blockchain.info is back up, but I'm a tad tire to continue where I left off, with the except of leaving this here: https://blockchain.info/tx/578f144c14a9eab939949ba9fbf655bbe52dcc83ee9340d307cd0c8ae43ee37f

This truly is an amazing tx, ain't Davout? Bear in mind, when I get done exploring EVERY transaction of InstaWallet after, and just prior to the suppose "hack", I'll be a 'blockchain' expert.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Revisiting this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy we learn from http://thebitcoinnews.co.uk/2013/04/13/bitcoin-central-and-instawallet-hacked/


But, of that 41,854.5915 BTC, 14,319.9 BTC of it stemmed from InstaWallet's Cold Storage, whereupon it was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1JwXxGessiou1WaUaWXuttzkqnXFEbc4ZB on April 8, 2013.

On May 10, 2013, the above wallet was moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1FvMVtzxACJejfZvqtiSsTrUCpR2HYveB6 consisting of 14,329.9 BTC.

On July 19, 2013, the first batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 11,509.82549641 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1HAo32apFqzKcSBkXVHR5vLnnFuuFoxzFU

On July 26, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 7,323.12048901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19vZF13np1n33xBBxw6v2vbnC37P1UXpGN, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AGbFkrQPuRHLSU3FNLpdkBvcXBuyZjJWn on the same day.

On August 1, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 6,459.55705531 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/13j3Hqq2H5F8dP1UbXWKFP9h6JohjdNim5, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1BNZxywLJNkBAivqRZfvVGSnLf6JdcefXr on the same day.

On August 9, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 5,283.01032861 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1PSuJQjccfDGjopXYUQnof7b3KeeN8wZLy, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DSQSZujNWvjHTTzuwjDgaHjMNKojSg3Nbon the same day.

On August 20, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,970.80156601 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/17Mhe6FKxGQto3a3BgY7ugtLcaMNQwTLUD, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DFX3PwMuiuQJTzAT4kJMpokfXoEquJBss on the same day.

On August 31, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,096.70590951 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19fr8eSramPNTdx53CfgBTveEdrkQWPHZc, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1GjZuMW2kpY8jchyNsgeeHusRouPvCdtC4 on the same day.

On September, 21, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 3,421.80247781 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/16bNW7aFNsPCuZ4G4aDzQxbAoJKASFebDJ, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1JFnEKDNPCvGTzX4CPec9WzA5mieUsxiVc on the same day.

On October 7, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,686.95105901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19qB4iJAs4BYwYfXzWrWmTiSAnwsHCufDV, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr on the same day.

<https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr ~ Note to self: Explore this wallet a little bit more, for there's added transactions involved.>

On November 11, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,477.44025106 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof, then moved to one main wallet and a currently unspent wallet as seen in the following tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/83611cbdc7b461d8e355342075d32bff9978e42f3eaacaa6b97555d498920e9d


Thus, 2,228.6694267 BTC was transferred from https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof to https://blockchain.info/address/16EoVcokYrSDHu4i26vR2h69Y8VtPLEyyf on the same day.

Still on November 11, 2013, according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/d3b20dcdca7c3ed8709bf03c09138a690ed1ae6a7d6a8c21f1d3b35162545ae3, another 250 BTC was transferred and currently unspent to https://blockchain.info/address/18QQAfHJ5jx6drHapCKY4791LtvwMZEFfy, with the bulk totally 1,978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Ln1VirN3aGUh5xvbS6oRVKkX41G9GJ5ZV (again, on the same day).

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/81798aab88fa2e35ace1b7ef105e185b7dedebeb4f251e853eaf5ca8f2bd35bb, with the bulk totally 1,728.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17McuH2qWo4BU9Sf2QdM23zbLqQbB7H5cC

Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/171891497886b4903ef00ac035c043b3091d68f5e24ff8917903cc5ba0874b37, with the bulk totally 1,478.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/15U1EdLjh5wHPgxaChVyjqH5bQVs96MbYY

LOL, HaHaHa, Fuck Me In The Ass, guess what? (unless you're an idiot, you should know what's coming next) Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/0e56ed15efe125590112727872ec4b6371885acc72faf9561e34db7021907736, with the bulk totally 1,228.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AnzZ889ZndDLfwEiKzKPSou1JzjxJxWy

As if you didn't see this coming, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/20f4cbe736be54f835b55d1cb0c6fce2141a94061df3674ca0a57ec6196ad50d, with the bulk totally 978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17ffqaEXgzAYww5U4PwXBLVDHBu4b5jJM8


DAMN!


I was just gettin' warmed up.

I'm not done with this post yet, but suffice to say that somebody at InstaWallet has skimmed off my 1,132 BTC, and then some. But, it's worst than that! I will show some fat-ass wallets moved just prior to the suppose "hack" and also some disguised as claims still unspent. With a few other surprises thrown in for good measures.

I'm 99.99% confident that those controlling InstaWallet, Paymium, and Bitcon-Central don't want certain parties snooping around their playground: http://mineforeman.com/2012/12/07/bitcoin-central-begins-operating-as-a-bank-sort-of/


It's a shame that Davout and Boussac both have me on ignore, especially if I'm not quoted, for it may be days before they see this post and realize what shit I'm about to unleash.

To be clear, I showed grave concern about InstaWallet prior to the suppose "hack", but my concerns were laid to rest by Davout in a thread that laid out that InstaWallet needed to revise their business model, namely in the security department. Then, Davout took a vacation, of which he better have some damn convincing proof as to where he was, hoping that the locale doesn't coincide with where the suppose "hacker" may have been located, for the timing sure does look suspicious.

Ironically, the suppose "hacker" broke into InstaWallet, Paymium, and Bitcoin-Central, all of which were supposedly über-secure. I firmly believe that InstaWallet was purposely "hacked" so that the principals can get out from underneath it, having their personal bitcoins (stemming from where, not sure, but may stumble upon the answer) washed along the way, taking my bitcoins, and perhaps others, as an added prize, somehow clearly their tracks along the way. Remember, servicers were switched after the initial claim process was in place, but people, including myself, were having issues. I'm not verse much in the back end of websites, but I'm pretty sure that info could've been gleaned, then cleansed, prior to the server change. At least that's how I would do it if I knew how and wanted to make a score.

Far-fetched? From what I've only shown above, to date, I, among others, now, think not. Those 250 BTC transfers were not, I repeat, were not part of any claims, but either my 1,132 BTC or part of some money laundering scheme, or a combination of both. I have several more examples to show prior to, and after the suppose "hack", all of which I can't wait till blockchain.info is back up.

Speaking of blockchain.info being currently down: You guys ain't going to believe which online wallet service I've been using since InstaWallet was so kind to watch over my 1,132 BTC since last April (a year ago). Don't worry, it's not an "insane" amount like I and a myriad others kept on IW.

It still gets my goat that InstaWallet claims that they couldn't find my three claims, and even after showing them mega proof of the smaller one several times, they denied it, but finally came around. It's like in their mind if they honored the smallest one, they would have to honor the two larger claims, for they were submitted at exactly the same time.

It's also a shame that they've opted to withhold the names of the independent auditors. Yes, more than one, for Boussac said such in the OP of this  thread. But, no problem, for when I get done, some French banking institute, or two, will whip out their microscope(s) and see what the hell is really going on over at Bitcoin-Central. I'm not just some fuckturd here in Sandwich, IL, tossing shit into a fan because I like it.

Remember, Davout and Boussac, don't bother replying to my posts unless you're asking me what wallet I'll be using for you kind folks to send me the settlement, otherwise the following will be part of my reply: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0.

More to come, a promise or a threat, however you desire to perceive it.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Just got back home to Sandwich, IL, so if anybody in the Chicagoland area desires to check it out, drop me a line. We can do it at your place or mine.

Via EXIF: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.532167+114.051333&ie=UTF-8&ei=28U8U8LjNMPb0QGg3IDQAw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ

I wish I could help out here, guys, but for the next few days I'll be busy exposing Bitcoin-Central and their money laundering scheme, for it's connected to InstaWallet of which they still have my 1,132 BTC.

NeoBee's been on my radar, but I had them pegged as viable. Sorry to read that that's probably not the case.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Well, ain't this special! Looks like a lot of interesting transactions transpired prior to the creation of https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy, namely InstaWallet's Cold Storage wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1FrtkNXastDoMAaorowys27AKQERxgmZjY, moreover during the time frame that Davout had the following in his signature prior to InstaWallet going dark and not returning to this forum until April 18, 2013, 17 days after the supposed "hack" occurred, last seen on March 21, 2013, in sprite of InstaWallet's customers (of which Boussac claimed InstaWallet didn't have any customers) demanding where Davout was.



From the looks of it, I'm pretty sure I'm on Boussac and Davout's ignore list, of which is fine with me, because as soon as I'm quoted and they start seeing tx from the 'blockchain' on this thread, they'll be singing a different tune. The only tune I want to hear is what address of mine can they send my settlement to, otherwise this is the tune I WILL link to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ (think meme, not its title).

Here's my promise or threat, however its perceived: I will be dedicating the next few days to this thread, linking and discussing a myriad transactions that transpired prior to, and after the supposed "hack". When I get done, this thread is going to look like a mini blockchain, for I've already uncovered a slew of bitcoins moved outta InstaWallet's cold storage to fat-ass wallets, and they're still unspent. Likewise, I found fat-ass wallets as part of settlements that they too are unspent. Looks to me that InstaWallet had/has control of said wallets and possible was using InstaWallet as their own personal laundry money service. YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT I SAID IT AND I WILL NOW GO ABOUT PROVING IT. I'm 100% certain that they don't want others looking into their affairs, for it'll cost them more than just those coins when the authorities start digging. I promise you that.

I'm sure that if I'm a nutcase, then the bank backing Bitcoin-Central will pay this nut-job's action no mind. But, if what I'm about to unleash is true, then I'm pretty sure Bitcoin-Central's customers (if Boussac deems them to be such, for according to him InstaWallet didnt' have any) will soon be making a mass exodus, for I'm about to make some fucking noise, whereupon the principals WILL be in some serious damage control mode. These fuckers weren't playing fair from the get-go, and they sure the hell aren't playing fair now.

Again, take it as a threat or promise, either way I'm about to toss shit into the fan and there's only one way to stop me from doing such, otherwise you get Rick Roll'ed.

~Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL  60548

815-508-1668

PS: For the record, everybody reading this knows more about me and where I live then of any one of the principals of InstaWallet, Paymium, or Bitcoin-Central, and they're in control of millions of dollars in BTC of fellow bitcoiners.

That narrowed it down: It's a well-know French IT-security firm.

Glad to see you filed it with LE. Sadly, I haven't a clue as to who or what LE is.

So, we're not getting the name of the security firm eh? I'm pretty sure they're some big outfit that has a website for everybody on the planet to see and inquire about, but you opt not to give us their name. I'm going to take a stab in the dark and state THERE IS NO SECURITY FIRM THAT CONDUCTED AN AUDIT OTHERWISE YOU WOULD HAVE GIVEN US A NAME. This is not privileged information we're seeking. Besides, it's not like the outfit is going to offer up information to some Joe Blow. But, at least they'll be able to confirm that an audit did take place.

One more thing. You said: It is a well-known French IT-security firm.

Kinda negates:


Plural > Singular

Meanwhile, while you're huntin' those fathom INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, I'm goin' be doin' some BLOCKCHAIN FORENSIC ANALYSIS on my own.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=173902.msg1809889#msg1809889


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167215.msg1741392#msg1741392


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167215.msg1818944#msg1818944


Guess what? 11 months later is the next scheduled payout.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167215.msg1741392#msg1741392


It took two and half weeks to get a link to the police report, and Boussac thought it would be funny to place it in the French section of this forum, knowing full well that THIS thread was the main line of communications. It was some other Bitcoiner that discovered it and migrated the police report to this thread.

Now, it's been over a year, and has been ask a hundred times--at least--with myself asking it again yesterday of which you conveniently ignored again: WHO ARE THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS THAT DID THE COMPUTER FORENSIC ANALYSIS?

So, two claims totally 1,132 BTC (one wallet was 1,000 BTC and the other was 132 BTC) is pretty fuckin' insane eh?

Then how the fuck do you explain this: https://blockchain.info/address/1HAo32apFqzKcSBkXVHR5vLnnFuuFoxzFU


The above was paid out in spite of the following: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167215.msg1852586#msg1852586


And this was how I was treated up to this point (below), and to date no police report was given.

https://blockchain.info/address/15VjRaDX9zpbA8LVnbrCAFzrVzN7ixHNsC

Total Received   19,659.7999629 BTC

Looks like the mods took down one of my recent posts. This is the first time I've ever had to repost a post that was deleted, for it is very relevant to this thread.

---

Let's play "Let's compare posts!"



For those not good with math, 146 < "A few hundred."

Unless, of course, AMT pulled a rabbit outta their ass and shipped out a couple hundred in only 4 days.

Pretty good job, but you forgot one thing: 2BG2PAIL. I'll leave it you to figure out where to paste it.

AMT_miners will reply that Alyssia did make the first post when she was in the office at noonish, and that it was Jim Brown who make the post at midnightish.

Joshua Zipkin with his 7 year business degree from Penn State rarely posts on this thread, for he's thoroughly disgusted with it. Besides, most of AMT's sales stem elsewhere, with only a few sales stemming from this forum. This thread only acts as a communique for the various other folks that mostly own hosting companies in case they have an issue or desire to order more product, both of which they don't because they don't exist. 90% of sales stem from this thread. Since nobody has yet received a miner, it's a foregone conclusion that AMT is mining with equipment paid for from its customers.

If I were a con man, this is exactly what I would do. If AMT is viable, then in no way in hell would they have let this become the mess it is, ergo they are a con and mining away.

So, my amount was insane, but some smaller amounts doled out during the first payout weren't insane, eh: https://blockchain.info/address/1HAo32apFqzKcSBkXVHR5vLnnFuuFoxzFU

Like this one that still hasn't been spent, just sitting there: https://blockchain.info/address/17we9qiPqgmirh9JZv1ucshJ9YBKVq1V7q

And, Davout made sure he was included in the first batch: https://blockchain.info/address/1DavouTAsveznCFHsz688xvbrRAq4u2qm8

Like I said, I want this resolved ASAP now, for more than ample time has passed to get this resolved, otherwise I'm opening up a can o' worms I know damn well you folks don't want open. I will also start doxxing every single person involved now or prior (for some have left, but have the names) with InstaWallet, Paymium, and Bitcoin-Central. I WILL NOT leave a single person out. Please take this as a threat or promise, for at this point I don't fucking care which one you choose. And, please don't threaten to sue me. JUST DO IT! It will be welcomed, but I'm betting that that's not an option on your part and you all know why.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Well, jack me off and happy 1 year anniversary.

Back in December, a dialog was started between me and Davout via emails to look into the three claims I submitted on the first day last year claims were able to be made. Back then I submitted three claims: 1000 BTC; 132 BC; 0.835 BTC. After several back-and-forths, and after even denying all three claims, guess which one they finally honored. You guessed it! The latter. I can finally retire and purchase my own island with that ~$700 USD and falling (actually already fell) amount.

So, because I was insane to have 1,132 BTC on InstaWallet, it gives them the right to keep it. I consider that insane, not my actions. What's really insane is just a couple weeks prior to the supposed "hack" I expressed a concern about InstaWallet, but was rest assured that all is well with no need to worry.

Well, it now is going to look like Paymium and Bitcoin-Central will need to do the worrying for if this is not settle fairly quickly, the bank backing Bitcoin-Central WILL be conducting an audit on both those and InstaWallet's concerns. After asked hundreds of times to provide who conducted the audit investigation, that question was never answered, thus safely assuming there never was one, simply doing it themselves.

I'm Goddamn sure they don't want ANY official body looking into their books, fearing what they will find. The following is not a threat, but a promise. If this is not resolved immediately, I WILL make this a crusade to have said books of ALL three entities opened. We can all clearly see via the 'blockchain' that there's still over a million bucks in InstaWallet's coffer that belongs to its customers, and 1,132 BTC of it is mine.

I will start on that promise now by penning a Scam thread about all three entities, and only lock it once this issue has been resolved, with Post #2 of said thread reserved for later stating that InstaWallet has resolved my issue.

I started penning in this thread relatively calm, but soon went on a vitriol attack, then later was informed by a fellow Bitcoiner to chill, whereupon I did, realizing that you'll get more with honey than vinegar. Well, I'm sad to say that vinegar was stuck up my ass and my balls about to rust off, thus it's back to my turn to bust some balls.

My two wallets that yet to be returned to me:

https://www.instawallet.org/w/rL2DhMWW9tDvs24oFwtiq99zhh7A3ii6bg
https://www.instawallet.org/w/gZh1afVVl5aAtjNwXo0BiYChTxjwln33ab

Where I was rest assured that all is well...


I felt all was well in spite of this comment...


I'm pretty sure that the above will not bode well with ANY authorities. Ironically, it was shortly after all the above was brought to light that InstaWallet went dark with their supposed "hack".


Notice how Boussac avoided this post like the plague.

Now, back to my promise/threat (however you desire to view it), if I'm not made satisfied, Paymium and Bitcoin-Central WILL be looked into. You folks were given more than ample time to get this resolved, but I sincerely feel that that time was used to cover your tracks.

Sure is strange that after the last payout was made last year, not counting February's payout, millions were still in InstaWallet's coffer: https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr

I am more that prepared to post a myriad more bitcoin wallet addresses all stemming from InstaWallet depicting none of the moneys going to customers (in spite of InstaWallet claiming they didn't have customers) of theirs.

I'm prepared to open up a major can of worms. Just say when. I'm willing to bet that with Mt Gox being predominantly  in the news, this is the last thing Paymium and Bitcoin-Central desire.

Money currently classified as being stolen from me WILL NOT be used to fund either Paymium or Bitcoin-Central. And, from what I can ascertain from the 'blockchain' that's exactly what it's being used for.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Equilibrium be damn!

"Stay hungry. Stay Foolish."

Damn you, AC. I wanted to pen that, but opted to read till the end before opting to post. Ideally, I would rather hold my tongue, assuming the best is happening, vis a vis AMT is doing their best to get a handle on things.

As a courtesy to those with pending orders, I shall keep my noise down to a minimum.

Having been in AMT's office, and even used the bathroom, it's safe to say that nary a woman has graced their office, working there or visiting, pretty Jewish girls or otherwise. Ergo, the ruse from Camp AMT continues.

What's even more amazing is that with all the individuals that supposedly man the AMT_miners account, none of them felt it prudent to satisfy nary a customer that has penned on this thread and what nut. Further amazingly, Joshua Zipkin supposedly rarely pens using this account, let alone taking the time to come here and read posts, reiterated most recently, and he's the brains of the outfit.

I didn't give away anything I gave you. I gave/made you the Ambassadör of Europe, of which you would earn 2% commission on each and every sale stemming from Europe. Each person desiring to be an Ambassadör, beside yourself and I (North America), would have to pay $200 USD for said title. There are only 4 such positions left: Africa, South America, Asia and Oceania.

If somebody in Europe orders a $10K bitcoin miner on Überqöin (e.g.), then you would automatically receive $200 USD via BTC into your bitcoin wallet on file. If an order is place from Berlin, Germany, and nobody is Squïre of Germany or Emissäry of West-Central Europe, then you would receive 14% commission, or $1,400 USD via BTC.

Once allocated, I nor anybody else, can take claim regions controlled by Ambassadörs, Emissäries, or Squïres. A Squïre can partial off their region to Bürqömeisters for no less than $50 USD via BTC up to the total commission amount paid out to date, a sum that will be transparent to all members of Überqöin. Likewise, a Bürqömeister can further divide his region (city, island, etc.) by selling it for no less than $50 USD via BTC to a Viceröi.

Note that those on the bottom pay less to hold positions and garner a higher percentage than those above them. But, earning 2% commissions from all sales stemming from a continental region as an Ambassadör for only $200 USD via BTC is one helluva bargain.