It's just a coincidence and I don't have any proof, so just forget about it.
Okay! Next topic guys! How to advertise this site more!
My ideas:
- Signature campaign that I would take care of - Share it with your friends - Thread giveaways!Im ok with giveaways. Like i promised yesterday, 10x 0.0001 and 1x 0.0005 available today, i will give 0.0005 to new player who didn't get some yesterday , just ask here, i will send it within 1 hour Thank you Cech! Easy free coinnn!! Anyonee? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I will take some as well ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
You don't need to post, you just need to log in to get 14points providing your post count is higher to your activity, not the other way around
I believe you need to at least make 1 post instead of just logging in, as the "time" in the formula is definied as: The activity number is determined in this way: time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration activity = min(time * 14, posts)
Yeah, pretty sure you need to post. I am sure I read you just needed to log in but since it is written "in which you've posted" I guess that wasn't correct and you need to post during the 2-week period to get your 14points providing your post count is > or equal to your activity You can check tomorrow since that's when the activity updates ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) . From another thread on activity the next updates and times are apparently: ( All times in GMT ) April 29th , 2014 , 8:26:40 AM May 13th , 2014 , 8:33:20 AM May 27th , 2014 , 8:40:00 AM June 10th , 2014 , 8:46:40 AM I posted during the 2-week period and my post count is high enough to get +14points; we would need someone that didn't post during the 2-week period but logged in; I guess it is possible to find one by looking for him carefully
|
|
|
I have to agree that if you showed the pixels also on the free money page, than you would have much more traffic for the ads. Which would raise the intrest in buying them.
Or am i wrong in that assumption?
Mixing the two sections would be a mess, people would get confused. However i have added the "500 block purchase contest" i was talking about: who gets 500+ pixel blocks can also place a banner on the faucet page. There is something wrong at pixel page. If I press that Freebitco.in link at center it opens this page http://static1.freebitco.in/banners/468x60-1.png, I don't think it is supposed to? And I haven't seen anyone even buying those pixels. My gosh! thank you for having warned me...now it's fixed. The right link was http://freebitco.in/?r=163799The user boumalo bought them Thanks! I didn't even see it It got quite a lot of clicks @ Holdaaja it was not personal ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I just found DogebinHood and shadow are the same people, very smart, I think he made some money through referring himself.
Isnt that against the rules? I don't think it's against the rules. Also, it's very hard for the admin to tell if two people are really the same one, maybe they are friends sitting together. Hmmm, actually that's against the rules Uptweets ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) . Because referral reward supposed to be used only on new player (oneself is not new player). We have a way to identify very suspicious account, but yes it is not easy ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) OK, maybe DogebinHood and shadow are just friends, which is hard to tell:) How do you even know they have same ip or something? I don't know their IPs, just witnessed some coincidence. What was it? They played same time? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Self referring itself is illegal but I wonder what coincidence you witnessed? They play the same way or you have heard something somewhere? BTW is it legal to accept a link with a balance if you already have an ED account?
|
|
|
Don't worry, we'll run another one sooner or later. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) That's awesome! This should be a regular thing since you guys don't have a faucet. Be another giving site like primedice and the others! In fact we do have a "faucet", come on LB chat you'll see! But the happy hour was a one time thing? It would be nice to have it every week
|
|
|
Site is down!
You play on ED nahtnam? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Not much, but sometimes. Nothing wrong with that RGD wouldn't like it if you say ED is the best though ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
A 120euros tu n'as pas une montre dans le même matériau que la montre à 11,000euros qui sera en or, les répliques en or seront très chères et sans garantie de qualité; à 120euros tu n'as pas non plus une montre de la même précision et aussi bien construite qu'une rolex doccasion à 2000euros qui marchera encore bien dans 30ans
pas besoin de mettre 10000 boules pour une belle montre. regardez ebay.com (en USD évidemment). Y a des montres PORSCHE DESIGN qui déchirent, effet garanti. la derniere que j'ai pris m'a couté 500 euros (transport+TVA). Et elle est numérotée (no466/1000 exemplaires). manque plus que la 911 qui va avec ! Porsche design ne fabrique pas de montres, ils sous traitent; je pense que certains intervenants dans ce thread sont plus intéressés par le mécanisme de la montre que par son design
|
|
|
Site is down!
You play on ED nahtnam? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I feel it is an easier decision to buy 50,000$ now than it was to buy 10,000$ a year ago at 100$/pop and not that much harder than buying at 5$ two years ago so no one should say that he regrets not to have buy more when it was 100$ if he doesn't buy 50k$ now I presume not everyone will agree ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I think creating another thread is not logical, since there are already millions of them. I don't understand last line you wrote, explain a bit please.
He is paid 0.0006/post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387.0 so when he post "I sent you 0.0001" he actually made 0.0005 if his post is counted as a constructive post in the signature campaign, there is nothing wrong with that though Any free for me? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) please.. I don't get paid since i don't have signature as you can see. Why are you sceptic? i have my referral signature since i wan't to promote site and to maybe get those 0.1% if someone would play anyways. My mistake, I thought Holdaaja was offering the links Thanks for giving away, you might get a few regular players out of it Can you PM me one link? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) sent 0.0003 Received thanks; if 0.3 is played on the account you are even It is nothing if a few deposits are made on the account; it is very hard to attain otherwise; PD3 will allow referring I hope they will allow to creates links with a balance as well
|
|
|
You don't need to post, you just need to log in to get 14points providing your post count is higher to your activity, not the other way around
I believe you need to at least make 1 post instead of just logging in, as the "time" in the formula is definied as: The activity number is determined in this way: time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration activity = min(time * 14, posts)
Yeah, pretty sure you need to post. I am sure I read you just needed to log in but since it is written "in which you've posted" I guess that wasn't correct and you need to post during the 2-week period to get your 14points providing your post count is > or equal to your activity
|
|
|
I think creating another thread is not logical, since there are already millions of them. I don't understand last line you wrote, explain a bit please.
He is paid 0.0006/post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387.0 so when he post "I sent you 0.0001" he actually made 0.0005 if his post is counted as a constructive post in the signature campaign, there is nothing wrong with that though Any free for me? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) please.. I don't get paid since i don't have signature as you can see. Why are you sceptic? i have my referral signature since i wan't to promote site and to maybe get those 0.1% if someone would play anyways. My mistake, I thought Holdaaja was offering the links Thanks for giving away, you might get a few regular players out of it Can you PM me one link? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Right but I think bitcoin has the potential to reach a price into the 5digits in 2014 USD within 2years
|
|
|
Is it common knowledge how points will be accrued to get a "better" faucet with pd3? I'm hoping since I've been around a while that will factor in somehow.
Also I saw there another site offering 5555 satoshi faucet but only every half hour.
We have a leveling system (level 1 - level 30) You gain experience and therefore levels by being active on the site, placing bets, referring users, unlocking achievements. Will everyone start at level1 or will the existing players get rewarded for their previous activity? I hope for the latter. EDIT : apparently not Waiting on PD3 like everyone else. Any news on when it's coming?
Soon? i hope there is an internal transfer from one accout to another in PD3 the leveling system in PD3 is great and add some fun to the game ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Wanna collect free giveaways? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) It is not a problem if you impose a minimum transder amount of 0.001
|
|
|
I cant imagine the butthurt from the people who bought all along the way down and are still holding ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) If you bought every week from 1000$ to 450$ today, your average cost per bitcoin should be around 640$ so you are down 30% and you need a 40% increase in price to be even Your average cost is going down right now ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) If you bought at the dips, but lets think of the bulls (the ones who cry CCMF, with every bull-trap) who buy when there is somewhat of a price increase, your average cost per bitcoin would be around 800$ I fit the buying all the way down scenario fairly well. I began buying at about $1,200 b/c I got my first 1.24 BTC through Localbitcoins.com in the end of November 2013. Mostly, ever since, I have been buying on the way down - even though i missed a few buying opportunities here and there to buy more when the price was lower and to refrain from buying when the price was higher. Today my average buy-in price (including fees) is a little less than $605. I am on the edge of buying a little bit more - yet I am thinking we may get down to $420, the way this seems to be going.... not sure when to pull the trigger on the next buy, exactly. If I panic sold today, I would be about 28% down (including fees). not a good idea... You are saying it is not a good idea to buy while it goes down or to sell now? Yes. Technical analysis, sentiment analysis and, to a certain extent, fundamental analysis all work with Bitcoin. Here is a good one, with real fundamentals: https://medium.com/p/ba5f3fcce103 Thanks for the article. Even though it is supposed to be a "bearish" article, I think that it is too optimistic already when it implicitly identifies "crypto-currency" with "bitcoin". Consider this hypothetical statement that one might have made 20 years ago: The World Wide Web is here to stay. As more people choose to use it to publish text and data, more people will have to use it in order to get the information they need. Surely, there will be a time in the not-so-distant future when perhaps 500 million people will use the Web regularly, and perhaps 10% of them will find it essential for their business or work. Therefore, we can conservatively predict that a Netscape browser license will sell for 10'000 dollars or more by then.
Of course an asset going up can disappear and we see new bubbles all the time and they always end up popping
|
|
|
au niveau prix et comission, bitcoin-central, c est competitif?
Oui, en plus c'est pratique, français, rapide ect. mais il n'y a pas une liquidité énorme donc les prix ne s'ajustent pas toujours rapidement
|
|
|
You could consider that players sending under or over the deposits limits, players sending after the round is over or deposits by players not asking for refunds are kept by the owner; you can argue he should give it back but I think it is ok as long as the rules are observed
Ponzi owners are not santa clauss they are here to make money, some sc.am right away, some wait a bit before sc.amming and some enjoy the few perks of running a ponzi games without stealing; the third category seems like the best you can get
|
|
|
Pour nombre d'entre vous, l'impression que le BTC va remonter tiens de l'évidence. Mon objectif ainsi est de donner quelques arguments. Qui valent ce qu'ils valent, c'est-à-dire pas grand-chose (biais de confirmation, tout ça). Je serais intéressé par entendre vos propres arguments. J'ai lu le fait que l'État va ponctionner sur les épargnes (je ne suis pas convaincu), j'aimerai en lire d'autres.
En fait, il prend déjà depuis cette année sur les bénéfices de tes comptes épargnes (livre A et trucs dans le genre). La nouveauté est surtout qu'en cas de crash de la banque, ce n'est plus la BCE qui prête ... mais les épargnants de la banques qui se font "freezer" le compte pour que les actifs restent et permettent à la banque de refaire de la trésorerie. Moi, j'accepte pas ça. Si tu laisses de l'argent dans une banque, tu le prêtes à la banque qui le compte dans ses fonds propres; le problème n'est pas que l'Etat devrait garantir tous les fonds des banques, même celles qui font n'importe quoi mais au contraire qu'on devrait faire attention à ne pas mettre son argent dans des banques qui font n'importe quoi mais ça ne sera le cas que si on a peur de perdre son argent et qu'il n'y a pas de garantie d'Etat Les premiers à payer sont les fonds propres amenés par les actionnaires puis ça devrait être les prêteurs senior puis les autres prêteurs et enfin seulement les clients mais les Etats interviennent trop tôt et sauvent les banques qui continuent donc après leurs pratiques alors qu'elles auraient dû disparaître
|
|
|
How bullish divergence turns into bearish ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sierrachart.com%2Fimage.php%3Fl%3D1398565705523.png&t=664&c=oaHdcFUetqtmAw) What looked like a bullish divergence was caused by the truncation of the downward sub-wave, possibly because of positive news from China at that time. But when weekly MACD is about to go negative for the first time since September 2011, guess what comes next... It is interesting and it may be enough to make a trade for a day trader But there are a few scenarios from where we are and some are bullish
|
|
|
|