The 'straw that broke the camel's back' is a joke on Americans with regard to Ukraine. One would think that every serious Ukrainian would be giving his ALL to save Ukraine from extinction, because the little bit that somebody gives just might be the 'straw' that saves them from Russia.
[... of topic fake removed...]
This is not just about "saving Ukraine", this is about saving democracy (I know you only believe in it when it suits you). A strong Ruzzia and a strong China means the US and the European democracies may not be able to keep being the freedom reference they are today. As usual, you are a simple and short sighted individual (or a Chinese agent). But, back on topic after you lame wall-texting, Ukraine has managed to hit Morozov air base with several drones - damages are pending confirmation but satellite pictures of before the event show nearly 20 planes there, mostly SU-24 an SU-35. Let's see how many are left. Also to note, repairs to some of the damages to refineries in Ruzzia require parts from the US and only from the US. Just to put this into context, the damages are causing a few hundred millions of loses... per month! To note, somehow Indian 155MM munitions are appearing on the front. It is not difficult to guess how these made their way to Ukraine. Good luck! |
|
|
|
I guess in simple terms the 2% house edge give the chance for the game outcome to favor the house on 2x advantage compared to the other casino that have 1% house advantage.
Sometimes I ask how we measure the probably fairness of the game system when there is house edge in place, regardless of how the casino promise to be fair?
Absolutely, a 2% house edge is excessive in my view for a general case of gaming. Having said that, the very famous roulette has what... like 1 in 50 to the house permanent on the numbers betting on average? That is a 2% edge and even more if you play with the double 00 or, as I have seen with triple zero too in some American casinos. Anyway, you can always find a better deal that 2% that is for sure. |
|
|
|
Of course, the feeling of regret is so deep that when the gambler has lost a lot of money due to their bad behavior, they will think too deeply and the consequence is that if they are unable to withstand the burden of these thoughts, they will experience severe depression.It is true that if a gambler uses gambling games just for entertainment then he will get pleasure and enjoy every game he plays because he only uses gambling when he needs it, not to make money in addition, money might be played excessively.
It's true that if you gamble only for entertainment you won't have regrets of losing money because you're not gambling to make money but for entertainment. If you lose money from gambling, you shouldn't be feeling regrets as you are the one that use that amount for staking and you should have already known the risk that come from staking money when gambling. You're either going to lose the money or you win money therefore every money that you use in gambling is to be considered lost already so you don't feel regrets when you lose it. Your gambling strategy should have the law that you'll always use money that you can forget if you lose them to gambling and you'll not be gambling with borrowed money or money that isn't yours. You can still have regrets even if you play just for fun because you may have taken an strategy thinking it would last a long time and would give you a fun betting experience and then find out that is not really that great and will produce excessive and too quick of a loss, which is not what you initially would be aiming for in this case. Also, you may go too far if you do not choose well or lose some control. |
|
|
|
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/georgia-judge-rejects-trump-bid-dismiss-election-interference-charges-rcna146431It seems that another judicial decision is confronting Trump with real life facts. This is what happens when you cannot solve the "problem" just by tweeting something stupid with no proof or evidence whatsoever. McAfee, however, found "the Defendants’ expressions and speech are alleged to have been made in furtherance of criminal activity and constitute false statements knowingly and willfully made in matters within a government agency’s jurisdiction which threaten to deceive and harm the government." It was quite stupid in the first place to even try to allege that freedom of speech covers lying to protect yourself from the action of justice when all the facts are there for everyone to see. And this is the best the Republican Party can offer to the US as of today. Sad. Even Trumps lawyers admit he was blatantly and knowingly lying! McAfee noted in his ruling that during oral argument, "the Defendants posited that the speech at issue, even if false, was political and that one cannot be prosecuted for falsity alone."
|
|
|
|
The funnest part is how little the odd is and still lost, however its all about luck not strategies or smartness.
True, the luck is the main factor, if someone's luck isn't good then he/she can lose a bet with so low odds while on the other hand if someone's luck if good then they could win bets with high odds. When it comes to strategy, high odds are always considered risky however, if someone's luck is not in their favor then low odds can also be risky. We have learnt a great lesson from that gambler, that luck is the main determiner of success in gambling without it there's loss only. Crazy money for crazy people, but the story is not complete unless we know the story of the person who decided to place such a disparate wager. If it was part of a strategy of betting many times such an amount across several bets with some probabilistic chance, then he might have recover the loss with some short of earning in the rest of the process. Some people can afford such things. |
|
|
|
Talks first, actions to follow. Until very recently Macron has been quite quiet about the war. He has backed down from requesting a direct intervention to promising aid which is much more likely. Counting on Le Pen winning is nor really a strategy for Putin, it is more of a hope - I mean if Le Pen really stops support to Ukraine, which I doubt.
Of course, the baltic countries are providing the most help, they are closer to Putin's Ruzzia and they know what it means. There are now talks of providing Gripens to Ukraine (much much better option than f-16, as they can be based in pretty much any road in the middle of a forest.
For now, nothing is very clear IMO.
It’s interesting that you ignored the first part of my message, that it is not Congress, but Biden, who has been slowing down the allocation of aid to Ukraine since the end of last year, essentially pushing this problem to Europe. In the case of France, I can say that sometimes words are just words. Germany helps Ukraine the most, and it is the country that gets the most crap for insufficient support. France is basically pushing all sorts of illiquid assets onto Ukraine, which otherwise would have to be disposed of at a high cost. Although the French Scalp missiles and Caesar self-propelled guns are quite good, let me remind you that it was France that for a long time torpedoed the purchase of shells for the Ukrainian Armed Forces outside the EU. I have already answered you: you are wrong, Biden has a cap on the aid he can send before having to pass a bill to raise that figure. You should know that even by minimally following the news coming from US - I am very surprised you are trying to pass the message that Biden is blocking??? If you do not know, please learn and if you are trying to fake you need to do better. And it seems that Ukraine is still fine with attacking deep into Ruzzia. Today another two facilities more than 1000 miles away. Biden could issue a decree that has the force of law, but does not require approval from the Senate and Congress, or could use numerous State Department funds, or could try to revive lend-lease, during which Ukraine has not received a single cartridge, or take advantage of another loophole , which, for example, allows you to continue supplying weapons to Israel, although aid to Israel is stuck in one package with aid to Ukraine - but his does not do this. Therefore, do not tell me that I am wrong if you do not have complete information on this issue. None of those options are available for the funding needed. Biden cannot send a 60B package which is what Ukraine needs to stand a chance at stopping and perhaps even driving Ruzzia back and what is left of the drawdown authority is required for other ongoing conflicts (not Israel-Palestine, but all the rest). Israel has a long standing deal by which the US has weapons "in custody", pre-assigned to Israel and sometime even held in the US bases in the region as it is considered that if Israel is attacked, the bulk of help from US would take too long to arrive. It is a completely different case and process. My guess is that Ukraine will keep on hitting refineries with their own native technology, since the US is not sending ATCAMS and seems to have issues digesting the aid. |
|
|
|
And another refinery was hit today in the region of Tatarstan. Talks first, actions to follow. Until very recently Macron has been quite quiet about the war. He has backed down from requesting a direct intervention to promising aid which is much more likely. Counting on Le Pen winning is nor really a strategy for Putin, it is more of a hope - I mean if Le Pen really stops support to Ukraine, which I doubt.
Of course, the baltic countries are providing the most help, they are closer to Putin's Ruzzia and they know what it means. There are now talks of providing Gripens to Ukraine (much much better option than f-16, as they can be based in pretty much any road in the middle of a forest.
For now, nothing is very clear IMO.
It’s interesting that you ignored the first part of my message, that it is not Congress, but Biden, who has been slowing down the allocation of aid to Ukraine since the end of last year, essentially pushing this problem to Europe. In the case of France, I can say that sometimes words are just words. Germany helps Ukraine the most, and it is the country that gets the most crap for insufficient support. France is basically pushing all sorts of illiquid assets onto Ukraine, which otherwise would have to be disposed of at a high cost. Although the French Scalp missiles and Caesar self-propelled guns are quite good, let me remind you that it was France that for a long time torpedoed the purchase of shells for the Ukrainian Armed Forces outside the EU. I have already answered you: you are wrong, Biden has a cap on the aid he can send before having to pass a bill to raise that figure. You should know that even by minimally following the news coming from US - I am very surprised you are trying to pass the message that Biden is blocking??? If you do not know, please learn and if you are trying to fake you need to do better. And it seems that Ukraine is still fine with attacking deep into Ruzzia. Today another two facilities more than 1000 miles away. Russia only needs to maintain its rather peaceful stance for a little while, yet. Only until Trump gets back into office. Then the war will end; further help for Ukraine aggression will be blocked. More important, Ukraine will be rebuilt in a good way, and trade relations between all the Slavic blocks will open back up, and with the US and Nato, and even with China and the ME.[...] Ukraine did not invade Ruzzia. The "Slavic" trade was working perfectly, as most of the other world trade before the army of the Ruzzian Federation decided to invade (again) Ukraine. It is quite unclear how Trump intends to "end the war", what is sure is that simple solutions tend to attract simple minds (yes dumBAss that is you, a simple mind). By all means, keep hoping for Trump as Putin does. BTW, I know is difficult to defend a guy that says one thing in the morning and another in the evening but it was Trump the first one who spoke about limiting trade with China, destroyed several free trade deal (Mexico, Pacific) and is proposing tariffs and protectionism. Just make sure next time you bother to understand what Trump is proposing - you do not even seem to understand it dumBAss.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_tariffs#:~:text=international%20trading%20environment.-,Effects%20on%20China-US%20trade,of%20all%20American%20agricultural%20goods.The Trump tariffs are a series of United States tariffs imposed during the presidency of Donald Trump as part of his "America First" economic policy to reduce the United States trade deficit by shifting American trade policy from multilateral free trade agreements to bilateral trade deals. In January 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines of 30 to 50 percent.[1] In March 2018, he imposed tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) from most countries,[2][3][4] which, according to Morgan Stanley, covered an estimated 4.1 percent of U.S. imports.[5] In June 2018, this was extended to the European Union, Canada, and Mexico.[3] The Trump administration separately set and escalated tariffs on goods imported from China, leading to a trade war.[6]
The tariffs angered trading partners, who implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.[7] In June 2018, India planned to recoup trade penalties of $241 million on $1.2 billion worth of Indian steel and aluminum,[8] but attempted talks delayed these until June 2019 when India imposed retaliatory tariffs on $240 million worth of U.S. goods.[9] Canada imposed matching retaliatory tariffs on July 1, 2018.[10][11] China implemented retaliatory tariffs equivalent to the $34 billion tariff imposed on it by the U.S.[12] In July 2018, the Trump administration announced it would use a Great Depression-era program, the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), to pay farmers up to $12 billion, increasing the aid to $28 billion in May 2019.[13] The USDA estimated that aid payments constituted more one than one-third of total farm income in 2019 and 2020.[14][15]
Tariff negotiations in North America were relatively more successful, with the U.S. lifting the steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico on May 20, 2019, joining Australia and Argentina in being the only nations exempted from the regulations.[16][17] However, on May 30, Trump unilaterally announced his intention to impose a five percent tariff on all imports from Mexico beginning on June 10, with tariffs increasing to ten percent on July 1, and by another five percent each month for three months, "until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP," adding illegal immigration as a condition for U.S.-Mexico tariff negotiations. The move was seen as threatening the ratification of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the North American trade deal set to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).[18] The tariffs were averted on June 7 after negotiations.[19]
A May 2019 analysis conducted by CNBC found Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in the U.S. in decades.[20][21][22] Studies have found that Trump's tariffs reduced real income in the United States, as well as adversely affecting U.S. GDP.[23][24][25] Some studies also concluded that the tariffs adversely affected Republican candidates in elections.[26][27][28] |
|
|
|
Talks first, actions to follow. Until very recently Macron has been quite quiet about the war. He has backed down from requesting a direct intervention to promising aid which is much more likely. Counting on Le Pen winning is nor really a strategy for Putin, it is more of a hope - I mean if Le Pen really stops support to Ukraine, which I doubt.
Of course, the baltic countries are providing the most help, they are closer to Putin's Ruzzia and they know what it means. There are now talks of providing Gripens to Ukraine (much much better option than f-16, as they can be based in pretty much any road in the middle of a forest.
For now, nothing is very clear IMO.
It’s interesting that you ignored the first part of my message, that it is not Congress, but Biden, who has been slowing down the allocation of aid to Ukraine since the end of last year, essentially pushing this problem to Europe. In the case of France, I can say that sometimes words are just words. Germany helps Ukraine the most, and it is the country that gets the most crap for insufficient support. France is basically pushing all sorts of illiquid assets onto Ukraine, which otherwise would have to be disposed of at a high cost. Although the French Scalp missiles and Caesar self-propelled guns are quite good, let me remind you that it was France that for a long time torpedoed the purchase of shells for the Ukrainian Armed Forces outside the EU. I have already answered you: you are wrong, Biden has a cap on the aid he can send before having to pass a bill to raise that figure. You should know that even by minimally following the news coming from US - I am very surprised you are trying to pass the message that Biden is blocking??? If you do not know, please learn and if you are trying to fake you need to do better. And it seems that Ukraine is still fine with attacking deep into Ruzzia. Today another two facilities more than 1000 miles away. |
|
|
|
you post manipulated statistics that don't account for the government shutting down the economy for covid. If you believe the statistics you posted You seem really angry. Take a deep breath. All the numbers charts I posted are from the bureau of labor statistics. https://www.bls.gov/Yes, Covid caused a lot of jobs to disappear from the market, and then return to the market. The jobs reports, which come out every month, reflect how many jobs were created or lost. That's the whole point. Just because they don't make Trump look good doesn't mean they were manipulated. As for crime statistics... It's easy to manipulate those when you refuse to charge illegal immigrants who are assaulting people all over the country. If you honestly believe there's less crime now than under Trump's watch you are even dumber than I thought.
Seems pretty clear to me that illegal immigrants are less likely to assault someone than, say, an angry white magatard. You need to lay off clicking on those right wing rage bait headlines. They're turning your emotions into money. The angrier they make you, the more you click. The more you click the more they make. At this point I'm not even sure what would piss you off more, if tomorrow the economy is better or worse. As long as you keep sipping the media cool aid it really doesn't matter, you will be angry. The MAGAs just do not care about anything you can say about Trump. Particularly anything that is data or logic - it is absolutely useless to present them with any proper information as they will always claim manipulation or bias or that it is an attack or whatever. On the growth, here OgNasty just throws something as ridiculous as the "illegals" as the factor for growth. Nothing needs proof, anything is equally valid, the understanding of the economy of the US matters not. This is Trumps major achievement: divide the US. There is no single president that has been so divisive and this is no longer about discerning truth or providing arguments but either you are with him or against, period. I wonder how does that make "America Great" if you alienate more than half of the population. But fortunately this thread is about the trials and the results, so there is no point in denying he has been found guilty of rape and fraud and that he had to request relief from a relatively modest fine. At most, they can use the usual argument that everything that is not to Trumps will is a conspiration. |
|
|
|
Now to serious things - again, this means that all you have said is mumbling idiotic stuff - it seems that the Republicans will actually have to vote to deny or accept the aid to Ukraine. The speaker is confident it is getting in the agenda. Better late than never.
The big lie is that aid to Ukraine in the United States is blocked by the House of Representatives of Congress. Biden has the ability to provide military assistance bypassing Congress, he just isn't using it. Ukraine has ceased to be interesting for the United States because no one wants to be associated with losers. Actually, Biden is using it, but to send a 60 billion package, which is what is in discussion, it does require passing an specific bill. The presidential drawdown authority is capped and there needs to be a bill to increase it. https://www.state.gov/use-of-presidential-drawdown-authority-for-military-assistance-for-ukraine/ Republicans (MAGAs) blocked it requesting a deal for Mexico's border. Biden accepted and the Trump blocked it anyway, because without that problem in the border, he would actually have little left to offer other than 4 years of name-calling and rants. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/can-biden-keep-us-aid-flowing-ukraine-gop-chaos-house-rcna118907I know very well all the ins and outs of this Speakeriad in the House of Representatives of the US Congress. Ukraine is actively used by both parties as a bargaining chip in the election race, but Ukraine itself has long been of no serious interest to anyone in the United States; it is waste material. I remember a couple of years ago there was a lot of talk about lend-lease until it ended. Do you know how much military aid was provided to Ukraine under lend-lease? That's right, not at all. Just have a look at the news, it is easy to see the procedures and how the aid gets there. I think it has to either arrive by summer, or accept that there will be a difficult summer despite France's transfer of weapons recently announced. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-send-old-armoured-vehicles-new-missiles-ukraine-2024-03-31/It is hundreds old vehicles but also modern air defences. Should that air defence be well placed and sufficient, the Ruzzian army would struggle to through the major obstacles using the gliding FABs. Ahaha. France talks a lot and does little. I think even the Baltic countries provided more assistance to Ukraine than France. All of Macron’s bellicose rhetoric is aimed mainly at the domestic audience, where they once again threaten the nightmare that Le Pen’s party could win in the summer. Well, an attempt to lower the economically weakening Germany in France’s struggle for European strategic leadership. And also to soften the pain of the loss of African colonies. In general, this has nothing to do with Ukraine. Talks first, actions to follow. Until very recently Macron has been quite quiet about the war. He has backed down from requesting a direct intervention to promising aid which is much more likely. Counting on Le Pen winning is nor really a strategy for Putin, it is more of a hope - I mean if Le Pen really stops support to Ukraine, which I doubt. Of course, the baltic countries are providing the most help, they are closer to Putin's Ruzzia and they know what it means. There are now talks of providing Gripens to Ukraine (much much better option than f-16, as they can be based in pretty much any road in the middle of a forest. For now, nothing is very clear IMO. |
|
|
|
Now to serious things - again, this means that all you have said is mumbling idiotic stuff - it seems that the Republicans will actually have to vote to deny or accept the aid to Ukraine. The speaker is confident it is getting in the agenda. Better late than never.
The big lie is that aid to Ukraine in the United States is blocked by the House of Representatives of Congress. Biden has the ability to provide military assistance bypassing Congress, he just isn't using it. Ukraine has ceased to be interesting for the United States because no one wants to be associated with losers. Actually, Biden is using it, but to send a 60 billion package, which is what is in discussion, it does require passing an specific bill. The presidential drawdown authority is capped and there needs to be a bill to increase it. https://www.state.gov/use-of-presidential-drawdown-authority-for-military-assistance-for-ukraine/ Republicans (MAGAs) blocked it requesting a deal for Mexico's border. Biden accepted and the Trump blocked it anyway, because without that problem in the border, he would actually have little left to offer other than 4 years of name-calling and rants. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/can-biden-keep-us-aid-flowing-ukraine-gop-chaos-house-rcna118907Just have a look at the news, it is easy to see the procedures and how the aid gets there. I think it has to either arrive by summer, or accept that there will be a difficult summer despite France's transfer of weapons recently announced. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-send-old-armoured-vehicles-new-missiles-ukraine-2024-03-31/It is hundreds old vehicles but also modern air defences. Should that air defence be well placed and sufficient, the Ruzzian army would struggle to through the major obstacles using the gliding FABs. |
|
|
|
Lol. I'm simply enjoying your name calling. I'm not against you or anything like that. In fact, I feel rather sorry for you. Do you remember the sanctions against Russia, and how they have improved her condition? The sanction-makers knew that Russia would improve because of them. That's why they did them. World behind-the-scenes leaders are building Russia up as their new home from where they will rule the world. Ukraine is done for right now. Ukraine, itself is a long lost nothing. As the US and Nato fail, where are you going to go or be? You would be safer saying nothing, and quietly moving to Russia. Remember, Putin is offering 2.5 acres of land in Siberia for homesteading. Not nearly enough, but you could get your whole family involved, and maybe get 20 acres or more. I mean, Polish people have big families, right? And they all support each other, right?  Name calling? You mean dumBAss? That is not name calling, it is a description. It is ok to feel sorry, but if I were you well... you are wishing for a number of things that you will die without seeing and it is due to your lack of ability to see clearly and to convince others that you see clearly. That lack of meaning in your life is something to be sorry about - loosing the time you have been given on earth like that... what an immorality. If the NATO ever falls, you are going to have much bigger worries than writing stupid things here, that I can assure you. Now to serious things - again, this means that all you have said is mumbling idiotic stuff - it seems that the Republicans will actually have to vote to deny or accept the aid to Ukraine. The speaker is confident it is getting in the agenda. Better late than never. |
|
|
|
However, anybody can make charts and graphs.
It must be frustrating not knowing how to read them. I'll try just words and see if that helps. When Trump was sworn in there were 145.6 million US Jobs. When he left office (in shame), there were 142.7 million US jobs. While Trump was in office, the total US job growth was negative 2.9 million. When Biden was sworn in, there were 142.7 million US jobs (because it was the same day Trump left). As of the last jobs report (Feb 2024) there are 157.8 million US jobs. That means, so far under Biden 15.1 million jobs have been created. [...] Good job  There is something that people who care about information do not know, but several polls reveal that Trump voters are absolutely convinced that there were more and better jobs created during Trump than during Biden. And that is just the tip of the iceberg, there are quite a few very relevant figures and data that they are equally convinced or and wrong about. This is what happens when people limit their sources of information to only those that reinforce their beliefs. |
|
|
|
Wanted everyone's opinion about which Casino and Sportsbook have the best UI. What is their best feature and which casino and sportsbook do you like but want to see improvement when it comes to UI or features?
UI means User interface.
Mr. OP, feature is good, Many casinos have a UI that mainly attracts players. So if you choose a casino that has UI and it can definitely attract you. So users should be given the facility to choose a casino so that they can check various services, such as deposits, withdrawals, KYC system, betting policies and restrictions, etc. Need a review when you register there. So if you want to find out the casinos that have UI and register there, you must read the various betting guides, and then you can proceed to bet there. Moreover, for choosing a good casino you not only have to choose the casinos that have UI, but you can also use the trusted and good casinos that will give you maximum benefits. It has to attract but then it has to keep the user well engaged with the gaming experience. That is easier to say than to do, because interfaces that engage tend to be very intuitive and have nearly no learning curve for the usual user interactions, however the interface that keeps engaged is such that allows an infinite additional learning that makes the user more efficient as they further learn. This is applicable to the more complex games mostly. |
|
|
|
Your strategy is good because you pay attention to the little things. These points contain something that will help you win a sufficient amount of money over a long distance, or lose significantly less than we would have done without it. Each sport has its own nuances that you should pay attention to, but only if you apply them all together will they give a positive result. You can add one more point, but you need to pay attention to each player and take into account his individual abilities and his moral stability in order to win back, etc. It is possible to notice this in teams only in one league, which has been followed by loyal fans for many years, so this is not available to many.
Sports betting is all about knowledge, someone who gets into sports betting has to pay attention to everything about a team or an individual that is involved in a game they are about to bet on because they need to analyse everything when they are doing research, and for better and proper analysis, one needs a lot of knowledge and information about each side involved in a competition. Positive results can be yielded from sports betting if someone pays a lot of attention to small details about each match and each sport they want to make bets on. So the main point is, that sports betting can be profitable for those sports bettors who know sports very well, and not everyone. Now even those experts are having problems, the more information we can get about a particular sport, the better prediction models casinos can create and this in return generates more precise odds, so a skilled sport bettor needs to keep improving their system or one day they may find that the system that gave them profits on the past is not able to beat the casinos anymore, an occurrence I have read it has happened a few times before to some of those professional bettors. We are about to live in a world with much more complex and well studied models with more data than ever before. It is customary that we understand than a personal experience has the advantage of being very human, but it is only a very minor part of the universe of understanding and can be clearly be defeated by an automated system there where the games has simple, non-open rules. |
|
|
|
I hope they keep to it, most online casinos also wanted to be like freebitco but along the line they join other popular online casinos that ask for KYC, I have been using freebitco since many years ago and they have never asked me for KYC before, I am impressed, but what if freebitco become as big as Stake some day? Won't that bring attention?
Online casinos can survive and still become successful under the radar without being noticed, but when the attention gets bigger they might come looking for them, and they can be forced to go same route like big online casinos have done too.
The thing is that, why most of them don't survive when they have kyc in place is because the authorities always look at they activities as illegal and against the law since they are not paying any tax if their are not regulated in the first place and most who don't want to expose themselves are always looked for and sectioned that is the reason most of the new casinos always make sure that they uptain license before they begin they operations. We have seen many cases of those no kyc casinos becoming victims of government sanctioned which at most time leads to their closer in the long run, this have taught most some lessons. Yeah! Casinos without KYCs for government to have part in the running are always main target for sanction as they would tag all their activities to be an illegal one NMW and there's no way they can just themselves Governments are just concerned with the both the gamblers and the casinos itself .... if the government is truly concern about the casino and the players itself then lets thank them completely   But I doubt that this is the main reason why government is acting such but for me? they are acting for themselves because We knew how much money is flowing in every casinos and indeed they might be checking if how much they can gather having all these regulations and requirements . In theory, the government is actually everyone in the sense that money evaded from the governments does not get spent in the general interest of people so governments tend to prevent anything that escapes their financial control so dealing with crypto or casinos is the same: make sure you get money while making sure there is enough incentive to keep the business going. |
|
|
|
|
BTW, why is not anyone talking about the obvious utility as alternative investment now that we have ETFs?
For me the 2017 to 2019 period was critical to my personal stance towards bitcoin holdings. I did mine, take any token on offer by bounty hunting or translating and played trading with ethereum an a few other things. I did get profit from it.
Now, I clearly figured out that I would have made more profit from bounty hunting only for bitcoin and simply buying and holding (hodling if you want). It is as simple as that and it seems that lots of people are in that wavelength now.
|
|
|
|
Oh, I can see your level of English is not good enough to understand this, let me translate: "UK could not fight Ruzzia for 2 months" means we want to reduce social care, raise the state pension age, put more taxes and raise the military salaries and get the public health system to even a lower standard and buy weapons instead. And the funny thing is that it is quite likely to happen, as Ruzzia pushes people perceive that they are under threat. As the joke in the US marines goes "our enemies are about to find out that we do not have a public health system". Anyway, if the situation comes, the UK would call Ukraine for help, they seem to know how to drone Ruzzis. Sounds more like your level of thinking is not that good. But we knew that, now didn't we. There is at least one serious study that claims that US citizens are one of the most non-contextual receivers of messages. In words that you can understand, you just do not get it and do not see even the most simple double meanings. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjxgI2c6pyFAxW7hf0HHaAoBdIQFnoECAIQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fastcompany.com%2F3059534%2Fthe-american-style-of-business-speaking-and-why-you-need-to-master%23%3A~%3Atext%3DThe%2520U.S.%2520is%2520generally%2520a%2Cget%2520straight%2520to%2520the%2520facts.&usg=AOvVaw3ZtrxfehIcXCv7L9soUgWd&opi=89978449Now to serious matters (for context, since you tend to miss it, this implies you are not a serious matter dumBAss, nor anything you say), the glorious Air defence forces or Ruzzia have gloriously taken down their own SU-27. The pilot has survived, which speaks of either how hard are these planes or how weak are the air to air missiles depending on your point of view. |
|
|
|
... ~
I know, I know. It hurts that Trump winning the election means justice for Russia in the war. Poor baby. Ukraine will simply have to stop sucking off the teat of the US money system. The question is, how much money are you getting of the US funds being pushed into Ukraine that you are so in favor of the war and the killing? Told you many time dumBAss... there is no way you will scape the bill for being the preeminent nation in the world. Your choice is to pay now the bill while Ukraine does he fighting with you or face in the future a strong Ruzzia and a strong China which have geostrategic interests that I would describe as two trains running at full speed against each other relative to US. That will be a real "bill" that the US may not even be able to afford. I know they do not teach this in Texas, but your country (if you are US, I suspect you may be Chinese) is not "free" because the world is a nice place full of friends. But on-topic. Trump has asked for relief from a very "small sum" compared to his assets. That is sending a very clear message of where his personal finances seems to be. It speaks louder than anything he may say, so I am going to allow myself a signature myself this time. And well... let's see if Trump wins or he is "victim of the greatest complot ever" as usual. We're really in a big moment for American politics. I'm more curious about what this might mean for the Republican Party. If Trump gets convicted, it could hurt their image and make winning elections tough. There might even be a rift, with some Republicans backing away from him while others stay loyal.
But even if Trump gets off the hook, there could still be problems for the party. All this attention might not sit well with voters, and it could overshadow other important topics they want to address. It's a real tight spot.
You're right. That's a visible figure that of Trumps finally gets convicted it would negative affect the republicans political structures and even at this moment, the political sector doesn't seem aling with the formations towards taking rulership positions because as it stance now, they're distabilized and most focused on how to deliver Trump's from the forces against him. Meanwhile if the pressure persists, they would surely be pull back of memebers who has sighted they'd never regain to proclaim the presidential position so they'd earlier on make a pull back so they don't keep flirting around loosing teams. In politics when things goes weird memebers would always pull back while some stays loyal just says said @sesterceshop He has been convicted. Where have you been the lasts months? BTW what is this post? Autotranslate? |
|
|
|
Vale, el título es clickbait, pero es la primera frase literal extraído de la publicación de La Razón abajo enlazada, donde cita como la policía de Sevilla ha cerrado una granja de minería ubicada en Santiponce, con 21 ASIC que minaban bitcoin. No la ha cerrado por minar, sino tal y como hemos visto en varias ocasiones, por pincharse a la corriente pública. Tampoco es la primera vez que la policía pensaba haber dado con una granja de marihuana y, en su lugar, encontrarse una granja de minería de criptomonedas. Eso sí, abramos la noticia con el preámbulo demagógico citado a modo de titular en este hilo … Ver: https://www.larazon.es/andalucia/20220128/l23uxoq7pvh25lnilz54vwvfge.htmlMe pregunto porque no han comparado el movimiento de criptos relacionado con actividades ilegales con el movimiento en dolares. Asi a lo loco y sin mirar datos, me atrevo a decir que seria un x100. Edited to add: x 10000 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
