In this instance, I would rather have you award the user of your choice, rather than including it in an "official" prize. It's becoming increasingly difficult to track all the conditions that are left for each rank and rewards for those ranks, especially when the rank has multiple rewards with certain stipulations for each of those rewards.

While I appreciate you donating your merit to winners, I do invite you to award it as you wish to a deserving participant of your choice

Thanks!

It would be ideal if the sMerit (by non-sources) was transferred to a Merit pool that was distributed by MS-1 (Merit Source Depth 1) members to MS-2+ automatically. Otherwise, the transfer of sMerits could end up being abused if the user was allowed to send it to whoever they desire.

The pool would only work if the sMerit donated to it were dispersed whenever there is an amount that is divisible by the amount of MS-1 members (eg. If there are 100 MS-1 members, the pool wouldn't disperse the donated merit until 100 Merits were collected in the pool).

@InvoKing, I think this is a very valid start to what could become a sustainable merit source system. Great job!

I have now had an (two) accounts from OP. The first one was in working condition, but was replaced by OP because it was still being actively used simultaneously when I wanted to use the account.

I have used the replaced account on a daily basis now, and haven't had any issues with it. It has now been a week since I've used @bitcointalk's provided accounts for Spotify, and I'm pleased.

Welcome to Round 7; good luck!

Unfortunately, the escrow address is being hosted from a wallet that is only compatible with nested P2SH SegWit addresses so I'm unable to send to bech32 addresses at the moment. No need to change addresses at the moment; if you place in any ranked positions, we can revisit the issue then. Cheers, and welcome to the challenge!

Amazing! Thank you very much for your generosity! Your donation will keep this challenge ongoing for another month! Did you have anything specific in mind, in regards to how you wanted your donation dispersed?

I will update the sponsor roll when I return to a computer. Thanks again, @eternalgloom. This is very ungloomy of you

I showed evidence and then he challenged me to send him money and then reverse the payment. Why the hell would I break the PayPal terms and conditions just to prove a point? This user’s view on trust is diluted, and he has been warned multiple times about PP being able to reverse F&F payments. Whatever. I guess he will just learn the hard way lol

How the hell do you get fisted from "ham-fisted"?

This is why you're making more enemies the more you open your mouth. Because you take things out of context, and then spin them into slanderous and inappropriate insults in your replies.

Thanks for providing me with yet another account to add to my ignore list.

I did check. Which is why I wrote what I wrote. So now you're lying? You're not doing yourself any favors by digging yourself deeper... You should just save yourself the headaches and quit the forums.

Participating in the airdrop is not the reason for your negative trust. You received negative trust because you showed extremely untrustworthy behavior by creating multiple accounts in order to game the campaign and earn more of the airdrop by breaking their conditions.

I vote to keep your negative trust, along with the red tags for all accounts involved. It's easy to apologize once you've been caught, but chances are that if asked to return all of the dishonest earnings you've made with all of your alt accounts, you'd say no. You're welcome to prove me wrong, but I highly doubt that you're that apologetic and remorseful about what you've done.

Like @Neelix has stated, you're better off creating a new account. Good luck trying to rank it up, though, as your post history shows that you don't give a single shit about this forum except for making money.

I'm glad that the merit system is implemented now, because it will do its job in ensuring that your new account(s) won't rank up simply for spamposting 14x every two weeks.

Good riddance.

I must have missed that post. So now his alt account is posting in this thread to defend his main account?

What the actual fuck is going on in that brain? Meanwhile, he makes general/false accusations towards other members as being alts of other members accounts. Hypocritical to say the very least, and very shady and untrustworthy behavior, in my opinion.

Can you send your CV to btcforjoe@protonmail.com?

I may have an opportunity for you, and it sounds like this will fit right up your alley in what you're offering. It's a sweat equity position, but the true potential to earn is huge. Send me your resume and contact information (Telegram, Skype, and/or WhatsApp) to my email address, and let's talk!

---

This signature did not verify using Electrum v3.1.0.

If you're going to go on to state that @digaran could have been talking about accounts outside of this forum, then don't even bother. You're clearly taking the @digaran approach in keeping things extremely technical in order to avoid the context of the actual situation.

Whose alt are you?

I have read hundreds of threads about how to earn merit. I've only merited a few of them, this being one of them. Just because someone opens a thread about merit doesn't mean that they'll earn any, thus your argument is invalid.

What kind of ignorant narrow-minded imbecile assumes that the accounts that @Sellingaccs sells are bitcointalk accounts? Take a simple look through their post history, and you'll see that the accounts that they sell are for other services.

Kind of ironic, if you ask me, that you're so quick to criticize and slander others, yet your own idiocy blinds you to see how stupid your own actions and posts really are. I don't even have to nitpick them anymore; people are starting to see you for the real psychotic individual that you really are.

I would recommend that you remove the "1 year" out of your title, and just indicate in your top post that while these accounts may be valid for 1 year, that you can only guarantee 2 months of the service.

However, I have a question. If my subscription expires after those 2 months with the guarantee, will you have new subscriptions available for sale? Or are all of the subscriptions you're selling based on the same admin account?

Oh look. Another newbie who got screwed out of some cash whose posts get deleted because the seller has a self-moderated topic...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3295830


Seriously, why is self-moderation still a thing in the marketplace boards? Has anyone brought up any valid points as to why anyone would need self-moderation in these boards?

Off-topic, but in all seriousness, you are now in my top 10 favorite users of all time on bitcointalk.

I don't like you and i don't agree with your methods, but your posts are extremely entertaining, and I keep coming back to this thread to see what other nonsense you've posted.

Quoted and verified

This is a great instance of the good actors of the community helping to eliminate the malicious ones. Kudos for that.

I've reported a good amount of these shill posts from MarineCoin, and I'll continue to do so, but I really do hope that you find a solution that won't encourage spam and shitposts. Sounds like you have something in the works; I just hope it's relatively soon as my fear is that future ICO's will see this as an example of all the shit they can get away with for future campaigns. That's the last thing we need here... A dozen altcoins with hundreds or thousands of users trying to qualify for an airdrop by flooding bitcointalk.

Nope.