+130k monocle coins
Can you please contact developer for further integration in VTC?
VTC doesn't even really have any devs to speak of. If you want to integrate it, you need to release a fork of MON with lyra2rev2 algo or whatever and keep auxpow, then get it on cryptopia or something. |
|
|
|
Can i convert my monocle to VTC?
Or what can i do with my monocle coins?
send them to /dev/null  |
|
|
|
|
Tried Wolf's new cgminer, seemed to build OK, but got segfault on launch. Using a version of Debian/pimp, I think 32 bit.
|
|
|
|
Why can't I send any coins? I've tried 4 times, every time I get this error.
2016-Mar-25 12:22:48.643902 Error: transaction <f46693c336ba66659404c750724d18278dc778f429bebb22995aae8d6e775bf3> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed
Using latest 64bit Windows wallet.
Try to use the "transfer_new" command, which uses a different algorithm to construct the transaction, and also try to send in smaller amounts. |
|
|
|
Need a Gui wallet  Is the Light wallet safe, because i donīt trust MyMonero? Thx I have had no problems with LightWallet2 make sure to save your 25 word seed when you setup. Light wallet is running, but i canīt find the payment id to receive any xmr? Where can i find the id? Thx Nice to hear, BitcoinNewsMagazine. pippo, you don't need a payment ID to receive funds, you usually only use one of you're sending coins to an exchange or payment processor. |
|
|
|
Hello all,
I have tried sending DSH to both exchanges and nothing is showing up. The wallet shows the money successfully sent. Where could the problem be? It has been about one hour. Is there a lag time at the exchanges or am I doing something wrong? I only sent small amounts as a test.
Everything looks good in my simplewallet including the balance with the spent coins that haven't shown up in the exchanges.
Did you remember to include payment ID? |
|
|
|
i see no issue with reducing block time...
Bitcoin is having a civil war over whether or not to go to 2 MB per 10 min. With a 1 MB block limit and 15 s target time, you would effectively have 40 MB per 10 min. Greg Maxwell would probably shit a brick if someone proposed that for BTC. I guess 20 MB per 10 min (current situation with 30 s block target), or 40 MB per 10 min doesn't make a big difference in the end probably, but there could be an issue at some point if lots of txs started flying (or miners created a bunch of txs to stuff their own blocks for whatever reason), probably in either case. |
|
|
|
right now, in our specs, its 30 seconds, 12,500 xvg per block. of course, difficulty affects this greatly. which is why no coin has exact timing specs actually occuring. i could see keeping the reward schedule identical, but changing the 30 seconds to 10 seconds, however 12,500 isnt divisible by 3. you'd get 4166.666666666667 which just doesnt work. however, 15 seconds, with 6,250 does work. ill add that to the poll, reset, and see how it fairs.
Cool, you understand exactly what I'm getting at. You might consider 12'500 coins is divisible by 5, and so is 30 sec.  6 sec block time 2,500 reward is clean, but so is 15 sec and 6,250 reward. Just post one though or votes would get split. A 15 second block time would probably be OK at this point, however, imagine that suddenly there was suddenly a lot of interest in the coin, and blocks started filling up to be 100 or 200 kB - I think with a 15 s block time you would probably start inducing a shit ton of orphans due to the non-zero propagation time of non-zero sized blocks. Not that this is an immediate issue, but even with 30 s target time you would probably get lots of orphans if the blocks were getting filled at all. My vote is to leave target time at 30 s. |
|
|
|
...
All things being equal, which they're not, aeon's hashrate is about 1/100 of monero's: typically 300 kh/s divided by two because of algo versus 15 MH/s , give or take. So, with a network security that is 1% of Monero, why expect a price/marketcap far off from that?
Both can price and hash rate can fluctuate both up and down. I don't see a good reason to assume either will remain the same. I'm not saying they both won't change, or even that one is a leading indicator of the other, just that with the current state of affairs the price ratio seems reasonable. Just from casual observation the hashrate of both has been pretty consistent for at least the last few months, and though the price has jumped by 2-3x on both, there hasn't been order of magnitude changes in either for quite some time. |
|
|
|
When does everyone think we'll hit 0.0002?
I'm thinking fairly soon.
Lol, wut? That's 5x the current price.  Mark my words, 640kb of memory is enough for anybody and Aeon will never be worth more than 10 USD cents each. What the hell are you talking about? 10 cents is 10 times the current price now... and that's only 0.0004. If you think that's high... well frankly I'm disappointed Aeon's most vocal investor has such low expections. If Aeon was just 10% of Monero's marketcap which is pretty low anyway, then assuming Monero were to hit a new all time high... well that's 0.001 right there for Aeon. And that's pretty darn low. All things being equal, which they're not, aeon's hashrate is about 1/100 of monero's: typically 300 kh/s divided by two because of algo versus 15 MH/s , give or take. So, with a network security that is 1% of Monero, why expect a price/marketcap far off from that? |
|
|
|
Counterparty... Myriadtoken...
Sorry, I don't understand you. Counterparty is neat, but what use would MyriadToken have exactly? The whole point of Myriad is its blockchain security, which MyriadToken wouldn't have. Myriad could, however, make a fork of Counterparty to sit on its blockchain  Myriadtoken would be a Counterparty asset to (crowd)fund a project but using MYR's (sent to a burnaddress like MYRXXXXXX) to receive a Myriadtoken in your Counterwallet address. The funding can be a combination of btc (let's face it, the developers of this project have to be paid) and sending MYR's to a burnt address. The keyword here is the "project". There are many tokens issued on Counterparty that have no useful purpose. Storjcoin and Bitcrystals are obviously successful as the projects were very good and the market understood that. Unfortunately; to address your statement, yes Myriadtoken would not have anymore connection to Myriadcoin after this (crowd)funding period has ended. Now, if the project Myriadtoken was to somehow be used as the fuel of the SMS Myriadcoin wallet/payment/system that never got completed due to a requirement for a centralized server (I read this somewhere), then there would be a seemingly continuous link between Myriadtoken and the Myriadcoin. Unfortunately, just thinking it through, I already see a problem as the Myriadtoken would travel at a much slower pace (due to the bitcoin blockchain vs myriadcoin blockchain speed). Anyway, whatever project that Myriadtoken may serve; the only link to Myriadcoin would be during the conversion and the effect of decreased Myriadcoin in circulation. After that; they are separate and different entities... Make a fork of Counterparty to run on the Myriadcoin blockchain I think is very difficult. I'm no developer so I can't say for sure but I follow the github of Counterparty and there's lots of activities and commits almost everyday...please There's also the possibility of launching a counterparty clone using myr a la dogeparty. Then people would burn myr to get the initial distribution, and could launch as many myr tokens as they pleased. I think one of the previous devs was working on a "countermyr" project, but never got off the ground. |
|
|
|
GRS Pump, finally....
Must have been all those guys waiting to run a full node on their blackberries |
|
|
|
Hi again! I wanted to ask if its profitable to just mine with gpu(I have an r9 280x) or mine decred for example and then trade it for monero...Thanks! Pretty sure it's more profitable to mine decred and trade, which is what I've been mostly doing, although over last few days decred is down and XMR is up, still think you're better off mining decred atm tho. |
|
|
|
|
I voted for scrypt, x11, prime, neoscrypt, groestl. Mostly because I'm a big fan of Myriadcoin and with this option people (me) could mine scrypt and merge mine myriad, and also give some exposure to myr-groestl algo (or groestl-groestl, I also like groestlcoin).
I don't think there's much difference between x11 and other x-algos. I believe they all use same algos just different order and rounds of hashing. Prime I just know that it looks for prime numbers, and I think the only GPU miner is a closed source claymore one that forces you to "donate" to him. Neoscrypt seems like a pretty good option for GPU.
Honestly, it's a tough decision, but I think as long as you stick with relatively popular algos (that have well developed and ideally open source miners) then you can't go too far astray.
|
|
|
|
...
It looks like a few popular algos will be left out no matter what we pick.
So lets be pliant and willing to change it up if our first multi-algo recipe doesn't taste as good as it should.
I haven't voted yet. I'm going to do more due diligence and read more comments from you guys before i vote again.
Every change of algo(s) would require a hard fork, unless some major re-engineering of the multi algo codebase was implemented. Imo, that's not something you want to be pushing miners and exchanges and users into doing: hard forking on a regular basis. |
|
|
|
|
Sounds more like they want to bite than lick...which is OK I guess, if you're into that sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
Any release date for the gui wallet?
Can i trust mymonero online wallet??
Thx
No official date afaik, but I'd guess maybe August. I wouldn't keep more than 100 or so XMR on web wallet. There was a Reddit thread where one guy supposedly lost 32k XMR on mymonero  |
|
|
|
|
Your coins are safe using a remote node. Take it for what it's worth from a random internet person.
|
|
|
|
I think 18080 is for p2p, whereas 18081 is for RPC. Also, you will need to make sure that 18081 is open on your server. Thanks GingerAle, learning every day. Opened port 18081 on the node as well, please give it a try parker928. Windows: simplewallet.exe --daemon-host 185.112.158.127:18081 Linux: ./simplewallet --daemon-host 185.112.158.127:18081 I type that in the command line? without having simple wallet open and the daemon open? or does the daemon already have to be running Type in the command line with neither simplewallet or bitmonerod running. That command will open simplewallet and tell it to use a remote daemon, so you don't need to run bitmonerod on your comp at all. (This does degrade your privacy a bit.) |
|
|
|
What the hell, .004 BTC/Lisk? Do people actually think Lisk is worth around $1.6-1.7? That's laughable
I have a better question: wtf is Lisk??? And yeah I agree this totally sounds contrived. It's a fork of Crypti, afaik it basically is Crypti, but the devs ran out of btc so they came up with the great idea to fork their own project, rename it, and run a second ICO. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
