Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 04:12:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ... 67 »
241  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: December 14, 2013, 06:44:26 AM
As was announced earlier, most of the coins that were stored in WeExchange.co are now gone. We are still limited in what we can share about how that happened, and what is being done about it, but we do have some updates.

There are still approximately 386btc available in the wallets. These coins will be paid proportionally to all owed users, based on current user balances, by Monday night.

All old withdrawal requests will be removed and each user will need to initiate new withdrawals when this new balance is ready.

Full instructions on how to access the site to process these withdrawals will be provided by 5pm (GMT+2) on Monday 16th December, when you should be able to withdraw the portion of available funds allotted to your account.

This is far from ideal, but it gets every satoshi that is available to those with outstanding balances. When we are able, we will announce more details on what is being done to repay the remaining coins that are owed to WeExchange.co users.

The proportional withdrawal looks good on the first glance. But it should be considered more carefully because not every balance to be returned is of the same type of risk:

1. Coin which was deposited after "the accident". This coin should be paid back first as it should not be used to repay other debt from before the accident!
2. Coin which was deposited before "the accident". This coin should be paid after the returned coin from the above point.
3. Coin which comes from selling Ukyo.loan. This coin should be paid the last. I am stressing on this matter since ukyo.loan shareholders in my opinion should be the most affected group as they were paid for risk taken while regular deposits were supposed to be risk-free. Treating regular deposits the same way as balances coming from closing ukyo.loan would not be fair!

This proposed order of resolution depends of course on type of the "accident". Since we don't know exactly what happened You must be the judge on that matter.

No.

Ukyo.loan was a risk-free investment, just like deposited money in bitfunder or weexchange . They should all paid back proportionally at the same rate. The only way ukyo can get out of paying them would be to declare bankruptcy. Otherwise it is fraud.
242  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 13, 2013, 11:50:42 PM
you spend 50 btc for hashfast batch 1?Huh

61



Yeah it was 61 for those of us who ordered early on.


wow.....  thats almost as bad as the people that paid 50btc for 1 13ghs blade.....    thats what over $45,000USD per blade those first buyers spent.....   should have just held btc....

You also have to remember that at the time HashFast was promising delivery in October and said they had multiple contingency plans in the event there was a delay in one part of the project. There was no "december 31st" date and there was no "mining protection plan". Just a 400+ GH/s miner promised in October at well under 1 W/GH/s
243  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: December 13, 2013, 11:03:00 PM
We should make a new thread for all people who want to take part in setting up legal action, private investigation, whatever, to learn the truth what happend to our funds and assets.

That's a good idea. There has been far too little information and far too much waiting and I'm beginning to get impatient, especially regarding ukyo.loan which has had no information of substance whatsoever in quite a while. It's seems like there are many people that are owed more than $10k and a few that are owed more than $100k. That is definitely a sum of money that it would be worth hiring a lawyer for.
244  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 13, 2013, 09:35:57 PM
you spend 50 btc for hashfast batch 1?Huh

61



Yeah it was 61 for those of us who ordered early on.
245  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: December 13, 2013, 08:06:19 PM
As was announced earlier, most of the coins that were stored in WeExchange.co are now gone. We are still limited in what we can share about how that happened, and what is being done about it, but we do have some updates.

There are still approximately 386btc available in the wallets. These coins will be paid proportionally to all owed users, based on current user balances, by Monday night.

All old withdrawal requests will be removed and each user will need to initiate new withdrawals when this new balance is ready.

Full instructions on how to access the site to process these withdrawals will be provided by 5pm (GMT+2) on Monday 16th December, when you should be able to withdraw the portion of available funds allotted to your account.

This is far from ideal, but it gets every satoshi that is available to those with outstanding balances. When we are able, we will announce more details on what is being done to repay the remaining coins that are owed to WeExchange.co users.

A couple of questions:

1) What is the total amount of outstanding WeExchange balances? In other words, what percentage of the coins owed is that 386 btc?

2) Is there any news as to the coins owed ukyo.loan owners? Are those coins missing too? Is the repayment plan for that separate from the WeExchange plan?
246  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoins mentioned on the Simpsons on: December 13, 2013, 05:53:06 PM
I guess Krusty invested in Labcoin.
247  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Tax Question: Sell BTC on Jan 1, 2013. Spend $ to buy BTC Dec 31, 2013 on: December 12, 2013, 09:43:07 PM
Umm, the answer to your question may depend on your jurisdiction, in any case:

Sold 10 BTC on Jan 1, 2013 at $100/BTC, you realized a capital gain of 10 x $100 = $1,000.

This capital gain needs to be declared in your income for the taxation year 2013.

However, Dec 31, 2013 you buy 100 BTC at $10/BTC = $1,000, so you lost $1,000. Depending on your jurisdiction you may deduct this against your capital gains for the year.

Therefore for the taxation year 2013 you made $1,000 by selling 10 BTC, and then lost $1,000 by buying 10 BTC.

This is definitely NOT true in the US. I can't speak for other countries.

Buying an commodity like bitcoin is NOT a loss as the bitcoin has value. Namely the value is what you bought it at! You can only realize a loss when you sell it for an amount less than what you paid. Or you realize a gain when you sell it for more you paid for it. The price you buy the bitcoin at is used as the basis for calculating your future gains (or losses).
248  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 12, 2013, 09:07:55 PM
I feel like the moral of the story is that no one should buy mining hardware until we hit mining hardware equilibrium where it is readily available for anyone who may want it.

I'm batch two with no MPP...

No, it's the opposite. Once we hit equilibrium, pretty much NO ONE will make money and those who do are the ones who have free electricity and cheap time.

If we'd approach an equilibrium, there should be opportunity to make a small profit for those who do it most efficiently. Cheap electricity will be a key factor, but not the only one. The problem however, is that we will likely overshoot any equilibrium, because people dont seem to mind pre ordering 6+ months ahead while underestimating how much is being ordered  and without minding paying (a lot) more for hardware than the bitcoins that hardware can generate cost on the exchanges.



Yes, exactly. Plus there are enough people out there who can't do math and want to jump on the bitcoin bandwagon who will continue to pay too much for miners keeping the price high.
249  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 12, 2013, 08:23:18 PM
I feel like the moral of the story is that no one should buy mining hardware until we hit mining hardware equilibrium where it is readily available for anyone who may want it.

I'm batch two with no MPP...

No, it's the opposite. Once we hit equilibrium, pretty much NO ONE will make money and those who do are the ones who have free electricity and cheap time.
250  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 12, 2013, 07:58:25 PM
Also to put it into perspective 400 GH/s devliered 1 Nov would have net ~10.8 BTC for the month of November and another ~6.8 BTC for the month of December.  Had they actually shipped earlier it would have been an additional 0.5 BTC per day before 1 Nov.

Yes, but this is the world of bitcoin hardware where nobody has ever delivered on time ever (though KnC did come impressively close I will admit) where if you think about all the possible lost BTC you could have theoretically mined you surely go insane.  I'd be worth millions by now if BFL had delivered in 2012 like they had claimed but they didn't, and I'm not a millionaire but that's just how it goes.

Don't buy mining hardware assuming you'll be able to get whatever you paid in BTC back, I don't think any hardware has managed this except batch 1 and 2 avalons. 

Not even batch 2 Avalons! My batch 2 Avalon has only made 70 coins and it isn't likely to make more than 1 or 2 more through the rest of its life.
251  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Long term bitcoin unit on: December 12, 2013, 06:29:32 PM
That's a good point but at the same time I think that if BTC will ever reach "facebook popularity" somebody will have to look at the transaction numbers and find a solution (be it off blockchain or whatever other method) and there are many many other points like global legislation, security, stupid-proof wallets, etc.
We are still in early days and probably we won't see this happening in our lifetime Smiley


I disagree. Internet phenomena move very fast. Either up or down. If bitcoin is not facebook popular in 10 years, it will never be.

Yeah I agree. With the speed at which technology advances I think it is very likely we will either see BTC become widespread or see it die off.

Its been 5 years already if it doesn't become a phenomenon within 5 years its already doomed. Google, Apple iPhone, Facebook became massive well before 5 years. I guess you can say that bitcoin had regulation issues not really up until recently there was still no regulation.

Now with new coins coming out and the foundation wasting a year with a worthless update, it's time is coming nigh. Doesn't mean that the price can't go insane, it's just will never become mainstream.

As written before Bitcoin is just here to warm people up to cryptocurrencies and conditiom them to accept them, until governments come out with their own digital fiat currencies.

Bitcoin is a way bigger paradigm shift that a new product like facebook or the Apple iPhone.

Bitcoin is more like the PC, cellphones, or the internet, and both existed for decades before they really became relevant. The internet was around since the 70's but only became relevant in the mid 90's. Cellphones existed as carphones since the 80's but only became relevant in the late 90's.
252  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin will be 10k+ Q1 2014. on: December 12, 2013, 06:20:07 PM
Its more likely for bitcoin to go back to $100 than it is to go to $10,000.

The only way bitcoin can go to $10,000 in the near term is if wall street gets involved. That means the Winklevoss twins ETF gets approved. It might take a while for that to happen if it ever does.
253  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Time to start thinking about taxes on: December 12, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Okay, I get that buying Bitcoin and then selling for a profit probably falls under capital gains.

What about mining?  Say I started with 0 bitcoin, bought some mining equipment with fiat, and mined 1 bitcoin.  If I cash that out, is it capital gains?  Other income?

With my situation, it gets even weirder.  That bitcoin that I mined has never been exchanged for fiat, but instead has been invested into things like CEX and CryptoStocks.  In addition I have a 2nd bitcoin that I bought for $200 that is also invested in these ventures.

I don't plan on cashing any of it out before the end of the year, in fact my mined coins all get reinvested into something.  But I have no idea on how to treat this stuff with regards to U.S. taxes.  Mining in particular is unique in that I'm "creating" either a commodity or a currency, (depending on how you view Bitcoin) as well as performing a service (collecting a fee for confirming transactions).

If you mine bitcoins it is counted as income based on the value of the bitcoins at the time you mine them. Yes, it's a huge pain to keep those kinds of records, but it is the legal way to do it.
254  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Possibly dangerous tax situation when mining in US on: December 12, 2013, 06:01:47 PM
BItcoins mined are revenue and will almost definitely be taxed as income based on their value at the time they were mined.
Based on the price at which exchange? 


It doesn't matter, but it would be safest to use mtgox. Alternatively, if you primarily use another exchange to sell your coins, you can probably use their exchange rate. Just because the exchange rate isn't set in stone, doesn't mean there isn't a fair market value for the bitcoins and you still owe taxes on them. If you drastically underestimate the price on your tax return the IRS will come after you.

This isn't the only situation where there is this kind of ambiguity. If you were to barter with someone, or if you were to do some work and you were paid in goods instead of cash, you need to estimate the fair market value of the goods exchanged or received on your tax return.
255  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Possibly dangerous tax situation when mining in US on: December 12, 2013, 08:08:22 AM
I would be more concerned about this (from http://fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html, emphasis mine):
Quote
c. De-Centralized Virtual Currencies

            A final type of convertible virtual currency activity involves a de-centralized convertible virtual currency (1) that has no central repository and no single administrator, and (2) that persons may obtain by their own computing or manufacturing effort.

            A person that creates units of this convertible virtual currency and uses it to purchase real or virtual goods and services is a user of the convertible virtual currency and not subject to regulation as a money transmitter. By contrast, a person that creates units of convertible virtual currency and sells those units to another person for real currency or its equivalent is engaged in transmission to another location and is a money transmitter. In addition, a person is an exchanger and a money transmitter if the person accepts such de-centralized convertible virtual currency from one person and transmits it to another person as part of the acceptance and transfer of currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency.
Perhaps one could argue that mining is finding, not creating, (claiming that "satoshi nakamato" created it al when bitcoin the p2p network was initiated) or maybe it's worth registering as a money transmitter in that dollar range, but do you want to tango with the feds?

You could also argue that it is the mining pool that is creating the currency and they are simply paying you for the work you have done to help them find a block. This is the case for most people out there these days since few solo mine now. And for those that mine in a pool it is likely that they have never actually been the one to find a block, so did they actually ever create any units of a virtual currency?
256  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Possibly dangerous tax situation when mining in US on: December 12, 2013, 08:04:36 AM
- You mine a coin a day for the month of November. Bitcoin is at $1000, so you mine 30 coins worth $30,000.
You would owe income tax on those coins, on that $30,000.
Mined coins aren't taxable income until you sell them to someone else.  


I wish that were true, and to be honest the IRS hasn't said anything official about it. But any accountant will tell you that that based on how taxes work that isn't the case. BItcoins mined are revenue and will almost definitely be taxed as income based on their value at the time they were mined. This is really annoying actually, since it means that you need to keeps records of every fraction of a bitcoin you mine and the exchange rate at that time. It's unclear how granular this must be. I have records by day, but theorecticaly you probably need to record every time you get a payout from your mining pool.
257  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: One problem with BTC on: December 12, 2013, 12:14:38 AM
This is ridiculous and not true at all.

Six months ago there were only 3 ASIC manufacturers. Now there is almost a dozen.

Six months ago you had to wait months to get your hand on an ASIC. Now there are plenty of options that ship in much shorter time frame.

Six months ago ASICMiner dominated mining with nearly 30% of the global hashrate. Now there are serveral major players.

You are very mistaken when you say that you need a lot of ASICs to be efficient. In fact, the opposite is true!

The average person can presently run a couple of terahashes/second out of his home and only have to worry about his electricity bill.

If you want a larger setup you need to rent space for them, figure out a way to remotely manage them, pay for a separate internet bill, figure out how to cool them, plus pay commercial electricity rates.

Electricity is quickly becoming the limiting factor once again.

A large corporation does not have an advantage here. Mining ASICs are a commodity of which there is no bulk discount.

OP sounds like sour grapes that he didn't think to order an ASIC months ago when they were very profitable.

Nothing you say argues against my point.  I'm not talking of six months ago or now, or the next six months.  Once "banks" were little more than a money lender and a ledger, and ledgers are a commodity.  The power, the limiting factor you highlight, is one of the key reasons for this inevitable shift.  Corporations can have an advantage here, they can buy "bulk", or place their ASIC farm where power is cheap or free.  Having a half dozen or a dozen producers of ASIC hardware doesn't make much difference if you need $'00,000 of them just to mine a Bitcoin a month. The ROI on ASIC is already priced out most, if you don't get the next generation within the first couple of weeks the difficulty soon eats the returns. See contracts for hosted hashing, how far removed is that from a bond or other financial instrument?  The centralisation is already happening.

I don't see how this leads to centralization.

There is no such thing as a free lunch. As long as there is a cheap and easy way to mine bitcoins the difficulty will ALWAYS rise high enough so that it is just barely profitable. You can't stop people from buying a free money printing machine. The only reason why it's been profitable to mine up to now is they can't make ASICs fast enough to keep up with the rising price of bitcoins.

Expect within in a year to reach a state where you can buy a mine machine for a few hundred dollars. Larger machines will cost a few thousand. Power consumption will be under 1000w which is low enough to run at home. The machines will expect to ROI in 6 months to a year after taking into account electricity cost. People with expensive electricity might not ROI at all. People will mine for fun, in general, not because they believe they are going to get rich. Some companies will mine, but likely only the ones that also sell ASICs as they will have access to hardware at wholesale prices. Other small companies might start mining where electricity is cheap. No one will be getting rich and there will be no centralization of mining because it is not cheaper to consolidate mining in one location or one company. As difficulty and price waiver up and down mining will come in and out of fashion with people who time it right possibly making a profit. Many people will lose money, though, and continue to mine anyway, either because they can't do math, or prefer it as a method for earning btc.

fyi, the difficulty at that point will be around 75 - 100 BILLION.
258  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Possibly dangerous tax situation when mining in US on: December 11, 2013, 10:30:14 PM
The "good news" is that your capital loss doesn't disapear.  You can keep applying $3,500 of it until it is either gone or you die.  However yes what you described could happen.  I would guess most miners are not paying taxes on mined coins.  Still if you want to play by the book I would sell enough of the coins to cover your tax liability and put that money aside (and be sure to make quarterly tax payments) that way you are covered.

Yes, that is true, but you could be totally screwed for that year if you don't have enough savings to cover that tax liability.

I plan on paying income tax on my mined coins since that way I can deduct the costs of everything I paid to mine the coins (mining hardware, computer and networking equipment, etc).

The other issue is if you don't declare the mined coins and later sell the coins on the exchange that IRS says "where did you get that money? where did you get those coins?" you will not be able to point to any transaction where you bought those coins and established a basis for their value for the purpose of calculating your capital gains.

For small time miners maybe the IRS won't care. But for those of us who have hundreds of thousands of $ in bitcoin the IRS WILL notice when those bitcoins are liquidated and so the rules will need to be followed.
259  Bitcoin / Legal / Possibly dangerous tax situation when mining in US on: December 11, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
I am not an accountant, so please correct me if this is incorrect.

I'm assuming that you are someone who is trying to follow ALL the rules as best as they can (and many of them are unclear right now).

Here is a hypothetical scenario:

- You mine a coin a day for the month of November. Bitcoin is at $1000, so you mine 30 coins worth $30,000.

You would owe income tax on those coins, on that $30,000.

- Now let's say bitcoin crashes to $10 in December. You sell off the 30 coins for $300 and take a $29,700 loss.

You can declare that as a capital loss on your taxes.

Now the problem is the 30 coins you mined aren't a capital gain, they are declared as income. So you can't deduct the $29,700 capital loss from them. You can only deduct up to $3,500 per year off of your income.

So you'll be stuck owing taxes on $26,500 and have no money to pay it as your coins only earned you $300 in fiat!

This seems pretty scary. Am I wrong in this scenario or is this really what would happen?
260  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Tax Question: Sell BTC on Jan 1, 2013. Spend $ to buy BTC Dec 31, 2013 on: December 11, 2013, 10:08:14 PM
Do I have to pay taxes? There's no realized gains.

Therefore no capital gains. Or am I wrong about that?  Grin

That's not how it work. You buying bitcoin on Dec 31st is not a loss.

It's only a loss when you sell bitcoin for less than you bought it with.

I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing. Give me a specific example.

You got the BTC for free for example. Sell 10 BTC for $100 USD/BTC and get $1,000. USD/BTC rises to $1000. You buy back 1 BTC for $1000. You'd still have to pay 15% on $1000. Now if BTC drops to $1. Your capital gain tax is the same?


Yes, but only if you sell that btc for a dollar.

So, you could do this
1) sell 10 BTC for $100, and have a capital gain of $1,000
2) buy 1 BTC for $1,000
3) sell 1 BTC for $1, and have a capital loss of $999

You would only owe taxes on a $1 gain if you did that all within a calendar year.

Of course you'd only end up with $1 too so I don't see how this is helpful to you.

I think this is starting to make sense now. I have to pay capital gains on Dec 31. Next year if BTC drops to $1 and I sell, then I can declare a capital loss and get it all back. And there's no limit right?

Basically if you sell 367-day-old BTC and rebuy new BTC repeatedly at the same price a few times a year, you have to pay taxes right away on gains. If you buy and hold, then sell all at once, you can pay capital gains later. But the capital gains tax remains more or less the same with some extra transaction fees.

You only get to declare a loss or gain when you sell. The price you buy at is used to determine the basis from which you calculate your loss or gain when you sell. The time you buy and sell is important as if you hold your coins for at least a year and a day you may be eligible to pay long term capital gains instead of short term capital gains tax on them. Also note that you can't pick and chose which coins you are selling. You have to pick either a FIFO (first in, first out) or LIFO (last in, first out) plan and stick with it. Most people will pick FIFO except in some unusual situations.

To answer your question, if you sell on Dec 31, yes, you have to pay capital gains for 2013. If you have a loss next year, it will appear on your 2014 tax return and can be used to offset gains in 2014 and future years. You can not use it to retroactively get your capitals gains tax from previous years back. It's important to realize that only up to $3500 of capital loss can be deducted off your income. The rest must be deducted off of other capital gains. Fortunately, you can carry it forward to future years. So if you sell in 2014 and declare a loss but don't have any capital gains of that year, you can put it on your 2015 or future tax returns if you have a capital gain that year. Or you can deduct $3500 a year off your income.


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ... 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!