It doesn't sound that weird to be honest, it's just that the term "private" can be used in various ways. The op is more or less talking about privacy focused crypto currency, while the government you mentioned views it in the public vs private company. Which one is right? Depends on the context I guess. Most of the time privacy-focused cryptocurrency is used to describe what OP talk about instead of "private crypto", afaik.

Sebenarnya lebih ke feenya sih om yang ane maksud di sini, bukan kewajiban pembayarannya pake apa. Dengan kata lain ane tetap pesimis fee bakal jadi murah kalau cross border tx meskipun pake token rupiah. Fee blockchain bisa saja mahal tapi bisa aja merchant tetap matok fee agak tinggi karena likuidasi ke fiat murni bakal nambah biaya lagi, but who knows. Bisa aja cuma angan" ane.

Perlu hati" juga sama token allowance scam. Ane pernah nemuin proyek scam yang make model begini buat ngasih airdrop terus nyuri token yang ada di wallet user, atau kalau ga begitu disuruh ngirim token ke alamat tertentu buat klaim (tapi tokennya dia buat sendiri). Memang makin kompleks tapi pada prinsipnya kalau waspada sih pasti bisa terhindar.

Hoo, baru tau ane. Kalau di ane soalnya semua address nerima token scam meskipun terakhir transaksi berbulan" lalu. Ane juga lebih setuju sama sebutan token allowance yang disebutin sama om rico di atas daripada dusting attack. Penasaran juga kenapa Binance academy juga mengkategorikan ini sebagai dusting, but well yang penting sama" ngerti realita yang dimaksud lah.

I use Windscribe since a few months ago. It's quite ok. Keep in mind that the lowest price is not exactly $1, but $2, with an extra dollar for unlimited data. Sometimes the speed is terrible (I bought the Singapore IP) but it doesn't last that long, it is also possible that my network is the issue so this will need more test. Not the most privacy focused one but good enough if you just need something cheap.

Semoga saja ga ada perubahan ke depannya ya om, mengingat kalau pake fiat tarifnya lumayan mahal. Emang sih kartu debit bank Indo rata" udah pada support visa/mastercard jadi langsung otomatis ke convert ke USD, tapi banyak merchant (terutama yang ane pake) sering ngash diskon kalau bayar pake kripto, jadi jatuhnya lebih murah. Ane rasa masalah ini juga ga akan berubah meskipun BI ngeluarin token rupiah sekalipun.

Setidaknya perlu dua hal supaya jadi reliable, antara lain ga bergantung sepenuhnya sama Chainlink buat generate kode alias harus decentralized, dan feenya tidak boleh terlalu mahal (tergantung chain utama juga sih). Kalau ujung"nya transaksi mentok gara" kode ga diterima atau fail saat generate code, plus feenya naudzubillah pasti bakal susah buat jadi mainstream.

Kalau mau latihan langsung juga bisa bikin thread aja di archival atau off-topic, bisa agan kelola sendiri dan kalaupun dihapus sama mod juga ane rasa fine" aja toh emang dari awal niatnya dibikin buat dihapus (belajar).

Kalau mau jualan bikin thread baru di jual beli gan, yang ini di lock kalau agan udah merasa ga bisa recover asetnya lagi (kalau memang ada asetnya). Semoga ga kena phishing lagi, mengingat phishing sekarang juga banyak modelnya.

Oh, jadi sekarang term dusting juga dipake buat token" spam yang diardrop ke address user ya? Ane kira yang model kaya gitu disebut phising attack, mengingat ada perbedaan yang cukup besar dengan dusting di jaringan BTC seperti yang disebutin om abi di atas.

But eniwei, prinsipnya saran op adalah revoke akses ke sc yang ga terpakai sama jangan swap token" yang diairdrop, tapi ga ada trik buat menghindari airdrop itu sendiri. Ane rasa emang attacker ini airdrop ke seluruh address yang punya histori tx dari awal, jadi kalau mau ga kena ya bikin address baru.

It's basically ICO all over again. That strong community you're talking about can easily die when the price drop, just like others coin who scam as soon as there's a decent volume on DEX. Don't feel it will last forever, if you get a good ride then make sure to exit asap.

Kayaknya kok malah ga ada hubungannya sama dusting attack ya. Atau maksud OP dusting attack itu bisa membuat agan kehilangan token karena kode sc yang allow spend tanpa sepengetahuan user? Kalau iya, kayaknya salah penggunaan term.

Dusting attack itu targetnya menyerang privasi pemilik wallet, kalau ga bikin network penuh spam, dan ini ane rasa lebih kentara di jaringan kayak BTC daripada ETH/BSC.

Memang ga ada salahnya kalau agan mau bakar duit, misalnya 100 ribu per koin icin buat dihold atau koleksi, selama ga terlalu berharap aja bakal jadi milyuner karena luck ini sangat sulit diprediksi. Koin" kaya gini memang sangat rentan buat jadi bahan gorengan whales jadi kalau agan beli di waktu yang tepat emang bisa profit banyak, tapi kalau ga ya jadinya minus 90% kayak rata" retail investor lainnya.

Looks like India ban news is becoming more like China mining ban/crypto ban. They have their own cycles and it seems retail  investors still fall for it every now and then.

They don't really need any reason to ban crypto to be honest, just like how government can issue many problematic laws just for the sake of it.

Tidak, tinggal approve saja (setidaknya terakhir ane pake MetaMask, beberapa hari lalu begitu).

Mungkin multi-sig juga bisa jadi opsi jadi ga bergantung pada pihak ketiga buat nambahin 2fa. Rata-rata penyedia 2fa bakal nambahin fee, jadi bisa bikin mahal buat bertransaksi, apalagi kalau chain yang dipake mirip ETH. Cuma ane jarang nemuin wallet yang support ini di chain selain BTC.

Kalau kebutuhan buat memakai BTC sebagai mata uang kecil ane rasa uji materi juga ga ada gunanya. Rata" user di Indo juga ane rasa memakai kripto bukan buat jajan di mall, jadi kalaupun dianggap ilegal sebagai mata uang ane rasa sih fine" aja. Mungkin transaksi individu atau internasional aja yang bakal masuk ranah abu", tapi kalau volume transaksinya cuma $5 atau $10 per bulan masa iya pemerintah mau capek" menjerat user yang bersangkutan atau menelusuri seluruh address yang mungkin (atau tidak mungkin) dia miliki? Baru kalau ada yang jualan barang dengan nilai ratusan juta atau milyaran itu yang mungkin kena masalah, apalagi kalau posting adsnya di publik. Ya siap" aja kalau dibawa ke ranah hukum.

"Sending" is not really the right term for this. What you describe is more or less a faucet where the owner host a lot of ads to earn money so they can give you some sats. They're not doing this just because you "work hard". Just take a look at the first page(s), there are in-depth explanation about this including whether or not it is worth it or not.

IMO you should edit your post and add this explanation, or just use the term suggested by etf above. There is nothing wrong with using the more popular term so you don't misled others. This anonym vs pseudonym thing has been going on for years iirc. If you go by this definition though, there are a ton of things that can fit with "no physical contact while protecting privacy".

Where did you get this conclusion from? Most people suggest using TRC because you mention USDT above, where TRC is one of the cheapest chain since if you pay with ETH you'll spend at least more than $20 just for fee. BNB or smart chain is also available, so if fee is your only deciding factor, you should not lock yourself with Tron. Not to mention Tron get more expensive recently (but not insanely expensive) after the update.

It's not new, we've been seeing a lot of threads complaining about them. There's no other choice but to keep annoying them on their social media, but don't get your hope up. They might simply claims that you're not using their service according to the ToS or something.

I suggest you to start using other wallets such as Electrum, or other reputable non-custodial wallets if you want multi-chain support. Don't compromise even if flexibility is your main choice. While earning more sats from reward program is quite interesting, it should not make you lose more money when you failed to WD.