@Coolcryptovator, you might want to change subject of this topic and some lines within, rumor has it that if you register account at MorCrypto exchange, agree to their ToS and fail verification in any way, your binance's account will be terminated:   |
|
|
|
WE ARE BIGGER THAN THIS NOW, SO YOU CAN CHOOSE TO FOCUS ON OUR PAST OR LOOK FARWARD, THE FACT REMAINS THAT MORCRYPTO HAS GROWN BEYOND THIS LEVEL A LONG TIME AGO.
But sir, you said: our project was never a Ponzi
So it was a ponzi. I just have to archive this topic http://archive.is/cuSPJ. Feel free to post your opinions then, there is nothing we more we can do, we believe everyone has eyes and they can see the truth about our Legitmecy, After all we are still the biggest Project from Nigeria/Africa
Ok, Mr. Legitmecy, elaborate this:  Is Binance aware that biggest Nigerian project is using their ToS ( MorCrypto's ToS: archived http://archive.is/ImpP9)?
I am going to add negative to this profile as well. |
|
|
|
It is trivial to change your displayed time zone, even to something other than complete hour differences.
Yes, but Bpip showed 11:51:19 PM and if you take a look at that screenshot and bitcoin discussion, account "rodskee" posted something @12:18:21 AM, you can't really fake that . In theory it could be faked. Although at least part of the video had to be taken on it after 12:18:21. I don’t see any reason why someone would take looking at the PM part of the video ahead of time to wait until the password is reset to take the first part. What? That's what I am saying, video is taken after account changed password  |
|
|
|
It is trivial to change your displayed time zone, even to something other than complete hour differences.
Yes, but Bpip showed 11:51:19 PM and if you take a look at that screenshot and bitcoin discussion, account "rodskee" posted something @12:18:21 AM, you can't really fake that . |
|
|
|
Since we are looking at a video that was supposedly taken from BitcoinGirl.club's computer, why can't he see his own smileys?
Different browser, for example Tor doesn't show those smileys. So the next question is, who is Side chain, and then how did he get BitcoinGirl.club's password?
How do you know Side chain knew BitcoinGirl's password? It's wild speculation. I have looked into something. According to bpip, account has changed password @11:51:19 PM: That video was taken (according to https://streamable.com/7w307k) @ 21:29:14. According to forum time, it was taken at 12:28:47 AM:  So it was taken after password was changed. (bpip use the same timezone as forum, right?) |
|
|
|
WE WOULD APPRECIATE IF YOU CAN REMOVE YOUR NEGATIVE COMMENT SINCE THERE IS NO PONZI IN OUR PROJECT.
Yeah, stop yelling. What's this: but surprisingly some people interpreted it as Ponzi
"We removed our perfectly legit lending platform because someone on internet forum said it is ponzi."maybe because we had no working product at that time which is understandable, so we decided to remove the Lending Payout from our project, a Ponzi system does not have any working product backing it to generate funds that's why it's called a Ponzi, but if there is a working system generating funds then it's not a Ponzi, so our project was never a Ponzi, people only misunderstood us because we were just starting at that time, So *( EVERYTHING LENDING HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM OUT PROJECT) since the initial concept of Lending was not working.
"We, at MorCrypto didn't have working product but we actually did and we removed it because our working product was not working" |
|
|
|
What's the proof for that though? Looks to just be sign-up dates unless I'm missing something, which could lead to false positives.
I didn't look too much into this (just thinking out loud), but there are 7 accounts from that post tagged for account trades/campaign abuse. Rizzlarolla has found some patters, for example this one or this one (at the bottom of post, seems like alphabetic order) but I guess all this is circumstantial  I'm not familiar with Bitcoingirl.club, but I didn't see anything else than a funny way of talking about himself in the third person.
Hm, self-accusation to random forum accounts and risking ban because of PM spam?  |
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl.Club changes their password fairly regularly, so they'd be hard pressed to claim their account was hacked (or sold for that matter)
Bitcoingirl.club AKA Pamoldar was already mentioned in the past as one of farming accounts: Anyway, it doesn't sound like real account owner sent messages: This is beyond my expectation! [...],BitcoinGirl.Club, [...], [...] are protecting sportsbet.io secretly. It's beyond bitcoingirl's expectation that bitcoingirl protects sportsbet? Wth?
I tagged account, I won't break my head over this too much. |
|
|
|
You mean your first instinct after making an alt account isn't to quickly give it some merits so it can level up? Which sig campaign are you planning on entering it in eventually? Hope its not Chipmixer.
Damnit, you got me  |
|
|
|
Yeah... but marlboroza does this one infuriating thing in his prose where he refuses to space out an extra line before starting a quote box
Hey, I am not doing that all the time! I don't think I could reliably call OP an alt of marlboroza - I see no noticeable connection here.
"Account AjdinS was active "Today at 04:02:02 PM", just 11 minutes before marlboroza posted this, both accounts have this green thingy :
Further, marlboroza replied to LFC in scam accusation topic and he also replied from AjdinS pretending he doesn't know LFC posted something just to look like they are not alt accounts.
And, as I don't have anything to say about subject and I don't like marlboroza I will just go with my regular off topic trolling, as usual."
rohang was speaking to me privately throughout the whole sportsbet mess & he seems a nice kid (think he’s young) so I added him to my trust list. [...] Is it really that important?
Well, if their feedback appears as trusted I would say it is important. |
|
|
|
This guy is complete lunatic. It seems that I am not allowed to respond in topics started by fake newbie accounts, if I do, according to timelord, I am automatically their alt account:
Instead of replying off topic can you tell us on what trust and deals you added rohang to your trust list? Please give one example why rohang should be trusted and I'll never message on forum again.
Are you sure you know which alt you're using to make these idle threats that mean nothing from? Well, Mr. Moron2067, it's not me. (ARCHIVED --> http://archive.is/lJlUA#selection-9535.0-9907.95 <--) |
|
|
|
That is old info, here is new one: https://bpip.org/TrustLoghttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;fullNo, c'mon. He made a mistake and corrected it. If he hadn't recognized it as a mistake then it would be a problem. But he did, well before OP made this post. Show's over.
According to bpip, accound become DT2 (again) prior to creation of this topic ("8/1/2020 8:59:54 AM") Anyway, rohang is not a DT and I think there's nothing left to discuss.
What is this then, visible-not-a-DT-feedback? 
@OP perhaps to post from your main account next time? |
|
|
|
Don't feed the troll please, he doesn't deserve serious answer for that drivel. Thnx.
IIRC this has already been discussed, LFC added Rohang to his trust network after this account countered Royce777's negative feedback and then he removed account from his trust network because account "wasn't reputable enough". Since then, account made exactly 1 post so they probably become "reputable enough" If you feel a user is abusing the trust system, contact them directly or in the DT thread on meta for an explanation. As a last resort, you can use your distrust~ option to exclude them from your trust list.
I am pretty sure OP knows all this, if I have to guess reasoning behind this topic, I would say OP isn't satisfied how DT system works. Well, I can't blame him for that. |
|
|
|
~
Hover the mouse over that picture and click:  Stop shitposting, everyone is aware that OP posted from new account. Genuinely wondering why it only seems to be Russian ‘noobs’ that post about ‘problems’ with sportsbet here?
I would say it is irrelevant, casino accused player and decided to seize funds allegedly because of multiaccounting, from that email I can only see " it's my word against yours" |
|
|
|
How can we stop scammers from making a profit by pretending to sell accounts they don't have?
I am little confused here, you want to stop scammers by escrowing accounts to potential scammers and abusers? A neutral tag "account changed hands at this date" would be great for transparency
Probably no one will buy account knowing it will be marked as sold and even if they do: but would instantly be followed by more red tags too.
...and maybe some flags too. Okay, the first step imo, is to have a consensus on what should happen to an account that was sold, a negative or a neutral tag, if that is not addressed
What consensus? According to lauda, theymos said it is ok to flag sold accounts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197446.0. |
|
|
|
And for 'item 2', money launderers pay people a percentage of the money to get them to use their identity, some could use fake ID's, etc, etc...
I am under impression that you don't know what is money laundering, no hard feelings. How rollover rule stops money laundering exactly? And it never happened to me tbh. Deposited around 200 USD and made 20 - 30 bets with no problems.
Edit: Reading it again... 'You have to make at least one bet with minimum stake of 50% of your deposit.'. 'At least one bet' means you can do multiple bets until it reaches 50% of your deposit. I think... But let's clear things up.
It really doesn't, but as you said that you have made some bets and it never happened to you, they should change something in ToS, it is confusing and just because it is part of ToS, site could force player to place large bet. |
|
|
|
Ti haikui su u principu nekakva forumska zajebancija na temu shitpostera koji su pisali gluposti od par riječi u više redova samo da ispune svoje shitposting tjedne kvote a da ipak izgleda kao da su nešto pametno napisali, ono, u više redova je pa je OK.
Evo i od mene merit, tko je sljedeći?  |
|
|
|
It's really quite common for fiat sportsbetting sites to have 2x or 3x deposit roll overs from my experience...
Not from where I am coming from. Our gambling sites don't have rollover requirement, you are free to make deposit and if you don't like what they offer or if you have changed your mind and you don't want to place bet, you are free to withdraw full deposited amount, no questions asked. Of course, you will need to provide them your full personal information when signing up and if there is something suspicious going on, government agency will probably contact you. All these rollover requirements, selective KYC over few bucks what some casinos are doing, bet half of your deposit is bullshit and it really doesn't prevent money laundering, however, it forces player to make more bets. And really, it's protection for the site from money laundering and stuff like bonus whoring if anything cos most crypto gambling sites don't really collect any identification
Having 2 scenarios: 1) player make $100 deposit, does 1/2/3/whatever rollover, lose $10 and withdraw $90, KYC free 2) player make $100 deposit, decide not to gamble and withdraw $100, casino refuse to send them their funds and enforce KYC check, telling them it is because of their AML policy and shitty ToS. How the fuck is this protecting them from money laundering? |
|
|
|
Flag supported, I don't trust these exposed scumbags trying to make impression that they did nothing wrong. Question is can we trust this user and his business if we know about his "mistakes" or "attempted fraud"?
It's kind self explanatory. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
