Just like what had mentioned by @bullrun2020bro there's no certain rule for that when creating a thread.
But on some boards like Marketplace, Collectibles, Currency Exchange this is encouraged to easily categorized a post. You can see the title thread have this kind of tags aside from the mentioned above.
[WTS] = Want to sell [WTB] = Want to buy [WTT] = Want to trade [EDU] = Education? [General] = i dont know, something like a general post [HELP] = self-explanatory [GUIDE] = self-explanatory [AUCTION] self-explanatory [FREE RAFFLE] = self-explanatory [FOR SALE] = self-explanatory [OPEN], [CLOSED] = self-explanatory, mostly used for campaigns accepting participants, or trades [CFNP] = Close For New Participants [SIGNATURE] = Signature campaign [Merit] = Usually a post giving merit for certain task, accomplishment, etc.
|
|
|
That's interesting, but won't work in the current forum software unless someone make a browser plugin for it. The idea is to show the BTC price when hovered the post with API when a BTC tag is detected to a post based on the post's timestamp.
On the other hand, you can manually check the price by looking CMC with the post's timestamp.
|
|
|
But, why is there no negative trust on the account? it makes it seem as though the message and platform are legit.
The guy just woke up, mean he just got active after a long time of inactivity based on his trust feedback page (the orange phrase). Probably was hacked or something, well, now he deserves a red tag.
|
|
|
No, there's no such thing, and that person is not one of the moderators here, you can click the report button on the PM you received so mods or admins can take necessary action, probably ban him for life.
|
|
|
Well, it may be cheaper for some, but, in general, sellers must be charging more than what they're buying for, otherwise, their business is not sustainable.
Yes, business wise, you need to do that even just a little profit you can gain. From the seller's perspective, does it actually matter if a buyer is highly rated or not? Are buyers actually rated as well?
I don't think it matter since the buyer will need to send first the fiat. The seller will only confirm if he receives the fiat then release the crypto afterwards. What should be avoided is those order who has more than 15 mins. time and fiat payment method such paypal or other transaction that can be reverse back What concerns me is: To my understanding, Binance is locking the crypto to make sure the buyer receives it. But is there any similar security feature for sellers? If buyers are sending fiat directly to sellers, what happens when the buyer says he has sent the payment but the seller didn't receive anything? I'm guessing Binance would require some sort of proof from the buyer that he indeed sent the money - but what would that proof be? A screenshot? That can be easily faked. Or are fiat transactions also going via Binance? What am I missing here?
Seller should report it and open a dispute, give every details as much as it should be. And let binance decide the outcome. To be honest this is always be the case in every platform when it comes to p2p, there are also existing issue other users experienced. That is why dealing only to higher rated or verified seller or merchant or whatever they call it will lower the chance of facing this kind of issue but it won't give you 100% assurance so always proceed with risk.
|
|
|
I'll suggest you to follow this scam report format [1] to make it more understandable. I suggest you to include all information as much as possible because you were talking to a high reputed platform, sportsbet.io to be exact. Scamming $1400 is too little for them to ruin their reputation. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260073.0
|
|
|
Why not both? Yes, you can gain more in crypto trading if you have the right skills, this include day trading in alts/token rather than just holding BTC or ETH and we're talking in both bear and bull season. Investing in stocks might be best but only for long term, but you have more assurance that it won't go to zero or 50-80% down overnight unlike in alts/token imo.
|
|
|
The valuable lesson that can be learned from the story above is that if you want to remain anonymous for your lottery winnings, do it yourself, and don't entrust money-related matters to other people (even if that person is someone close to you)
You mean to be safe and secured (of the money) rather become anonymous. Because i see no reason being an anonymous when it comes to claiming money in person unless you can claim it virtually (using VPN, TOR etc.)Well, you can, in more legal way, e.g. using your attorney to claim the money instead of some closest friends or relatives. It's better than sorry.
|
|
|
but struggling to understand who would actually use P2P Trading for buying, as it seems more expensive than the traditional way of using bank cards or fiat deposits.
It's the other way around, p2p in binance is way cheaper they don't have fees (as of the moment), and there are lots of options you can choose from payment methods (e.g. banks, wallets) to buy/sell order rates. Is it targeted at people from jurisdictions where banks are banning transfers to crypto exchanges?
You can't use binance if you were from a country who banned crypto as you will need to pass KYC and they will probably you to leave. Unlike decentralized p2p sites like bisq and hodl hodl who are all welcome to trade there.
|
|
|
He transferred the money internally but when I tried to withdraw the money to my trust wallet they asked me for 0,11btc in order to verify my wallet and complete the withdrawal.
Good thing you didn't proceed, because this is a scam like what other scammers do in telegram or twitter asking for help to get their money in a particular exchange (they made) but need to deposit first before they can get their shits there.
|
|
|
It's okay to be bullish just be wary and remember that every time market could go down again so your sell order price is already ready. But this only applies if you are trading regularly. Holders doesnt bother for such increase or decrease later on.
|
|
|
then I found out that it was because I used different IP for each login and used it on different devices with different IPs. I haven't encountered this situation before, it seems like coinbase just changed their policy to be more strict to protect their users. The tip when using coinbase is only to use 1 fixed IP, do not change too many IP, otherwise, they may continue to lock your account to ensure your safety.
Are you sure about this? Because modem assigning dynamic range of IP address are designed to used like that unless you configure to have it as static assigning which probably coinbase knows a lot about it. Unless a VPN, new device or new browser is used and it will trigger their system. Though disabling the account looks like not normal to me for every suspicious login, except when changing email or password.
|
|
|
I lost access because the Yobit exchange changed the BTC deposit address, which was my wallet password.
Really? Every transaction has a record of wallet address either the receivers or the sender address or you can check on the receiving wallet. Your reason is mind blowing and why you're going to sell it. Same like other newbies who are selling core .dat files here who are just trying to scam.
|
|
|
This is the worst nightmare that could happen in a huge event like this. That's why i'm always hesitant to go to an event where huge crowd gatherings. I remember last halloween in Seoul where hundreds had died due to stampede as well, although its not a sport event.
For an event like this organizers had the most responsibility make things peace and order. If there were to blame then they should be responsible for this.
|
|
|
Never heard and tried this wallet before. Also i never used an open source multi crypto wallet before unlike coinomi and trustwallet which are opposite, or I guess there is no open source multi crypto wallet yet so this should be a must to try.
|
|
|
To be honest with you, that doesn't surprise me. After CZ tweeted in 2022 about a post that was made in this forum 13 years ago or so I concluded he has an operational account here. If not, how did CZ remember such a simple post that wasn't even elaborate. I don't remember seeing that tweet. What post did he share? Since it was a post from such a long time ago, he might have seen it elsewhere on the internet in some references about historical bitcoin-related news or something. It wouldn't be that unusual. Maybe he is talking about this one [1] although the timeline is messed up, but he only retweet it, not tweet it as his own. So CZ having an account here might not be 100% true, forum posts are public and this forum is known where bitcoin history is written all over the boards. [1] https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1231638821504200704
|
|
|
I found this tweet earlier today. I don't know how true this post is and if there should to be worry about talking about chatGPT in programming space. I just want to ask coz this sounds like sarcasm to me lol. About the improved payserver, well, that's all good to me though. https://twitter.com/ElectrumWallet/status/1616542181115990016
|
|
|
I believe adding a child board namely Slot, Table Games, Sports Betting and other gambling types will make the discussion on that board more organized and easy to distinguish for all the gamblers. Gambling discussion board is already flooded due to signature campaign requirements. What do you think about this suggestion?
It will be a whole lot of child board there is this will be considered knowing there are lots of games, and its pretty useless imo. So far that board is fully controlled by the mods assigned there, i see lots of locked thread for some generic thread questions about games and etc.
|
|
|
Unfortunately i cant see google search page ads due to adblocker. But my guess it shows not because it targets bitcointalk users or any related to bitcointalk but the word "bitcoin".
|
|
|
|