
|
|
|
A free market is one where I am free to kill my competitors......
hmm. no? |
|
|
|
0.5% is way too much. 0.005% is much more fair.
And there you have it. Those complaining about ownership distribution have a fundamental aversion to "some people having more than others." Fairness? Why is .005% fair, but .05% or .5% is unfair? This is arbitrary silliness. fairness! no its not "some people having more than others.", its simply people with too much power/money can't handle the responsibility. if they just put anything over 0.005% in the faucet, when they think the price was high enough so they could live their live with out even moving a finger. it would be fine with me. i have absolutely no problem with some one having more then me. but it seems that you have some problem, with understanding our opinion. SgtSpike's point about the world not wanting to be part of Bitcoin because some might have lots of it... I think that's a myth. no think thats true, why would anyone buy something, that some early adopter, could just crash, if they felt it could be fun? Maybe if someone owned greater than 10% of the currency it would be an issue for stability? But really, this is such a short-term problem. short-term problem. maybe, i don't know. but its a huge problem. Early adopters will sell coins over time and their ratio will fall. If they don't sell, then there's no problem for market price. If they sell all at once, then it's a fantastic buying opportunity for any who aren't tricked by short-term market prices. buy with what? the btc that we own? when the whole world are using bitcoin in every day life, and a early adopter decides to cash out then there will be mass panic. Again, it's a non-issue.It's "fair" for anyone to have as much BTC as they've bought, mined, or traded for.
true, but not if the world didn't know about it. |
|
|
|
seems so. but the term heads and Shoulders, just sounded like it was made up. many people are doing this on the forum. so not sure if serious? |
|
|
|
I don't have a problem with early adopters being rewarded. I DO have a problem with any single person holding more than 0.5% of the currency available.
Hmmm maybe I'm just weird, but this seems like the biggest non-issue of all the non-issues. Those who "adopted" earliest represented the greatest initial thrust behind the project. Bitcoin was a "silly nothing" when the early adopters got involved... and without them it would've forever remained as such. I sincerely hope those early adopters make a fortune, and I care not at all what "proportion" of Bitcoins any single person owns. Those who hold the most coins have the greatest incentive to see them succeed, and if they decide to "dump" them, then all the complainers will get a great opportunity to buy for cheap! I really don't see the concern here... but it seems just like jealousy and a misunderstanding of how prices and markets work. you are weird. it simply can't be good for the market if anyone is holding too much of the currency. they are over rewarded, i have no problem with them getting insanely rich. 0.5% is way too much. 0.005% is much more fair. yes its only 1050. and you can't buy much with that now. but lets seen in 5-10 years, i think they will be insanely rich, and i will too, even if i only have 35 btc. |
|
|
|
I don't have a problem with early adopters being rewarded. I DO have a problem with any single person holding more than 0.5% of the currency available.
+1 agreed! did just put that in my sig! |
|
|
|
|
try booting on linux. should work even with a fried card.
|
|
|
|
I'm using BTC Guild. I want to request a payout. Do I need to have my bitcoin wallet open when requesting a payout? Or how does that work?
have you ever tryed to STFW. i about to get tired of you noobs! Please try to be nicer to the new folks. They're just trying to figure this whole Bitcoin thing out. true, but they need to seek the information them self. and stop asking us to feed it to them. hell its in the FAQ |
|
|
|
I'm using BTC Guild. I want to request a payout. Do I need to have my bitcoin wallet open when requesting a payout? Or how does that work?
have you ever tryed to STFW. i about to get tired of you noobs! what do you even mean by "have my bitcoin wallet open"? do you mean that the client should run while receive payment? no is the answer then! you do not need the client to be running while you are recving your payment. the transaction will be stored in the blockchain. and whn you open your client next time, it will continue downloading blocks. when your client have downloaded the block that includes your transaction, it will show up in your client. btw. if its not showing up, just wait, and let the client download the blockchain. it will show up sooner or later |
|
|
|
|
what the hell do you mean?
|
|
|
|
BUMP
fuck off with the bumping! you are fucking annoying! |
|
|
|
Also I like to run all my software in the cloud, not on my computer. Safely and reliably. This is another thing that needs to be sorted out.
STUFF IS NOT SAFE UP THERE! |
|
|
|
 Ja men det var jo bare et hobby projekt...det skulle aldrig være blevet til en børs, men kun en info side Ser sku meget frem til at se havd de har fået stablet på benene, er lidt træt at de udenlandske børser, og især deres service og sikkerhed. Det ville jo også gavne Bitcoins i Danmark meget at vi har vores egen børs, så vi ikke behøver at bruge en masse tid på at sende penge over og lige ledes tilbage... det tar jo mega lang tid:( jeg har det helt fint med de udenlandske, mtgox's service er i top, eller det er min erfaring med dem. man spørger bare magicaltux på irc, og problemet er løst på under 30 sekunder. mtgox's sikkerhed har også kun været ødelagt 1 gang. så det syntes jeg sku er helt fint. selv en af de store banker har failet(citigroup) men selfølgelig ville det da være rart med vores egen, helt sikkert. jeg håber bare de får testet den ordenligt igennem, jeg hjælper gerne. |
|
|
|
på en eller anden måde, tror jeg at du er en spammer from saris group.
nu vil du sikkert spørge hva er saris group?
aha! det er dem der er bag den danske bitcoin børs.
de er får at sige det som det er nogle inkompetente røvhuller, som spreder FUD om at mtgox ikke virker eller stjæler deres penge.
MEN deres hjemmeside er meget uprofesionelt lavet, og de sender spammere som dig ud for at prøve at give dem et godt rygte.
mtgox, tradehill, og bitmarket virker helt fint.
Ha ha.. du da for dum.... jeg tænker på http://www.btcx.dk/ ikke bitcoinborsen Så hvis du ved hvornår COPBE (COPenhagen Bitcoin Exchange åbner så kunne jeg godt tænke mig at vide det. ja jeg er sgu nogle gange... sorry. så bare at der før havde været en tråd omkring dig og saris group. det ser faktisk meget intrasant ud. glæder mig til at se om det virker. |
|
|
|
So how is the weather today in fantasy land?
Mostly sunny, chance of showers in the afternoon. LOL! SELL SELL SELL! (sorry, i just had to do it) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
