I feel like these 'free' analyses are similar to pump & dump signals, just not as explicit. It is unavoidable since you get somewhat outdated data if you rely on another party to collect and aggregate the market movement for you. It is true that sometimes it works, but a broken clock can also do the same thing if you let it run long enough.

At the end of the day, most indicators can fail for various reasons. I doubt people only use one type of indicator to decide their trade anyway. As long as they know and realize that they can get tricked by self-fulfilling prophecy or being used by big players as exit liquidity, they should be able to filter the information.

Saat ini SEC emang berperang sebagai villain di pasar kripto US. Beberapa exchange juga mengeluarkan pernyataan publik yang pada intinya menyayangkan keputusan SEC untuk memberi mereka sanksi padahal regulasi yang ada dianggap tidak jelas. Interpretasi sangat berperan dalam hukum yang saat ini mengatur pasar kripto sementara respons SEC atas pertanyaan/permintaan mengenai kejelasan regulasi hukum dianggap lambat.

Ane ragu kalau lobby ini bakal berhasil dalam waktu dekat, plus kalau mereka meminta data user sebagai syarat sanksi diperingan ane rasa bisa jadi jaminan kalau data pribadi kita bakal dimiliki negara lain. Ane pribadi sudah tidak menggunakan Binance atau exchange luar negeri yang membutuhkan KYC. Semoga saja bakal ada opsi dan verifikasi untuk menghapus data personal di exchange yang sudah tidak kita gunakan kedepannya, walau ane rasa peluangnya kecil.

Walau gak ada data konkrit, ane rasa bisa kita duga kalau profit jadi salah satu alasan utama kenapa ATM Bitcoin pada tutup, bisa juga masalah registrasi atau legalitas di tempat ATM" tersebut dijalankan. Menarik juga sampai saat ini AS masih menjadi negara dengan ATM terbanyak, padahal SEC dan market kripto sangat tidak bersahabat saat ini. Kalau mereka sampai menganggap bisnis ATM Bitcoin/kripto termasuk dalam ruang lingkup mereka, mungkin dramanya bakal nambah lagi.

Sekilas ane baca di beberapa thread, seperti ini[1] misalnya, ada beberapa hal yang membuat kemungkinan adanya Electrum versi iOS yang 'resmi' tidak bakal terwujud dalam waktu dekat. Antara lain adalah masalah lisensi dan kurangnya minat dari developer untuk membuat versi iOS. kalau ada yang mau fork mungkin bisa mengatasi masalah yang kedua, namun untuk isu yang pertama mungkin butuh riset lebih dalam. Salah satu solusi yang ada adalah dengan menggunakan sideload app ke MacBook, tapi ane rasa malah jadi ribet. Mending menggunakan dompet lain saja daripada menambah point of failure.

Mengingat om Husna tidak mengupdate post ini, apakah bisa disimpulkan kalau transaksi coinjoin yang om lakukan dengan Trezor suite masih belum berhasil juga? Tapi itu di riwayat transaksi sudah ada transaksi output menggunakan coinjoin? Atau saya salah baca?

Berikut ini beberapa berita terkait malware/virus di beberapa hari terakhir yang menurut ane menarik:
1. Adanya malware baru yang menarget pengguna MacOS bernama Atomic[1]. Ringkasnya malware ini menarget MacOS dan berusaha mencuri data dari keychain, cookies, password yang tersimpan di browser, dst. Salah satu targetnya juga dompet kripto seperti Electrum. Kabar baiknya untuk saat ini malware ini masih belum bisa membypass proteksi data yang ada di folder Desktop dan Documents user, tapi tentu saja agan jangan menggunakan proteksi itu sebagai perlindungan utama karena bisa saja ada eksploit lain ke depannya.
2. Maraknya hijack website jual beli online oleh hacker untuk mendapatkan informasi kartu kredit pengguna atau pembayaran lainnya[2]. Kalau agan sering mengakses situs marketplace internasional (termasuk situs yang berbasis CMS marketplace seperti PrestaShop), jangan lupa untuk double check alamat website yang agan kunjungi. CMIIW.
3. Malware ViperSoftX melebarkan target serangannya ke password manager seperti Keepass[3]. Malware ini dikabarkan sering menempel ke aplikasi activator, crack, dan aplikasi sejenis lainnya untuk mengelabui user. Untuk menghindari malware ini, sebaiknya agan tidak menginstall aplikasi yang kodenya tidak bisa diverifikasi sama sekali.

[1] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-atomic-macos-info-stealing-malware-targets-50-crypto-wallets/
[2] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-swap-stealth-for-realistic-checkout-forms-to-steal-credit-cards/
[3] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/vipersoftx-info-stealing-malware-now-targets-password-managers/

Regardless of how legit your service is, I'd stay away from a service that asks me to join a sketchy Telegram group before I can access them. There are many tools out there that can compete with yours, most of the time there is a free option that allows users to test them without giving unnecessary personal information.

You should probably improve and offer other means to access your service if you really want to get customers and not just exit scam after you earn a hundred or a thousand deposit.

I believe the market for each product is different anyway, I doubt anyone who would happily buy a Ledger is interested in DIY products or something similar. Of course, some exception does exist, but the majority of them is definitely not an enthusiast. If anything I believe this product compete with other alternative such as an air-gapped USB device with Electrum or something similar. CMIIW.

I can't even access your website. It shows an SSL error and I can't really see anything about your website, granted I used a VPN to access it. Did you block some IPs from some countries or something? As far as my internet experience goes with the VPN I use right now, even if they got blocked by some services I still get a notif or explanation about it.

How will you guarantee that the buyer won't scam the seller or vice versa btw?

You're assuming they want to accept/integrate crypto into their system, which is not always the case. If they don't want crypto to enter then you will never see any crypto-friendly regulation or strategy comes into play. Basically, you'll probably need to change the person in charge of these policies if you want to see any changes, or try to lobby them with organizations and so on. Like it or not it becomes political to some extent, especially if this issue can be used to determine whether they'll get votes from the public or not.

I believe the majority of countries will likely regulate exchange sooner or later, but will never allow crypto as a legal form of payment. Basically, it will be treated like gold or other investment assets. That won't really stop you if you want to pay stuff with crypto though.

It is not new. If you're around for a while you'll realize that mempool always gets busy when there is high volatility. People don't really have the patience to wait and that's why they'll keep increasing their fee, which in turn increases the average fee for the next blocks. CMMIW, but miners would still make a decent profit as of right now as long as they can find a block even if the fee does not increase since the majority of their profits come from the block rewards and not fees.

I'd still discourage users from reusing the same address after this. Even if you can still use it for as long as Binance exist, who knows what kind of move they will pull later down the line if you newer 'renew' your deposit address. I also believe it is bad practice to copy-paste from a notepad or something similar instead of always checking your deposit address since malware might alter your data and so on. In short, better use the new one and ditch the old one asap.

It is a deposit address anyway, your balance on Binance won't change because of this. It just affects your new deposit for those coins/tokens in Binance.

It surprise me a bit that what has been done in my country for months, or maybe years, is slowly happening to other countries (if I don't misread this news). Not sure how it will impact the global market, but as far as I can see it doesn't really change how the status quo works that much. I can imagine people being more open to sharing that they have crypto and want to trade on a registered exchange, oversea exchange gets more hurdles to pass if they want to serve customers from Taiwan (depending on the law tbh), and so on.

At the very least, this is better than how US do their thing where they just sue exchanges left and right because they fail to register their service and follow regulation when the regulation they set is unclear and so easy to interpret to different ways. CMIIW.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I remember, they still support lightning network, just that you need to use other nodes or run your own node if you want to use lightning network. I don't think there's any new update that clarify they also stop the lightning network features, CMIIW.

You can just lurk around this sub since people will usually make a new thread if there is a new price cut or something similar. Not limited to Nano S or any Ledger product too. AFAIK you can also browse around their website since they don't really hide/make their discount a secret thing. Btw, why are you looking for a Nano S plus? IIRC, you already have a Nano S. Have you considered using other wallets or building your own?

From my experience, sometimes Trust Wallet background process got killed by my phone saving feature so if there is a new transaction there won't be any notification. You might want to check your device saving feature, but keep in mind that changing settings/adding the app to a whitelist doesn't really help for whatever reason. This is not always true though, since sometimes it doesn't give any notification too even if I open the app and close it for a few minutes. At the end of the day though Trust Wallet is just not reliable and good enough if you want to use it as your main wallet.

As far as I know, collectibles are pretty popular here. Have you tried making those kinds of products and selling them in the collectibles section? I'm not familiar with it but there is no other choice since your product is quite niche. I don't think things will change even if you tried to make a thread on the Services board since your service/products are not really in demand here.

How did you try to sell on Twitter anyway? Do you just make a new account and start tweeting here and there? If that's the case, I believe your marketing will produce no result.

I suggest you spend some time browsing around the Wallet Software boards. There are many threads that discuss different wallets there, including which wallet is good for beginners. The threads linked above are a good source too, just remember that some info on the OP might not be up to date, although the principle should stay the same. You can also use resources like https://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet (although the list is a bit out of date afaik, CMIIW) to help you decide which wallet to choose, although it looks like you're limiting your choice to a hardware wallet only.

Since you're looking for a hardware wallet, the Hardware wallets would be the best sub-boards if you want to ask more. I suggest you read and learn something first before you make a new thread though, since information on how hardware wallet works, which products are available to buy etc are easy to find.

I'd discourage OP if he wants to do this, regardless of how much BTC he lost. The time and money spent to get his money back is probably not worth the hassle. Just move on OP, and learn from this to never share your private key with others, even if they are famous/reputable in the community. Some services even straight-up exit scammed you when they believe they are being threatened or they no longer make profits. It takes a single take-down notice or insolvency notice to lose all of your money, better store all of your crypto in a secure wallet next time. At the end of the day, this is one of those risks that you need to accept if you used a service that works like Chipmixer.

According to some news, when the hacker was in control of the Kucoin account they tweeted some phishing websites. So it is safe to assume some users assume it was a legit one, connect their hot wallet to it, and then they lost their funds. I can't verify it myself, but there have been many similar phishing scams in the past, so it is not unlikely. People should've learned by now to never connect their account/wallet to some shady website even if it was posted by a famous account.