that sounds rather rude? actmyname, would you mind having a word with tman to demonstrate you wish to uphold the same standards for all members. Sure. TMAN is rude. This is a banal point, however: my remark was in relation to your deflection.
What we do see is a lot of double standards and gaming of the current DT and merit systems. I care not about the one voicing concerns or points I disagree with. What I despise is when blanket statements are made when the impact thereof is significant. |
|
|
|
Are you claiming you can guarantee this does not or will not happen at any point? Answering a question with another is rude. TNA is not responsible for all of DT, which is fluid and changes on a monthly basis. Let us assume that a user is wrongly tagging others. They would surely be removed or at the very least have their feedback countered. **given that we have awareness thereof |
|
|
|
I think the solution to this will be to start tagging people who apply to campaigns when it's either full/closed or they don't meet the requirements. If this is done people will be more careful reading before applying. It's really appalling. That's a pretty strict solution... and one that wouldn't make sense, especially considering the new changes to trust in regards to Guest perspectives. Annoying? Sure. But it's not worth diluting the value of negative feedback to resolve it. Besides, all you'll have is a slew of extra threads in Reputation reprimanding rigid regulations. |
|
|
|
That could be it, but I think it could also be for spam. Bans for spam would not have a reason that dictates they were banned for plagiarism. It would be something along the lines of "Insubstantial post quality"
user hacker1001101001 has found something that could be the main reason for this perma-ban. That is almost assuredly the cause of the ban (a post closely resembling the highlighted post). There have been past cases of plagiarism bans given out for similar situations. |
|
|
|
|
Report shitposts if you don't like them. The button is there for a reason.
Perhaps the only difference between your deleted posts and the would-be deleted posts made by other members is the active reporting.
|
|
|
|
That post should not be considered plagiarism. The act of listing the general specification and prices is dissimilar to using other people's statements that you adopt as your own. |
|
|
|
If those images are going to be considered instances of plagiarism, then that's pretty ridiculous.
We have these, though: Autoban user: N/A in topic #0 by member #896499 Remove topic: Electrum balance drops to 0 BTC in topic #5136237 by member #2589009 Delete reply: Re: I know who Satoshi Nakamoto is in topic #5118566 by member #896499 Delete reply: Re: I'm little bit confused about Yobit Campaign, I need an advice. in topic #5135007 by member #896499 |
|
|
|
Lol so they operate in Costa Rica but isn't San Jose in California, as I just got my Cisco Certification Package and it says San Jose California or there are 2 San Joses in existence It's possible for there to be duplicate city names. (i.e. the >20 Madisons in the US) With San Jose, there are literally hundreds of places named thereof. |
|
|
|
How can it be deserved when a) the forum rules say you are allowed to buy account In the forum rules, scamming and ponzi/HYIP schemes are also allowed. |
|
|
|
This option would serve as a great help when working for a signature campaign and there is probably a dispute about it authentication or there has been some rumours of scam you can choose the don't show users signature probably until the issue is resolved Uh... what? Let me try to dissect what you're saying: You're assuming that the "don't show users' signatures" has an effect outside of the authorizing member (that is, the user that ticked the option). This is wrong. This has no effect on anyone that is participating on a campaign outside of their perspective. You may be assuming that it disables their signature... but if that were a concern, then they could simply remove it manually. I don't get it. |
|
|
|
|
The following post is used for a test to see how [ tt ] tags are affected.
|
|
|
|
Apologies for multiposting but I'm running into formatting problems if I try to fit more than one list into a single post. Ah jeez. Forgot about digaran. Would have guessed him if I remembered! 
Testing in my Archive thread has shown that posting the exact same text and bbcode will produce unexpected results. What may be properly formatted at one moment can be jumbled and obfuscated the next. [tt] is very arbitrary. EDIT: [tt]
[glow=#fff,0,0][b] # Friend [abbr=How many times you quoted this user]Quotes[/abbr] [abbr=Percentage of all your quotes]%[/abbr] [/b][/glow]
[glow=#ffa,0,0] 1. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110]cryptohunter[/url] 62 1.89 [/glow]
[glow=#fff,0,0] 2. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149737]BADecker[/url] 28 0.85 [/glow]
[glow=#ffa,0,0] 3. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=138471]Spoetnik[/url] 28 0.85 [/glow]
[glow=#fff,0,0] 4. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31239]etotheipi[/url] 26 0.79 [/glow]
5. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872]Lauda[/url] 26 0.79
[glow=#fff,0,0] 6. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24792]Phinnaeus Gage[/url] 21 0.64 [/glow]
7. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747]Vod[/url] 20 0.61
[glow=#fff,0,0] 8. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=60820]DannyHamilton[/url] 20 0.61 [/glow]
9. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=55384]Foxpup[/url] 18 0.55
[glow=#fff,0,0] 10. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=4602]myrkul[/url] 15 0.46 [/glow]
11. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=71158]Lethn[/url] 15 0.46
[glow=#fff,0,0] 12. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459836]LoyceV[/url] 15 0.46 [/glow]
13. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=35]theymos[/url] 14 0.43
[glow=#fff,0,0] 14. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771]suchmoon[/url] 13 0.40 [/glow]
15. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=41048]DeathAndTaxes[/url] 13 0.40
[glow=#ffa,0,0] 16. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487418]The Pharmacist[/url] 12 0.37 [/glow]
17. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=290195]achow101[/url] 12 0.37
[glow=#fff,0,0] 18. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=68520]rpietila[/url] 12 0.37 [/glow]
19. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=68466]SEC agent[/url] 12 0.37
[glow=#fff,0,0] 20. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244104]notbatman[/url] 12 0.37 [/glow]
21. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2472107]H8bussesNbicycles[/url] 12 0.37
[glow=#fff,0,0] 22. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543]o_e_l_e_o[/url] 12 0.37 [/glow]
23. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65837]franky1[/url] 11 0.34
[glow=#fff,0,0] 24. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361]Timelord2067[/url] 11 0.34 [/glow]
25. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355462]Thule[/url] 11 0.34
[glow=#fff,0,0] 26. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=359810]Mr Tsoutsounopaiktis[/url] 11 0.34 [/glow]
27. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=89388]dnaleor[/url] 11 0.34
[glow=#fff,0,0] 28. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15728]TECSHARE[/url] 10 0.31 [/glow]
29. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=547161]languagehasmeaning[/url] 9 0.27
[glow=#fff,0,0] 30. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=62955]odolvlobo[/url] 9 0.27 [/glow]
31. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=21728]dank[/url] 9 0.27
[glow=#fff,0,0] 32. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=504237]TPTB_need_war[/url] 8 0.24 [/glow]
33. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18158]wachtwoord[/url] 8 0.24
[glow=#fff,0,0] 34. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=17251]Fuzzy[/url] 8 0.24 [/glow]
35. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88197]AnonyMint[/url] 8 0.24
[glow=#fff,0,0] 36. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=144490]abacus[/url] 8 0.24 [/glow]
[glow=#ffa,0,0] 37. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400]The-One-Above-All[/url] 7 0.21 [/glow]
[glow=#fff,0,0] 38. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=60969]420[/url] 7 0.21 [/glow]
39. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=23132]Gabi[/url] 7 0.21
[glow=#fff,0,0] 40. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102608]FinShaggy[/url] 7 0.21 [/glow]
41. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49994]Frizz23[/url] 6 0.18
[glow=#fff,0,0] 42. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67815]b!z[/url] 6 0.18 [/glow]
43. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=62414]Buffer Overflow[/url] 6 0.18
[glow=#fff,0,0] 44. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=125747]Taras[/url] 6 0.18 [/glow]
45. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=34967]CoinHunter[/url] 6 0.18
[glow=#fff,0,0] 46. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=57136]gweedo[/url] 6 0.18 [/glow]
47. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=654]kwukduck[/url] 6 0.18
[glow=#fff,0,0] 48. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=229393]Moloch[/url] 6 0.18 [/glow]
49. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=21053]jackjack[/url] 6 0.18
[glow=#fff,0,0] 50. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88753]freedomno1[/url] 6 0.18 [/glow]
[/tt] Arbitrary text
[tt]
[glow=#fff,0,0][b] # Friend [abbr=How many times you quoted this user]Quotes[/abbr] [abbr=Percentage of all your quotes]%[/abbr] [/b][/glow]
1. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=806776]digaran[/url] 109 2.54
[glow=#fff,0,0] 2. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=465017]actmyname[/url] 61 1.42 [/glow]
[glow=#ffa,0,0] 3. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355462]Thule[/url] 42 0.98 [/glow]
[glow=#fff,0,0] 4. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020]Quickseller[/url] 32 0.75 [/glow]
5. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936]DarkStar_[/url] 32 0.75
[glow=#fff,0,0] 6. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872]Lauda[/url] 31 0.72 [/glow]
7. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=844470]RichGang[/url] 30 0.70
[glow=#fff,0,0] 8. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=526154]cjmoles[/url] 27 0.63 [/glow]
9. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=35]theymos[/url] 25 0.58
[glow=#fff,0,0] 10. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487418]The Pharmacist[/url] 24 0.56 [/glow]
11. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=906005]endlasuresh[/url] 23 0.54
[glow=#fff,0,0] 12. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=357609]kiklo[/url] 21 0.49 [/glow]
13. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=537536]xavier77[/url] 20 0.47
[glow=#fff,0,0] 14. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81995]peloso[/url] 19 0.44 [/glow]
15. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1374262]cryptomoon123[/url] 16 0.37
[glow=#fff,0,0] 16. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254]game-protect[/url] 15 0.35 [/glow]
17. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=522317]paul gatt[/url] 14 0.33
[glow=#fff,0,0] 18. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459836]LoyceV[/url] 14 0.33 [/glow]
19. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2530845]itomarketing[/url] 13 0.30
[glow=#fff,0,0] 20. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736]marlboroza[/url] 13 0.30 [/glow]
21. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=829151]hurain[/url] 13 0.30
[glow=#fff,0,0] 22. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=156665]deisik[/url] 13 0.30 [/glow]
23. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=524209]JackpotRacer[/url] 12 0.28
[glow=#fff,0,0] 24. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771]suchmoon[/url] 12 0.28 [/glow]
25. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=560412]Joel_Jantsen[/url] 12 0.28
[glow=#fff,0,0] 26. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=359888]BTCevo[/url] 11 0.26 [/glow]
27. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361]Timelord2067[/url] 11 0.26
[glow=#fff,0,0] 28. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=51173]mprep[/url] 11 0.26 [/glow]
29. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=543626]jackg[/url] 11 0.26
[glow=#fff,0,0] 30. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=186696]brituspol[/url] 11 0.26 [/glow]
31. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=367868]expert4knowledge[/url] 11 0.26
[glow=#fff,0,0] 32. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=727696]LuanX3[/url] 10 0.23 [/glow]
33. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=541898]Arcteryx[/url] 10 0.23
[glow=#fff,0,0] 34. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747]Vod[/url] 10 0.23 [/glow]
35. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=999105]ElPedras[/url] 10 0.23
[glow=#fff,0,0] 36. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=823387]BetAdviser[/url] 10 0.23 [/glow]
37. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855]JollyGood[/url] 10 0.23
[glow=#fff,0,0] 38. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=337097]iluvbitcoins[/url] 10 0.23 [/glow]
39. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358450]letyouearn[/url] 10 0.23
[glow=#fff,0,0] 40. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109365]FJNuñez[/url] 10 0.23 [/glow]
41. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=917361]DuckDice.io[/url] 9 0.21
[glow=#fff,0,0] 42. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553970]grim007[/url] 9 0.21 [/glow]
43. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=688810]Tyrantt[/url] 9 0.21
[glow=#fff,0,0] 44. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=565024]BetKing.io[/url] 9 0.21 [/glow]
45. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149737]BADecker[/url] 9 0.21
[glow=#fff,0,0] 46. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15728]TECSHARE[/url] 9 0.21 [/glow]
47. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154485]DoctorG[/url] 9 0.21
[glow=#fff,0,0] 48. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2536607]gwsukabokepjepang[/url] 9 0.21 [/glow]
49. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=893674]btckings1[/url] 9 0.21
[glow=#fff,0,0] 50. [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377]Hhampuz[/url] 9 0.21 [/glow]
[/tt] Apparently this works, somehow. |
|
|
|
I gave Lauda a merit because it made me laugh out loud when I read the trust comment that she gave you Nobody has yet merited Lauda, or at least mentioned here (until this reply message is published) they were made laugh out loud by Lauda's comment. Honestly, I just got little smile at his comment. Means, it has happened something special for you... 1) Humor is subjective. 2) The value of merit is subjective. 3) Correlation is not causation, especially if the correlation has no substance. 4) The "Nobody else" argument is a twist of argumentum ad populum |
|
|
|
The list is growing quickly and its always the same people who cause the trouble.
Keep going i bet the trustfeedback is going soon to be removed. If it's the same people that are creating false feedback then don't you think the better solution is to remove them from the trust system rather than abolish it outright? Perhaps, for you, the critical point is to start learning about the system that you are against. Then you won't make inane remarks thereof.
We see already the first effects negative trust members being accepted in signature campaigns (not just yobit)
Campaign managers complaining of abuse of other DT campaign managers and so on. Source? |
|
|
|
|
Assuming: most quoted user?
Shit, I don't even know... Thule?
|
|
|
|
|
GET PAID GET LAID BRO, CONGRATZ ON THE NEW LIT COINZ
|
|
|
|
You did look at my profile but you didn’t check it all.
iv’e been out of here for quite a while now.
and who are you? another one of us bounty hunters or signature campaign posters.
lol don’t lecture me. Anyway... The campaign is full, as per the title. The only exception is this: Note: If the campaign is full, but you are a very trusted member of the community, feel free to apply. I recommend PMing me to get a faster response. |
|
|
|
|
Can't believe you would give away the first physical crypto coin, this is a hodler's dream.
🔥GET🔥PAID🔥GET🔥LAID🔥
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
