Bitcoin Forum
July 15, 2024, 10:34:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
281  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Simple idea on: November 19, 2019, 12:03:39 PM
Hi fellas, i want to drop this info mainly for newbies on this forum that just start getting familiar with crypto wallets, i was waiting for some tokens to get delivered into my coinomi wallet since a month ago but they never appeared but the projects teams claim its been sent but guess what? i decided to track my address last night using Etherscan and i saw all the tokens there, sometimes your tokens might have arrived in your wallet but you won't know until you track your wallet address or you manually add token contract address, thank you.

Yeah, thanks for the good advice. As a newbie I kept making the same mistakes with Ethereum tokens, assuming I never received them because I was ignorant and didn't bother to take the time to learn about Ethereum technology better. I think Etherscan is an excellent tool to use for exploring addresses. Here is another and I think it has a much cleaner interface and is a whole lot easier to use (at least for me).

It's called Ethplorer and it's very good and was designed just for exploring tokens in your Eth address.

https://ethplorer.io/
282  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XLM Burn Increased Coin’s Centralization, Argues Charlie Lee on: November 19, 2019, 11:28:22 AM

After the recent announcement that the Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) had burned roughly 55 Billion XLM, Charlie Lee took to Twitter to point out that based on the math, the SDF had actually increased their control of the coin’s supply by about 8%. This observation was met with some push-back from the XLM community, including attacks on Lee himself.

As BeInCrypto has recently reported, the destruction of roughly half the supply of XLM led to an almost immediate bump in the current market price. The stated reason for this decision “was to be as efficient as possible in our work,” going on to say that “those 55.5 billion lumens weren’t going to increase the adoption of Stellar.”


To read the full news, you can go here

I do have a question for all of you, especially XLM holders. I myself is an XLM holder too. However, as Stellar burned down 55 billion of its tokens, do you honestly agree about Charlie Lee's statement that it's going to increase XLM's centralization?

And do you also agree about the statement regarding the 55.5 billion XLM not going to contribute to Stellar Lumens' adoption? I would love hearing some different opinions from the amazing community here. No matter if it's positive or negative, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks in advance!
Wow, I really don't know if this wasn't expected. XLM is a pretty big Cryptocurrency, it's even rated as top 10 in rank on http://coinmarketcap.com. Centralization isn't always a bad thing, a lot of good projects have a some what centralized platform model. Stellar had that massive airdrop for Blockchain.info and I believe that it was a very successful, but didn't increase adoption at the rate they had hoped. According to the article,
Stellar foundation claims that the burning was necessary in order to implement a newer and more efficient business model. It also seems like there may have been too many Lumen available within the circulating supply so they decided to burn some.
283  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How do people decide to create Cryptocurrencies? on: November 18, 2019, 01:21:10 PM
Since there are hundreds or even thousands of Cryptocurrencies out there around the world, I am rather interested in what are the processes of creating a new cryptocurrency. I’m interested in things like how do people decide when to make new cryptocurrencies, what are the logistics in making the new coins and how do they promote their new coins to the public or certain groups of people in order to facilitate its usage.  


I'm guessing in order to start you must have some idea of how to utilize the source code of Blockchain and Bitcoin technology. My guess is that you also have to be able to code & program a little. If you want to make a clone project, you just copy all of the ingredients in the recipe and go, but if you want to really innovate, you modify an existing Blockchain project and coin by making several new useful additions. If you really want to support the movement, you create an entirely new Blockchain from scratch or one inspired from another, then build a foundation and support community from the ground up.
  Just a guess  Wink
284  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Does Bitcoin Have A Quantum Computing Problem? on: November 17, 2019, 10:50:54 PM
Google claimed quantum supremacy recently. That sent Bitcoin enthusiasts into uncharted territory. Traders, who are typically easy to spook, have the most to lose – or gain – from the implications that quantum computing might have on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. But what are those implications at this point? Does Bitcoin really have a quantum computing problem? How can it be addressed?

Quantum Supremacy

To understand how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency communities should react to Google’s announcement, it is important to delve deeper into what this quantum supremacy claim entails. According to Andreas Antonopoulos, this is what Google really achieved:

- Up until now, quantum computers didn’t have a significant advantage in terms of solving problems faster than regular computers
Google’s experiment showed for the first time that a quantum computer could solve a problem significantly faster than a regular one

- What Google means by quantum supremacy is that their quantum computer solved a problem that would take a regular computer thousands of years, which proves that quantum computing works

- This doesn’t mean that quantum computers are ready to take over or are an imminent threat to the level of cryptography that Bitcoin currently has
For quantum computing to threaten Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, thousands of qubits – quantum bits – of quantum corrected calculations

- Google’s quantum computer has 100 qubits of power

- The problems that Google’s computer solved are not necessarily the kinds of problems a computer needs to solve to break Bitcoin’s encryption

Google Lied About Quantum Supremacy

Therefore, Google lied when it claimed quantum supremacy. That is because supremacy entails the ability to use quantum computer on a wide range of problems, systematically and effectively. Google is still far from this, which is great news for Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and mostly traders.

Quantum Supremacy Threatens the Whole World, Not Only Bitcoin!

Traders of course rely on various platforms and on the international financial system for their livelihood. Quantum computing has the potential to threaten every kind of encryption that is currently deployed. That means:

- Traditional financial platforms and infrastructure
- Communications
- Any kind of service based on internet accounts and passwords

So, if you are a trader on a platform like eToro, you should be relieved to know that you don’t have to scramble to liquidate every single position you have and make sure you bring a Brinks truck home with gold bars and cash. You will be able to keep on trading Bitcoin and other assets because every single platform you use is still reasonably safe.

Bitcoin: The Last on the List

Given the extent to which all our infrastructure is vulnerable to quantum computing, whenever any actor gains quantum supremacy, then it is time to run to the hills. Forget about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Together they are not worth as much as the market for gold is worth, and any malicious actor who would like to take advantage of quantum supremacy would probably target nuclear weapons’ codes, strategic infrastructure like dams or the power grid, and even the biggest banks on earth. Bitcoin is the last asset on their list.

Bitcoin can Face Quantum Supremacy

In fact, because it is near the bottom of the list of any malicious actor – rationally speaking – Bitcoin might even have enough time to update to quantum-resistant encryption before it is targeted. Some of the members of the Bitcoin community are among the world’s leading experts in cryptography and all Bitcoin needs to update is a fork. We have been through a few of those and Bitcoin keeps on working as advertised, so it is safe to assume that we will be able to survive in a world dominated by quantum computing. That is an assertion not many organizations and decision makers around the world can make.

Therefore, if you are a trader, don’t let Google’s noise disturb your focus. Keep on doing your research and trading in whichever way you want. Google is not coming for your coins – at least not yet!

https://bitcoinchaser.com/news/bitcoin-quantum-computing-problem
Google isn't the only company dealing within the realm of quantum computing. The very first publicly commercial supplier of quantum computing systems was by "D-Wave Systems". D-wave Systems are are used by Super Big Companies like Lockhead Martin & Google (who also has their own Quantum project). You are right to suggest for people not to panic, it is too soon for quantum computers to take over the world, but in the future, who really knows for sure?
285  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Bounty Hunters Please Explain This ? on: November 17, 2019, 09:18:47 PM
I see that now a - days new bounty camping are not comming. I also see that some project are come but this project are not good. Every project are lowest price then Exchange.

How this Problem ?

We are within a bear market on the verge of becoming a bull (my belief). There are a lot of variables one has to consider. There was a period of time where the ICO movement was thriving, but only because regulation hadn't quite reached it yet. It was like a wild west, whereas companies were operating within the legal gray area of the laws. On top of all of that the price of Bitcoin was nearing it's all time high, it was a pump like never seen before. All tokens and coins were gradually following Bitcoin's price movement up, so Bounty Campaigns paid much higher then.
  Then the regulatory bodies like the SEC started moving in pretty heavy against cryptocurrency based companies who raised capitol through means of ICO types of fundraising. The claim being made was that many startup companies who sold tokens may have encroached upon the securities laws, in-which if a company wants to raise capitol through crowdfunding, it must check with the SEC first to ensure they're not violating any securities laws by their creation of "so-called" utility tokens. These tokens may have utility but may behave like securities. To prove so, companies are responsible to practice their Due Diligence by observing the statues of the "Howey Test", a test designed to recognize whether or not the tokens being offered constitute as utility only tokens or securities. see "SEC v. W. J. Howey Co" for further detail
286  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google possesses threat to bitcoin. What do you say? on: November 17, 2019, 08:47:35 PM
Quantum supremacy was a lie or a failure attempt. may be they failed to break cryptography but they showed potential risks and whole crypto industry suffered. Now, google is here with smart checking bank account by google pay. And again bitcoin or other crypto giants will have hard time. Crypto provides security, can secure privacy, giant like amazon, twitter and apple are supporting crypto. Yet only price speculation is only factor that effect the crypto price, it seems.
What if google attracts millions of new investors? what if crypto fails to attract investors? Google may make the path harder
I think people are getting a little too carried away with the phenomenon of quantum computing, it's like they've seen way too many science fiction movies  Grin. The quantum computers available today can only do certain types of calculations, and they do  them exceptionally well, better than most supercomputers. Today's Q-bit quantum computing is in it's infancy, so there there are a few shortcomings like the DECOHERENCE problem. It is one of quantum computing major flaws at the moment. However, remaining optimistic, some time within the future the DECOHERENCE problem will definitely be solved, but most likely not any time soon.
287  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: China’s Digital Currency Will Allow Consumers ‘Controllable Anonymity’ on: November 17, 2019, 04:14:00 PM

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) is the first major central bank to hint at issuing its own digital currency. Consumers fear an end to the anonymity of cash, but officials say that their goal is ‘controllable anonymity’.

Based on data from patents that have already been filed, Chinese businesses and citizens would download digital wallets which can be replenished from bank branches and then used to make digital cash payments.


Read the full news here

I don't know what are you going to say about this guys regarding "controllable anonymity". Do you think it's a good thing for Chinese consumers? As China is pushing to invest big time on blockchain by 2023, along with removing the "cryptocurrency mining" ban and circulating a Bitcoin article to their citizens, I think it's a good sign.

I strongly believe that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies would be massively adopted much faster as China is back in the game as one of the biggest crypto players around the corner.
I don't think should come as a surprise. The technology within China for surveillance is quite astounding. One wouldn't even think of J-walking through traffic last ones wants to be given a guaranteed citation thanks to the retinal cameras that zoom in track your face recognition throughout the city.
  In some schools all students must wear a BCU devices that measures their brainwaves to see who's spacing off at any given moment in school. It's all been a good success as well. Parents encourage it as it helps push the students to the limit, due to the added preasure.
288  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3 Things You like To learn on: November 17, 2019, 03:39:57 PM
For all of you who follow various content creators to Crypto?

what are 3 elements or pieces of information you like to see?

That the content creators may be missing out?

What would you like to see?

What would make you generate interest towards a specific content creator?

I like to see consistency amongst the content I'm provided. Just simply providing content for the sake of staying relevant,  has become all the rage these days for social media influencers. It's no different than having to watch filler material episodes from your favorite show. Filler material is fluff in the middle to stretch out real content.
  When a content provider starts going left field with their material and begins using slap schtick methods and schemes when the ideas and creativity run dry, or simple cheap laughs & tricks for monetary gain with no reguard for morals or ethics, the overall provider suffers with loss of real followers. Happens all to often.
289  Economy / Speculation / Re: The 2020 Next Bitcoin Halving vs The 2016 One on: November 17, 2019, 03:12:45 PM
Bitcoin saw its price jumped from $400 to $800 USD per coin during the 2016 halving. Can we expect the same for next year's BTC halving?

I've written a little article on the halving and need you guys to point out inaccuracies. Let's get ourselves pump and ready to rip the benefit (if there will be any).

https://www.cryptozink.io/what-is-bitcoin-halving-when-why-2020/
As they say brother, nothing is written in stone. When dealing with history, the past has a pretty good tendency to repeat itself but not indefinitely. Things are subject to change. In light of remaining optimistic, I would certainly hole that the price rises, as this would indicate a bull run. We could sure use one of those right about now!
   Only time will tell what will really happen after the initial block halving again.
290  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why only 6.2 percent of American citizens own Bitcoin? on: November 17, 2019, 02:40:46 PM
According to this article , only 6.2% of a highly developed country like the US of America own Bitcoin , which seems unreasonable among the crypto community who rely on the Americans for Bitcoin to be mass adopted quite fast around the world. Here is the link of the news:
 https://www.tronweekly.com/bitcoin-advisory-founder-shares-research-that-shows-6-2-percent-of-american-citizens-own-bitcoin/
What you don't understand is, that people really don't have a clue what Bitcoin or cryptocurrency is. Sure they may have glimpsed a news article or seen a news briefing on tv, but how many people actual know how to use cryptocurrency. If you were to try and explain it to my grandmother, she'd say your tripping balls. If it hasn't got a push from a celebrity or major public influencers. People won't bother to touch it.
   This is why I feel Facebook's Libra is the answer to the mass adoption problem. Facebook alone could educate the world about Blockchain & cryptocurrency.
291  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How Informed is Your Country's Police About Crypto? on: November 17, 2019, 02:10:07 PM
In my country, I see many sites that are Bitcoin ponzi and scams. These thrive because the police put in little effort in tacking them. I like the awareness being created by the Indian police. What is the awareness level of law enforcement about crypto in your country? If All Police Officers are Trained in Crypto... https://www.cryptoinfowatch.com/indian-police-train-officers-on-cryptocurrency/
In the United States of America the policy for cryptocurrencies is pretty strict. There happens to be several governmental organizations that exist to uphold the law within the financial sector. When dealing with assets like cryptocurrency, the sector falls into one of many areas of law. The CFTC or (The Commodities Futures Trading Commission) is there to regulate commodities, & Futures.
  Then there is the SEC (The Securities Exchange Commission), which regulates securities laws.
 Last but definitely not least is the IRS ( Imternal Revenue Service), they regulate tax. So as you can see, there are many regulatory bodies in existence.
292  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People are underutilizing Bitcoin on: November 16, 2019, 03:33:32 PM
Full article: https://www.forrestvisions.com/blog/people-are-underutilizing-bitcoin

People need to start accepting Bitcoin and keeping it, not converting it.

If you think of Bitcoin as just a virtual placeholder for fiat currency, stable coins will be the future and Bitcoin will slowly fade away.


Thoughts?
I disagree, I think Bitcoin will finish it's course in order to reach it's maximum supply of 21,000,000. By then, I'm sure Blockchain will have changed significantly, and numerous upgrades for the Bitcoincoin protocol in order to keep up with all of the new consensus algorithms there most likely will be.
   I think stablecoins are a blessing. No longer do you have to trade in fear, worrying about the fluctuations in price differentials between two trading pairs. Now you can stabilize your trades, with every trade.
293  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Where are the positive news and those users? on: November 16, 2019, 03:01:01 PM
There is a trend in this forum whenever there is a dump there will be a group of people who will spam the forum with FUD and then there are a set of people post unrealistic things will bitcoin will cross $50k if it pumps by few hundred dollars,  right now I don't see anyone predicting the price. Does it mean people have learnt no one can predict the price or just waiting for right moment again?
They say, if you go looking for bad news, you'll likely find what you've been looking for. I can understand why, in times like this, where one feels discomfort from the current markets stagnation, it can cause hope to seem distant.
  This is why I try to remain optimistic, thinking positively. It's easy to lose patience when dealing in cryptocurrency.
294  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Trade Bitcoin - AVOID "Get Rich Quick" Shit Coin Pump and Dump on: November 16, 2019, 02:33:34 PM
That's the thing. The only people gaining are the people that initiated the pumps. They're smart. As soon the shit coin goes up buy 10-20% they sell to people buying after the 10-20% up. Anyone who buys after that is stuck with those coins because no one is going to buy a shit coin that is up that much. They end up selling at a huge lost (sometimes 70-90% lost). It's a scam that works well for people who organize pump and dumps.

The FOMOs are trying to get rich overnight, but ended up loosing everything. I wish people get it that only trading / investing in Bitcoin will bring you profit. Only BTC's price fluctuate to the point where you can make nice profit trading with even $500. It's going to take a while to build up the profit, but it's almost always a sure thing.
I think that I have to agree with you. These scammers are getting out of hand, and pocket. The schemes that they keeping coming up with are getting more sly by the day. A lot of projects are just a bunch of copy cat clones that offer little to no real innovations. I try to avoid scammy sounding projects at all cost.
295  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin is wasting electricity and are harmful to the environment.. Yea right!!! on: November 16, 2019, 12:25:36 PM
So, we all know everyone is going on and on about Bitcoin mining wasting lots of electricity and how this is harmful to the environment, but have we ever considered how harmful other payment methods are?

Visa and MasterCard have about 65 million customers <old statistic> and we also have debit cards from Banks and also other payment cards like American Express and Diners Club etc. A lot of these cards are replaced once every year and it is made from material that are very harmful to the environment.

Cards are made of several layers of plastic laminated together. The core is commonly made from a plastic resin known as polyvinyl chloride acetate (PVCA). This resin is mixed with opacifying materials, dyes, and plasticizers to give it the proper appearance and consistency. - Source : http://www.madehow.com/Volume-4/Credit-Card.html

The average American has 2 to 3 credit cards and there were 304 million Visa credit cards in circulation in the United States and 545 million Visa credit cards in circulation outside of the United States in September 2014. Source : https://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/market-share-statistics.php

There are about 189 million Americans adults with at least one credit card.

In Q4 <2014> cards in circulation looked like this :

Citigroup -    109,774,131

JPMorgan - 93,847,656   

Bank of America - 79,822,686
   
Capital One - 63,194,228
   
American Express - 54,900,000

Discover - 43,630,772

Synchrony - 31,030,786
   
Wells Fargo - 24,271,107
   
Barclays Delaware Holdings - 16,156,368
   
U.S. Bancorp - 14,440,681

So, looking at some of the statistics and considering that those cards must be manufactured with the use of electricity and also destroyed and ending up in landfills, then I would say Bitcoin's carbon footprint must be minuscule compared to this industry.

Feel free to add some updated statistics and also a graphical presentation of what those millions of cards would look like, if you had them all together. We would circle the earth a couple of times, if we had all the cards that were manufactured, since it was introduced many years ago.  Roll Eyes
   
It takes a warehouse full of miners now to turn a true profit on the minting of Bitcoin and other proof of work based cryptocurrencies. It's becoming way too costly and mining the traditional way will eventual become obsolete, taking a back seat to consensus algorithms like "Delegated Proof of Stake".
  Mining was an excellent proof of concept for Satoshi to implement in order to demonstrate the mechanics of Blockchain & Bitcoin.
296  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: How to avoid falling into a FOMO trap on: November 15, 2019, 03:00:21 PM
Most new traders are easy targets when it comes to falling into a FOMO trap. FOMO stands for “Fear of Missing Out” and usually occurs when there’s a lot of hype around a new project or a new development in an established project, that traders are scared of missing out on. But here’s the thing, giving into FOMO can actually be hugely detrimental to a crypto trader’s efforts. We’ll be looking at how to avoid falling into a FOMO trap, so that you can keep your trading efforts sustainable and avoid giving into hype. Here are 5 questions to ask yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dasfUZXrMqQ&feature=emb_title

1. Does this sound like paid hype?

The first question you need to ask yourself when you’re trying to avoid falling into a FOMO trap is: Does this sound like paid hype? Paid hype essentially means that a crypto influencer or other’s in the cryptosphere have been paid to hype up a particular project, usually without knowing whether or not it actually has a chance of being a success in the long run.

This can be particularly impactful on new traders, who often look to figures in the crypto industry to direct them towards sound and secure projects. Unfortunately, many people are in it for the money, and may promote a scam without much care. If you’re hearing about a project from an influencer, be sure to do your own research thoroughly before considering buying in. Doing your own research is vital to making a successful trade. And if something seems odd, definitely wait the FOMO out.  

2. Are there a lot of controversial statements being thrown around?

Maybe you’ve heard about a new platform and have done your own research, but there are a lot of conflicting and controversial statements being thrown around. Firstly, good for you for doing your own research. However, if opinions are generally conflicted about a coin or a project, it’s probably a good idea to wait a bit and see what happens.

Often, conflicting information is a sign that a project is unstable or too risky, and you’d be better off sitting it out. You can always buy in later if it seems like things are going well, but don’t give in to FOMO if you’re uncertain. Risky trading doesn’t make you a better trader, it is

far more beneficial to be cautious and to make the right decisions.

3. Who is the authority pushing this information, and can you trust them?

Do you know if the person or entity promoting a certain project is trustworthy? If you’re skeptical, you should probably stay away. Unfortunately, there are some individuals and authorities that use crypto and crypto trading to take advantage of people, especially people who are newer to trading. When you see someone pushing a particularly project, ask yourself whether or not they themselves are trustworthy, and whether the project that they’re promoting seems viable or realistic.

Ultimately, if neither seem legit, you should most likely stay far away. You can always keep an eye on the project and buy in at a later stage.

4. Has this been done before?

When looking into a project, you should definitely ask yourself, “Has this been done before?”. If the answer if yes, you would be better off avoiding the project altogether. Why? Well, it would make more sense to buy into the original project, than into a knock off. We’re not talking about something like a hard fork, because that’s a different situation entirely, but rather projects that seem eerily similar to other platforms that are operating under somewhat false pretenses. Those projects are most likely going to fail, as they don’t provide anything new to the cryptosphere.

5. Does this investment stretch beyond your financial means?

When you first start trading, it’s incredibly important that you evaluate how much you can afford to trade with, and start from there. If a project requires an investment that is outside the realm of affordability for you, it’s crucial that you don’t stretch yourself just to give in to FOMO. Rather wait and build yourself up to a point where you can comfortably make that investment, and then buy in. Giving into FOMO at a time when you cannot afford to can be especially disastrous.

So, how to avoid falling into a FOMO trap particularly when it comes to your finances? Wait it out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh9Hfh2tzs4&feature=emb_title

Avoiding FOMO

Now that you know how to avoid falling into a FOMO trap, you’re prepared to take on the world of crypto trading. Bitcoin trading and altcoin trading can feel incredibly daunting to start, but once you’ve got the hang of it you’ll find yourself flying in no time.

If you’re new to crypto trading and want to learn the ropes in a safe and encouraging space, check out eToro, the world’s leading social trading platform.

Cryptoassets are volatile instruments which can fluctuate widely in a very short timeframe and therefore are not appropriate for all investors. Other than via CFDs, trading cryptoassets is unregulated and therefore is not supervised by any EU regulatory framework. Your capital is at risk.



https://www.etoro.com/blog/market-insights/how-to-avoid-falling-into-a-fomo-trap/
Fear of missing out is really an everyday occurrence for guys at the bottom trying to work there way up the investment ladder. Fear of missing out often grabs hold of me, till the pint where I don' think rationally and jump into a financial endeavor. It is always more important to practice ones Due Diligence and take the necessary time to plan out things accordingly and try to minimize any common mistakes one often pitfalls into!
297  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: not a rule! but it's about your common sense to avoid scam projects on: November 15, 2019, 02:11:42 PM
Regulasi aren't a golden bullet against scammers. As all those things become more obvious to the general public, scammers evolve to mimic decent projects with almost impeccable efficiency. Still, the most reasonable rule of investment isn't about ICOs or IPOs, it's just about your common sense. I mean no matter what, never spend more money than you can afford to lose.
   I have to agree, all that it really comes down to, is having common sense. If one practices their Due Diligence correctly and takes the ample and necessary time to research the endeavor first, one won't be able to be be scammed so easily and will be able to spot potential pitfalls that these scams turn out to be. I once sent 1 Ethereum ($150 per ETH at the time) to a telegram bot that was supposed to go toward an ICO. The bot ended up being to good to be true, and I never seen that 1 ETH again.  Undecided

So please remember to practice your Due Diligence
298  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Prove that you shouldn't rely on icobench and others on: November 15, 2019, 01:40:24 PM
This is a warning to all newbies that seek help from ico rating websites when they are looking for projects to invest money on..

Facts
- You have good money to pay? you will get good rating on the platform, this is the way of ico rating websites
- Good projects can get bad rating on them, and that doesn't mean they are bad project..

For example, you must have been hearing about how successful gowithmi project was right? check out the rating on icobench using the link below.

https://icobench.com/ico/gowithmi

The score is 3.3 where as projects that have better rating turned scam as well, all i am saying is its better to rely more on your own research and not rating.
Wow, now that's crazy. I didn't know IcoBench couldn't be trusted, they seemed like a legitimate platform. Out of all of my different ICO rating website bookmarks, IcoBench is listed as my first, I guess I hadn't practice my Due Diligence.

I have a question regarding your quote below

"The score is 3.3 where as projects that have better rating turned scam as well
You stated that Gowithmi is a "scam as well", yet I couldn't find any evidence to refute your claim, care to provide a source for this information?  Huh I thought it was a successful project?
As for the ICO rating websites, I'm glad you brought attention to them, and how their opinions could potentially be biased  / influenced.
299  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Which one makes sense on: November 15, 2019, 01:10:00 PM
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
The answer to this question is way too broad for a straight answer. It is going to end up being made up of biased opinions because several conditions and or anomalies can occur affecting ones decision on whether or not to join a bounty campaign at any given time (Before ICO/IEO or During). It could be easier to join a bounty campaign during the initial offering sale to the public, this way if the campaign is proving to be successful, there is a chance the campaign could be extended. Instead if you go the Pre-ICO/CEO route which is before the fundraising, you give your self time to earn from a project and start your planning at hunting for a new campaign after the one you joined early finishes!
  As I said, the reason on which someone may join at this particular time, or that particular time is going to be different for every individual, so to answer your question, just simply join a bounty campaign during a time that is most convenient for you!
300  Other / Off-topic / Re: Why are people of today hates learning? on: November 15, 2019, 12:48:09 PM
Have any one try throwing these questions to people of nowadays? (who wants to learn?) the fact is many people don't want to learn, the moment you start trying to teach them one or two things you will see them walking away, lol but if you ask them if they want to earn money they will quickly give you their total attentions or even drag a nearby chair to sit and listen Cheesy Cheesy why are people like this? How will they EARN without LEARNING?  Cheesy this is still affecting many newbies coming into crypto space till date, how will them not get scammed? lol
Your topic is the kind of question that many tend to over look. I think that the attention span of the today's generation of youth is accelerated. When I was younger, if you wanted to play multiplayer mode on a game, and didn't have any siblings, chances are you had to go to an arcade or join up with friends to play together. Today, things are so advance, most processes are automated with just a touch of a button. Not everyone could afford house hold computers then, let alone have access to the world wide web (nostalgia).
   The youth of today are used to things being fast and efficient, learning anything for the first time, takes a little time though. I imagine with cryptocurrency one most approach the scene with caution as it is a new sector of digital financial instrumentation. There's no choice but to take the time and learn slowly in this field (crypto), as I believe that it is a field still in it infancy. If the newbies will take their time to learn more about the scene (blockchain) and actual follow and participate within the community, the journey into crypto won't seem so complicated.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!