While people are continually dying from the covid shots in the US and Europe, here's a country that used Ivermectin instead... and it's a third world country. Maybe the US and third world countries are starting to change places. Most Intensive Ivermectin Use Had 74% Reduction In Excess Deaths In Peru: New Study
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/most-intensive-ivermectin-use-had-74-percent-reduction-excess-deaths-peru-new-studyThe paper's results, published August 8 in Cureus, found a 74 percent reduction in excess deaths in 10 states with the most intensive ivermectin use over a 30-day period following peak deaths during the pandemic. When analyzing data across 25 states in Peru, researchers found these reductions in excess deaths correlated closely to ivermectin use during four months in 2020. When ivermectin was available without restriction, there was a fourteenfold reduction in nationwide excess deaths. Once access to ivermectin was restricted by the government, a thirteenfold increase in excess deaths was observed in the two months following the limitation of its use. The findings align with summary data from the World Health Organization for the same time period in Peru. Ivermectin is a widely-known and inexpensive treatment against parasitic diseases. Scientists believe the drug can also bind to the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, limiting its morbidity and infectivity. ...
 |
|
|
|
Trump is having his troubles, as we all know. But tables are starting to turn against Biden... and this time from his own son's lawyers. Hunter Biden's Lawyers Threatened To Put President Biden On Witness Stand
https://www.dailywire.com/news/hunter-bidens-lawyers-threatened-to-put-president-biden-on-witness-stand-if-hunter-was-charged-by-doj-reportChris Clark, a lawyer for Hunter Biden, threatened the U.S. attorney investigating his client that if his client was charged in the case, the defense would call President Joe Biden to testify, thus creating a constitutional crisis by pitting the president against his own Department of Justice, POLITICO reported. The warning came after information had leaked to the news media that federal prosecutors believed they had enough information to charge Hunter Biden for illegally purchasing a firearm despite being a drug addict. "President Biden now unquestionably would be a fact witness for the defense in any criminal trial," Clark said in a lengthy letter to prosecutors, later adding: "This of all cases justifies neither the spectacle of a sitting President testifying at a criminal trial nor the potential for a resulting Constitutional crisis." ...
|
|
|
|
I think the cause is lack of savings. without savings man can do nothing. if you are that can of person that doesn't save, you will work in particular place for 100years without nothing to show fort .
It's 3 things: 1. Lack of wisdom in using the funds one has; 2. Income tax; 3. Inflation. If we didn't have the Federal Reserve Bank, but instead let the US Treasury handle the money, inflation would be almost 0%... and we wouldn't need the IRS. The amount of money the IRS collects is the amount of repayment of the money and interest that the US borrows from the Fed. It determines how much the government can borrow. If we didn't have the Fed, the US creating money would be in the hands of the US Treasury, and the people would recall or sue government officials when they created too much money. |
|
|
|
~
And your alternative is? Ukraine giving Putin whatever he wants? How suspiciously convenient.
~
Lol. You haven't really noticed, have you. It's more like stopping Putin from taking whatever he wants. If Putin wasn't such a nice guy, he'd have steamrollered right over Ukraine long ago. If Ukraine didn't have the help of the US and Nato - because THEY want Ukraine - the war would have been over in a month. Big Brave Western Proxy Warriors Keep Whining That Ukrainian Troops Are Cowards
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/big-brave-western-proxy-warriorsReporting that Ukrainian efforts to retake Russia-occupied territory have been "bogged down in dense Russian minefields under constant fire from artillery and helicopter gunships," The New York Times reports that Ukrainian forces have switched tactics to using "artillery and long-range missiles instead of plunging into minefields under fire." Then the article gets really freaky: "American officials are worried that Ukraine's adjustments will race through precious ammunition supplies, which could benefit President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and disadvantage Ukraine in a war of attrition. But Ukrainian commanders decided the pivot reduced casualties and preserved their frontline fighting force. "American officials say they fear that Ukraine has become casualty averse, one reason it has been cautious about pressing ahead with the counteroffensive. Almost any big push against dug-in Russian defenders protected by minefields would result in huge numbers of losses." ...
|
|
|
|
Satoshi = AI. |
|
|
|
People would be shocked and surprised.
If they knew what was written in the bible.
And if they understood that it is the truth, they'd feel guiltier than all get out. Then many of them might look to Jesus for salvation. As it is, even the best of Christians mostly don't really know what is written in all the Bible. |
|
|
|
Russia is having successes some of the time, and Ukraine is having successes some of the time. Looking at an individual success by either of them doesn't tell you much of what is going on throughout the whole war. "I'll Be Blunt, It's Failed," Says Congressional Ukraine Caucus Co-Chair On Offensive
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/top-ukraine-caucus-congressman-counteroffensive-ill-be-blunt-its-failedRep. Andy Harris (R-MD), a co-chair of the congressional Ukraine Caucus, said this week that he's not sure if the Ukraine war is "winnable" and called for the US to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to pursue peace talks. Harris is also a member of the Freedom Caucus, which has many members who have opposed US support for Ukraine. But Harris has been a staunch supporter of the proxy war against Russia throughout the conflict. "Is this more a stalemate? Should we be realistic about it? I think we probably should," Harris said at a town hall on Tuesday night, according to POLITICO. Discussing the Ukrainian counteroffensive, Harris said, "I'll be blunt, it's failed." ...
|
|
|
|
It looks like he’s now sending United States reserve troops to Europe to assist in this war. I wonder if they’re going to be able to keep the media from using term like World War 3 in the upcoming United States Presidential election… Like with the definition of women and recession, I think the definition of world war is about to become a moving target.
It would be fair that there is a difference between sending soldiers to counter-attack the Russian army and sending military advisors and aid personel to improve the efficiency or the Ukranian troops. I hope you are wrong though, because what I would have expected by now was a way to stop the conflict, instead of escalating it further into a global confrontation. On your point about censorship, it is very likely media will try not to talk about further developments on the war until there are some important advances by Ukraine to push Russia further closer to their border. In the mean time, the prime time is about presidential candidates and their public appareances. Note that, even though the world might not yet view the lands that Russia has taken from Ukraine to be Russian land, it essentially is Russian land... because they took it. Probably in the near future the world will have to accept the new borders that Russia is carving out for itself. The Russia/Ukraine border is in turmoil, ever changing, daily. Note, also, that the possibly hundreds of years of turmoil between Russia and Ukraine, is making every offensive on both sides into a counter-offensive. Kinda like the Hatfields and McCoys in the US, but longer. |
|
|
|
Can we donate blood if we have Tattoo?Only if the people being donated to have tattoos.  Just curious, does a scar from a wound count as a tattoo if it shows up on the skin?
|
|
|
|
^^^ You certainly are correct. However, that is not scientific or proof. While the things in my previous post are scientific proof for God, there are better. If somebody would put scientific teams together and examine the Bible, the history of the Bible, and the history of Ancient Israel scientifically, they would prove that Moses was real, his strength for miracles was real, and so, God is real because Moses professed and confessed Him, and did the miracles by God-strength. But the Bible proof goes way beyond this. The problem is that scientists want to be able to take the credit for finding out things that are not true, and then making people believe them. Then the 'media', for the same reasons, want to make many copies and pronouncements of the lies. |
|
|
|
World Bank halts new loans over anti-LGBTQ law. Right decision or hypocrisy?It is a good and right decision by the World Bank. Why? Because it signals the beginning of the coming downfall of the World Bank.
|
|
|
|
~ As you say, I think that there are two sides to the coin. But I probably don't mean it in the same way that you do. People in the US government and military aren't that stupid... not all of them. The sanctions have helped Russia. Russia is developing worldwide contacts and trade it never would have if the sanctions hadn't been initiated. But the US idea of the sanctions was to weaken or destroy Russia. Total backfire... it seems. So, when you look at the bigger picture, it seems like the sanctions were really set in place to make Russia stronger. The point? Who is really running the world show? Whoever it is, Russia and the US are two sides of the same coin. Russian could have developed those economical and diplomatic connections without the senseless attack against a country and it's people, by the way. In the end, Russia and any other country is supposed to be free to make deals and treaties with other countries or their choice, for the development of their own people's standard of living. So, the hardening on the economy cannot be an excuse or part of an excuse to support war between neighbors. Also, even if Russia manages to find new clients for the gas and raw materials they export, being ilosated from much of the rest market can be harmful to any nation, not matter what plans they have in the mid term. The so-called attack by Russia was simply a counter-attack against Ukraine. Now, I would agree that there have been mixed relations between Russia and Ukraine for ages. If a country wants to increase its international trade structure, what does it do? It figures out how to trade with the US and Western Europe. This is what Russia was trying to do before the sanctions. Why waste time developing trade with countries who are not as beneficial to your trade as the US is? No need to develop deep trade relations with other countries when the US is there to trade with. Part if not all of the reason why the US started war with Russia (even though it was a covert war) was that Russia was increasing its world trade faster than the US was. And by trading with the US, Russia was outstripping even the US in some ways. This was something that the US couldn't take, because it was exactly the thing that the US was trying to do to Russia. The sanctions were just about the only way (outside of the covert Ukraine war) to stop Russian trade... or so they thought. Russia took advantage of the sanctions, and now there is a new gas pipeline between Russia and China... cementing relations between them somewhat. Also, Russia is opening up all kinds of new roads to trade with many countries around the world... oil and grain to India for example. In addition, there are loads of countries who want to join BRICS. |
|
|
|
^^^ I guess I agree. RFK isn't that big of a thing, yet. The one thing that a Trump/RFK team might do for Trump is, it might bring a bunch of Dems over to Trump (because RFK is Dem, at least in name), who would have felt hopeless and lost otherwise. But, I don't hold out any expectations for a Trump/RFK team. 4th Indictment Sends Trump Surging in National Polls;
https://banned.video/watch?id=64dd5e1c4e506ac6f5ad288aIf the purpose of indicting Trump was to make him less popular or electable, then the plan has backfired. [Donald] Trump now has more support than ever, and is beating Biden constantly in the National Polls. Owen Shroyer breaks down this phenomenon with the latest polls as well as what's happening inside the Republican party. Breanna Morello was on the ground in Georgia dealing with the evidence of voter fraud, she joined the show to discuss what she presented to Brian Kemp. Alex Stein joins the show to discuss his latest, and perhaps most ridiculous, stunt yet. Dr. Ben Marble talks about the lies that lead us into the death trap of the covid vaccine. ...
|
|
|
|
In the early days, good leaders were chosen by not really wanting to be a leader that's why they often became good leaders when they finally took the throne on the other side of the story, people who wanted to be elected as government leaders were often corrupt and already have hidden agenda once they took the power in their hands. Lying in politics is common because in order to win you need to throw countless promises that you don't even remember because most voters want to have new hope they are taken advantage of with that mindset. that's why most of those politicians are a bunch of liars and they seem not to bother about it and they want to get those votes in any way or shape to perform.
After Jesus fed the 5,000 from 5 small loaves of bread and 2 small fish, what did He do? John 6:15: "Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself." People attempt to make somebody king when that person proves he is going to do good for them. Husband and wife are similar. The wife wants her husband to be head of the family, and wear the pants (so to speak)... as long as he does what she says. |
|
|
|
Reading through the comments, some people think Russia made a mistake getting involved in the Ukraine conflict and will regret it later. But we can't be sure about that. If the US and UK were in Russia's place, they might take stronger actions, or they might not. The situation is complicated and hard to predict.
Yes, Russia made a big mistake when it decided to restore the USSR within its former borders. The time of empires has passed, and the Russian Empire is facing its inevitable end. I think there are two sides to the coin likewise the story of Russia and US on Ukraine. I don't think Russia was going for the reunion of the old Soviet Union and of course that won't be possible but the interest of both world powers are barely political at the expense of the Ukrainian soil. Ukraine has not known peace ever since they wanted to join NATO and US as the big man of NATO trying to advocate for freedom of association maybe be for other reasons though. About the losses, well people actually thought Russia would have given up because of the economic sanctions but that is not helping because I read somewhere that even US gets above 13% of her uranium from Russia. As you say, I think that there are two sides to the coin. But I probably don't mean it in the same way that you do. People in the US government and military aren't that stupid... not all of them. The sanctions have helped Russia. Russia is developing worldwide contacts and trade it never would have if the sanctions hadn't been initiated. But the US idea of the sanctions was to weaken or destroy Russia. Total backfire... it seems. So, when you look at the bigger picture, it seems like the sanctions were really set in place to make Russia stronger. The point? Who is really running the world show? Whoever it is, Russia and the US are two sides of the same coin. |
|
|
|
So, not a crack, just a dude having that type of happy moment in public - not only not an official posture or comment, but something that he had to take back minutes after he said it.
Let's speak of cracks, real cracks: But BA, which of 39 felonies indicted to Trump would you say is going to be the easies to prove? I am saying this because they are using the RICO legislation - this is used for drug gangs, pimps & slavery networks and many other crimes committed by an organised group.
This means that penalties are around 20 years per each individual involved and as of now the count is around 19. Tell me BA, how many "cracks" do you think are going to happen here? How many will start speaking for immunity?
Really? I bet he was ordered to "test waters" Improper usage of RICO can be RICO in itself. In this case it's RICO activity of the Deep State, using RICO accusations against Trump. The indictment thing is simply a stay-afloat procedure the Deep State is using so that they can keep on making money through the Ukraine war, and all kinds of illegal, but for certain unconscionable, things that they do around the world. The point? All the US wars since WW2, but maybe long before WW2, are US government RICO activity. This includes Ukraine. And since its inception, the Federal Reserve Bank has been a major tool of the US for doing them. Time for the Fed to fall, and take the US government along with it. |
|
|
|
^^^ Now these kinds of things are exactly the kinds of things Trump has been accusing the Dems, Biden and his team, and various States of doing... and a whole lot more. People don't indict people for nothing. But the indictment doesn't prove anything, because some people indict because of their own leverage rather than the other's wrongdoing. So, the whole indictment thing against Trump is totally foolishness IF he is smart enough to recognize his rights, and apply them properly. The Deep State better win, because if it doesn't win against Trump, Trump will use their fighting as part of his machinery to destroy them. Trump to disprove “WITCH HUNT” GA indictments with irrefutable election fraud report
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-17-trump-to-disprove-indictments-with-irrefutable-report.htmlFormer President Donald Trump, who has been recently indicted by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis on a range of criminal charges relating to his attempts to "alter Georgia's 2020 election results," is set to fight back to prove the "witch hunt" of a decision is "politically motivated" and "wrong." The top Republican presidential candidate announced that he will be defending his stance that the 2020 election was rigged in a press conference to be held on Monday, Aug. 21, in response to a decision that indicted him and 18 others on "racketeering charges." According to a post on his social media platform Truth Social, he is going to present a large, complex, detailed but irrefutable report on the presidential election fraud which took place in Georgia. "[It] will be presented by me at a major News Conference at 11:00 A.M. on Monday of next week in Bedminster, New Jersey," the former president said, further adding, "Based on the results of this conclusive report, all charges should be dropped against me & others – There will be a complete EXONERATION! They never went after those that rigged the election. They only went after those that fought to find the RIGGERS!" (Related: 'Detailed but irrefutable': Trump to present report on 2020 election fraud in Georgia next week.) He also posted on the platform his lamentations that the two-year investigation was a "WITCH HUNT!" Legal experts and practitioners agree with Trump on this. Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes commented that this indictment is the most insane yet by the looniest prosecutor, citing how claims on tweets are conspiracies, legal advice is a crime, Constitutional law is a criminal act, and demanding officials do their job is criminal solicitation. "It is an embarrassment to the state of Georgia," Barnes lamented. ...
|
|
|
|
Thanks. All these accusations against Putin, and almost 100% no proof. Not even evidence when you consider situations in Russia and Ukraine. That's a lot of pages you have up on your websites. Are you that fast of a typist? Or how many people do you have working with you? Most of Russia's crimes are organized by the bandit Putin. The fact that this murderer is awaiting a tribunal and a gallows is beyond doubt. According to your approach, there is no evidence for Hitler either. However, there is no doubt that if Hitler were arrested, then he would hang next to other criminals. The same will happen with the Russian international terrorists led by Putin. There will be retribution for evil, this is how the world works. You are more or less correct in that... no evidence for Hitler, either. But, to keep it in context, almost no evidence if you wrote it the way you write about Putin. Maybe somebody has evidence for how bad Putin is. But there is evidence for the good, as well. One BIG chunk of evidence is that Putin has held off regarding nukes, even though the US is straining to goad him into using them. Putin wants peace and prosperity for the world rather than destruction for the peoples of the world. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
