How did you know about Bitcoin in the first place? I've seen many users do more or less the same thing, just buy Bitcoin and then never learn more about it, which results in a loss of coins or something similar. Personally, after hearing about bitcoin for the first time, what I did was learning stuff like how to store it, which device can I use, etc. It is really surprising to me that you just buy and assume it will work out in the end.

Is he still around? What led you to know them/interact with them through Twitter? 2020 is around the last bear market, I'm surprised you got scammed through Twitter instead of Telegram. IIRC, Telegram scammers are more active at that time if my memory serves me correctly.

Is this the same thing that happened with Amazon's MMO game where it bricks some Nvidia cards? IIRC, the issue is also related to uncapped FPS in the main menu, kind of wild that the same thing happened again. I thought either Nvidia or the game developer will fix it. I don't think it is hard that to put a cap on FPS from the driver or even the game itself no?

Some claim that the GPU is dead though, as it no longer works after the crash. Not sure how reliable that claim is though. IIRC some people also claim the same thing when New World comes out, it is word investigating at least if more reports show up.

I don't think you can classify a Reddit post as an article. It's like referring to some threads on this forum as news. Just take a look at that thread and you can see more or less the same comment about OP's decision. It is clear that OP is addicted to gambling and he probably won't quit until something worse happens, which is unfortunate.

If you share the same opinion as him, I suggest you take a break and rethink it. You can't get closure by keep gambling your money away, if you already lose too much then stop and quit, look for jobs, and save/invest your money in BTC or other things. That is arguably better than spending your money continuously without thinking about your life.

Bitcointalk Username: joniboini
SegWit BTC Address: bc1q2e9ekyt5zugaknf0tqw0zhwxnak8ym3u745jnc
Merits Earned in 120 Days: 60+

Ada beberapa user yang ane tahu dapet airdropnya gan. Di Twitter juga rame mengenai airdrop Arbitrum. Itu yang agan quote pesan error yang muncul? Dari nadanya kok seperti notice biasa ya. Agan cek elegibilitnya lewat website yang mana? Coba cek di websitenya Arbitrum gan, di https://arbitrum.foundation/eligibility. Tinggal konekin ke Metamask atau wallet yang agan pake, nanti bakal add new network sendiri kalau perlu.

Btw, kalau ada yang mau hunting airdrop lagi, ini beberapa list yang ane temukan dari Tweetnya Milles[1]:
- LayerZero Labs
- zksync
- Scroll_ZKP
- SuiNetwork
- Starknet
- Shardeum
- LensProtocol
- Fuel Network

[1] https://twitter.com/milesdeutscher/status/1639030859016867840

Kalau laporan yang diberikan sama pemerintah US bisa dipercaya dan ane tidak salah paham, maka Nguyen sebagai pemilik Chipmixer diklaim tahu kalau ada yang ingin menggunakan mixer miliknya untuk melakukan pencucian uang (lewat pengiriman pesan), dan atas alasan inilah dia dianggap melakukan tindak kejahatan. Meskipun dia menolak memfasitilitasi pun (dengan menjawab tidak lewat PM atau media pesan yang saat itu dipake oleh agen untuk melacak Nguyen), ane rasa pemerintah bisa bikin alasan lain untuk melakukan penangkapan, misalnya atas pendirian Chipmixer itu sendiri.

Ane rasa mixer yang lain juga punya risiko yang sama, untuk benar-benar bebas dari risiko ditangkap aparat mungkin jalan yang bisa diterima oleh pemerintah adalah dengan memberikan data/backdoor secara cuma-cuma, tapi tentu saja bakal ga ada pelanggan yang setia.

Semoga saja alternatif lain masih bisa survive. Misalnya coinjoin atau joinmarket, masih bisa dipakai kalau tidak ada mixer yang menyediakan layanan sebaik Chipmixer atau mixer lain. Semoga saja privasi yang dimiliki juga lebih baik, jadi tidak perlu meninggalkan data sama sekali setelah mixing selesai. Lebih bagus lagi kalau pengguna bisa memverifikasi hal tersebut, walau tampaknya bakal susah untuk diimplementasikan.

Can you at least explain why those jurisdictions are prohibited? I'm seeing countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. What is the legal rule or regulation that you refer to when you ban them? IIRC, other payment gateways don't prohibit users (business owners or buyers) from those countries from using their services, so it looks odd to me. From a quick glance, it seems like you prohibit business owners from countries where using crypto as a payment option is not legal.

So basically a tool like a chain analysis for blockchain transactions right? If that's what you're referring to, I'm pretty sure we can build it already without relying on "AI" or whatever the tech is called. I won't be surprised if some platforms already use this, just not explicitly explained to their users. At the end of the day, it is just a filtering process, as long as there is enough data and machine learning should be able to do it.

I'm not a fan of over-reliance on technology, especially something as young as "AI". They should probably start with using AI to filter fake KYC registration first before implementing something like that.  If the task is simple they can definitely do it without any human intervention, as long as the filtering reference is not terrible.

Setahu ane kalau status agan berubah harusnya KTPnya juga perlu diupdate, meskipun KTP agan udah yang pake status berlaku selamanya. Ane bayangin sih bisa ribet kalau kondisi agan tidak match, nanti platform yang agan pake juga bisa tidak kooperatif karena data yang agan kasih tidak tepat. Setidaknya untuk kasus ane sih perlu update karena ane punya tabungan dan investasi yang mensyaratkan ane kerja dan bukan mahasiswa/pelajar, kalau hanya untuk exchange kripto ane kurang update.

There are provably fair casinos out there if anyone is interested in checking the odds. I think it is popular enough that most people probably know which one is verifiable and which one is just using jargon to trick its visitors. In one way or another, it is even more impossible to verify if a match in a sport is rigged or not unless the user has some access to insider information imo.

That would be a dumb move IMO. It is not like they can't recover from the loss (if they ever did). I bet the house is more or less winning regardless of the outcome of the match either way. As for compensation for those who bet on the wrong side, they'll probably give free bets or something similar. They can definitely use their ToS to prevent being bankrupt by shouldering users' 'mistakes', such as claiming that such a situation falls under "extraordinary circumstances" for example, and not the casino's fault. CMIIW.

Recency bias definitely plays a part to arrive at such a conclusion. I also find similar behavior outside of casino games, I think people tend to remember bad luck better than good luck, so it is not uncommon for people to feel cheated even if they know that the house will always win in the long run. That being said, as long as they can gather enough data to support their claims, any unfair platform will be exposed sooner or later.

Ini beneran masih online? Ane cek websitenya barusan ga ada hash sama sekali, koin yang di list juga tidak ada (hanya BTC untuk kalkulasi), kecuali websitenya sudah berubah. Ane rasa susah kalau agan mau mengajak orang lain mine di pool agan kalau potensi dapet blok sangat kecil, plus poolnya juga terlihat tidak terurus saat ini.

Do they even support non-KYCed accounts now? I've heard some users are even required to resubmit their KYC documents a while back. Not to mention they can simply block your withdrawal on the basis of linked IP and so on. Even if you can delete your account, I bet they still record some data and will just use that as a basis to block your new account if you don't comply with their rules. If there are other options OP should probably take that instead of risking his money and playing hide and seek with Binance.

Other than that, I think there are other issues. For example, compared to existing alternatives such as using a multi-sig to secure the loan (if it is a collateralized loan), your solution would add another insecure layer. If it is an uncollateralized loan, then the lender can easily solve this by limiting the criteria for borrowers. While your solution can help them reach other lenders, there is not enough incentive to take that risk compared to what we have right now. At least that's how I see it when I lend to somebody here.

Your idea is similar to Kanpeki then. Last time I checked, not that many users are using the to borrow/lend, probably because most of the users are just looking to earn more profit by depositing funds to some lending pool instead of manually finding contracts and funding them. Try to check them out and see if you can improve on their model, who knows maybe you can find customers for alts lending.

Would love to join back to this campaign if possible, I'm okay with Hero payroll royse.

---

Current number of post (Including this one): 8763
Rank: Legendary
bech32 address: bc1q2e9ekyt5zugaknf0tqw0zhwxnak8ym3u745jnc
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 60+

I'm not sure what makes you come to this conclusion. A payment gateway can still record users' data even if they use blockchain to process the transfer. For example, stuff like e-mail address, user address, volume/transaction history, etc. Do you think they also dump those data to the blockchain or something? Unless the seller is generous and uses an open-source gateway that automatically deletes buyers' info after a few days or something.

Unless you use some privacy coins, most crypto transactions provide you with pseudonymity at best. That's why services like mixer or coinjoin exist. This also doesn't solve the identity theft or fraud that you mentioned, at best it helps you get fewer phishing e-mails. If you are afraid of fraud or identity theft, the best thing that you can do is stop using a sketchy platform that asks you to KYC for everything you do. You might want to explain more if you really believe this is the case so that we can discuss it better.

I mean, knowing how the system works, including how their randomness is generated is key if you want to build a strategy to reduce your chance of losing. Unless you're talking about sports or something similar, it is difficult to dismiss how their RNG is generated. Sure, you don't look for profit but if you play on a guaranteed loss I doubt you'll have fun either.

It is not a bad idea to regularly test whether a platform is still serving its users as promised or silently change its algorithm to favor their side more. The recent case of Chipmixer shows that even an arguably popular platform can still hide something from its customers, even if they claim otherwise. It is also a good check and balance, if we can even use that term to describe this. if CMIIW.

It is the same thing, the real Bitcoin is on the Bitcoin mainnet, other networks just use a wrapped token with scammy BTC or shady BTC to back it up, just like fiat if you ask me. If you don't want to pay many fees, consider using P2P where you can change the transfer fee. If that's not an option wait until the mempool becomes free. Unless you use a terrible exchange that doesn't update the fee according to the network condition, that should be an okay option.

Make sure you do some research first if you decide to use another exchange to process your GBP. I'd also check if there is any USDT to GBP P2P trade available on this forum or other P2P marketplace before you decide to do KYC on another platform. Or, you can also just buy more BTC with your available GBP if you can afford the risk (unless it is not possible for one reason or another).

This would require you to trust the government. Personally, I don't really trust them because the people on top probably don't care about us either. Just take a look at the recent bank run and how they handled it, retail is the one who got screwed in the end. While it is inevitable, having the option to not use a centralized exchange is still a welcomed one to me, so that's that. At the very least, they don't force us to use one or two exchanges to monitor everything. If that does happen though, P2P is probably the only choice for me.

True, some even went as far as changing the law to make sure a bank can buy their competitor's stocks. If they can do it without any repercussions, then other regulations don't really mean much since they can just change it anyway. Even if crypto is fully regulated later on, I won't be surprised if they can change the law as long as it suits their purpose.

I'm not sure about speed, but OP should improve the listing filter. There are many projects that got listed with a presale dated back to 2022 with terrible information. For example, stuff like this[1]. There is no way a trader would use this website compared to others who have better listing information. You need to improve your service if you want to compete with them unless your target shitcoin developer who wants to market their projects as cheaply as possible.

[1] https://www.coinvotelist.com/coin/shiny-inu

Maybe you can go more practical to help you decide how much money you can invest in Bitcon or other investments. Asking questions such as how much are your monthly bills, have you planned for emergency funds (you get sick, your family suddenly is dying, etc), how much do you make each month, and if you suddenly lost your job for how long can you survive without using your emergency funds, etc. Let's say you make $500/month, has $5000 in your saving account, and your monthly bill is around $300 (food, rent, etc), so you have around $200 free money per month but you have no emergency funds. I'd say that spending $100 per month to buy Bitcoin is one of the alternatives you can do while you save the rest for emergency funds, at least for the first few months or so. This is just a rough approach though, you can also apply traditional finance rules for saving if you want to look for an alternative, such as the 50:30:20 rule.

You can check out Bitcoin price history and the economic history of the world in general. We just have two or more bank run cases in this month so you can see how risky it is to store all of your wealth on fiat, especially if you're not one of the big players on the market. You should probably read more about Bitcoin before you ask somebody to encourage you to invest in Bitcoin. This will help you make a better decision and not blindly follow whatever the other parties tell you to do.