With popular exchanges comes great liquidity as the saying. It's all about money. Maybe you can think that paying popular exchange just for listing is a huge waste of money but then again, the coin that are listed on shit exchanges usually dying out within few months thus having a shorter life span.
Getting listed in popular exchanges you could also enjoy the benefit of publicity to thousands of people unlike in a low volume exchange where you are the subject of selling point to attract people but if both the project and exchanges are crappy who's gonna be attracted?
The price of getting listed into popular exchanges despite really expensive is quite relative to the project. If a project is raising huge amount of money it will be no problem but a little project will just dreaming of getting listed into Binance or many top exchanges.

What is so special about government backed digital currency if there's already one created by private companies out there. Take it for example Apple pay they just work basically the same as any other digital payment application and the function is just well as the name says to pay something and now recently Gcash aswell. Such a thing as Government backed digital dollar is actually just a waste of time because there's no advantage to having it while some other services are already providing similar option. The government is not going to compete with corporation and private company because they are all about free market (although government could). The only difference about it is that Government print the money meanwhile service like Apple pay and Google pay are reserving the fund in their system.

people always wants more I guess. The people who are not really into tech always prefer something that works regardless whether the service they are using is centralized and decentralized this kind of thing is definitely out of their understanding anyway. Platform like Youtube and Facebook will definitely not turn into decentralized anytime soon because they are corporate and only seeks for profit. They also need the authority to take down any content they deemed harmful to the community they maintain.
It's just a no brainer that a platform that already success and having a really good revenue stream will definitely not change their entire system and risking their entire existence just because of such frivolous matter.

If the coin is manipulated or using bots in certain market that can't be considered a high volumes coin though. only the genuine ones could be considered as one of that. I honestly pissed off with the existence of that bots aswell. It's like they are trying to give us false information and make us screwed.Only unreliable exchange I assume, the popular ones rarely does this but doesn't guarantee that they are not doing this anytime soon. only time will let us know.

in the United States getting fraudulent developers into prison is easy but outside the United States? not as easy. The law enforcement in each countries around the world varies from excellent to really bad. These fraudulent developers could also flee to third world countries although the interpol might be after them but it takes a lot of time to search for them. I do support this kind of real punishment toward all those fraud people but I really hope that such punishment could be enforced in the third world countries as well.Yeah, it's always better to prevent these scammers rather than jails them since the losses might be enormous. There's no guarantee that we could catch them as well.

That actually a good thing. No more scammers running away with their wallet full of investors money and then dump it to the market. Usually if a project could meet up tho that standards it means they are dead serious about their project and not just playing around therefore it could pump the productivity of those project not just to gather some money.When China announce the release of their own cryptocurrency it will be a huge news and most of countries will try to put their attention into it and possibly creating a new regulation. Yeah, that year will be a huge reveal of what most the countries think and their stance regarding cryptos.

my guess is that people there are considering the liquidity of certain coins to minimze the value fluctuation thus chosen Bitcoin which has known to be the most adopted coin and have the biggest liquidity while in the other hand monero is anonymous though the liquidity is just sufficient. But, I always wonder whether those people in the deep web are making their own altcoin aswell since the deployment is quite simple if using an already existing smart contract platform. That actually makes sense and have the possibility since making their own currency that is not know to the public could lead to lesser attention.

I've never heard any expert from when talking about Libra trying to mention bitcoin or even recommends us to adopt bitcoin by any means. Even Libra is not approved because it could potentially become a danger for the national currency and bitcoin which is decentralized can't go anywhere if the government have that idea.

It is a stablecoin, created for the purpose of becoming the new digital payment method to compete with the already existing digital wallet like Google wallet, Apple pay, etc. I see no point for facebook to give any offer because it is not ICO or IEO.
Some big investors are just trying to get the profit generated from every transaction just like any other stablecoin out there. People who buys the coin and think themselves are investing into Libra is definitely bamboozled.

It is always greedines that lure peolpe into holding for too long and missed the train. I know because I did such a thing in the past too and that was such a painful experience and expensive ones too. it definitely feels like getting a slap right on my face. People who are always holding for too long are those who believe too much on what people says. usually they just outright follow people's opinion while those thoughts are truly biased from someone unqualified and deemed to be a shill.

Just forget about that project, if there's someone getting arrested from a project that simply means the project is a failure and there's no need to further follow that project. After all, the emergence of such arrest is simply a catastrophe for the entire team despite having large amount of money being thrown down to their face. Even their coin have sunk to the depth of the coinmarketcap and nowhere to be seen as of now.

Speaking of the truth they could still sustain through their banner but it wont make that much profit. The bribing is what makes their wallet and although that practice is wrong in so many ways they are still doing it for the sake of profit. Guess what, that alone could actually explain the recent trend of ico list that are sporadically spreadout across the internet.
The only thing that make it unfortunate is probably the fact that there are no people who wants to provide a platform to expose such practices to the public and that's why their reputation is untouched even after doing such practices.

Unfortunately if something like that is not stopped, it will be a massive burden for the people here. Imagine an ICO rating website is giving 5 stars out of nowhere to fake project and ended up scamming so many people meanwhile the ICO rating website can just get away with the money.

If you are talking about bruteforce, there's definitely no way a scammer will do such method because it'll be not worth it anymore because bruteforcing a password is not as simple as "picking a password"

Retesting the seed is a crucial part that most of people usually just skip. They don't know that there are chances error to occur and not testing the seed beforehand is really something lackeys would do.
Maybe OP need to check out the word one by one if there's any typo in it or try to rearrange the words which surely take a quite the time.

that's true but when so many people in deepweb aware if bitcoin doesn't provide good privacy for its users and they are all moving to the monero to get the best privacy to make their transaction becomes untraceable. Some parties have already made a reliable article about that.

You may right about that but remember this not all of people have big amounts of money to invest in bitcoin. Imagine when you have a few dollars and you are interested to get the best volatility to get profit from your money and doge is the right now. We should know what was the situation before we decide to move our portfolios to another coin.

Is there proof? i can't even say if that was creating a big awareness in colombia. Bitcoin can do it alone and when bitcoin was created and it didn't even need the altcoin to get its value. bitwing is a new altcoin and so many people are still asking about the credibility of the project itself. Just because it was created an awareness doesn't mean if bitwing can be taken as an example of how altcoin helped bitcoin.

At least to bet on altcoin is also not a bad decision consider about altcoin will always here forever. That just the matter about how good the development of altcoin. It's better to invest in a project that has a bright future. The decent profit will come to good altcoin. This time people must focus on how they can get the quality over the quantity. An altcoin that has already present by the utility usage of altcoin itself. People must aware if altcoin is not always become a bad story

that will be back to how good the old coin is. The new coin will not replace the old coin instantly and the new coin needs to show good progress to attract the demand from the old coin to the new coins.
But again, have you seen that so many new coins are also grabbing the demand from the major coin? that has already happened and so many new coins are getting their hype caused by some investors from old coins are moving to the new coins too.

Can you tell me what potentials that already showed by dogecoin except for pump and dump combined with enough liquidity in the market that makes doge as a perfect pnd coin?
What fundamental effect that already affected the doge's user? Isn't it better to call the supporters are loyal to the doge coin rather than use fundamental as a word to determine that?

Ico is turning as a scam way and it's quite far from being HYIP. Investors have been moving to the IEO project and this is recovering the funding image that has already destroyed by the scammer.

Blockchain should not be mentioned in this case because most of the scam were not even creating blockchain.

This is the reality that is happening in our ecosystem but there should be a way to fix it.

You should not mention the word of ICO caused by investors have already lost their interest to invest in it dude. As you can see about IEO becomes a trend right now and that means if the adoption gets centralized on IEO. The majority of IEO nowadays are still using ERC 20 as the main token asset except some coins were launching on IDO.

It's meme coin when it was started but the developer has made it become a real coin and then after the dev retire from doge's project to another project and then it has become another meme coin again but since there was a news about the crosschain platform between doge and another chain has made doge become alive again for the two times.
Mining just a part to secure the blockchain and it should not be included as the advantage that has already given by doge.