You need to bet a lot in order to get to Silver and Gold in my opinion but for a high roller it shouldn't be a problem. I need to start working on making it to silver level in the clubhouse, I'd soon be halfway through bronze level. It's slow at my end because I haven't placed much bets. I'm right there with you. I've only been toying around when I feel confident about the bets. I've been so busy lately I've barely had time to keep caught up on the Premier League, and zero time for the Champions or Europa cups.
|
|
|
Considering that none of these are loaded, you could expect about 0.1 to 0.15 btc at current pricing.
Just curious; would that be for the whole set? Is that based on the value of the metals? Beautiful set of coins, though. I wish I was around when these were being minted.
|
|
|
I got the Newcastle game as an EXACT score & just got a CLOSE with a draw in the Manc Derby. Hoping to net some points in the late kick off now, I’ve gone with a risky draw (Everton vs Chelsea).
Your prediction was closer than mine. I thought I was going safe picking City and Chelsea, and flopped both. Last weekend I completely forgot to update my picks, and dropped 13 positions, so now I'll be playing catchup the rest of the season. It doesn't look like I'll get much help this weekend.
|
|
|
Immediately I like the following for Sunday, but I'm gonna think a bit deeper about it before placing a bet.
Cleveland +2.5 I'm tempted call ML for Cleveland on this one, quite tempted. Washington +3 I won't touch this, too much emotional involvement. I want the 9ers to win, but maybe I'm being a cynic for thinking Washington has a great chance... Miami +7 Tennessee -7 Both of these are too risky for me. KC can run up the score on anyone. They had a tough time last week, but that was against a division rival, a team very familiar with their schemes. And, Miami has been too unpredictable. Tennessee has been averaging +4 per game, and while the Jaguars have been averaging -12.5 I still find this too risky for relatively low gain. Here's my chickenshit, low-risk parley for the weekend, but I haven't submitted the bet yet. I might add some more handicaps to boost the odds, but I'll wait until tomorrow morning's injury reports. KC (ML) over Miami Green Bay (ML) over Detroit New Orleans (-6.5) over Philadelphia Have I mentioned how much I hate Cam?
He has single handedly made me hate football this year.
Cam is overrated thrash. I've never been a fan of Cam Newton either, but I must admit I've been rooting for him lately. Maybe it's because he's in a uniform I've become accustomed to rooting for, or because he's actually showing some humility on Belichick's team.
|
|
|
And I got 4mBTC free bet from the Clubhouse rank up.
Lost the free bet 😂 same here... Lol, easy come, easy go. I hope you two at least had some fun. What tier to have to get to to get a free bet?
|
|
|
It does take a bit of trust to be among the first to install a new release, but you can also verify for yourself that the download is safe. First and foremost, you should learn how to verify the download using ThomasV's PGP signature. This will ensure that you've downloaded the official version signed by the developer. Even if Electrum's website gets hacked, and the download link is directed to a malicious version, this will mitigate your risks. Here's a tutorial I wrote: [GUIDE] How to Safely Download and Verify Electrum [Guide]. If you still don't trust the binary releases, you can always take some time to verify the code hasn't been manipulated with nefarious intent. If you go the Electrum repository, you can browse through the changes made in real time. You can confirm for yourself that only the changes published in the release notes are implemented into the code. And if you're still doubtful about the binary releases, you can even run electrum right from the source code. It's fairly easy if you're running Linux and have all the python dependencies installed (which you probably do if it's a recently released OS.) Electrum's github.com repository: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrumElectrum's Release Notes (change-logs): https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES Electrum's previous releases: https://download.electrum.org/
|
|
|
Ok, I'm not much of a fan of the ad broadcasts that have a few minutes of football here and there, If you condense a three-hour broadcast to eliminate the commercials it's about 1:15 minutes. If you further eliminate all footage between downs, and condense to two seconds before the snap to two seconds after the whistle (coach's film,) you'll end up with about 40 minutes worth of football. no emotional attachment.
BWAHAHAHAH! Ok, I won't mention any kitties. >sadly remembering I cried myself to sleep last night.
|
|
|
I would have never thought that I would be able to say the words "PO" and "Giants" in one sentence without embarrassing myself I don't know why you would be embarrassed, but somebody should be. 5 and 7, yet still in first place in the division? Yeah, they have improved a lot, and I must admit the game against Seattle was not one I counted for them. But, the Giants have a long history of screwing with the NFC west, it goes way back. I think Ravens will win by less than 20 points. No particular reasoning other than Cowboys being last in the league in rush D and only marginally better in pass D, and Ravens should be in somewhat better shape than they were last week but still have a few top players out.
I don't see Ravens getting to playoffs. They'll lose to Giants or Browns (LOL what a year to be alive to be able to say that and not sound completely dumb).
For someone who claims to not be much of a football fan... I guess that's what being a wizard with data will do to you.
|
|
|
I just don't see what everyone else sees in this being the game that the redskins bust out a signature win. One of the best defenses in the league, and the return of the Game Manager. Alex Smith is 3-0 since returning. I always had a lot admiration for Alex Smith. He's obviously an incredible athlete, but unfortunately his career was doomed when Mike Nolan drafted him. I hope he gets the chance to play in a championship game some day. Mike Nolan on the other hand, I'll never forgive him for the dysfunctional cluster fuck he made of the 9ers. Speaking of which, crazy start to this one with the Bills.
|
|
|
Jets losing to that Hail Mary in the very last second
That one really bugged me. I put a small wager on the Jets in the early 4th, and was counting my winnings with less than two minutes left. All they needed was one first down, just ONE FIRST DOWN! Ugh! The Chiefs game really surprised me, I really didn't expect the Denver defense to make Patrick Mahomes' life so difficult.
|
|
|
Did it get moved from today to Monday or what happened? Whatever happened explains why I couldn't find the odds last night. It's up there now though: line looks to be about Steelers -6.5. The Washington ML for this game is ~3.45x, which I think would make for an exciting bet. This is one upset I'd like to see happen: the team without a name defeats the only undefeated team.
The way they've been playing recently it's bound to happen sooner rather than later. I'm not much of a football fan but there was nothing else to watch last Wednesday when Steelers barely beat Ravens B-team... they would have lost against any team with an actual quarterback. OTOH it was like 5th undeserved win they got this season so what do I know. The Washington game is Monday. I like Washington in this game, I'm actually surprised to find the odds so high against them. Their defense is stout, and now they finally have a real quarterback. And like you said, the Steelers looked off last week. I believe the Steelers have been skating by on an easy schedule. This year's NFC adversaries are the East, and the south for the AFC. Not the toughest divisions. The only team with a winning record they've beaten by more than 7 points was Cleveland in week 6.
|
|
|
That being said, +81, +86 or +87 really doesn't matter much.
I agree that going form a trust score of +81 to +87 doesn't seem like a huge difference, and it's unlikely sway the decision of someone looking to do business with OGN, but your statement begs the question: At what point does it matter? If adding +6 to your trust score through manipulation of the trust system doubles your trust score, would it matter then? What if it added 50%, or just 10%?
|
|
|
Thanks ... the idiot even created a fake flag on me for some random other alleged scam thread. Interesting part is immediately after he did that 2 other tagged scammers jumped in and supported it. There would be no way those 2 even knew it existed UNLESS he dropped his pants and exposed his smelly ALTS. I don't give a fuck about it as it just gets lost among all the others but it does add a couple more connections to watch. I noticed that and opposed the flag, a type 2 no less. What's the punishment for creating a flag that has no merit? Oh, there isn't one? Hmmm, maybe it's about time to hold flag abusers accountable.
|
|
|
DireWolfM14 figured it out in ~20 minutes: Hey now... I might be slow, but not THAT slow! I figured it out in less than 20 seconds, and took a few minutes to compile that post... <j/k I know what you meant>I also think that any lemming who would exclude me for adding users to my trust network should maybe give an example of a user that doesn't deserve to be included in my trust network... I almost excluded you when I learned you used Theymos' bitcoin to earn yourself a hefty load of airdrops... that you didn't share with theymos. Not only did you not share, you didn't even tell theymos you used his money to earn some for yourself. I still haven't made up my mind whether your club is a Ponzi or not, so I'm not taking that into account. This particular use of the trust system, however does demonstrate that you can be prone to shady behavior. I came to those conclusions on my own, spontaneously, without encouragement from anyone. When I have an issue with the way people behave around here, I call them out on it, using their name. Cowardly calling me a lemming isn't the right way to change my mind, if anything it only adds to the evidence that I made the right decision. And, if you would like to challenge my ability to think for myself, lets get it on. Don't worry, you wouldn't be the first one to fail.
|
|
|
If asu was in a really bad situation and at the same time if we're going to take the moral and ethical approach, the attempt would be to at least try to negotiate with DireWolfM14 for a reduction or complete removal of the interest(probably with some proof), and a delayed deadline. But nope. I haven't charged interest since April. All I've asked of asu since then is to maintain communication, and make payments. He offered to pay off the loan in full by August, I only asked him to honor his word. I know what this past year has done to many folks, and I don't want to put any one in a difficult position. I just want my money back.
|
|
|
Account coming back from a long sleep could be hacked or bought and selling stuffs worth thousand of dollars made you suspicious not to mention the tag, that's a huge amount and the account is only full member he has nothing to lose with that account, I have doubt but I hope I'm wrong and he will refund you or send you the code. Check the date on the OP; December 23, 2016, four years ago. According to CMC bitcoin closed at $921.98 on that date. wetsuit was scammed for the equivalent of $480. Bitcoin is worth 20 times more now than it was on that date. It doesn't really matter if the (Worldwide) account was compromised or sold, it seems obvious he's trying to scam. Check his threads, many have sockpuppet reviews that smell like total bull shit. @wetsuit, you should create a type 3 flag against (Worldwide)
|
|
|
Hopefully some one will quote for me here on this for safety of my account. Address: 1FcsFvNJ3eJjC84A2H44XWJLHTegcYxU38 Message: I am SATWAT from Bitcointalk.org today 04/12/2020 signing this message as now I am also member of this forum for better understanding of crypto and bitcoin stuff. Signature: IEMzBWWURctjXKYoalhEw1wKqU/tfqqrYX9tML3GtxLcfcnSB8XzqdEsE930V8/3Tp8gY/a7KngI8e5jWDnPPOs= Verified
|
|
|
you are fucking asshole Can't argue with that. I will say it's better than being the whole ass. when you exclude someone that you dont know is not Self-Scratching ? No, it's not. My trust score isn't affected in any way. I've never received any reviews from OGNasty, nor have I ever given one. However, I have seen enough to know I do not value his judgement, and only partially because of this incident.
|
|
|
Trust score fortification (Self-Scratching) by DT1 member:
|
|
|
|