What I don't understand is how any rational being can look at BSV and think 'hot damn, Craigy and his miner have this shit nailed.'
You can support big blocks and still think the current options offering it are broken jokes. It's not a crime or dichotomy. Most people are pissing on their current implementations and the personalities controlling them, not the concept.
You can't. This isn't a matter of opinion, it's a matter of facts based on empirical evidence. Just because some people choose to approach science then same way that they approach religion (hurr durr the almighty God/Satoshi/whatever), that doesn't mean that this position is correct from any perspective. Because it isn't. |
|
|
|
When this coin starts to be a coin to be considered?
It's a garbage scamcoin; run away into the other direction as fast as you can. |
|
|
|
- What do you think about all of the expert witnesses in the Wright vs Kleiman case?
What are you talking about? It's a clear appeal to authority; nobody shouldn't listen to them because of that. Ooh, wait a minute.. |
|
|
|
You have one chance to guess who controls that account. *eats popcorn*  Lauda! You're back. Now it's only a matter of time until cryptohunter and his posse of multiple pathological personalities starts ranting again. It seems to me that this section is weaker than ever, maybe the army of wanking leftists and "modern-progressive liberals" has finally scaremongered people to refrain from acting.
Man up, otherwise you're just worthless bags of meat. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=921 |
|
|
|
Cat moon soon?
HODLsleep soon. Another 20% and I will meow. What if it would be 40-50%  I unleash my inner Queen. 
lo sientoYou might be onto something there. |
|
|
|
Cat moon soon?
HODLsleep soon. Another 20% and I will meow. What if it would be 40-50% I unleash my inner Queen. |
|
|
|
Cat moon soon?
HODLsleep soon. Another 20% and I will meow. |
|
|
|
|
Is this thread by any chance about me?
|
|
|
|
What client are you using?
Have you not read the thread? He stated several times that he's using Electrum. You can freeze every address and UTXO individually.
No SPV wallets for me, thus the question was directed at him for learning purposes. Let those seeking help tinker; for future sake: I don't need an answer to any question that I post in this sub. |
|
|
|
1) Use this explorer: https://blockstream.info/address/1Q4xJNNmyPEy3iP3v2xKPn837Uic3i4wYk. Stop being tracked all over by blockchain.info. 2) Is that means whatever unspent transaction available on my address all of them will move to change address when I will try to make new transactions? Or am I missing something? I know about send fund from single address even I have fund on multiple address at same wallet. I was use electrum.
No, it does not mean that. The selection of UTXOs as inputs (confirmed or not) for a transaction solely depends on the used algorithm and its implementation in Electrum. Summary is, I can not spent individual unspent transaction from my address if there is multiple unspent transaction. Or still am I missing something? Curious to know.
Is coin-control for unconfirmed UTXOs implemented for electrum, i.e. can you freeze them individually? If not, you could make an Issue on Github and ask them to fix/implement/etc.
For reference: Bitcoin Core does not have this for unconfirmed UTXOs, and thus you would not be able to control spending from them using the GUI. |
|
|
|
Is that possible to occur "corrupting" in wallet.dat file for some reasons? Did it happen before?
Yes, there's probably an unknown number of potential causes for file corruption. It's irrelevant if you have a valid backup of it though; you'd just have to rescan the old backup wallet to get the latest transaction history. Keep in mind that you'll lose address labels though. If I use different address for every deposit, well, I'll have bunch of addresses so keeping every damn private keys of them should be pain in the ass. That's why I'm asking.
Just keep wallet.dat backups. Export private keys only for things when you need it elsewhere. |
|
|
|
18months later and Lightning is worse than ever...like i said it will never work , and is more likely a scam by Blockstreamcore.
-snip-
This is false propaganda by shitcoiners. This is no different from any other hot-wallet loss that is a result from software-misuse. Maybe it is time to flag HostFat and be done with this story. Luke Dashjr 5 points 11 hours ago
This is like posting your wallet private keys on a pastebin service... PEBKAC
BCash is a scam. Destroyed yet again. |
|
|
|
You have one chance to guess who controls that account. *eats popcorn* |
|
|
|
(and signature design plagiarism)
It is not. I would shut down a huge chunk of this campaign as well and actually agree with the bloke on this situation for the most part. Unless you think that Vadi2323 is actually promoting terrorism, this is either parody (may be fair use) or satire (probably not fair use). Given that Vadi2323 seems to be ridiculing the Chipmixer campaign itself - it could be considered parody. On the other hand, he could be targeting privacy/anonymization in general, in which case it's more of a satire. IANAL. This. |
|
|
|
 RIP. |
|
|
|
It's not at all ambiguous, it states it exactly how it is.
well maybe it is just me, but i still think as a "documentation" (specially the BIP) it could have been written in a much clearer way by using a slightly different terminology. for instance it doesn't mention "standardness" anywhere instead uses the term "default policy" which i interpret as meaning "consensus rule" not "standard rule". The differentiation between consensus rules and policies is widely-known, or I have presumed that this was the case. Is it not? |
|
|
|
 Tick-tock. |
|
|
|
Yup that was what I think as well, I need individual private keys, so basically I need to keep every private key of my addresses, but wait, what is "master private key"?
https://bitcoin.org/en/wallets-guide#term-master-private-keyIs there any other thing that I should know about Bitcoin core wallet I haven't mention above?
Well, I wouldn't recommend running it on any external drive. Also, makes sure to properly shut it down before you turn off your system in any way. Both of these could cause corruptions which could require a full reindex, and those are painfully long. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
