I think that you cannot speak or protest peacefully in public in Iran. Feel free to answer without a picture, it is starting to make you look like a propagandist of the regime  So why shouldn't I post facts that contradict your posts? Your false claims based on truths manufactured by the mouthpieces you follow that are designed to "wash brains". Outlets that end up turning you into this, someone who says "show evidence" in one post and in another post below that says "don't show me any evidence" just because what was posted contradicted what the mouthpieces had told you initially and you want to continue believing that no matter what. This is also why you stooped to name-calling at the end, that's resistance in the face of facts. I guess is that if facts and truth are opposites in your world, we may have a difficult conversation here. You do not have to answer. You just may want to. Can you protest freely and peacefully in Iran? Are people in Iran mostly supportive of selling the weapons that kill Ukrainians? Are people in Iran mostly supportive of the Theocracy? does people in Iran have a say and the possibility of changing the law if they think is not fair? As said... you do not have to answer, sometimes silence speaks more than words. |
|
|
|
It's like they're campaigning specifically to BADecker. Mind bogglingly dumb liars.  I am convinced now that dumBAss is a Chinese agent pretending to be from Texas. |
|
|
|
|
All that, but not exactly that, has already happened, it is just not spoken openly.
There is already a thread on the war in Ukraine.
|
|
|
|
You can protest peacefully in any of those countries.
Tell that to the 2000-3000 arrested students who were peacefully protesting the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Or tell that to the 4000-5000 Yellow Vest protestors in Europe that have lost a limb over the past couple of years just because they wanted "economic justice" among other basic rights. Again, you need to say something realistic. Please confirm that you are stating that 4000 people of yellow vests lost a limb due to undue police action. Next step is me asking for your source. Please, confirm that you are stating that there are 3000 people arrested for peacefully protesting about the actions of Israel in Palestine. Feel free to put a credible source before I ask. Please note the difference between "detained" and "arrested". Answering to your edit... you are aware that I live in my country (which may or may not be the US) right? You are aware that I do protest and say whatever I want and I have all my bodyparts in order? BTW how many people in Iran protest when their government sells Shaed drones to Ruzzia? do they know? [...] So does that rule only apply to UK or does it by any chance apply to other countries? Maybe you don't consider people's shops that was burnt down as property because it was in another country? Or maybe you don't count banks as property? Maybe you don't count ambulances and firetrucks as property? As long as these things are being damaged in anywhere but UK! How about hospitals? Maybe you don't count them as "property" as long as they are in Iran? The below picture is the result of the terrorist attacks you referred to in previous page while insisting on using the word "peaceful" to describe them. The same project that John Bolton and many other Western politicians have confessed to being behind...  In any case, I'll stop here with only telling you that you don't know anything about Iran as long as you are reading some Western mouthpieces be it mainstream media or on social media. I'll stick to your own country and worry about what your own regime is doing if I were you I think that you cannot speak or protest peacefully in public in Iran. do you disagree? Feel free to answer without a picture, it is starting to make you look like a propagandist of the regime [moderator's note: multiple posts have been merged] |
|
|
|
Protests against the government and against government actions are allowed in liberal regimes in general yes.
So you agree with me that US, UK, France, Germany, ... are not liberal regimes at all.  Those are your words not mine. You can protest peacefully in any of those countries. Can you in Iran? A different matter is if you try to violently impose something in those countries. Are you? It is so simple: You are free to make your view known and convince others in most western countries, with very few limits. You are not free to damage property or injure others. In Iran you cannot make your view know, period.That means that all this show of condolences means nothing, as there is no way of expressing any other view. I know you need to say something, but you need to find something realistic to say first. This comparison is ridiculous. BTW, yellow vests protest on the price of gas mostly (interestingly, Iran coin is going down the pit with a 50% decline during your "beloved" president mandate. Yellow vests have 3 million members, most of them in the same physical condition as when they joined an free to speak and act peacefully as much as they want. If you start burning cars in the street or acting violently, you will get into trouble.  |
|
|
|
[...]
Its not about how much money you spend, its what can you buy with that money. Same thing can cost $2 in Bangladesh and $2000 in Luxembourg
Another example, look what USA got for their 2000 billion USD investment in Afghanistan...imagine that unimaginable amount of money
spent in the USA on building infrastructure
But obviously you're brainwashed into thinking that money spent wins the war
That is correct, the multiplier in Ruzzia and China may be larger - despite a dacha here and there - but it is still not even close to an even match. The money spent in Afghanistan by Ruzzia? Oh, you mean the money spent by US only later on? Well, the problem seemed to be that some groups in there were destroying the infrastructure of the US (e.g. towers and the like) so US had to make sure that the infrastructure was protected. For example, Ukraine was not destroying anything in Ruzzia, so the invasion money and blood could have been put to a better use in Ruzzia. There was no threat. Now Ruzzia has spent a lot of money while creating a new and very real threat. I am sure you will try no to see the difference right? Money wins wars, among other things.  Ukraine is essentially dead. If Ukraine quit right now, and if Russia didn't destroy her, Ukraine wouldn't be able to do anything at all to get back on her feet. Why would China want to end the war? World trade. Peaceful trade with the world is what everybody wants. The problem is that the US wants to control (rape and plunder) it rather than let people and countries be free.  You have a dual personality. You pretend to be an US Texan guy, but it is becoming more and more evident you work for China and have only ill intentions toward the US. |
|
|
|
UK defence minister says China working to supply lethal aid to Russia
British defence minister Grant Shapps accused China on Wednesday of providing or preparing to provide Russia with lethal aid for use in its war against Ukraine.
Western nations have provided Ukraine with billions of dollars in weapons and aid since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. Britain for the first time is accusing China of working to supply Russia with weapons for use in Ukraine.
Shapps told a conference in London that U.S. and British defence intelligence had evidence that "lethal aid is now, or will be, flowing from China to Russia and into Ukraine, I think it is a significant development".
Shapps did not provide evidence to support his assertion. But he said there had been a 64% increase growth in trade between the countries since the start of the Ukraine and "they are covering each other's back".
These are the usual unfounded statements by the representative of Great Britain, which throughout the conflict has been actively engaged in its escalation and attempts to incite a full-scale world war. Yesterday, Sullivan said at a briefing that the United States does not have data on China's supply of weapons and military equipment to Russia or preparations for its shipment. Simply put, the UK defence minister is publicly lying. So you think China is not supplying weapons to Ruzzia and this time the US is not lying but most other times they are lying? I have seen a few news here and there of ships doing a "pit stop" in China, getting to Ruzzia and getting some containers pretty quickly to the front. And if I have seen it, Sullivan has seen it at 1x1m resolution. My guess is that China is supplying mostly dual use stuff, like this "washing machine controller" that oh look! perfectly fits in this "missile control unit", etc. Shells and stuff that leaves traces, I have not seen yet. e.g. drones are relatively low tech and parts may not have markings. |
|
|
|
I am wondering... Are demonstrations against the regime or against the president allowed?
Are demonstration against any regimes in any country in the world "allowed"? What did the French regime do about 2 years ago when people were protesting the police brutality after they shot a 17-year-old kid in cold blood? They announced Martial Law! And this is what they've been doing to the Yellow Vest movement in Europe for years:  What are they doing in US and Europe these days to students who are protesting their regimes' support of genocide in Palestine? They are beating them and arresting them and these are peaceful protestors who aren't even looking for a domestic regime change!  ... How big would you say a demonstration in favour of a laic (or simply without the Ayatolah) republic would be?
2 years ago there were riots in Iran, majority of whom were singing a "regime change tune" (or rather a color revolution). At most a couple of hundred participated in it (out of 85 million population of Iran). In the same month there was anniversary of the Islamic Revolution victory that toppled the US backed dictatorship. Tens of millions participated in that, a record high which was exactly because of these riots were threatening Iran's safety and were being globally advertised as "the majority", the advertisement which is exactly the reason why you are asking this question here. How big is such a demonstration you ask? Not even a tiny one according to what we've seen. Anyways, during those protests, there was quite brutal prosecution by the regime against protestors and I even recall there were some people who participated in the protests and one they got captured, they got a trial (perhaps not the fairest one) and got sentenced to death. Not sure on what the charges were about, but they were probably religious, something related to apostacy or rebellion against the state.
Nobody is arrested in Iran for "protesting". Any arrest is either for riots (damaging public or private property), acts of terrorism, acts of espionage and stuff of that nature. As Trump's National Security Adviser John Bolton confessed on BBC in his live interview, those riots 2 years ago in Iran were orchestrated by United States (operation with the codename Zhina) and it US was arming foreign terrorists (mainly Kurdish separatists that were members of an international terrorist organization called Komoleh) and sending them into Iran. What Bolton confessed to are acts of terrorism and espionage at the same time. As for the death sentence, capital crimes such as first degree murder get that sentence. In all cases I've seen from 2 years ago there have been a public court and the videos of the murderers committing the crime (ie. indisputable evidence of the capital crimes) have been available. Such videos are available on the internet already, they're in Farsi though. For example in one case that took place on Karaj-Tehran highway, I was close to the scene myself. A small group of terrorists shut down the highway by dumping large stones in the middle of it, creating traffic. Then they started attacking the stopped vehicles. In the middle of that chaos a young kid tries to clear a small path so that vehicles can escape. The terrorists seeing this start attacking him with knives and stones (and later they bring out their guns) and brutally murder the kid. Here is some screenshots of the video they recorded themselves of their acts of murder!  The photo on the top shows the murderer hitting the already dying kid in the face with his own shoe. The photo on the bottom right shows the murderer pulling the dead body of the kid to the side, in front of the cars to block the cleared path and continue the blockade. The trial these murderers received wasn't just fair it was also more than they deserved. Protests against the government and against government actions are allowed in liberal regimes in general yes. If they are violent protests, there is intervention - proportional intervention, most of the times anyway. As far as I know and see in the streets, I can protest about anything, including the acts of Israel in Palestine or the acts of Hezbollah in Israel or both if I want to, with very few and very reasonable limits. I have protested myself about many things when I thought it convenient and did not heard of people in general sentenced for just protesting peacefully or having thousands of people in jail like during the latest protests in Iran, much less being hanged. Martial law requires generalised looting or violence or the like, again in general. The problem is that you are comparing a regime in which people do not have a say or are monitored by the Theocrats with regimes in which you can vote peacefully. In one, you are protesting because you cannot change it, in the other you are protesting because you do not agree with the majority and want to make your problem visible to other.As you can see, it is a completely different thing. Also, blaming any problem in an external "enemy" is kind of a cliché, I think that people in Iran have heard that so often that probably chuckle at it by now. What I see here is that the regime is using the death of this president to somehow show that people support them after the massive protests after the death of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahsa_Amini_protests Mahsa Amini. They, as you, know that a good image is an useful tool .   I think that if the US wanted the regime in Iran gone it would be something achievable. But they are too useful to keep the Arabs in the gulf check. |
|
|
|
I like your answer. There is also say in Spanish "Piensa el ladron que todos son de su condicion", but the one that applies here is the English: "It takes one to know one" In English it is more correct to be translated to "mad men think all men mad" This was Tabriz  And this was Qom in mourning accompanying the bodies of the beloved fallen officials as they travel through Iran to the capital (Tehran, tomorrow) and then to their final resting place  And Tehran today...    Tomorrow (last day of funeral) will reach Khorasan... I am wondering... Are demonstrations against the regime or against the president allowed? or only demonstrations in favour of the president and the like? You, know... is difficult to compare when only some can speak and other's can't. How big would you say a demonstration in favour of a laic (or simply without the Ayatolah) republic would be? What meaning does this have if there is no chance of supporting anything else? |
|
|
|
Ivermectin is for horse right? I think that it didn't really do anything to the disease that it was trying to cure, I don't even think that it made someone better, it's more of a placebo or something like that, that's what my cousin from the province was professing about during the height of the pandemic, to use it as a way to cure or make themselves immune to the symptoms and complications that might arise from contracting COVID-19, you want to know where's that cousin now that's talking about Ivermectin? 6 feet under.
Yes it was conceived and used for animals. |
|
|
|
Meanwhile, Zelensky's original peace plan, scheduled to be discussed at a summit in Switzerland in June, appears to be reduced from the original ten points to just three. And there will no longer be any talk about the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Frankly, I did not expect that Russia’s diversionary strike in the Kharkov direction with only 10-15 thousand bayonets would be so shockingly painful for Ukraine. Syrsky feverishly began to pull reserves from other sectors of the front, seemingly significantly weakening them. Today Russia announced that it had taken Kleshcheevka and its surrounding heights.
I think in the next three weeks Russia will try to clearly demonstrate its best fighting spirit.
Emm... there were 50.000 well armed Ruzzis in the offensive and it is pretty much stopped after Ruzzia loosing in the range of 1500 soldiers a day. Are you sure you have taught a lesson to anyone? BTW Klishivka is at most "contested". A flag in a ruined building is not "control". Respect to peace plans... there will not be peace. There will not be a Putin & Zelensky meeting and surely not a handshake ever. What may happen is something similar to North and South Korea, with Ruzzia playing the North Korea role. Putin does not have a plan B, he only has the "double the bet" plan... is called martingale and end in ruin. But it is good to see you remain optimist about this whole idea of invading your neighbours. I am sure Finland and the Baltic Republics are taking good note. do you remember you post with a smiley saying "only if those missiles would stop" (two years ago or so)... time to apply this to your oil facilities. |
|
|
|
That issue isn't a case for most physical casino, I think that there's been an involvement of corruption in this specific case or there's been a lapse of judgment or negligence on the management side of the casino because this can never be allowed in most casinos, it's difficult to claim or falsely claim a win because there's measures in place that would be placed to make sure that this won't happen, I think that there's a possibility that the person can also sue for the negligence of the casino besides that one where he already won the money, that's going to be a scandal for the casino if the person escalates things.
It is difficult to escalate if you have an issue with the casino. In most places, casinos are accepted because the bring plenty of work, tourism and economic activity. In many places there is a self-regulated organisation that will try for sites not to damage the general reputation on the area, but that's it. If you try anything else, you will not get anywhere, the systems plays against you. |
|
|
|
Of course, because house edge does tells your chances, a lower house edge the higher chances of winning although your chances is still below 50%.
This games with house edge are luck based game
That's not how the he works. The house edge does not affect the odds and does not affect your chances of winning/losing. If you play a coin flip game, for example, your chances of winning/losing are 50/50 meaning you always have a chance of 1/2 to win regardless of the house edge. It only affects the win amount: the higher the house edge the lower your winning not your chance of winning. The house edge is important, I know, but a person who is always looking for the best casino because the house edge is lower ,
Casinos with the lowest house edge aren't necessarily the best. Of course they are not, everything is a pack and the cut of the house is not at all the only criteria. Reputation, such as in the sites that have campaigns in here and the user experience when there are problems and when they have to transfer funds or pass the paperwork red-tape or when they try playing and the site is down or a game is not fair. There are many considerations. |
|
|
|
|
I am not sure I get it. I get rewarded if I get the price of crypto right in whatever future? So basically, I would have to register, transfer funds, trust the site and get everything straight with the KYC and the place a bet for whatever price?
The problem as I see it is that I already can do that by buying and selling in a crypto-exchange, in which the middle-man will take a small cut and will let me leverage x20 if I want to. What is the benefit of this site?
|
|
|
|
Friendly relations have been established between Russia and China. This can be seen from the meeting of the presidents of these two countries. It is interesting to see how the Russian President is greeted in a friendly manner in China. This is a serious business alliance between two strong countries and it is an alliance for many years. Therefore, I think all leaders of European countries should understand this and draw conclusions.Friendship between Russia and China brings benefits to the two countries and I think in case of danger or military confrontation, these countries will unite to fight and this will be the strongest army in the world Total US + Europe (just France, UK an Germany): 960B + 200B = 1160 B Total China + Ruzzia 296B + 109 B = 404 B (not even half, not even half of just the US)I think that your troll farm should pay you much less of whatever you are getting paid and Xi starting to get the right friends. Anyway, I think that this "eternal no-limits" friendship is as crap as it looks. Countries do not have friends, they have interests. Europe and the US are observing how even with such a "powerful alliance" cannot gain more than a few hundred meters a week against a small-ish country such as Ukraine with a minimal support from Europe and US. China's leaders should be taking very good note of what it means to try and above all, look a Ruzzia and see what it means to fail. Xi would not survive ever a disaster such as Ruzzia's in Ukraine. Your videos prove Russia was right to preemptively attack Ukraine? They show how the winners of this war are not in Europe, Ruzzia nor China. |
|
|
|
[...]
Americans Were Purposely Given "Bad" Information
[...]
This information is provided by someone selling this dangerous drug in his user's signature. Be sure to check proper medical advice instead of snake-oil sellers and human parasites. https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/details]https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/110124Doctor Fined for Prescribing Ivermectin for COVID
— Wei-Hsung Lin, MD, will have to pay $5,000 and take CME courses on managing COVID
In one case, Lin prescribed ivermectin to a 69-year-old man with a long list of heart ailments, including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease, as well as hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
That patient was taking an anticoagulant, which could have drug-drug interactions with ivermectin, potentially increasing the risk of internal bleeding, the board documents noted.
In addition, Lin prescribed that patient a double dose of ivermectin so he could share it with his wife, who reported having COVID symptoms. Lin couldn't prescribe the drug directly to her because only the husband was registered for the virtual visit. He prescribed the double dose so she could take half of the pills, the document stated.
Neither patient took the ivermectin after discussing it with their son.
In another instance, Lin prescribed ivermectin to a 71-year-old woman who was COVID-positive. After taking the drug for 4 days, her symptoms didn't improve, and she eventually was hospitalized with pneumonia.
|
|
|
|
[...]
Something seems to have gone wrong! The page you are requesting does not exist. Perhaps it is out of date, has been deleted, or an incorrect address was entered in the address bar. Bloomberg also writes about it Russia Pulls Notice of Baltic Sea Border Plan That Raised Alarm
Defense Ministry paper removed from regulatory website Edit: Upps... you were speaking about the waters claims... Yes, you are right, it seems it has been taken back...Sorry Branko, you do not get Radioactive Spider powers just yet.https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-ministry-proposes-revising-baltic-sea-border-2024-05-22/Russia deletes draft proposal to change Baltic Sea border The Kremlin seems to have echoed / validated the existence of the proposal for the funding retentions: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-says-eu-plan-take-revenue-frozen-russian-assets-is-still-theft-2024-05-22/MOSCOW, May 22 (Reuters) - Russia would regard the seizure of revenue from its frozen assets in the European Union as a violation of all norms of the global economic system, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday.
EU countries have formally adopted a plan to use windfall profits from Russian central bank assets frozen in the EU for Ukraine's defence, the Belgian government said this week.
The Group of Seven countries (G7) froze around $300 billion worth of Russian financial assets soon after Moscow sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine in 2022. The EU expects the assets to yield about 15-20 billion euros ($16.30-$21.70 billion) in profits by 2027. I am going to give some credibility to this given that: - A proxy attack was recently taken in Germany. - UK, France, others are complaining of a ridiculous degree of hacking and infiltration attempts some with economic consequences. - France is getting geopolitical interests damaged. - The unilateral territorial waters claim in the Baltic by Ruzzia is short of on an annexation (it is not unusual, but opens the door to all type of problems). My guess is that the EU is simply increasing the pressure in an asymmetric fashion and is in line with the general strategy of deteriorating the finances of Ruzzia, while not directly robbing the assets but rather not contributing to the war effort passively. |
|
|
|
As far as I know, the President is not that relevant of a figure.
In other words you don't know the Iran's political structure at all. I mean, the guy was travelling in a helicopter that looks taken from an 80´s movie,
Have you even seen the helicopter? It was (and the rest of them are) in perfect operating conditions. Just being manufactured a long time ago doesn't mean it is obsolete. Such old vehicles in perfect shape are in use all over the world. For example the USS Eisenhower US Navy is overusing these days was built back in the 1970's. The B-52 bombers the US Airforce is so proud of was built in the 1950's. Even the Airforce One that carries the US president is two 30-40 year old aircrafts. Jokes apart, it is just crazy to fly a helicopter in those conditions, he must have been in a hurry to get to the local brothel.
کافر همه را به کیش خود پندارد If you have checked the helicopter maintenance records and are happy with them, I am happy too. You are right, many of the US stuff is quite old and some of it is quite new. The air force one however has already a replacement in place and the larger carriers, like most ships, can be refurbished to the point that only the hull remains. A helicopter is a completely different animal. But look, I accept your point, old does not mean bad, but if you are carrying a president you should expect some reputational matters on how it looks. I like your answer. There is also say in Spanish "Piensa el ladron que todos son de su condicion", but the one that applies here is the English: "It takes one to know one" |
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H66tBH2oku4The false science around Ivermectin – BBC News Make sure you are aware of the effects of medication and the right use cases. https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/detailsMany people with critical illnesses feel a sense of desperation as the doctors do not seem to have answers and science has not yet found a good cure for them. It is absolutely natural that upon this situation, anyone will try seek any and all alternatives - even unscientific, unproven or simply fraudulent. Please, be aware that there are people out there going after your money and they are going to take advantage of your situation in your most desperate moments. This society is full of this type of parasites, so do not fall from them.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
