I don't understand this coin anymore.
It'd be nice if we could get an explanation of how to see who the delegates are and how to check the list of all registered delegates...
|
|
|
TY oblox but what part of drooling masses don't you understand? Has anybody actually built the windows version? I am looking forward to running a node again. I built the windows db version and got it synced a few months ago, seemed to work without a hitch for me.
|
|
|
Received both transactions from poloniex How can we see who the delegates are, and who are the delegates to vote for?
|
|
|
Got this reply from poloniex: Hi jw,
Hm, okay -- the transactions are now failing with a bizarre error I've never seen in a CryptoNote. I've contacted the dev about it, I'll keep you updated. ¯\(°_°)/¯
|
|
|
Same, withdrew 200 yesterday, didn't show up.
Tx is not in my blockchain:
transaction wasn't found: <c3f6e681a6a7c82063287c054ac7721cc880c35e5da729ec08fca1b98ea25ed8>
Have you gotten the withdrawal yet? I got an email from Poloniex that they have dealt with this transaction and the other one whose ID was posted here. If anyone else has missing withdrawals then open a support ticket at poloniex.freshdesk.com . Still haven't received either of my withdrawals from poloniex...
|
|
|
Funny you mention that, Litecoin does not have the same blockchain size problem as bitcoin does.
I'm not anti-LTC or thinking it's going to die, but this isn't really telling the whole truth. If litecoin had been around as long as bitcoin, and had the same number of transactions, then it would have an even larger blockchain, because it would have 4x as many blocks with the same number of total transactions. It also doesn't address the block size limit that has recently become an issue for bitcoin, because even though the blocks come four times as fast, I believe the block size limit is twice as small, so in theory litecoin can only accept 2x as many transactions per second/minute/day/etc. If litecoin were to go ahead and before bitcoin and implement some kind of dynamic block size limit (a la cryptonotes/monero), then that would be a feature that would actually distinguish LTC from BTC, but at the moment I don't think smaller blockchain size because of shorter lifetime and less transactions is really a distinguishing feature worth pointing out.
|
|
|
Vote for me - delegate #33!
Also, how can we actually check which delegates are selected once first round of voting occurs? I don't see a command in the wallet.
(p.s. still haven't received coins from polo.)
|
|
|
The character I'm reminded of whenever dNote uses the pronoun 'we':
|
|
|
I'm still unable to withdrawal coins from poloniex. I tried twice and submitted a ticket both times within last couple days, and they told me today that they're wallet is all updated and I should have received both withdrawals, but neither showing up in wallet. Something seems awry with network, and now I can't register as delegate :'[
|
|
|
Voted for 18.4M max too. Less is more :-)
Then why not 1.84M, or 184k, or even 0.184 coins - there will never even be a whole coin! Seriously though, I guess if there's going to be a change, I'd vote for 18.4M, just to put it close to other coins that people are familiar with like BTC, XMR, DRK/DSH, etc. I'd kind of prefer to keep it where it is though, there's something nice about betting 100000 DSH on a single hand of blackjack in IRC that I find appealing, definitely not going to do that anymore if price is close to 500 sat
|
|
|
To be honest the Botnet thing is one of Monero's dirtiest secrets. It's a shame there is no way to avoid it yet. It is a stain on the whole project IMHO. But there are worse things.
I honestly don't think it's that bad. If/when Monero becomes more popular and easy background mining is implemented in the core wallet/daemon, then it will be much less of an issue, but even at the current levels of popularity and usage I don't think it's such a big deal. Would you rather have shady botnet operators collecting 10-80% of coinbases, or would you rather have shady operators like KnC, Butterfly Labs, Gaw Miners, etc. collecting a significant fraction of coins? It's a tradeoff, for sure, but one that I don't think is necessarily a negative compared to ASiC-only coins, leaving aside GPU-only coins.
|
|
|
Just downloaded latest binary and withdrew 1000 XPB from Poloniex to wallet address, and they're not showing up in my wallet. Poloniex says transaction is complete, with tx id 0ca0b0255f8d9026121d470bc68b5cc2337a1d7998d76e4dec79f192bd31a7d4 but I have zero balance in wallet using pebblecoind and simplewallet, both fully synced :/
Any suggestions on what to do? No block explorer?
|
|
|
The United States is found on the principle that the people have a duty to not allow tyranny. Clearly the current living conditions (in the United States) are far more tyrannical than the ones that forced the independence in 1776, and are listed in the Declaration. If I was American, I would be among the true patriots, following not only the spirit, but also the letter of the Declaration of Independence in not allowing tyranny in my life, and a good place to start is where it is most apparent, in the realm of money.
This is hyperbolic rhetoric, in my opinion, especially with the parenthetical qualification "(in the United States)". In 1776 the people living in the soon-to-be states were paying fealty to a king thousands of miles away, having to let his soldiers stay in their homes, living with no representation, slavery, indentured servitude, and oppression of women, natives, and imported slave labor, etc. Maybe if you left off the qualification you could argue that the USA is now oppressing/tyrannizing people in other countries, but I'd still call that quite a stretch. So you are saying the USA is not tyrannical? Pretty much, yes, especially within the context of people living within the United States. I know that's not a popular opinion among the uber-libertarians and crypto-anarchists that tend to be attracted to cryptocurrency, but it's just my opinion. Considering the list of world-powers/super-powers over the last few hundred years, the USA is probably the least tyrannical (maybe if you call the amalgam of countries that make-up the EU a super-power they would be a bit less "tyrannical").
|
|
|
The United States is found on the principle that the people have a duty to not allow tyranny. Clearly the current living conditions (in the United States) are far more tyrannical than the ones that forced the independence in 1776, and are listed in the Declaration. If I was American, I would be among the true patriots, following not only the spirit, but also the letter of the Declaration of Independence in not allowing tyranny in my life, and a good place to start is where it is most apparent, in the realm of money.
This is hyperbolic rhetoric, in my opinion, especially with the parenthetical qualification "(in the United States)". In 1776 the people living in the soon-to-be states were paying fealty to a king thousands of miles away, having to let his soldiers stay in their homes, living with no representation, slavery, indentured servitude, and oppression of women, natives, and imported slave labor, etc. Maybe if you left off the qualification you could argue that the USA is now oppressing/tyrannizing people in other countries, but I'd still call that quite a stretch.
|
|
|
great to see that our devs were last time active James: February and Adam: December...
last update on blog was in March. and price is falling more and more.
look at NOBL if you want to know what missing updates can do to a coin ^^
Price actually seems quite stable around 4k sat. Stability without elasticity...imagine that.
|
|
|
I just open my Dashcoin wallet with dashcoinwalletgui-1.1.1-windows. And then I clik "Create wallet", and it's showing a text "Please wait for the sync to complete". I waiting for long but nothing happen, I don't understand what's goin' on.
It takes a long time to sync the blockchain, maybe up to 1 or 2 days depending on your network speed, cpu, and network speed of your peers.
|
|
|
What are the purpose & benefits of automated source?
I think the primary (only?) benefit is that you get bytecoin, with automated updates, without the 83% premine.
|
|
|
Whats the word? My chain and the explorer says no blocks are being found... yes i did a reindex :-(
block 1107666 my wallet and explorers, no problem except wallet relaunch, it looked stuck You can also now check network info (blockheight and network diffs/hashrates) on freenode IRC in ##myriadcoin using the !network command. Sample input and output: <jwinterm> !network <myrbot> The current block height is: 1108293 <myrbot> The current diff / hashrates are: <myrbot> Sha256: 546166.485 / 15.770 Th/s <myrbot> Scrypt: 14.656 / 0.423 Gh/s <myrbot> Groestl: 62.955 / 1.818 Gh/s <myrbot> Skein: 150.698 / 4.351 Gh/s <myrbot> Qubit: 13.077 / 0.378 Gh/s
|
|
|
It is still listed on poloniex.com, so I guess the network is still going...
|
|
|
The mining for this coin has actually been very heavy. There were periods where the hash rate got up to 60 H/sec. Right now the pool says it is 48.72 H/s so let’s use that. The 16 GB server I mine on gets 0.03 H/s. It may be more on the low end so let’s say an average computer could get 0.06 H/s. To get 48.72 H/s there’d have to be 812 average computers mining the coin. There are probably some people that have above average computers, and some miners that are putting a lot of power, but it shows there’s definitely a lot of interest in this coin, in terms of number of people.
I've heard there is a private miner, so I'd take these numbers with a large rock salt crystal. From the start I promised to innovate with this coin, and I’ve already provided the only decent GUI wallet on a cryptonote coin...
Lol you can't even include a payment id with the GUI, how is it the "only decent GUI wallet on a cryptonote coin"?
|
|
|
|