Bidding starts at $2,000 USD/4.44 BTC.

Free shipping to the Lower 48 States (US) if the final bid exceeds $3,000 USD.

Free deliver within ~200 miles of Sandwich, IL, regardless of the final bid.

Action will close if I'm offered over $3,500 USD for it via this thread or PM.

No escrow, for everybody knows who I am and where I live, having even posted my IL DL on this forum sans masking off its ID #, of which I will gladly supply again.

Auction ends in 48 Hours.

~Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL  60548

815-508-1668

Two blondes walk into a livery stable.
The next day, "Wilburrr, you ain't goin' believe what happened with me last night."

AMT doesn't mine with its or anybody else's miners. Everybody will get their miners that they ordered and what nut this week, of which all will ROI or they will honor their MPP.

http://www.timeslive.co.za/opinion/2014/04/04/it-s-true-today-is-tell-a-lie-day

I have a 7cm penis and have never masturbated in my life.

...Of which, is not a bad thing.

What if one were able to pick any completed game, picking some move round as either black or white, then resume play, either playing sans a bot or bot-vs-bot.

Or, what if a player picks some completed game that was lost, resuming play at some point where the score was relatively close (within some %, that is), and turns it into a win, thus enabling the player to earn 2 Ccc for h/his efforts.

If it still results in a lost, some future player can pick it up at the exact same point to see if s/he can turn it into a win to now earn 4 Ccc. Of course, each iteration would definitely take more time between moves.

Again, just thinking out loud, for I love this project.

~Bruno Kucinskas

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bitcoin-dark-wallet

Something doesn't add up. Even though they hoped to raise $50K USD, they did reach that goal, and then some by amassing $52,075 USD. But, once you subtract the PERKS that have to be doled out, depending on what funding level one contributed at, a big chuck of that $52K+ USD was no longer available to Team Dark Wallet.

Also, their donation address - https://blockchain.info/address/32wRDBezxnazSBxMrMqLWqD1ajwEqnDnMc - currently has 7.08661531 unspent BTC, equating to $3,175.51 at today's exchange rate.

This post is not meant as a diss, for I have no qualms with any of those involved in this noble project, but presented such for full disclosure purposes only.

God speed, all.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Like I said, let 'em cheat, but, in essence, there is no cheating because Ccc controls the clock. At the end of the game, a player is either rewarded with 0 Ccc due to a lose, 0.5 Ccc for a stalemate, or 1 Ccc for a win.

A player possessing a great chess program may be able to amass more wins, but due to how long it takes Ccc to make its next move, Ccc controls the payout schedule. After X blocks/games, the difficulty, read clock setting, is adjusted determined by how many players, how many wins, and/or other parameters.

For shits and giggles, a tally is kept on the main site to show how games were played to day, how many are in progress, along with total loses, wins, and stalemates (possibly, further broken down by countries).

Of course, at first the games are relatively easy to win, along with being played relatively quickly. But, as more and more blocks of wins occur, the games get more difficult to win, coupled with Ccc taking more time to make its next move.

Shortly, down the road, few will be physically playing the game, though that's always an option, dependent on moves taking ~1 minute or ~5+ minutes. Later, as the difficulty increases, 10/20/etc. minutes between moves become problematic, thus would already be in the bot-vs-bot stage.

Proof of Work, is a given with Ccc. Thus, no issues there.

No pre-mining/playing, with the exception of showing proof-of-concept prior to the official beta release.

I'm just thinking out loud, hoping to see Ccc come to fruition.

~Bruno Kucinskas

"And, anybody trying to pass holding an umbrella and a Frappuccino , shoot to kill.?

And, every morning we can greet one another with "Satoshimon" and in the evening "Nakamotomon". The only mode of transport would be...wait for it...train. All communications between fellow bitcoiners would be via the community forum.

<continuing from where I left off yesterday when blockchain.info had a hiccup>

---

Revisiting this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy we learn from http://thebitcoinnews.co.uk/2013/04/13/bitcoin-central-and-instawallet-hacked/


But, of that 41,854.5915 BTC, 14,319.9 BTC of it stemmed from InstaWallet's Cold Storage, whereupon it was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1JwXxGessiou1WaUaWXuttzkqnXFEbc4ZB on April 8, 2013.

On May 10, 2013, the above wallet was moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1FvMVtzxACJejfZvqtiSsTrUCpR2HYveB6 consisting of 14,329.9 BTC.

On July 19, 2013, the first batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 11,509.82549641 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1HAo32apFqzKcSBkXVHR5vLnnFuuFoxzFU

On July 26, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 7,323.12048901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19vZF13np1n33xBBxw6v2vbnC37P1UXpGN, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AGbFkrQPuRHLSU3FNLpdkBvcXBuyZjJWn on the same day.

On August 1, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 6,459.55705531 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/13j3Hqq2H5F8dP1UbXWKFP9h6JohjdNim5, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1BNZxywLJNkBAivqRZfvVGSnLf6JdcefXr on the same day.

On August 9, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 5,283.01032861 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1PSuJQjccfDGjopXYUQnof7b3KeeN8wZLy, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DSQSZujNWvjHTTzuwjDgaHjMNKojSg3Nbon the same day.

On August 20, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,970.80156601 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/17Mhe6FKxGQto3a3BgY7ugtLcaMNQwTLUD, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DFX3PwMuiuQJTzAT4kJMpokfXoEquJBss on the same day.

On August 31, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,096.70590951 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19fr8eSramPNTdx53CfgBTveEdrkQWPHZc, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1GjZuMW2kpY8jchyNsgeeHusRouPvCdtC4 on the same day.

On September, 21, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 3,421.80247781 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/16bNW7aFNsPCuZ4G4aDzQxbAoJKASFebDJ, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1JFnEKDNPCvGTzX4CPec9WzA5mieUsxiVc on the same day.

On October 7, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,686.95105901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19qB4iJAs4BYwYfXzWrWmTiSAnwsHCufDV, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr on the same day.

<https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr ~ Note to self: Explore this wallet a little bit more, for there's added transactions involved.>

On November 11, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,477.44025106 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof, then moved to one main wallet and a currently unspent wallet as seen in the following tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/83611cbdc7b461d8e355342075d32bff9978e42f3eaacaa6b97555d498920e9d


Thus, 2,228.6694267 BTC was transferred from https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof to https://blockchain.info/address/16EoVcokYrSDHu4i26vR2h69Y8VtPLEyyf on the same day.

Still on November 11, 2013, according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/d3b20dcdca7c3ed8709bf03c09138a690ed1ae6a7d6a8c21f1d3b35162545ae3, another 250 BTC was transferred and currently unspent to https://blockchain.info/address/18QQAfHJ5jx6drHapCKY4791LtvwMZEFfy, with the bulk totally 1,978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Ln1VirN3aGUh5xvbS6oRVKkX41G9GJ5ZV (again, on the same day).

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/81798aab88fa2e35ace1b7ef105e185b7dedebeb4f251e853eaf5ca8f2bd35bb, with the bulk totally 1,728.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17McuH2qWo4BU9Sf2QdM23zbLqQbB7H5cC

Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/171891497886b4903ef00ac035c043b3091d68f5e24ff8917903cc5ba0874b37, with the bulk totally 1,478.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/15U1EdLjh5wHPgxaChVyjqH5bQVs96MbYY

LOL, HaHaHa, Fuck Me In The Ass, guess what? (unless you're an idiot, you should know what's coming next) Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/0e56ed15efe125590112727872ec4b6371885acc72faf9561e34db7021907736, with the bulk totally 1,228.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AnzZ889ZndDLfwEiKzKPSou1JzjxJxWy

As if you didn't see this coming, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/20f4cbe736be54f835b55d1cb0c6fce2141a94061df3674ca0a57ec6196ad50d, with the bulk totally 978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17ffqaEXgzAYww5U4PwXBLVDHBu4b5jJM8

Looking forward, I see a pattern here, so I'll abbreviate my paragraphs.

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/19a5bfc6c35986f06b0addec245bf6b45f09a4e9e7baff57f350e045f262d35d, with the bulk totally 728.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Lkdr6JHEmo4xwPnMHVvpWfGAMREVptN7D

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/9ba783d9f9788b107bee4fb3c78c4063b60b8dda0653022ed4505ed2315c0fde, with the bulk totally 478.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1JMeWJKdrFho1mvcZsahcxWyBxRJ9rc1wA

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/12949fe6e6419c400d11c8c7b8c5a7b15bb839cc93a28061540ce372c0de664b, with the remainder totally 228.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/14GNRm8iqwg7em7yqdz4gYPA1MvyvdA41P

Now, this is where is gets very interesting. Remember what I penned above (in pink) about revisiting a certain wallet?

<https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr ~ Note to self: Explore this wallet a little bit more, for there's added transactions involved.>

When I penned the above, I seriously didn't believe that I would be revisiting said address anytime soon, let alone in this thread, but that's exactly what I'm about to do.

Prior to the November 11, 2013, claims payout, the previous claims payout date was October 7, 2013. On October 12, 2013, this tx occurred: https://blockchain.info/tx/578f144c14a9eab939949ba9fbf655bbe52dcc83ee9340d307cd0c8ae43ee37f

Note the 21.3305733 BTC that went into the bitcoin wallet address 1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr. It just so happens to be the exact - to the satoshi - amount needed to be added to the 228.6694267 BTC in bitcoin wallet address https://blockchain.info/address/14GNRm8iqwg7em7yqdz4gYPA1MvyvdA41P to become another perfect 250 BTC, currently unspent and sitting in https://blockchain.info/address/126hEMN9C1s6fXRifvaR41euW7oy3pnLXW

That's a pretty amazing feat considering we're talking about ~30 days in between said two wallets. In case there's a mistake on my part, allow me to check the math: 228.6694267 + 21.3305733 = 250. Yep! No mistake, and I even highlighted it because that's the way Davout likes things of importance shown on this thread.

But, I'm not done yet. This was so interesting to me, albeit probably not to others, that I couldn't but help myself to uncover how, and from where, that 21.3305733 BTC was derived. Boy, was I ever in a shock, as I'm sure the reader of this post will be once it's revealed to them.

https://blockchain.info/tx/578f144c14a9eab939949ba9fbf655bbe52dcc83ee9340d307cd0c8ae43ee37f



In the above pic, note the two addresses:

https://blockchain.info/address/1FQ3zjPAvCNFHAWijc7XhywJMHQxh9N27n
https://blockchain.info/address/1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J

Following back on the second one first, we have...

1FQ3zjPAvCNFHAWijc7XhywJMHQxh9N27n (1.2092733 BTC - Output)
https://blockchain.info/address/1NShJuJmhAEGxrtcfAhYgYKK16isqyzRdA
https://blockchain.info/address/1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J

That's odd: 1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J funded 1FQ3zjPAvCNFHAWijc7XhywJMHQxh9N27n utilizing an added hop. Why would address 1NShJuJmhAEGxrtcfAhYgYKK16isqyzRdA need to be introduced at all? Perhaps, https://blockchain.info/tx/d954cb43d625612cc214b977782d3d1c16d8e90a0fbd63cb80144f5adb2b356c holds a clue.



I see! Some bitcoins needed to be moved to some other wallet, namely...


Sadly, there's no way in hell to figure out who that wallet belongs to, or even if they still have access to it, for it's been since last October when it was funded. As a PSA, if anybody recognizes the wallet address, please inform its owner that there's bitcoins awaiting them. I'm sure they'll love to know.

Now, let's explore bitcon wallet address https://blockchain.info/address/1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J, shall we. Perhaps, there within provides a clue as to where that magic 21.3305733 BTC derived from. We can only hope.

For starters, the wallet was created on 2013-10-01 21:17:52.

The first tx is the following: https://blockchain.info/tx/efc6a4ce37c63f8ba7ddc19ffcb74aafc0dd20594574150f5b55e749eb1acfd8



After doing a little Googling, I discovered that some dude named Jan Vornberger owns bitcoinmonitor.com and bluetile.org.

Question: Why would some dude named Jan Vornberger fund an InstaWallet claims wallet, especially aiding (and abetting(?)) by creating a bitcoin wallet address with exactly 21.3305733 BTC that's going to be needed ~30 days down the road to fund an exact 250 BTC bitcoin wallet? My guess is that we'll never know who owns the 1Paymium... wallet I mentioned above, only Jehovah (Jav for short) is in the know.

Wait, there's more! The wallet where my February 11, 2014, baby claim payout stemmed from https://blockchain.info/tx/f4dae89782552df4c15f1dcd9c82a199ea756579245a38c1c97ec4d4f6993eff was created on...wait for it...August 1, 2013, the day the third claims payout was dispersed.

After https://blockchain.info/address/1NfRQpRSrCztyxeHkwp3YAyA6yJGBCbUE paid out claims, there still remained 51.79075967 BTC in wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1AmTeTpMC777yH1SJENhH4zzArwqg2qi8P, currently unspent.

Thus, at this penning, I've uncovered 2,477.44025106 BTC + 51.79075967 BTC = 2529.23101073 BTC that InstaWallet still has control of and belongs to its non-customers unless, of course, it's mostly theirs and still going through the spin cycle. Heaven forbid I discover more bitcoins deposite via some dude named Jan Vornberger, but phrase Jav that that won't be the case, otherwise I may have to hunt down this Jan dude to see what's what.

~Bruno Kucinskas

As you're well aware, when InstaWallet came back online for those of us to submit claims, the wallet addresses were missing, not having a reason to copy & paste said addresses into some folder prior to the supposed "hack". Besides, the account amounts were moved at least twice prior to the supposed "hack" stemming from about mid-December, 2012. This is what I was trying to get at/resolved starting back in April, 2013, after the supposed "hack", but thanks to the principal's infinite wisdom, they felt it best to put me on ignore, and even go as far as to make fun of my name, of which I'm not ill about, albeit it did bring back memories of when I was picked on as a kid, and it was done so in spit (meant spite, but spit works well here) of...



Apologies for not expressing your respect earlier, not being versed in how the French treat their customer or, in InstaWallet's case, non-customer base.

Thanks to InstaWallet's Fractional Reserve Bank Through & Mixing Service, the current tools available to me makes it difficult to hunt InstaWallet's hot wallet, though an attempt will be made, concentrating instead first on the Cold Wallet(s) and claim payouts doled out to date to show that some claims weren't claims at all, but simply moving your funds out to a safe haven prior to, and after the supposed "hack", for the police and for the two banking institutes backing Bitcoin-Central to read. And, I will make sure that my posts are read by them, willing to go the extra mile to get the media to look into your affairs, for we all know how they love Bitcoin, and would also love nothing more than to do a follow-up for their readership that can't seem to get enough of the Mt Gox fiasco, of which all I'm about to expose goes hand-in-hand. Newsweek comes immediately to mind.

On March 19, 2013, 08:14:56 PM, two minutes, max, prior to sending 0.105 BTC, I PM'ed the following to the recipient of said coins, of which can easily be requested from theymos to prove that the following PM was not altered in any way:


According to the following screenshots from blockchain.info, this is how the transaction is seen to the entire world:

https://blockchain.info/address/13wVc8gyoBSeTGmc7Abz3xtJ5QYRjWenTC



https://blockchain.info/tx/cb32e5147c0510a3423a9b9c57a90fa949a3960422563bf8ade5a621a0939cec

https://blockchain.info/address/1JppeHVdYQEBGR4uHVTqLQsb2FY1wUTziH



I have to admit that's some pretty damn good algorithm you guys devised, enabling the world to see a receiver of bitcoins ~7 minutes prior to them being sent from the original sender, all the while mixing the transaction through a whole slew of wallets, of which I'm still having trouble untangling. You fuckers were good, but sadly it's all going to come to an end, for I've only begun to untangle this web you weaved back in the day.

One or two hops from 1JppeHVdYQEBGR4uHVTqLQsb2FY1wUTziH to 13wVc8gyoBSeTGmc7Abz3xtJ5QYRjWenTC may be excusable, but dozens sans a clue as to how such was accomplished within a ~7 minute time frame is fuckin' nuts. Worst yet, it doesn't even show that the former wallet, mine, had a remaining balance of 0.835 BTC, an issue I, among others, brought to InstaWallet's attention, among other concerns, days prior to the supposed "hack", further cementing my claim that they needed to get out from underneath it while the getting out was good, thus time for Davout to take a vacation to do his magic, if he was the main or sole culprit, of which I firmly believe.

Currently, InstaWallet is still holding a helluva lot more coins than what's owed me, and none of them are suppose to be their's, because according to their own words one, they didn't have any customers, hence didn't supply a billable service, and two, only an idiot would store insane amounts on InstaWallet, including themselves, both statements I've already proven to be false, sans the billing of services part.

Now that blockchain.info is back up and my not-so-insane-amount-of-bitcoins have all been accounted for, I can get back to work, continuing where I left off last night.

Since, I didn't see anywhere in your reply to me a request for my bitcoin wallet address, as promised: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Here's the fun part: If the principals of InstaWallet, Paymium, Bitcoin-Central, et al. have honestly operated on the up-and-up, then they have nothing to fear. BUT, if they were not or still are, then they have everything to fear from Camp Phinnaeus Gage/Bruno Kucinskas, and anybody using any of your current services now better really consider how much longer they're going to be viable, for, like I said, I'm now in the process of making a shitload of noise via shooting shit into a fan using a cannon.

For what it's worth, my word against their word is helluva stronger, and WILL get much stronger as this ordeal is carried forward to the nth degree.

~Bruno Kucinskas

PS: Don't forget that in your next reply to me, please include asking what bitcoin wallet address I desire to have my settlement sent to, otherwise it's Rick Roll'ed city again with my follow-up reply.

PSS: You may have the option of suing my ass for libel and defamation of character, but bear in mind you sorta missed that boat considering I penned dozens, if not hundreds of posts stating in no uncertain terms the sentiment echoed above. But, if you feel so incline to still do such, quite frankly it'll be welcomed, remembering that when you loose, you'll be paying my expenses, will be exposing transactions we both know you don't want exposed, plus get counter-sued, of which I would easily win. Not to mention filling out a false police report, but then again since I'm not French, thus that may not even be a crime in France, albeit leaning toward that it is.

I'll go one step further and state that you and I both know that there's more actors involved here than just the principals and their employees, most all of which don't desire this to continue as you seem to firmly believe you have this under control and can easily win. Far from it! I'm sure you're in discussion with the yet undisclosed distant actors wondering what you should do with me, of which I have a solution: Request a bitcoin wallet address of me.

To be clear, again, this is not a threat or some sort of extortion, for how does one extort their own money? I was adamant prior to the supposed "hack" as well as after the supposed "hack", and said adamancy wasn't based on ~$83 USD at the time, but more like ~$100K+ USD, worth $1,405,944 USD at one time at bitcoins' peek rate of exchange, currently valued at $498,861.08, and I'll even let you keep the 8 cents because...wait for it...I'm a nice guy.

Dude, like I said, if you're going to bring on the funny, at least supply the most appropriate video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpE_xMRiCLE At :38 is classic!

You do realize that satire/sarcasm no longer funny if explained. Bottom line, Josh, in no uncertain terms, stated that there would be no refunds due to lack of funds in AMT's coffer, but there is money to purchase full price for and wait for PSUs oppose to shipping kits sans them along with a reasonable rebate, plus save on shipping cost due to the decrease in weight of each package. Josh is playing several ends against the middle, of which one is The Stall Game, his favorite.

It was tongue-in-cheek, like the rest of the post, of which morphed into satire/sarcasm.

There is a way to circumnavigate around the cheating issue: Let 'em!

If Crypto-chess-coins is going to dole out coins based on some exponential growth system, then along with each game getting harder and harder to play, assuming one is playing against a computer which Ccc controls, Ccc will also control the clock as to how long it'll take before it makes its next move against each and every "miner". Thus, it doesn't matter how long it'll take for a miner to make s/he's move.

The onus will then be on the miners to obtain the best chess program available to garner more wins over time. At some point, when such is more difficult to obtain, more powerful chess programs will need to be created. Imagine, in the future ordering said programs/systems/rigs from Rook Labs or Bishop Studios or Knight Mills or Queens with Clubs.

Who knows! At the end of the day some über-chess program my be devised that wouldn't have been created earlier due to the advent of Crypto-chess-coins.

Now, one's able to envision Solitaire Coin, Backgammon Coin, or even Puzzle Coin, all pegged against a computer opponent with a dual difficulty component incorporated, adjusted depending on the payout schedule.

During the penning of the last paragraph, I envisioned something pertaining to Puzzle Coin, but I see that http://puzzlecoin.com/ is already taken, but from the looks of the site, it could easily be re-branded.

Picture sometime like below that has to be solved via moving the pieces into place, then rewarded once completed. See the beauty of the example? Advertiser's logos (with generated links once solved, then also emailed) are the puzzles.

Obviously, you don't understand AMT. For every order cancelled, two more were made via professional mining outfits operating hosting facilities.

On to the partial refund aspect. There is no way that AMT can refund you $185 for a PSU that'll cost them $200, for they would be saving $15 on each and every person requesting one per miner ordered. Multiply that several fold and AMT would go broke. Now, imagine if they offered a refund on every part sans 10-15% savings each. They would go broke faster yet, for now we're talking several thousands of dollars of savings on AMT's part, not to mention the extra money they'll make due to shipping less weight.

Clearly, anybody attending Penn State for 7 years to get a business degree can see that this is not a viable option, and that waiting for all the parts to arrive after paying full price for them and lose money on shipping, to boot, is the most viable option from AMT's standpoint. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised to learnt that Josh is now in negotiations with some family members to have them, too, mortgage their homes to further fund this genius business model.

My only regret is that I didn't offer up a $100K loan to get AMT through this minor hiccup. I'm going to take the liberty and reach out to Andreas Antonopoulos to see if he'll use his good name to garner some donations to further AMT's brilliant business plan along.

BUY stock tip of the day:

Before I read any further, please, guys, cut Casey some slack. He's an alright guy. Seriously!

~Bruno Kucinskas

If you're goin' to bring on the funny, at least add a pic (or two, or three, or...).



All your hosted toasters can be remotely overclocked (note the clock).
Security is not an issue at our hosting facility (note the cameras).
Anything hashed can immediately be obfuscated (note the not one, but two mixers).

Before some smart-ass inquires about cooling all them toasters...



At TMF (Toaster Mining Facility), we were the first to introduce internal cameras to view the innards of each and every Toaster Miner, making sure 24/7 that maximum hashing is achieved.



Speaking of 24/7, a myriad backup generators stand at ready in case of the proverbial struck by lighting event.



Unlike other hosting firms, TMF does not farm out its support center to some Third World Country, but is Red-manned right here in the US of A.



Of course, TMF is not just a hosting facility for your precious miners. Far from it. We also build custom Toaster Miners, hence recently acquiring the state-of-the art overflow oven off eBay.



The next time you're in town, please stop by TMF, whereupon our well-trained flock would be happy to give you the grand tour.

Almost finished penning a funny in re. time machine related.

Anybody dealing with Goat shouldn't need an escrow. I would trust Goat with my...wait for it...goat.