Education is very important to the politicians in power. They use it to indoctrinate the students into their political thinking. And the students don't even realize what is happening most of the time.  |
|
|
|
Why did nobody indict Clinton? PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON paid Paula Jones $850,000 to shut up about sexual harassment charges while he was in middle of impeachment hearings for affair with 19-yr-old intern… why was he never arrested?
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-04-10-bill-clinton-paid-paula-jones-850000-hush-money-never-arrested.htmlYesterday, news broke that President Donald Trump could be indicted as soon as next week as a result of charges stemming from payments made to Stormy Daniels to keep an alleged affair between her and Trump quiet. Only hours ago, President Trump announced on his Truth Social account that he would be arrested on Tuesday. (Article by Patty McMurray republished from 100PercentFedUp.com) ----------  ---------- Do you remember when former President Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones $850,000 to go away? Do you remember the FBI raiding his lawyer’s office? Well, that’s because the former happened and the latter did not.In 1994, a former law clerk, Paula Jones, filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Little Rock, Arkansas, against President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment and defamation while he was the governor of Arkansas. In her suit, Jones asked for $700,000 in damages. On November 13, 1998, President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Jones for $850,000, putting an end to a lengthy four 1/2-year battle between America’s most accused serial sexual assault President and Jones. Why would President Clinton give Jones $150,000 MORE than what she asked for in her lawsuit? We will never know because America’s dishonest media didn’t care. The corporate media, like the Clintons, just wanted the Jones case to go away, as Bill Clinton was in the initial stages of his impeachment trial over his repugnant affair with a young, 19-year-old White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. ...
|
|
|
|
I still haven't figured out if Twitchy is simply ignorant, or if he is a troll, or what his reasons are for ignoring the obvious. Do you have any idea? Of course I have ideas about this. He and a number of other accounts active here are politically biased, heavily influenced by anti-Russian propaganda and forced to express their opinions under conditions of strict censorship, at the risk of falling under the pressure of cancellation culture, and even being subjected to criminal prosecution. It is also possible that they are paid for spreading Russophobic sentiments online. Under such conditions, it is difficult to expect any objectivity from them. Or... maybe you are getting paid for saying so, blurting the official buzzwords over and over to see what part of the shit sticks and somehow feeling that you are doing yourself a favour. The answer is much simpler: people do not like being shot at, being threatened with nuclear weapons and getting their countries invaded. If you do that, you will get people saying that you should not do any of that and that they are willing to fight back for mere self preservation. If in doubt go to any six year old and ask him how he likes the school bully. Well, of course. There wasn't only one reason why Russia did its police action. But the reasons you mentioned were sure part of it. Russia wanted to stop the Ukraine and the US and Nato from all that stuff. But the US is stubborn. And Ukraine is stupid. So, what do we have, now? A bunch of Nato countries that are falling apart, and plowed ground in Ukraine... plowed for spring planting. And, millions of Ukraine citizens leaving Ukraine because they didn't want the war that Zelensky and other leaders were promoting. Tease the bear, and you will get clawed to pieces, chewed up and spit out. |
|
|
|
Best ways to better society... in this order:
2. Get all the neighbors of the neighborhood watch to buy guns, and help them to become proficient in using their guns... lots of target practice;
I will not advice all the neighbors of the neighborhood to have a gun, not every one is psychologically stable to own a gun, there are too many shoot outs these days to increase the number of guns in the street. Your idea is sound. Don't advise all neighbors of the neighborhood to get guns. But, do what I said. 1. Form a NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH. These are people of the neighborhood getting together to protect each other. If some neighborhood jokers don't want to be part of the NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH, expel them from the meeting. Then, after you have an understanding with your GOOD neighbors, and they become part of the Neighborhood watch according to good rules, then... 2. Get the guns, and get some shooting practice in. Protect each other. If you have bad guys in the neighborhood, those who don't want to be part of the NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH, they already have guns and you need to protect yourselves from them. |
|
|
|
Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if the US hadn't gone back on its agreement to not expand Nato, and if they hadn't pushed Ukraine into harming their own people and some Russians as well. Maybe in BADeckerville. In the real world that "we won't expand NATO" promise is a fantasy, it doesn't exist. Just like the whole "tHeY aRe CoMiTtIng GeNocIdE!11!!" bullshit. You are mistaken, the promise not to expand NATO to the east is not a fantasy and there is documentary evidence of this. I still haven't figured out if Twitchy is simply ignorant, or if he is a troll, or what his reasons are for ignoring the obvious. Do you have any idea? |
|
|
|
The war won't have happened if the US and some western countries have kept to their promise of not expanding NATO towards Russian borders. And moreover, both Ukraine and Russia are brothers, just in arms. Russia is simply trying to survive hostile NATO policies.
The war won't have happened if Russia didn't invade Ukraine. Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if the US hadn't gone back on its agreement to not expand Nato, and if they hadn't pushed Ukraine into harming their own people and some Russians as well. Maybe in BADeckerville. In the real world that "we won't expand NATO" promise is a fantasy, it doesn't exist. Just like the whole "tHeY aRe CoMiTtIng GeNocIdE!11!!" bullshit. Thanks for this advertising of yours, helping me to advertise, so that people are prompted to seek and find the info that the media is covering up. |
|
|
|
For your viewing pleasure... to show how some people are using the US to try to take over the world. Over 100 More Classified Docs Appear Online: US Secrets 'From Ukraine To Middle East To China'
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/over-100-more-classified-docs-appear-online-us-secrets-ukraine-middle-east-chinaA more expanded document dump and leak of highly classified materials is being reported in the wake of the initial disclosure that memos related to US strategy in the Ukraine war appeared online, including material marked "Top Secret". This time the leak appears more expansive: "A new batch of classified documents that appear to detail American national security secrets from Ukraine to the Middle East to China surfaced on social media sites on Friday, alarming the Pentagon and adding turmoil to a situation that seemed to have caught the Biden administration off guard," The New York Times reported Friday evening. "The scale of the leak — analysts say more than 100 documents may have been obtained — along with the sensitivity of the documents themselves, could be hugely damaging, U.S. officials said," the report continues. One senior intelligence official was quoted in the report as saying the leak is "a nightmare for the Five Eyes" - in reference to the intelligence-sharing nations of the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Like the Ukraine war plans earlier reported on by the Times, some of these latest documents appeared on Twitter and other social media platforms, and they include reports labeled with one of the highest classification ratings of "Secret/NoForn" - which means they are sensitive enough to not be shared with even foreign allies. Interestingly, the NY Times notes that one intelligence slide which is circulating features "an alarming assessment of Ukraine's faltering air defense capabilities." But these leaks, some of which actually appeared on a Discord server devoted to discussing Minecraft and other unusual places, include more than the initial content on Ukraine war planning: But the leaked documents appear to go well beyond highly classified material on Ukraine war plans. Security analysts who have reviewed the documents tumbling onto social media sites say the increasing trove also includes sensitive briefing slides on China, the Indo-Pacific military theater, the Middle East and terrorism. ...
|
|
|
|
Then try to find a way that the universe could exist without God. You can't.
That's a poor argument and you risk your credibility when you make that argument. The argument is called "god of the gaps". You are claiming that because we don't understand how something works, it must be the work of a god. That argument has been shown to be wrong a countless number of times -- lightning, earthquakes, floods, etc. Consider a magic trick where the magician produces a rabbit from a hat. You can't conclude that it can only be a supernatural act of magic just because you can't figure out how the magician does it. It is also circular reasoning. You can't say that the universe can only exist through a god without first showing that a god actually exists. If the existence of a god is necessary for the existence of the universe, then you can't use the existence of the universe to prove that a god exists. You didn't quote the rest of what I posted. "God of the gaps" doesn't have anything to do with it. My claim had to do with the fallacies in standard scientific theory understanding of all kinds of things regarding the operation of the universe and life. Those things seem to be the standard by which you make your argument. We aren't getting deep enough into it in the posts here to even know what we are referring to. The universe, itself, shows that God exists. The simple science of the combined existence of Complexity + Cause and Effect + Entropy as they exist together is impossible without God. Further, the simple idea of machine universe - a complex machine made up of many complex machines - expresses God. Machines have makers. A machine as complex as the universe has to have a Maker far greater than the machine universe. As I said before, such a Maker matches our definition of God Almighty. |
|
|
|
The war won't have happened if the US and some western countries have kept to their promise of not expanding NATO towards Russian borders. And moreover, both Ukraine and Russia are brothers, just in arms. Russia is simply trying to survive hostile NATO policies.
The war won't have happened if Russia didn't invade Ukraine. Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if the US hadn't gone back on its agreement to not expand Nato, and if they hadn't pushed Ukraine into harming their own people and some Russians as well. |
|
|
|
Best ways to better society... in this order: 1. Form a neighborhood watch; 2. Get all the neighbors of the neighborhood watch to buy guns, and help them to become proficient in using their guns... lots of target practice; 3. Shut down government. |
|
|
|
^^^ One of the major reasons for the success of the USD is, loads of people in America love and have faith in God >>> Jesus salvation. The whole American nation started with people who fled other countries for freedom of religion purposes; it's right in the 1st Amendment... religious freedom. God actually allowed the USD to become strong so that the religious freedom of Americans could be spread around the world. But now that a bunch of wicked people are using the USD for evil purposes, it will fail... and so will the wicked people. But freedom-loving, God-fearing people will find deliverance from the failure of the USD. God always makes protection for His people. Freedom might be in cryptocurrency. The US government doesn't have authority over crypto transactions that are done privately... provided there is a privacy statement that goes along with the crypto exchange. Study Private Membership Associations, and consider how to use a different PMA for each crypto transaction you do... the hash being the part of the exchange that makes it different from all the rest of the exchanges done. |
|
|
|
You're dumb, gotcha!
What does my deafness or dumbness have to do with it? Any man or woman who has sex with somebody they are not married to is a sleaze. It's so sad that there is corruption in all these beautiful people - and everybody - so that we all gradually get old and die. Sometimes I wish I could have a little more money. But I DO have some power money can't buy. I have Jesus-salvation, meaning eternal life through Jesus, even if I die here. Only faith in God can get this. "For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil." |
|
|
|
The point of that website is this. IN US law, a person is an artificial entity, not a man or woman. The only way that a man or woman can be a person is by agreeing to be one. But if the man/woman doesn't realize this, he/she doesn't know to say that they are not the person in question, when government asks if they are the person on some paperwork. The first short clause in the 4th Amendment ( https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment ) says this: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons... ." What? How many 'persons' am I? One of your persons is any document, mostly a contract or agreement, that has a name on it that looks like your name - is spelled like your name - and your signature is at the bottom. Government, because it is an artificial entity, created by men and women, can't attack you, a man or woman, for anything. All it can attack is other artificial entities. If government tries to attack you, it always has paperwork - like an indictment - that attacks the person named on the document. Then government tries to get you, the man/woman, to agree that you are the artificial entity person on the document. Is an indictment with a name that looks like yours on it... is it one of your persons like in the 4th Amendment? NO? It is a fictitious entity that government created, and placed your name at the top. But you have to let them know that their entity isn't you, or even one of your persons. Your silence on the matter is all it takes for you to agree that you are their person... according to rules of estoppel. https://redress4dummies.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/office-of-person1.pdf |
|
|
|
The existence of God is a matter of faith and belief, and there is no scientific proof that God exists. While some people may argue that there are scientific proofs for the existence of God, such as near-death experiences, light, time, and matter/energy, these arguments are not universally accepted by the scientific community. Some scientists have attempted to formalize the existence of God using mathematical theorems, but these arguments are not conclusive and are often debated. Ultimately, the existence of God is a matter of personal belief and cannot be proven or disproven by science.
You are looking at it from the wrong direction. Consider the complexity of the universe; we don't know it all, but what we know is exceedingly complex. Then try to find a way that the universe could exist without God. You can't. The universe is a complex machine made up of multitudes of smaller complex machines. Machines have makers. The Maker of the universe machine is great enough that He fits our definition of "God Almighty." |
|
|
|
~ Nobody does something for nothing except by accident. The pay might be gratification in some way. But it doesn't have to be money. Men and women were messing around long before money was even invented. So, they invented a new word, prostitution, when people started doing it for money. Are we playing a semantics game? Or are we talking about illegitimate sexual intercourse? Show me a single woman who will have sex with a sleazy man for absolutely nothing. I'm very clear: not an alpha male, but a sleazy man. Don't you dare Google images of naked ladies having sex. It's not for your innocent eyes to see. But where do you think that these paid ladies got their sleazy start? They did it with anyone for no money, but maybe gratuity of some kind... or the fun of it, just to see what it was like. Are you dumb or what? Show me a sane & beautiful woman who wants to have sex with this guy for free (not rape, with her consent):  I'm as nice guy. That's why I'm not going to show you the women you are looking for. |
|
|
|
The old one who have stopped aging are the ones who are in the cemeteries or urns. They can't do anything, especially politics. However, if those still alive promote the manifestos of the aged dead, it's the same as if the old ones were still alive. |
|
|
|
Finland is in because Nato is losing, and needs all the help they can get. |
|
|
|
~ Nobody does something for nothing except by accident. The pay might be gratification in some way. But it doesn't have to be money. Men and women were messing around long before money was even invented. So, they invented a new word, prostitution, when people started doing it for money. Are we playing a semantics game? Or are we talking about illegitimate sexual intercourse? Show me a single woman who will have sex with a sleazy man for absolutely nothing. I'm very clear: not an alpha male, but a sleazy man. Don't you dare Google images of naked ladies having sex. It's not for your innocent eyes to see. But where do you think that these paid ladies got their sleazy start? They did it with anyone for no money, but maybe gratuity of some kind... or the fun of it, just to see what it was like. |
|
|
|
The Dems might as well try anything... even placing Trump on trial. They are already dead regarding the 2024 election. So, they don't have anything to lose. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
