It is fine to neg. rate people who consistently post false information, e.g. "Bitcoin Cash is the real BTC". I've rated many people for stuff like that, sometimes with explicit approval (IIRC). I think he's mostly referring to things that aren't objectively true/untrue.

What are these people doing in DT1? Looks like the ruskis have succesfully colluded their way into DT1.

Thanks for the input. I've sent messages to some people.

---

Seems qwk was right about this one.

What am I supposed to decipher out of this? Wipro claims that it's his client?

I believe he is referring to the old combination:
Atriz
Lauda
Untold

That link was already in the thread, but the hyperlink had a different text. The compilation of links from that thread might also be useful:

I forgot to say that I did not vote because I don't agree with the biased reasoning on either option. The poll should not have any 'because' but rather 'Yes vs. No' and let people elaborate themselves.

Yes, I'm strongly inclined to tag anyone who knowingly hires frauds/scammers - although each case would have to be reviewed independently. e.g. a BH accepting a translator which was already tagged as fraudulent.

Can you stop shilling the shitcoin Nano here? It's one of the worst things invented in recent years (out of those that have the highest marketcaps). If this turns out to be a coordinated shilling attempt, maybe it's time to kick Nano completely out of the forum. It is off-topic anyways.

That's fine; you should point out these things especially if your gut tells you that someone may be trying to set you up now or sometime in the future.

Which is irrelevant to me.

No surprise there. Thanks for checking it out.

You are completely wrong. ANN bumping on a large scale is permanently bannable, and this may be the largest scale bumping (from a single source) that we've indentified so far (or at least in recent times). Staff must absolutely get involved.

Added, archived, tagged. Thanks.

Note to moderators: This is not a scam accusation (despite the title); a scam accusation already exists I believe (or it is in the reputation section). I'm posting it in this thread for the sake of discussion/research; they're already a proven scam thus no need to "accuse" them of anything.

Tl;dr: Tokensuite.io and bountysuite.com are scam platforms that overcharge clients for fraudulent marketing -> they create fake marketing buzz via ANN bumping, Telegram spam and more.

---

What happened: Fraudulent bounty management offering; offering bot boosting on Bitcointalk and probably other sites as well.
Scammers Profile Link: needmoney, olcaytu2005, radnom, psy0, probably more.
Previous accusation(s): Running a fraudulent bounty - [Unethical]Bounty Team Tokensuite Misleading Token Calculations Sprintx [Proven]
Reference Link: Tokensuite.io archived: https://archive.fo/Q3dMC; Bountysuite.io archived: https://archive.fo/ANQtv; Tokendrops.com archived: https://archive.fo/q134n.

---

I've looked into their scam platform again after I've randomly received the following PM from one of their accounts:


Proof of offering "bumping services":



Known threads which were bumped:
[ANN][ICO] CrowdForce: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5032793.0 [Proven - See screenshots] - Archive: https://archive.fo/RGDzb
[ANN] BtcEX - Built for Security, Transparency and Liquidity: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5083960.0 [Proven - Same accounts from the above]



Everyone involved in this scam:





Archived in case that they try to hide something: https://web.archive.org/web/20190204105240/http://tokensuite.io/about.html

---

Note: I've had no interaction with any member of this scam myself in any way or form between the time that I've received the PM and made this thread.
Credits: Credits go to an anonymous source that forwarded me the messages (forwards can't be doctored trivially like screenshots can). If either platform acts malliciously and retaliates against the source, then actions against them should be elevated (i.e. they should be at least permanently banned; and maybe legal action should be taken if someone is a fan of that).
Note 2: While forwards can't be doctored, the person creating a screenshot of the forward can doctor the image. If anyone questions the validity of the screenshots that I've taken, then they can contact me on TG and request a forward (although anyone who is familiar with me knows that this would just be a small waste of time).

---

Local-self mod. rule: Nobody who has been excluded from my trust list (mostly whiny/untrustworthy trolls) is allowed to post (this includes Quickseller, OgNasty, cryptohunter, TECSHARE, the hacked VIP account, and many more). Even if your comment is constructive I will delete it (as well as any posts quoting these replies), so don't waste your time.

---

Questions/TODO
I partially believe that this is also a Meta issue. If some services are doing this on large scale (they are probably not informing clients that this is not allowed, and wrong), then maybe theymos should blacklist them and remove anything related to them that comes up. I don't see any other way of preventing this on such a scale.
Additionally, every ANN thread of every project that they have ever worked with has to be analized. I currently lack the time required to go through all them otherwise I would have already listed the results here.
All clients:
https://i.imgur.com/Z8gi9w3.png
https://i.imgur.com/r45rLWl.png
https://i.imgur.com/nQay1Gn.png
https://i.imgur.com/3qIJmi9.png
https://i.imgur.com/hANBtVI.png

---

Maduro is far better than the CIA spy that the US sent. A lot of the trouble that Venezuela is in now is not due to Maduro's faulty policies, but due to all the sanctions that the US war-machine set upon them. I could never understand how someone could say they are proud to be American.

Any business can request you to verify yourself when money is involved with or without KYC in their terms. Is it something I agree? No, I despise KYC and AML but it is just the way that things are now.

I'm going to wait for Cloudbet to respond publicly here (hopefully) and then re-evaluate. Obviously if they ignore their accusation for a longer amount of time, then I'll tag them.

---

I've just noticed that they've received several tags already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154563

Thank you. The grumpy response was due to you ignoring this the first time around:

---

I have another suggestion: Improve the structure the OP using tables if you have the time.

Of course they can. e.g. Binance doesn't require KYC either (up to 2 BTC in their case), but try withdrawing 100 BTC day 1 and see whether that is possible.

Third party verifies KYC -> Cloudbet ruined.

If a casino is really complicant, asking for KYC for insane amounts is nothing unusual. Many see this as a crypto laundering machine, and once they are unable to withdraw without KYC then they complain that the casino is a scam.

That's nothing new, nothing funny and not something that is done only by Cloudbet. If you are smart enough, you don't need someone else telling you how to avoid geo-restrictions anyways.