|
If you compile the data from the peak odds on any particular bet from as many sportsbooks as you're willing to use and aggregate the payouts against the empirical % of winning, you can create a model to determine if there's any edge. However marginal it may be.
The bottleneck would be to scrape that data. Or, if you want less precision for less work, you could just scrape "best odds" from some source online rather than the individual sportsbooks, but the queries would not yield the peak odds unless you're running it constantly. (even then, some sites are not monitored)
|
|
|
|
-snip- And you're okay with the buybacks being canceled. Despite it being displayed on the ICO page. Despite there not being any stipulation stating that it could/would be removed. Despite having the resulting price of BKT be less than 50% of your original buy-in price. Despite Dean stating that buybacks would continue both on and off-forum. Despite the price calculation of tokens being a large part of the ICO. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4751127.msg51398125#msg51398125 |
|
|
|
there is no HARD evidence required for any link to financial wrong doing at all for the lemons flag. So there is no point making any kind of extra warning for that. You won't see them. Newbies will. And given that users with any kind of flag have something negative associated with them, there should be some note to take what they say with a grain spoonful of salt. The only extra warning should be that the lemons flag should not be confused with a red scamming flag. Lemons flags likely means you have been trust abused by one of the dumb fucks that abused the old system so much we had to create a new one. Do you have any examples of abusive tier-1 flags? Can't wait for the first turd to get black listed because atm we notice all kinds of bullshit reasons to give the lemons flag out, whilst real scammers are not getting any flags at all.
Perhaps for the higher level flags SO LONG AS theymos sticks to his word and blacklists trust that start trying to abuse those flags. I thought anyone who abused flagging of any type would get blacklisted. Go ahead and create a thread in Meta exposing the instigators and supporters of abusive flags. |
|
|
|
When I read your complaining post here, I am curious when are you joining into this forum. As newbie, you are too clever by very fast to know bounty within less then 6 hour after joining into this forum. Here it will be shown: Either an alt of a lurker. People don't have to join to forum to read posts therein. I was actually active for a few months prior to my account's creation. I didn't feel like creating an account at the time because of laziness/lack of things to say.
If the post was regurgitating information, it would be considered insubstantial. |
|
|
|
It is the accusers job to prove, you show me proof, I don't have to do shit amigo. Unfortunately, that's the problem. You're not willing to accept the proof and you aren't willing to refute it. So what, stalemate? Are you willing to at least address your post? Why would you call it a scam and then a few months later start abhorring scam accusations? |
|
|
|
I don't like how every user saying the deal is legit is a Newbie. And not only that, but they're bounty-posting Twitter garbage newbies with no real stake in the forum. Considering the method and price, this is almost certainly bullshit. (Never mind the fact that the first vouch occurred only a few hours after the thread's inception, which was on a Sunday) https://archive.is/CHZbX |
|
|
|
Once you disclose the existence of the money publicly, you lose the benefit of hiding its exact location. What?
I'm still looking for an explanation to your comment. I don't see how you can't obfuscate the output of the escrowed 0.5 BTC in order to prevent the tracking of the funds. Sure, you might know the amount... but how do you trace it from just that metric? Maybe you're onto something that can break certain privacy-coins.  |
|
|
|
Why the campaign was closed If you really wanted to know, you could have gone back a page to see this exact post: - " Continue to be a target?" - " Best campaign Bitcointalk ever saw?" C'mon man! If this campaign is not infested by spammers (I'm not saying all participants, but some), I'd applied instantly  Too bad instead of hiring a decent campaign manager, they proceed with this kind of campaign.
Unfortunately, you're probably one of the reasons that caused the campaign to go downhill close |
|
|
|
Look this forum is dying and it's filled with corrupt people like yourselves who have banded together to make false claims and assumptions based on no facts. All the people who came to Deans defense were not payed anything. I have explained this and many other things that you state as facts that are lies or assumptions and you just ignore them, and repeat it or block me. All you have done is tarnish Deans reputation with your lies and make it harder for investors to recuperate funds back, which is ironic since you act like you been concerned for their well being or even players well being, yet not 1 single player has anything bad to say. At the end of the day you have spent hundreds of hours and days spreading lies to fuck everyone over. I hope you get what you deserve eventually!
What the fuck? He went broke trading alt coins, according to him he was tired of alt coiners making more gains than him so he started trading and he got liquidated for everything, this is not a lie I was told to keep hush but I ain't letting this dude get away with another scam, my 30k is long gone. Now the interesting thing is to speculate is if he used ico funds to gamble on is bitmmex acc or otc trades. Fromm y point of view since the inception of Ico it seems he is doing everything in his power for it to fail. Why did you have a crazy 180 change in opinion?
Can you at least refute one of the claims instead of just saying they're false? Show that they're false. |
|
|
|
does china really block bitcoin related websites? is mining totally banned there? because i have a friend who do mining at the moment. Just because something is publicly blocked does not mean there are not ways to get around it. An authorized connection that redirects your connections, requests and packets back and forth, to and from an unauthorized connection, can serve as a means to avoid The Great Firewall. If only there were a term to describe such a concept. |
|
|
|
Another interesting thing is i never have my posts reported my report rate is like 1/1000 less then that. On this campaign i had 3 posts that were perfectly fine reported just so the admin reporting or can be paid. Which is also something I never knew. Now o i know and understand why they report stuff. To be paid. So spam is not ok to be oaod for but reporting none spammers posts is. Got it. Though moderators do get paid proportional to their moderating activity, this doesn't mean they have a "quota" or are senselessly accepting reports to fulfill. Someone needs to first find a post, declare it spam, report it, and add a comment related therein. If you think that your posts were reported with malice, could you make a separate thread displaying the relevant posts? |
|
|
|
need to arrest coinmarketcap owners, they will tell about bitebtc associates I'm not going to say that CoinMarketCap is totally innocent here... but you're going pretty hard on them. :/ coinmarcetcap+bitebtc=scam
coinmarcetcap deliberately helps steal, other exchanges do not add due to fake trading volume, asking for a lot of documents, checking everything, but exchange bitebtc everyone is allowed
coinmarcetcap+bitebtc=scam
this is a criminal conspiracy
I don't understand what you're saying here. "other exchanges do not add due to fake trading volume, asking for a lot of documents, checking everything, but exchange bitebtc everyone is allowed" ?? |
|
|
|
Update on the tax allegations? Shouldn't I be in jail by now? Not sure we needed to bump this. Let foul spirits lay where they rest, aye? That's what the big boss theymos wanted, innit?  |
|
|
|
|
Go to your local grocery store, walk down to the snacks section... look near the row of chips and you'll most likely find your dip.
|
|
|
|
who may not be aware that no collateral loans are red flags That's not your decission Well it is, though. It's LFC's decision to leave feedback. To LFC, the user is high-risk. We have different standards for high-risk/untrustworthy behavior. After all, the changed system is to incentivize users to investigate the feedback on a given user. |
|
|
|
 Why are you apologizing, you didnt even ask a question  ? Apologies imply questions? |
|
|
|
If your ideas can't stand above FUD then there's something missing. If you need to limit freedom of speech then there's something missing. If you need to censor ideas no matter how idiotic then there's something missing.
If a user is truly swayed that easily, then I don't like the idea of having them be interested in an ICO/token/uselessCoin37 to which they can be dissuaded from entering just as easily. |
|
|
|
No, when they announced their new signature participants, there are 27 people and still same until now. Look more carefully, there is no one placed on row no. 1, as franckuestein placed on row no.2 My bad. Combine a headache and mobiles screens, you'll get my stupidity.
The issue of paying all users the same is a different approach but I can't say the reasoning behind it is no good. Great point with the fact that no matter the rank a Newbie could be a better poster than a Legendary.
Users have just always seen pay increases the higher the rank. Kinda like they earned the right to earn more. They have put in the work to rank up. Now more then ever because it's so hard for some to get those golden merits. I will usually read the posts from people who produce higher-quality content, anyway. The signature has nothing to do with it: if you can't get me to the page, then it doesn't matter how nice your signature might look. The key point to consider is that though some users may not have a high rank at the moment, the bottleneck may not be merit but rather activity. If there are consistent and polished replies posted by a user then certainly they deserve as much as they could be getting had they began posting earlier. I would almost call this analogous to paying someone for their skill rather than their experience - akin to hacker ethic. |
|
|
|
After a lucky page surf, here's what I've found:
First Time applying for loan due to some personal problem
Loan Amount: 0.03 btc
Reason : Personal
Repayment Amount: 0.036 btc
Repayment Time: 15 days
Collateral : None
BTC address: 0x931d262FB923630A65e3DCfFEF03f2B3d6b72271 Please can i know the status of my Loan Application whether i am eligible for this loan, if yes then i will put the sign message from the wallet Sorry, without collateral I can’t help, also check your btc address- it’s not btc.
Loan Amount: 0.03 btc
Loan Repayment Amount: 0.036 btc
Loan Repayment Date: 15 days
Collateral: none
Bitcoin Address: 1Jx7LFDLnehLiZKux1wHEhgWDdtAEzmE2q
Due to personal problem applying for loan HI, can i know the status of my loan application, If you can provide a valid collateral I can fill your loan request, I can't grant you no collateral loan because of your account status, sorry. Let me know if you have collateral to offer.
Two previous loan requests from two months prior.
It is always good to have the real life Job and not to depend fully on Bitcoin or this forum, as both are necessary in life and what if bitcoin got ban totally or the price goes down and it takes longer time to recover. so it is always good to have alternative options always.
I work in real life and also do cryptocurrency investments and work for it and earn. As real life pay runs my family life and what ever i am earning in crypto currency is a investment for my future and may family future also.
And let's not forget the fact that susila_bai is very active in the Gambling discussion board, whether they're there exclusively to do quick/easy posts or not. Most recent gambling discussion posts within 40 posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5150396.msg51370838#msg51370838https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141475.msg51370780#msg51370780https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084515.msg50965598#msg50965598https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123734.msg50948303#msg50948303https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3178163.msg50718393#msg50718393https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134270.msg50712570#msg50712570https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125693.msg50707623#msg50707623https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5114470.msg50689880#msg50689880https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1148053.msg50689030#msg50689030https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1135451.msg50688960#msg50688960https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1148053.msg50687987#msg50687987https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103778.msg50687740#msg50687740https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5114470.msg50686314#msg50686314
I'm not sure if LFC considered any of these as red flags when they were writing their feedback... but now here they are. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
