I also tried withdrawal yesterday, then it was canceled by their system after 24 hours but the $10 fee wasn't refunded, I made a new withdrawal assuming the fee will be taken from the previous one. Apparently not, I was charged a new fee for it. So if I withdraw $100, I only get $80 for 2 withdrawals (1 time failed).

Many members have asked this, but the admin avoids this question. I really don't recommend emirex because:

• user interface isn't friendly and incomplete trading features.
• I doubt the trading activity and volume there.
• High withdrawal fees. If the withdrawal fails, the fee won't be refunded (they seem to be playing here to rob you of it subtly). Check theie fee structure out.
• The withdrawal time can take up to 12 hours (in fact it is more than 24 hours).
• Emirex can't handle multiple withdrawals at the same time and risks being canceled by their system.
• Emirex can lock funds and delist any tokens on their spot without prior notification.

• And the mood of their telegram admin is like a woman having her period, complicated.

I don't understand "good reward" you mean. What makes you say it's good for a newly created token that doesn't have a market yet? The bounty manager can't conclude that the rewards offered are good going forward.

If the meaning of good reward here is a manager's payments, a bad manager will sacrifice his reputation with a big reward only once. most of them are new managers.

After getting tired of waiting all year, it's now opened, but not completely. Admin has not provided an explanation and some people are still locked. Even more surprising, someone tried to withdraw and got $10 of usdt withdrawal fee.

too high a fee for just a new exchange, not a good offer and inconvenient for new users I think

defi only solve financial problems, maybe some initial defi projects say 10 projects have unique features that differentiate from each other. And the rest tend to have the same features.

I even suspect some defi projects were created by one developer by looking at their site appearance, whitepaper content, and smart contract.

You have to change the way you research a project like the expert's ways.
this is what I found:
please go to the "KEY PRODUCTS" section of WPP (page 11)

Original:

It's like using a word spinner. I've only examined a fraction of the entire WPP content, but this could be the first clue to spot other gaps in this project.
actually I also suspect the team photos.

I think there is no need to go into more detail info,
I've read the table of contents of your whitepaper and I conclude that your project is 100% cloned of yearn4.finance

why lately have so many sad developers with scum ideas fighting luck over the hype of defi?

nothing special, https://graviex.net/markets/fxtcbtc
has a trading volume of only $31/24hrs, if you look between the buy and sell orders pumping easy, the difference between the two is too far and not liquid.

Not the same, altcoins always carry greater risk.
let's say news that the team stopped doing development, then the holder thinks the altcoin has no prospects in the future. And the biggest threat if the team suddenly locks large coins.

Bitcoin has long been abandoned satoshi without any further development to date, and you can see for yourself the volatility and trading volume of bitcoin over the years.

Tomorrow is the unlocked schedule for bonus tokens allocation. I see prices have been pumped up (by the team maybe) after dumping by distribution of tokensales last October 15th. maybe the price will be pumped back after dumping by the next unlocked program.

If this pump happens naturally, there is hope for hunters not to have to rush to sell their tokens which means the tokens still have market interest. If there is team intervention, the hunters must sell their tokens immediately because the team just saves the token price a little for the hunters.

Personally maybe not very significant. only increased from old hunters returning from rest.
Based on account ownership, the cheater hunters increased their account numbers because they spent more time working at home.

greed causes self-forgetfulness and loss.

Know that
stupid people won't share private keys because too many people are smarter.
smart people will share private keys because there are still enough stupid people.

I'll comment on your marketing.

Marketing via ambassify won't get enough viewers due to poor detection, the system is unable to ascertain whether the task is actually being done, whether your social media posts are actually being shared by participants. Points are added automatically by just clicking the link provided and then closing the new tab that appears.

I've followed your bounty on the ambassify platform. I found some bugs that you may not have thought about. I sent bounty feedback on one of your assignments in the 1st round on this issue, I don't know if you actually read every fedback that was sent on that assignment.

After 2nd round, I noticed that the bug hasn't been fixed, I announced it publicly in your telegram group and I'm surprised that you think it's not a bug (you think that the point I got from the task that hasnt been completed). Then I proved it by increasing points without getting new assignments. And at that time, my point was made back to the beginning. Since then I decided to quit your bounty program and stop supporting this project. Actually there were several PMs from other participants who asked how I got the points briefly but I didn't tell him because it will be more busy for you later because he clears the cheating participants.

I just summed up this with a confused mind that:
you're too confident that your system is good, but its not good enough.
You haven't thought about giving the bug hunter anything more valuable than disappointing him.
With a policy like this, other bug hunters (hereafter) won't bother telling you because they know they won't be valued.

I hope your marketing system will be changed to the manual way soon.
Good luck with this project.

The cloud mining site will work if the affiliate/referral program is wokrs and it's the only source of income to cover the customer's profit. Mining is just an appendage to them to make it attractive and if it matches real mining, 50% profit is hard to come by these days.

The referral program is only really useful for someone as a community leader or influential people. People trying to get referrals "honestly" are very difficult. And most of them cheat plus a weak system to find cheating.

Yes, I have a simpler one, don't be careless.
But you need to hear from several cases how various scammers tricked their victims who initially felt they were not stupid enough to give their money to the scammers.

This is good advice, but if you just hope without pressing them, you can't do anything even if they aren't willing to escrow. If you want to start a change, then apply it from yourself.
Avoid bounties that don't escrow then create groups or moves to get other hunters to care about this.

Will the USDT fluctuate more against the USD?
Printing this much makes me even more disbelieving that USDT is backed up by real USD, and USD is really in the company's pocket.

Yes, if their ICO is legit. Otherwise, their ICO would gain nothing but broken trust.
Running a signature campaign for the ICO only affects no more than 5% of the project's credibility. That said, this signature is only a gate to get credibility,  not as a final determinant.