Only publically hold shares have voting rights on Cryptostocks, the shares still held by the issuer don't have voting rights. So if an issuer of a stock put up a vote for something, then the investors in that stock control 100% of the voting power.

Du kan skicka mindre försändelser inom norden som brev upp till 2 kg med rabattfrimärken(den gamla sorten 1981-87?) vilket skulle innebära mycket billigare frakt då.

Both Altswap and Firemine have been tradestopped and trade has been reopened again on both stocks before it had been announced on cryptostocks what had happened(there's still no announcement of it on cryptostocks).
That action alone will of course make the one that reopened trades, Altswap/Firemine and/or Cryptostocks responsible to compensate anyone that (during the time after trade was reopened) will become victim of loosing on the now announced partial split for buying stocks(above lowest sold price they will recalculate from on respective stocks).

No announcement had been made on either Altswap or Firemine's stock on Cryptostock by the way when they announced here how the fix/split should work and it still haven't been made so more shady business from there side.

https://cryptostocks.com/securities/61

Mcxnow have been up and running for full for over a month now and the contract in MCXNOW100 say that dividend is supposed to be payed in the end of the month"...dividends will be paid on a monthly basis on, or near, the last day of the month..."
Last time dividend was paid it was made the 26:th of the month so one assumes that the interpretation of that the issuer themself made is last day or possibly a few days earlier(not later) is when the dividend should be payed.

No announcement have been made on the subject by the issuer of MCXFEE100 on cryptostocks so we have to assume the dividend date has been missed by the issuer and dividend now is 3 days delayed, why is that the case. Why is the dividend delayed and why has there been no announcement about it ?

To reply to what was mentioned in gridseeds forum, picture 31 is the gridseed product and it appears to have the correct CE marking see this http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/images/ce_mark_big.gif for example and there is cases where the identification number must not follow the CE marking on the product.

De aldra flesta som varit insatta i btc ett tag lämnade nog gox för gott våren/sommaren 2013.

Jag är dock säker på att du inte är den enda som hade pengar eller BTC hos gox. kolla denna tråd till exempel https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=476535.0

"Hello,

I am in Japan and have deposited 12.499 million Yen (about USD 122,000) at MtGox from October to December 2013. I currently have 175 BTCs and 13,000 Yen in cash at their exchange. I also have a Premium status account.

Please let me know how to proceed.
That was most of my retirement money."

"Hi.

My name is xxx and I live in Sweden, Malmö.
I am writing for me and for my girlfriend and my dad.
We all bought and sold bitcoins a last years and made some money.
We have taken out some money when we need to and right now me and my girlfriend was going to buy a house and start a family so we tried to withdraw the money in January.
Since the money didn't show up after 4 weeks I tried to contact them but still nothing.
I hope that together with you and some others get at least some money back.
If you need any proof of the withdrawals or such I can provide some of it.
We had in total $49000 on the accounts.

Hope to hear from you regarding this, since we are unsure how to proceed."


USgov la ju lagt beslag på 10+ million usd förra våren för MtGox så där finns ju en del att dela ut från det.

Folk har också spårat transaktioner gox gjorde internt och följt dem från 2011 och frammåt och MtGox har kvar åtminstonde 130 000 btc vad det verkar så det interna meddelandet som läcktes ut som sa att Gox endast hade kvar 2000 btc i deras hot wallet och att deras cold wallet skulle vara tom, det är helt enkelt inte sant vad som sades i det.

Mark Karpeles(ägaren till MtGox) skall visst vara god för många hundra tusen btc också så det kan vara möjligt att han beroende på vad som verkligen skett på mtgox kommer bli tvungen at ersätta delar av förlusterna MtGox har gjort.

205 SEK, ~31.5 usd för 1,67 GH SHA256(BTC)mining power är inte billigt, det är 18,89 usd per GH/s.

Nu för tiden kan du kan köpa KnC's senaste miner för 9995 usd / 3000 GH/s  3,33 usd / GH/s
eller CoinTerra TerraMiner IV  ~1700 GH/s för 5995 usd 3,53 usd / GH/s

Om de kommer ge dig pengarna tillbaka eller inte beror på när du har dem i hand och den kommande utvecklingen av difficultyn framöver, du kan räkna på en calculator som denna till exempel http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/calculator.

Något som dock är 100% säkert är att du aldrig kommer att tjäna igen motsvarande mängd btc ASICMINERS usb-miners du nämnde kostar att köpa ~0.0525 btc@600usd/btc. Kan vara en kul grej att ha kanske men knappast någon bra investering.

80 GH/s för att mina altcoins och du kallar det babysteg, du kan knappash prata om att mina altcoin av scrypttypen(LTC,DOGE..) då utan altcoins av SHA256(BTC, PPC, TRC...) typen då eller ?

Why is theese type of scams even on the forum and not automatically transfered directly to the trash ?

A lot of things looks very shady about this company lets take a look at the basic thing the mining and what they say about it.

"Revenue Sources:

Shareholder money will be directly put towards new mining power on a daily basis. We have miners ready to set up, more being shipped, and others that can be quickly ordered and delivered..."

This indicates that they should actually have some hardware and have more on the way and that they can order even more if needed so it should not be any overpriced cloudhashing GH they resell or buy in then.
and then we take a look at the numbers they have presented sofar.

                                                                                     share            Investors/Firemine
                            Mined    Payed out      Dividend     Sold    cost              invested BTC per GH/s   
Date     GH/s           BTC      BTC             per share   shares    BTC        current day        1 day behind         
18 Feb    8,8           0,0035   0,00315       0,0001125     28      0,84       0,095454545      0,068181818   
19 Feb   42,3           0,0168   0,01512      0,00008494   178     5,34       0,126241135      0,019858156   
20 Feb   112           0,0446   0,04014       0,00016317   246     7,38       0,065892857      0,047678571   
21 Feb   144           0,0573   0,05157       0,00008638   599     17,97      0,124791667      0,05125          
22 Feb   385           0,1252   0,11268       0,00016594   679     20,37      0,052909091      0,046675325   
23 Feb   415           0,1568   0,14112       0,00013767   1025   30,875    0,07439759        0,049084337
24 Feb   452           0,1541   0,13869       0                 1100   33,5       0,074115044      0,068307522  Not paid
25 Feb   452-900?   0,1492    0,13428       0                 2100   68,5       0,151548673      0,074115044 Not paid   
26 Feb   452-900?   ?0,15+   Not published 0                 5281   (179,835) 0,397865044      0,151548673   Not paid   
27 Feb   452-900?   0,1477   0,13429583   0,00002543   5281   (179,835) 0,397865044      0,397865044   paid 2 day late(1 Mars)
28 Feb   452-900?   0,1418   0,12758896   0,00002416   5281   (179,835) 0,397865044      0,397865044   paid 2 days late(2 Mars)
1   Mars  452-900?  ?0.15+            Not published                                                                              Not paid


The text in bold should be pretty accurate for what Firemine charged there shareholders for each GH/s(0.049-0.074 btc/ GH/s) mining power before they/cryptostocks got things totally messed up.

If you compare that to for example a KnC miner at 500-700GH/s for 5000-7000 usd delivered back in oct/nov(that should have paid off it's cost by now) but even if paid full cost it's 0,017-0,023 btc / GH/s or compare them with a cointerra IV delivered now at 1700 GH/s for 6000 usd then it's 0,0059 btc / GH/s so with there pricing of ASICmining GH's one just can't call FIREMINE anything else than a SCAM as FIREMINE charge 8 times more than current ASIC hardware cost.

The market on Ceo.io that is charging an increadibly high overprice for mining power was at around 0.024 btc / GH/s during this time so firemine has even charged 2-3 times more than there already inflated price.


"Shareholders will see mining stats on the Google Doc and be able to track exactly how much they are making each day. We will be continually adding more hashing power as more shares are released to even out the dividend payments and maximize shareholder profits!"

They removed the mining result that they already had published for the 24 and 25 feb and they haven't published the mining result for the 26 feb or the 1 mars and the payment for the mined btc for the 27-28 was 1-2 days late and the earnings for the 24-26 feb and 1 mars they haven't paid out at all.


So if you think about investing in BTC mining, comparing a couple of options then it could look something like this.
==================================================================================

1) Buy Firemine shares at cryptostocks at 0,03 btc per share(IPO price), get back 8-12% of what you invest if they don't run away with your money.

2) "Invest" in buying mining power at CEX.io and you will get around 25% back of what you invest if you buy and hold until the mining power is worth 0.00000000 btc per GH/s.

3) keep your btc and don't invest in any BTC mining equitment and you will have 100% of you investment left

4) Buy hardware from a serious ASICminer manufacturer that dont overcharge for there products then you may expect to get something like 50%-150% return based on when you invest, what you pay for it and what companys ASIC's you invest in.

So if you don't do very carefull calculations on your planned investment it's most likely better to not buy any btc mining shares or ASIC hardware at all, and whatever you do never ever "invest"/throw money away at cex.io or BFL(or anything even worse than them...).

It's bad of Gridseed to send you an old(not working ?) controller. But if the controller unit cost 67 usd and you need 1 unit for 10 gridseed miners i think the best thing to do might be to just order 1 (or 2) extra controller units that works for now and take that 67 usd cost, thats just 67/(160*10+67) 4% of the cost extra for that set of 10 miners, you can always try to argue with them about that later, the important thing for you is to get your miner up and working, 3 days of downtime for a set of 10 miners because of a bad controller is probably equal to the cost of an extra controller unit.

390 kh/s scrypt(LTC) mode, that sounds very good. Good luck on your project. Im sure you find what's the optimal for your conditions to get a good output and make the miners stable with some testing.

You mentined you were calcuulating what was best "I'm calculating which situation is better for us, both mining btc/ltc , or ltc only.", i did run the numbers a few days ago on the gridseed miners on the GRID project, the numbers on whats most profitable should be simular for you.


Mining both scrypt & BTC should still be slightly more profitable unless there is a scyptcoin thats extremely profitable a single day, but the difference is probably only something like 0,2 usd per gridseed 5chip miner and day or 10% with current difficulty on btc and the power usage reported seems to be 7 w scrypt only and 60 w scrypt+BTC(sha256) so maby the temperature increase may be a factor to if it's hard to get the miners stabalized.

On the next difficulty change in around 11 days the difference may be dovn to 4-5 % and the difficultychange after that it will probably be negative to mine dual, but it all depends on exactly how much you pay for power and how much scrypt hashrate you loose by mining both scrypt and BTC and how profitable scryptmining is each day and that seems to vary a lot. You can try coinwarz http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency to get a good estimates on what will be best for you.

fasbit has sold 65 BTC at an avg price of 601.46 USD/BTC on Coinbase a couple of days ago(26 feb i think), fasbit posted the info on there forum then. He expect to have the cash on or before the 3 Mars and wire the money to Gridseed the same day he gets the cash.

It's announced over on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=463721.0 OP has a link to the rounds countdown clock.

If they give you 5% compounded daily return that is definately a HYIP/ponzi, you don't even have to look at there page to tell that, just by the return you mention it just can't be anything else. They will run there scam until they get someone that invests a large enouth sum or until investements dry out then they dissapear forever.
5% compounded interest seen over a year is 54 211 841 times the money. 10 000 usd would become 542 118 415 800 usd in a year, if it were true. With those kind of amounts you could probably run a small poor country, surely you see it's unrealistic return they claim to be offering.

There is no serious business that would generate those kind of returns even for a small amount of time and not be able to get private funding in there nearest surroundings and have to go out to get fundings from strangers.

Even in the btc world, mining and else you woun't see those kind of extreme returns, if you look over time you may under special occations under shorter period of times have been able to get a few % daily interest but when it comes to 40,71% weekly compounded interest like the one you mention you just woun't find investments with steady returns on those kind of levels, if someone would find a nieche thats making those kind of returns on anything it will be done in a small closed private group, not open to public investors.

Do you actually have anything for sale on your site that actually excists that people can buy and recieve now ?
Think i earlier saw that you sold shares in your company on your site for 1500 dollar(each ?) if that was per share then thats quite a bit higher price than you sold them for on cryptostocks, why's that the case ?

I think the Altswap/Firemine listings looks strange. For example the fact that they reused the webpage for those listings and how they haven't been very clear about what they actually mine with or what they buy for the investors money and some other things in how the contract was formulated, also the price they seems to have payed per GH and what each GH seems to be generating don't seem to make much sence, but with that beeing said:


If this is what happened it's a bad flaw in CS system that they should fix as soon as possible, the whole point with 2FA is to make it impossible for someone that may get access to an email/password from doing any harm, even CS should realize that and maby they should compensate the issuer at least partially for that and if the losses "only" were 1 btc there shouldn't be any problems for Cryptostocks to take that cost as they charge each company 1 btc to list at there site. But it's stll up to everyone to protect there emailadress so even if the 2FA don't work the way one can expect it to do it's not fully CS's fault. 

Cryptostocks support is known to take long time in most cases, some exceptions exists thou when they acted and fixed things within minutes/hours.


How Kumala is thinking here i can't see, he clearly haven't realized what the 2FA used on CS is for then and some email accounts dont even have the possibility to protect the email with 2FA. Kumala if someone have 2FA on at CS, then no one should be able to reset there password without access to both the email and the 2nd authentication used, they should not be able to log in, not be able to buy or sell anything and not be able to withdraw anything.

I think i read way back something about that CS was sending out a postcard after a week or two to those that wanted to advanced verification to verify that there address was real as a step in getting that advanced verification. Maby something similar could be done to make sure resets of 2FA or changing of password is done by the correct person, or maby have people register there accounts with 2 emailadresses and both emails would have to confirm a change of password or reset of 2FA there could also be an automatic delaying of the change by a week or two if someone wants to change password or reset 2FA to make things safer.



Edit reading what you said a bit closer
Shouldent you have seen pretty mutch directly that something was wrong, if someone changed your password your old one sholulden't work, how have you been able to log into CS up until recently if CS support diden't answer you for 2 days ?

I don't think there is any law in the usa that outright prohibits there service but there may be quite some costs involved in getting licensed & registered as money transmitters in at least 43 of the states in the USA if the company &/or there servers is located in the USA. Where did the 2 year figure come from, i haven't seen btcQuick mention any such time-frame and they should be able to serve international customers(and probably us customers from 5 states) even if there not licensed in those 43 states that requires it for accepting customers from those states yet.

No i don't know much at all about crypto-trade, just checked there site in a few times the last couple of months, diden't even know they lost 30k, reasonable there stock should have taken some dive when such things happens but maby there shareholders is mostly people that bought it a long time ago that don't check there site to often and there was also some big walls up on there stock when i checked there site so maby that preveted those that know about the loss from effecting the price to much. and the fact that they started to pay out dividends in all sorts of coins now instead of just btc or ltc may have confused people even more and the increased trade the ACTM's introduction on the site was probably also seen as a positive thing by the crypto-trade shareholders.
But if your worried about the price on the crypto-trade shares price you could probably just sell them off if there's just 9 in BBBB's possession, that shouldn't have to much negative impact on the price of the stock.