Some people obviously look at the forum from a different perspective, so although I agree with you that this is a forum where people discuss and exchange their opinions, the other side of the story (financially motivated) still has a much greater meaning for many members. Given that we know where the OP is from and that his life is certainly not easy, I understand that the forum may mean a lot more to him than to someone else.

---

There is something called thread spamming, and I completely agree that it can be quite irritating for those who are active on the forum and see what is happening. Such people can not only be ignored, but also their posts/threads can be reported (the OP has 8 deleted posts so far), not to mention that some merits can be received just by accident if they do not change something in their behavior.

The OP asked, we gave our opinions and we just have to see if he will accept at least some advice and suggestions.

The Premier League is one of the most popular football leagues in the world and without any doubt everything they promote has a wide audience and a great influence. Obviously, someone from the institutions dealing with the problem of gambling addiction presented the data on the basis of which such a decision was made, but one should not think that the clubs will just give up that money - because gambling advertising will continue to be on their sleeves. Less visible, but still visible.


The source is the link from OP.

I know that your comment is not intended for me - but you have not proven anything new with this topic, because WB has been saying the same things for ten years. In my opinion, the bigger problem is that you emphasize news like this as important, but in fact there is nothing new or important for Bitcoin.


The so-called journalists always provoke WB with questions like this because they want click-bait headlines, and it's obvious that they succeed every time. You're shaking your head for no reason, his opinion has no bearing on the direction Bitcoin is going. I would like to conclude the story with an old saying: "when you have such "good friends", you don't need enemies".

It would be best if the service were available globally, but the EU is still a huge market with just under 500 million people and one of the richest areas in the world. In the future, there is always the possibility that the service will expand outside the EU. As for Russia, it is not only a matter of a personal decisions, but also the fact that most of their banks are on the blacklist, and anyone who would try to avoid these sanctions by offering this kind of service would only create additional problems for himself.


@blue Snow gave the correct link, and via a smartphone, the result for the keyword "peach" puts the app somewhere between 4 and 6 places on the list of results, and although it was not the case yesterday, today when I search for "peach bitcoin" I get a direct link to the app.

As for Google Play, I found the app, so I don't know why some users have problems finding it. Of course, the option is to install directly via APK, but such an installation requires the user to allow installations from unknown sources - it is much simpler (mostly and safer) to install the app directly from Google Play Store.

---

@Peach Bitcoin, my suggestion when it comes to payment options -> Aircash.

It's a little unbelievable that I started using this faucet in 2014, and that it still exists today


I am not a premium user, so I only have one free spin on WOF every 24 hours, which must be used within 48 hours. I have to admit that sometimes I miss that time frame, and I would certainly suggest that the deadline be a little more than 48 hours.

Why such hopes at all, do you need the positive opinion of a man whose whole life revolves around making a profit and who helped build a system in which the rich get richer and the poor remain without what little they have? Admiring a man just because he is rich is something that for me is total stupidity...

---

Time is not a factor at all, because if WB were to be alive in 100 years, I believe he would think the same about Bitcoin as he does today. The problem is not how long Bitcoin has existed, but that "they" don't want some new "money" to replace the instrument that keeps people on a tight leash.

Maybe every casino should be more precise in their statements, especially those that can be interpreted in different ways. The OP is definitely right when he says that he was guided by what he read, but unfortunately things are never that simple, because the real truth is always hidden in the TOS and is written in small letters.

I don't think there is a single online casino that is completely KYC-free unless it is something illegal, which is of course a completely different story.

I tried my luck today and even though I didn't get a golden ticket, I still won a slightly bigger prize than usual. In any case, good luck to everyone waiting for the big draw, and may the Lambo end up in the right hands.

I have nothing against the OP even though we disagree on some things, but why even mention a man who has been saying the same thing for 10 years - especially if we know his position on Bitcoin? I'm sure his opinion won't change, and frankly it shouldn't matter to anyone who understands Bitcoin.

---

But that's not exactly news we'll see in the media, because the Oracle of Omaha is always portrayed as someone who only profits and never loses. On the other hand, let's just remember what the media wrote about Saylor and his company when the price of BTC was collapsing towards $15k.

I concluded that Bitcoin is always a problem for Buffett and others like him, not because he considers it "war poison" or "mirage", but because he knows very well that the money that usually ended up in his pockets now ends up somewhere else. It would have been much more correct for him to have been neutral on this issue, but he knows very well how much influence his words have and tries to use that to his advantage.

Some members of the forum obviously have a great need to "feed" on what so-called "influential people" say, and the OP is just one of them. JPM's chatterbox has already proven himself countless times as someone who says one thing today and makes a complete U-turn tomorrow, so even though he may be right about the banks and the crisis, he hasn't said anything that isn't already known.

Save yourself time and nerves and listen to the advice from this post :


The man has a long-standing reputation and I think that the maximum compensation in the case of a successful job is 20%. It is obvious that you do not understand what others are writing to you, and that you need a professional to do the work for you.

Even when I was an active player at sports betting sites, I remember that suspicious matches used to be blocked practically everywhere if it was determined that there was suspicious activity (extremely high bets on high odds). I think there was even an agency or something similar that monitored such things and all bookmakers would then exclude such events from their offer.

People should read the small print in TOS, then maybe they would be a little less surprised by some things.

This is nothing to be surprised about, because every company that deals in sports betting has to "protect" itself from those that it estimates have a high percentage of winnings in certain sports/leagues. Maybe it doesn't seem fair to the player, but it's something that has always happened, albeit to a much lesser extent.

If we look at the offer of today's bookies, we can see that they really offer betting on such low football leagues where there are a lot of fixed results. Football is first and foremost a big business, and only then is it sport and entertainment. For those who think differently, I suggest watching the FIFA Uncovered documentary series.

I congratulate you on your first 10 years on the forum, and I wish you to celebrate a new anniversary one day, of course 20 years would be very nice

I'm a little younger than you when it comes to registration, but soon it will be 8 years since I registered, and even more than 9 years when I first found this forum. Given that it happens that some old members leave the forum for various personal reasons, it is good to see that we have members who have been active for such a long time and are still actively participating in the work of the forum.

I don't want to speak in general, but with regard to AI chat-bots, it seems to me that lately we have more and more bot-members and that in 10 years (if the forum exists), there won't be too much human interaction on the forum.

And then they say that such things have nothing to do with how people experience you on the forum - obviously each member is worth as much as he earns per week in the sig campaign


No problem, I'll send you a PM so you can see for yourself how it looks.

For all of them, profit comes first, regardless of the fact that they know very well that they are promoting anything and everything through their services, without almost any verification of what it is about. They have made sure that the laws protect them very well, i.e. that they are not responsible for the content that is displayed on their services through the advertisements that they provide. Even if they end up in a situation where they have to pay a fine, no matter how big those fines seem to us, for them it's just a small part of the profit.

---

Exactly, because as far as cryptocurrency users are concerned, I generally think that no company is responsible for as much data leakage as Ledger. I don't mean only e-mails, but complete data including e-mail, phone number, full name and address. I wonder how it is possible that they are still at the top after everything, but it is obvious that most of those whose data was leaked were not too worried about it.

Unbelievable that I mentioned this option in the second post of this topic, and then someone wonders if this option exists at all or discovers it again after 20+ posts

Do you all have me on ignore or does nobody read anything except the OP and the title anymore?

I am not a premium user and I only have one spin per day, but it seems that the golden ticket is something that has a very low probability of winning, just like any other prize that is a little more valuable. Since it's all just a game, I find that I just (like many others) have no luck getting the pointer to stop where I want it to. However, considering that I have been a user of this faucet practically since the very beginning, I remember the good winnings on the faucet over the years that I have not yet spent, so I even get some interest on the amount that I keep in the account.

When I became more seriously interested in Bitcoin about some ten years ago, I thought that things like this (hacking) did not have much of a chance of happening in countries like Japan or South Korea, because they are countries at a high technological level and with highly educated people who know their job. However, it turned out that these countries have become something that is mostly written about in a bad context, from Mt.Gox to Kwon, not to mention how many times the South Korean CEX Bithumb was hacked (at least 3 times as far as I know).

I really don't know what these people are doing there, but either they are absolutely incompetent or they are the biggest experts in internal theft, which they then present as hacking. Fortunately, news like this has almost no influence on the rest of the world, and as for the South Koreans, if they want to continue doing things the wrong way, just let them continue until finally some "smart" politician says enough and introduces a ban on crypto trading.