He refers to crypto limits because it is LITERALLY what the policy says (they don't differentiate between cryptocurrencies).
Therefore, why don't you bring it to the attention of Kraken and Coinbase instead?

Honestly, with @JJG entity on the prowl, we are going to lose probably 90% of new posters. Who knows, maybe that's the task at hand.
The post above sounds like newbie abuse to me. js

Are you kidding? The limit is only up to the point of how much you hold and can realistically move. If they own 10K btc, why would there be a limit of 100 btc?

FYI: with higher btc prices the whale category has been re-calibrated to above 100btc, which makes sense due to a comparison between >100btc holders and overall number of whales. Above 1000 btc is probably a blue whale.
https://ccnews24.net/bitcoin-whales-100-to-1k-btc-increased-their-holdings-from-december-2020-by-331k-btc/

Well, the rest of the article (apart from the heading) still shows old denominations that look incorrect to me (by the species preponderance).

Normally, one reads all of the text, then responds to the conclusion.
The idea could be presented as thesis, then antithesis, then synthesis.
Check on those concepts. This is reading comprehension 101.
Instead, you are slicing each individual phrase, which makes no sense whatsoever, unless  you are either a computer program or you did not receive education pass the elementary school (it is OK if this is the case, you achieved a lot, was right on bitcoin and accumulated wealth, but it would explain many things in your posts).

Additionally, presenting someone's idea, then disagreeing with the idea means that you did not agree with the idea, don't you think?

Some on WS could be following Bobby Lee's idea: that btc will go to 300K and then to $30K (he mentioned 90% decline from the top) within 2-3 years.
If you take it at a face value, there is no point for an investment house to buy in now, then show a 45% decline from here within 3 years.
Yes, it would pop up first according to Bobby Lee and pretty much everyone else, but as long as the downside from 300K is 90% the numbers above are not very desirable for a 3-3.5 year hold.
Personally, I think that Bobby is wrong and btc trajectory would be different, but it is certainly a possibility (maybe 1-5%).

It's just a pre-Coinbase IPO dip.
WS is trying to create a discount.

I did not bring the subject-it was in Elwar, vroom, whoever else posts.
Besides, WO (according to bitcointalk rules-check them out) could have posts OFF topic (by design).

However, that said, it is a little strange that your bowel movements are ON topic here, but some digital developments are not.

"Stupid is as stupid does" F. Gump

He is funny, but someone already bid $35K.
his auction ends on April 1 and I assume that he put up a high enough price that nobody would win.
It would be interesting to see where it ends up trading at.
This NFT actually does have value as "John Cleese making fun of NFTs" NFT.
Paradoxically, he just created value by poking fun at something.
Who knows, maybe he gets it......naaah (he will chicken out by putting up some "crazy" minimal price).

Why the passive-aggressive NFT hatred here?
NFTs do not interfere with btc "mission" at all.
To think that there will be ONLY bitcoin and nothing else is a little one-dimensional.

That said, most of NFTs would have low value, but some would have a non-zero value.
It's perfect for smaller groups, which are fond of some project.
No different from baseball cards collection.
Again, not to have WO-NFT is a mistake.

EDIT: say, for example, that you reached some high level in a game-make screenshot, converge to NFT, keep/display in your digital collection, sell to people who have vanity.
I remember my son playing Runescape and trading various objects (swords, etc). Basically the same thing, but outside of the game.

True, but, overall, there are some truly nut cases on that thread.

My take on this is that bitcoin is a chance for humanity as a whole to transition to a better system.
It would be something akin to a cruel joke if this is somehow curtailed after 12 years in the making.

That said, the trajectory is unclear, the current patch of following the "predicted" graph notwithstanding.
Everybody expect a straight path at a 45 degree angle to 150-200K, then a typical bear market to, say, 60K.
However, we might get something that not many are prepared for-a brief and violent correction from 60-80K to 35-40K, then flat, then a rise to above 288K, maybe even above 500k.
The difference: earlier correction, then rise to higher than expected.
Personally, I am quite comfortable with a 52-60K range. In my book, it could continue for months, but how likely is this? Not very.

How bitcoin looks like in a higher inflation background? We expect it to be very bullish, albeit gold is declining despite apparently higher inflation expectations.
Does it show that inflation would be followed by a stronger deflation pulse? If so, then why oil is rising? Maybe gold is being de-monetized (in favor of btc) and gold's movement is irrelevant?

Interesting nugget: I was checking some RE around the country and it is an amazing picture. In some spots things are stable, while in others there is an incredible bump up in the last 6-12 mo. COVID effect (escape from the cities)?
What happens if you buy now at that 1.5-2X bumped price? Most likely it would slowly go down in the next 10-20 years, which makes buying in those places and prices a non-starter, hence someone cannot even exchange btc proceeds into something stable aka real estate (at favorable locations). Of course , you can buy if you want to be there, but you are bound to lose money on many of the current "deals", imho.

Exactly, I need 3080 for games.
Hoping against reality that 3080ti would be nerfed (sorry, eth miners) and less in demand.

Every time i look at the daily chart, it starts trending down  .
The solution..never look at daily, so I either glance at CMC a couple times a day for a snapshot and/or look at weekly/monthly.

OT:
check out this joke: https://www.ebay.com/itm/EVGA-3080-FTW3-Ultra-Opened-Box-Sale-Individual-Contents/164766631285
someone is dissing buying bots

Let's assume, just for the sake of argument that LFC gf name is Elizabeth (I have no idea).
Instead of saying anything about bitcoin, retort by saying "Liz and I are thinking about splitting".
They would leave you alone and converge on a "poor Liz".
A risky proposition, perhaps, as some "retaliation" and sad face might follow, but maybe needed for the future opsec.
Otherwise, things would go out of hand shortly.

Thankfully, my wife is very discreet about it. We never tell anything even to our children.
Eventually, they would know, but not yet, although there could be some debate about this as their life path could be different (or not).
My worry is that knowing anticipation of the future 'reward' might result in the current passivity.

Gilfoyle's sound?  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS1KcjkWdoU

Not very early, but 'midterm', maybe, like AMZN from 2008-2010.

Considering that there are about 10-15K people with more than 100 BTC, it is unlikely that they will live like kings (not enough kingdoms, lol).
If btc 'consumes' a large swath of fiat, it would probably be the equivalent of $500 mil, give or take.

Re term life insurance.
If you have a family and a mortgage, it makes perfect sense to do it (in amount to at least fully cover the remaining mortgage), albeit it gets more expensive if you get it later in life.
One little tip: if you are choosing between two companies and are serious about it-you would get a physical out of it from each, sometimes with details about your params that you did not bother to collect otherwise-good to make life style adjustments. Example-HbA1C (many check this one), PSA (not all do this one), etc. I would rec TIAA-cheaper than many others and less hassle. Note this: the nurse would come to your house to collect blood, etc., no need to go anywhere, as they usually ask you to do in US of A.

It's nice to get 6-12 mo of free money.
I haven't decided yet.

True dat.

Re wealthy clients...if they start with already a LOT of money, they will surely get more, while if you start right here with a modest investment, your upside is probably limited to 10-100X
It is not very little, especially the latter number, but it is not millions of %. That ship has sailed.
BTW, I think that all this harking against shitcoins misses one point: it is advisable to invest SMALL amounts of money in all kinds of seemingly crazy crypto projects.
That's what venture investors do with early companies and they have great returns (on average).
Maybe limit it to 1% (in total), so 10 projects at 0.1% or whatever.
You are not going to miss that 1%, especially with btc going up at about 200% average, but you can possibly hit something special as far as returns are concerned.

That said, crypto projects now learned the worst habits of regular companies and instead of distributing a significant chunk in the first round, they are holding back 90-95% with a gigantic pre-mine going to insiders.
Starting here, I would mostly stay away. There are hundreds of projects again with very bad tokenomics.

Sticking to bitcoin makes sense.