It's doesn't trade if the BTC-e backend is down, it's just another frontend. |
|
|
|
We are now goxxed v2
Yeah well, it's not looking good. |
|
|
|
In the past, buying from Coinbase was a hit or miss IMO. Sometimes they would ask for a valid ID, sometimes it would just slip through. the only other place, besides localbitcoins (which is a hassle, because most sellers want you to be verified anyway), would be the serpicoin exchange (serpicoin.com). They're swiss based and don't require validation by law. based on their website, they've been around long enough.
I just looked at serpicoin.com, 15% commission, surely that can't be right? |
|
|
|
|
They have been down for half a day and not even a placeholder page saying what's going on, just the default cloudflare broken server page. That's not very professional.
|
|
|
|
|
An outage this long is going to tank their credibility.
It's ok to have problems, but you need to keep the public informed as to what's happening.
Bet there is a bank run on them if and when they come back online.
|
|
|
|
So do you guys reckon that it is worth buying an L3+? How fast would the ROI be on a unit like this if it arrived in October?
The problem I see is the next batch is priced at 40LTC, that's what you have to ROI not the spot USD price. I think pricing the miner in LTC is a bad idea. If LTC is $100 when the Sept batch ships, and the difficulty has doubled, then your are going to feel mighty silly that you didn't just hold onto your 40 LTC in the first place. This happened to me with Butterfly Labs miners, and the Antminer S1, in both cases I would have been better off just holding onto my crypto. I think 40 LTC at today's prices is too expensive, it should just be priced in USD like the last batch, just look at the curve of LTC/USD prices over the past couple of months. |
|
|
|
Poloniex turns over close to $US 290million per day. http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/poloniex/If they are getting 0.15% from the trade maker, and 0.25% from the other party of each trade, that means 0.4% of $290million each day and that's not including withdrawal, margin lending, and other fees. In short, Poloniex are rolling in it, and there is absolutely no excuse for shoddy support of the kind people here are seeing daily. I read many forums an Poloniex support ticket complaints are everywhere. Strongly suggest using some other exchange until they get their support ticket handling up to a professional level. |
|
|
|
Not really sure about that, how to find it out?
Use a multimeter and check it. |
|
|
|
|
Is the 12 volt rail collapsing?
|
|
|
|
Seems that it's a pre-order not shipping. Very risky, difficulty waits for no man. |
|
|
|
|
I had to submit my first support ticket on Poloniex this week because of a missing Ethereum deposit (yes it was over 1.0)
I provided all the details, txid, to and from addresses etc. from the block chain explorer. Very straightforward support issue.
No reply whatsoever, not even a "We are looking into it".
Worst support from a crypto exchange I have ever seen. Even Gox and Cryptsy made an effort to respond to my tickets!
So I have withdrawn most of my coins from there today and taking my business elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
So what's your forecast for EOS today? I'm thinking about buying now it's cheaper, but I don't like the tendency at all.
The current price puts EOS market cap at over 2.5bil without any working prototype or proof of concept. It's already double the market cap of DASH only after being in the market for like a few days? IMO, definitely overvalued right now. It's a honeypot for the greedy. Probably go down in the history books. |
|
|
|
|
Poloniex seem to be offline atm.
Not a good sign.
|
|
|
|
Please find the datasheet for NVIDIA Mining SKU; final naming is “MINING-P106-6G”
Product detail and condition:
PRICE: 226 USD
-Warranty: 3 months
-Packing: bulk pack, MOQ=10
-All I/O port removed
That's not a good deal at all. I paid $215 for an Asus gtx 1060 earlier this month, not a cut down mining one. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, other people are having ETH deposit issues the past few hours on Polo.
Their ETH wallet must be playing up.
|
|
|
|
I have not seen anyone that has gotten a gpu to work via an M. 2 to PCI-e adapter. The one I got from ebay did not and I was refunded. Not even if the system has only one gpu installed. So except for people that has modified custom MB I don't know of anyone who is has gotten more than 7 rx cards working.
They work. https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=155Of course you enter the problem with power supplies at a high enough rating, in which case it's usually easier to build two rigs with more affordable components etc. |
|
|
|
I'm getting a lot of issues with the Claymore miner within NiceHash in the past week, anyone else getting this?
This happens on 3 separate rigs running different cards, Furys, 280 and 390.
What often happens is periods of rejected shares even though the cards are rock solid stable and periods of disconnects/timeouts, I've tried switching regions but the same issue. If I switch miners I get no issues, but of course Claymore is the best performing.
Nicehash seems to have been doing a lot more "switching" this past few days vs it's norm - which impacts Claymore's miner more due to the overhead of setting up the SSL connection. R9 280x should run fine on Ubuntu 14.04 with the fglrx 15.12 drivers - but I think you have to manually download them and install, I don't remember them being an apt-get options anywhere offhand. There is ZERO reason to run "newer" drivers on that card, as long as you don't have anything more recent in the same machine with it. I am running fglrx(0): Version: 15.20.3 which was installed from the additional drivers menu in the Xubuntu 14.04 GUI. Should I update to Claymore v12.5 ? |
|
|
|
|
I just stated to get the same problem on Nicehash too.
It's rock solid on flypool mining ZEC, but I would like to mine on Nicehash now.
I am still running 12.4 about to update to 12.5 to see if it fixes the Nicecash rejects, but before I do, my video card is an old HD 7970 (R9 280x ) Tahiti chip model. I am running on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 with fglrx drivers.
Is that the optimal Linux solution for that vintage card with Claymores?
I haven't seen any later OpenCL drivers for the Tahiti chipset than the ones in Ubuntu 14.04
|
|
|
|
Hi, yes new release coming soon. What new api features do you want to see?
failover, so if a pool is not responding it tries a secondary pool you have nominated. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
