Isn't it all scammers operate like this? There is several new noobs sockpuppet in the IOTA thread everyday who post that they are very-very interested to buy the shit, and they can't wait, no, they have to buy it now. Classic scam/ponzi operation: project the impression before the P&D that there is a huge demand for the coin.

I hope law enforcement will arrest them before actually they start pumping the shit on the exchanges.

Yes, because all rational individuals understand this is a blatant scam. No IoT system, no revolutionary microprocessor and no prospect to implement any of those - only luring money from the idiots by selling a P&D scam operation. (Says a lot the signup process to the MSFT Azure platform was sold to the "investors" as a partnership and the idiots actually believed that.)

No wonder all experienced people and developers like CIYAM, smooth, TPTB_need_war, jl777, Gadgetcoin developers virtually told David that fuck off boy, you are a useless piece of shit and we want nothing to do with you.

Warning, IOTA sockpuppet/shill alert!

David boy and the Balarusian are in the typical stage in which all scammers must go through: they project a confident attitude to the public  - they have to, otherwise the idiots who bought into the scam would be questioning them -, but in reality they are shitting themself. That's why they monitor 24/7 this thread and troll it, instead of developing the software, never mind develop their zero employee, zero revenue, momma's basement operating business.

It is also important, the potential "investors" of the IOTA scam understand: the Lukashenko dictator's dick licking lead developer CfB who is hiding in the shithole of Belarus (and lectures US & UK citizens about democracy, politics and society, but that is another matter), and the IOTA CEO David boy have never ever generated a dollar revenue from a legit business venture or in fact from any businesses. The only "business" experience of these scammers is to lure money from the idiots via the NXT, JINN and IOTA money collecting operations.

Therefore, do not invest in the IOTA scam! If you have already invested, but by reading the truth about IOTA in this thread you feel that you are the victim of the IOTA scam, then send me your personal details and I will forward it to the relevant law enforcement authorities.

Yes, that is important. The target audience of the IOTA scam, the noobs and naive users see that all experienced and knowledgeable developers like yourself, TPTB_need_war, smooth, etc. correctly point out that IOTA is a blatant scam. The money party scam of these two wankers is spoiled, plus they will have to go to jail. Life is hard for the scammers.

We understand the NXT scam qualifies you to a life time achievement award in the shithole of Belarus where you are hiding, but in reality it is just a scam which used by absolutely nobody in real world. You shouldn't delude yourself that NXT was a train - ask the thousands of bagholders (similar idiots like those who buy into IOTA), they see it as a trainwreck.

Precisely that's what happening: he is just desperate to sell his story. But he is not even consistent, and when he wants to convince noobs and naive users to buy into the scam then he admits that IOTA is an investment ponzi:


Here we go, IOTA magically transformed from software into an "investment"  ... that according to the organizer of the IOTA scam "outperforms any other investment you can even imagine".

And of course this apply to IOTA, LISK and all other ICO/IPO scams.  

Yeah, I was wondering what has happened to the Skycoin dev?

@netzer

That's what you have got for $500K: a poorly written "reference implementation" software (see my above posts about that), which - despite of the promises of the IOTA scammers - has nothing to do with Internet of Things.
Of course there is no IoT device handling nor device discovery functions, not even IoT authentication or access control. There is nothing - not even a basic one. David boy the scammer will blame the IOTA community, he will say - in fact he has already started to say - that he sold a software and the community should create the IoT ecosystem. In fact he sold a coin and an illegal investment security product by facilitating a P&D.

Send me your personal details and I forward it to law enforcements. More victims of the scam report financial loss, the jail sentence will be bigger for these fucking scammers.

TPTB_need_war, please release something, because the software engineering skills of these scammers is disturbingly embarrassing and crypto need something more than what we have now.
I understand there are very good software engineers in crypto like gmaxwell, James (jl777), smooth, CIYAM, yourself, but when I see the work of these IOTA scammers who collected $500k for this shamble then I start to understand why alt crypto currency projects rejected by the public and use by nobody in real world.

So are you telling me from design and implementation standpoints it is acceptable to hard code the port which requires root privilege (or in fact hard code any port) as well as it is fine the system doesn't pull the configuration data from the config file? Are you telling me it is a good practice that an alpha stage software (which presumably vulnerable to security issues) requires root privilege?

I understand you are one of the shills, but if you are a developer as well, then don't BS and don't defend a poor design and implementation.
 

What a wanker and what a BS. No wonder NXT is used by nobody in real world, no wonder they delivered nothing with JINN.

And then a "reference implementation" is released to end users - obviously without any QA test - with a hard coded port numbers and by violating basic security requirements to run the system with root privilege, because there are "unexpected problems" and "the testing a nightmare". Will the idiots understand that they got a bogus and disturbingly poorly written "reference implementation" after 5 months and for $500k? Probably not.

What a wanker and what a BS. No wonder NXT is used by nobody in real world, no wonder they delivered nothing with JINN.

And then a "reference implementation" is released to end users - obviously without any QA test - with a hard coded port numbers and by violating basic security requirements to run the system with root privilege, because there are "unexpected problems" and "the testing a nightmare". Will the idiots understand that they got a bogus and disturbingly poorly written "reference implementation" after 5 months and for $500k? Probably not.

Fix you flawed design wanker and come back when you understand software engineering. Software engineering is more than writing 12 java files for these idiots.

As I said, you are hiding in the shithole of communist Belarus, because - apart from the scammer David boy who hired you remotely - no software company would hire you in the western world.

Are you stupid or what? That's the issue ... the software should not run on a port which requires root privilege.

Yes, and that is a design issue, which indicates very poor software engineering skills and lack of experience. Who are these people? Ah yes, they will challenge Intel with their revolutionary microprocessor and create an IoT software ... they just haven't reached the level of a junior programmer ... but they will get there.

Precisely. Please note these children have learnt programming in this forum and never worked in a serious commercial nor open source software project. Therefore, they have never experienced with addressing system requirements and design issues which are part of any serious open source and commercial projects. As I stated in this thread several times, their code would never bypass a code review - it is a material for the idiots who "invest" in IOTA. It apparently lack of basic understanding of software engineering as well.
 

So are you telling me from design and implementation standpoints it is acceptable to hard code the port which requires root privilege (or in fact hard code any port) as well as it is fine the system doesn't pull the configuration data from the config file? Are you telling me it is a good practice that an alpha stage software (which presumably vulnerable to security issues) requires root privilege?

I understand you are one of the shills, but if you are a developer as well, then don't BS and don't defend a poor design and implementation.