Trading signals honestly are just speculation. I mean, what could anyone do without internal information regarding some projects and capital?. The market itself always choose some random coins to get pumped and these signals provider are too small to affect high market cap coins aswell.
 Even if it's warren buffet that gives out the signal there's no guarantee that the trading signal gonna be correct and a trading signal that's 100% correct and always accurate are those signals that are created by pump and dump group which means market manipulation but of course they definitely gonna take advantage of the people who follows them blindly. But in the other hand could help you making some trade based on your preferences, bot in my opinion is worth it if you are like me who really getting tired of watching the market 24/7.

Most of people afraid that after an exchange got hacked the hacker might dump the coin immediately and cause the market to shake but these kind of hackers most likely uses P2P that won't affect the market at all. I mean, the transaction could get traced and the exchange might put an eye to the coin movement from an address to another one and if they find out it's going to an exchange's address the account immediately frozen. It might be different if the coins that got hacked amounts to ten thousands btc or more but below that, probably won't cause panic selling.

If you're reffering the most "used" as the cryptocurrencies that very frequently being chosen for making some kind of payments or transaction then it's definitely those coins that has lowest fee, I usually uses tron for making payment online due to the fee and many payment gateway already accepting it but if it's the most used for various activities like trading, etc I guess it's bitcoin.


If bitcoin's fee was not so high it could be the most used cryptocurrency for making transactions or purchasing goods but the fee could eat up the money sent easily but there's also wrapped btc or somekind that can be an alternative but still not widely accepted across payment gateways.

then it's thousand times a lot more profitable for those who buy BNB and hodl it since the time it was first goes into public but doesn't mean we should be very regretful of missing that opportunity.
but I do agree, just see most of cryptocurrencies they really give a good profit in long term and although the price could fluctuates a lot but if you see it, the price always going up and hits new ATH.
however, I'm sure people who regrets of not HODLing long term will definitely do the same which is hesitant of holding again.

It's so true, most of people I know thinking of cryptocurrencies in general as get-rich-quick scheme and they too think that owning crypto will automatically make them rich somehow which isn't true and most of the people who have that kind of mindset always ended up buying high selling low then rage quit lol and there's never been of shortage with newbies that are really thirsty of being rich and have that kind of uncontrollable greed. I just hope that they eventually could really differentiate high risk investment and low risk investment.

It's decentralized meaning if government really trying to hijack it they need to manipulate all the running nodes across the world which no government has authority too but they could manipulate it using tons of money I guess but considering the market capitalization of bitcoin or crypto market in general have been increasing like crazy I doubt any countries could do that, if any it's those top 5 richest countries by gdp I guess and if there's any government that could use 51% attack maybe it's china.

Well atleast their prediction isn't really far off considering many these so called financial experts have predicted bitcoin to go as far as $100K from when the price of bitcoin was below $10K and we're already more than halfway to go here. It's not like their prediction should be very accurate right? there's always some miss

I think there's these niche like VPS, domain, dedicated server that usually offers discount for using cryptocurrency though I know that bitcoin's fee is kind of too high for making a purchase and all but for transaction above $1K bitcoin could be very useful not to mention it avoids us of having problem dealing with banks or any corporation that have payment services.

Even if the speed of transactions and cost of transactions kinda high it's gonna remain valuable as long as binance which is the owner of the coin remains a giant and exist.
You know, the more reason why BNB could increase in value so easily because binance's services are really popular and by knowing that BNB is owned by binance they already sees it as legit and worth to be ETH competitor not to mention their BSC that has huge potential. Binance really has many ways to increase the value of BNB frankly speaking.

I personally think this time around there won't be any bearish market. The market is just too overflowed with the institutional investors capitals that are very bullish when it comes to crypto and not some whales' money that could inflict panic selling everytime the whales trying to make a play. The problem with the volatile market in the past is because everyone want to cash out to make profit, same thing to whales that eventually gonna dump the market when they sees fit. But now there's innovation like Defi, NFT (although deemed overrated) and many more I'd be surprised if the market gonna be the same as in 2017.

New exchange token could get so high only if they have good partnership which is fine for the most part, but most of the exchange token that comes from some low tier exchange never make it that high since they didn't got the hype as TKO and usually the utility offered from the token worth next to nothing and I definitely prefer defi or swap tokens if the service not coming from popular company like binance though they are also very risky which most of the time not really recommended.

if trader that used high price to get confirmed ASAP then maybe that makes sense but devs as far as I know always using testnet when developing their eth related software and if they used the main network and their code happens to have bug it could drain their eth easily.

That's exactly the problem just see this chart https://blockchair.com/ethereum/charts/transactions-per-second and witness how the 15 tps is just simply doesn't cut it anymore and that's why I heard in july the overall TPS will be increased to 100,000 TPS for ETH but don't really know whether that's truly gonna happen.

Burning BNB is inevitable, they generated so much profit and as they promised they gonna buy back and burn but whether the coin gonna get pumped or not we don't know for sure.
Though CZ really good at making people feel FOMO'd just see his tweets pretty sure thats gonna drive the price up again.

BSC is not the main factor that plays the part at increasing BNB price, though maybe it plays the same big role but it's thanks to their launchpad that causes this coin to be hyped up, most of people I know that invested to BNB doesn't even have an idea what BSC is and yet they bought BNB like there's no tomorrow because you can earn some coins from staking it and buy coin in their launchpad. BSC as good as it is as an alternative to ETH that allows migration very easily, doesn't play that big role in term of BNB success, but thats just my opinion, take it with grain of salts.

I have moderate view regarding NFT. Many people consider it as overrated and somewhat just a waste of money but honestly NFT could be used for various things and that doesn't make it as useless as most of people imagined it to be.
Like I know the controversy about people that spending million of dollars just for an NFT that represents a tweet but people should really take a look deeper that there are hidden motives and those people who buy these kind of NFT are most likely trying to get exposure and not really trying to collect those tweets' NFT. Moreover NFT could create like a platform for people who want to sell their digital arts or something like that without the need of centralized company. it's not like with existence of NFT its gonna bring catastrophe to the market anyway.

Definitely expected form CEX, and not to mention that it's a stablecoin anyway, basically owned by some private company, but still logical I guess if you're just trying to send money and be done with it, the problem with these high fee that are applied in some exchanges is that most of stablecoin users don't just move their stablecoin once but they make transaction multiple times. But I wonder why all the exchanges out of the blue increased the fee, is that decision from the stablecoin issuer or what.

I don't think institutional investors are dumb enough to just buy crypto in herd, they must have looked at the potential and whether it's viable or not to buy at the current price or just wait until there's dump considering it's high risk investment they must've monitored crypto a lot more than the other ordinary stocks not to mention that the bag you gonna dump probably just feels like a drop of water in the sea.

I think many people already switching over to tokocrypto as it's partnered with binance which adds more legitimacy to their platform cuz international partnership always deemed as very good and indodax as much as being the oldest and most popular exchange have underperfoming trading platform. Tokocrypto is kinda tough competitor not to mention their NFT platform and TKO release

Honestly XRP is just recovering back its former price and most of people who aren't really into its price chart think that the recent price movement as either pump or dump. beside I agree that XRP isn't the paremeter of altcoin, an altcoin season is when altcoin market combined becomes bullish and not just one market which is XRP in this case.
Though I doubt altcoin season gonna ends in may, it could be still going for another year.

Since the bitcoin's blockchain is more or less transparent I do agree, it's possible to identify even from where they got or buy btc from. the perk of having transparent blockchain I guess, rather than untraceable paper money, but if those officials are shady enought they might do some shady tricks but I guess it's just a tip of an iceberg, same with any other countries officials.

He meant it as a weapon that could be used to dethrone USD and threaten fiat in general, but that's just his opinion so no need to think about it that much.
However, that could also be stopped if the US also participate in the cryptocurrency war instead of letting China stockpiling the crypto alone. But, I don't think it can be used as a weapon to attack an economy as easily as it was pictured by this paypal cofounder.

I personally think BSC growth and transactions rate gonna be disrupted by ETH 2.0 if the devs really proven to solve the problem around july,
it's just undeniable that ETH is superior (IMO) due to it being truly decentralized. Big projects that revolves around creating Dapps or in decentralized technology definitely gonna prefer ETH than BSC by a lot.