$29,000 izgleda kao san, zar ne mogu iranci kupovati po okolnim mjenjačnicama po ovoj "normalnoj" cijeni? Doduše, nisam popratio kakva je situacija sa dollarom tamo ali ispod članka ima par komentara:   Izgleda fake news. |
|
|
|
You are rambling on about one single 6 year old rating.
 A day before TECSHARE was tagged by account koshgel:  Tecshare probably thought that retaliation feedback is not good, but who gives a fuck anyway when you can apply this strategy: "this Stalinist "show me the man I will find you the crime" bullshit must be stopped at all costs" - TECSHARE "Yes, lets just pretend this isn't about using the trust system as a tool of retribution and selective enforcement. You know what Stalin always said, find me the man I will show you the crime." - TECSHARE I like how you try to repurpose the term "shotgunning" to mean anything other than sheer volume of negative ratings. Last I checked I have an average of 2 negative ratings left per year. Not quote "shotgunning" or "wide net".
I see, so it is ok for you to tag 1 account seller but if someone tag ("shotgun") 50 account sellers then it is not OK. But this sounds like this then: "Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated?" - TECSHARE "Yes, lets just pretend this isn't about using the trust system as a tool of retribution and selective enforcement." - TECSHARE If that is all for now...
You are the one who started this, not me, look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.0
Now, @TECSHARE, if you don't mind: FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this. Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them. You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things! I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam
Would you like more or less scams here? |
|
|
|
I said the world "trolls" in the rating, that is all you have?
And I also said "troll" in the rating. Edit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4309586.0 Why are you selectively tagging account sellers?  "Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated?" - TECSHARE Why have you shotgunned feedback? User has plenty enough negative feedbacks. "wide net shotgunning" - TECSHARE Still nothing about this: I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam
Would you like more or less scams here? |
|
|
|
is related to other payments of some camping management on which I use to work with them as back end. ( I can't disclose the campaigns for privacy purpose of the same person ). I even did some deals about smart contracts with them to send multiple transactions at a time. None of this was related to bumping as I was aware of the risks involved a bit late. Well, this will definitely raise more questions. You could have said few day ago "I was paid to bump ico threads", but ok, you choose different path. Anyway, I said I will lock thread so locking it for now. |
|
|
|
What does this have to do with the trust system?
You said it is OK to add word "troll" to feedback:   Another example of your trolling, you don't read anything, you just see orange color, make assumption and then you form your troll post (I am still deciding how dangerous your trolling is) and wait someone to take a bait. Thread is locked so you can reply here (I probably won't get your reply, because that is what you trolls do, you say something to make some drama and then when people ask you something you either don't respond or you move conversation into different direction, like it happened with you in X number of threads, you even fail to stay on topic in your own thread which you started about me!): FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this. Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them. You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things! I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam
Would you like more or less scams here? |
|
|
|
WTF is this thread about exactly?
ree to tecshare's thread, he said "more trust abuse by me" and then he start trolling yahoo and then he said that yahoo abused trust so I am not sure what to respond there, and then I got what I posted above. Probably everything mixed together.
TIL I have the ability to make marlboroza shit himself and can force nutilduhhh to post. YLSNED.
Internet Troll
A person who posts remarks or comments onto internet forums or message boards in an attempt to get someone to comment negatively to it and to redirect attention onto himself. Usually, these remarks are controversial, stupid, off-topic, inflaming, illogical, or childish. Sometimes, the comments are enough to enrage the people in the forum to want to respond back with their own negative remarks which starts a flame war and changes the topic and attention of the discussion. Since, internet trolls are attention whores, this is exactly what they want since they probably don't get enough attention in real life and needs someone else to acknowledge their self-worth and existence. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet Troll In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement or a specific gain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_trollBy all definitions, this is perfect example of your trolling. |
|
|
|
FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this.
Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them. You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things! I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam  Would you like more or less scams here? |
|
|
|
^ Don't be. Example: 1) find nutildah's post 2) say something irrelevant for topic(again) and make sure it is something about nutildah which will make them respond (it can be word or one sentence, but strong enough to cause reaction) I act because I don't enjoy my character being discussed this way.
You're not the first member to be analyzed in this fashion and you certainly won't be the last. Weeks after getting on DT my reputation was thoroughly savaged. If you can't handle criticism then don't dish it out. If you must know, I distrusted you because I don't trust reformed shitposters that suddenly decide to take an interest in forum issues. You're trying too hard.
Seems as if my instincts were correct here. You should have taken this as advice to tone it down a bit, but instead you ramped up your involvement in the drama even more. You apparently have lots of alt accounts on the forum which makes your obsession with DT (perhaps quest for eventual DT status as it would appear) even more disturbing. I want to be clear that I do not wish to pass any kind of judgment on hacker.
That's all well and good Quickseller, and thanks for chiming in with your analysis, but could you please stop posting under both of your accounts in the same thread? Its getting rather insulting that you insist we pretend you're not Quickseller (you are -- I'd rather not open a thread in Reputation about it). If you're gonna post in a thread, stick with one account. Kind of weird that you are using an alt to post in a thread that is largely about alt accounts. Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of. 3) wait 4) nutildah replied, triggered by troll: Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of.
When I said my reputation was savaged weeks after being added to DT, I was referring to actions done by yourself and subsequently cryptohunter. You're in no position to be talking about "usual retribution" here as you tried your hardest to shit on me over an issue you supposedly don't care about, all because of some stuff happening in P&S. Don't play that tune for me, bullshit maestro. 5) Bingo! Continue to troll nutildah in not related thread 6) deflect thread more using "nutildah - bill gator" "argument" I mean I am not in control of any accounts accused above others than this ( not logged in from 2 years ). K, doesn't mean you don't have alts. Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of.
When I said my reputation was savaged weeks after being added to DT, I was referring to actions done by yourself and subsequently cryptohunter. You're in no position to be talking about "usual retribution" here as you tried your hardest to shit on me over an issue you supposedly don't care about, all because of some stuff happening in P&S. Don't play that tune for me, bullshit maestro. That wasn't retribution. Retribution for what exactly? When I am talking about retribution in this context I am talking about abusing the trust system to punish people for speaking out. All I did was talk about your history here, I never used the trust system against you. That was me using your own standards against you to show what a total hypocrite you are as you run around accusing people of shit you yourself are guilty of. You were trying to destroy Bill Gator's rep for speaking out using the fact that he purchased the account as the sole crime he was supposedly guilty of, yet you yourself were engaged in the same activity. Yes yes, you claim you never actually sold it, but you can never prove that, and we all know how much you enjoy speculating, so lets use logical speculation to assume your account was sold too since you can't prove yourself innocent. See how much fun the guilty until proven innocent standard is? People like you Vod, and Suchgoon keep saying this kind of shit like it is just so obvious I am abusive of the trust system you need never actually give any examples. Then when I press the issue you just again pretend it is self evident and scurry off to your clown holes, or argue over meaningless shit until the topic is sufficiently slid to another subject. 7) hope nutildah will respond again 8 ) drag more people into trolling system 9) hope Vod and Suchmoon will reply 10) rinse and repeat |
|
|
|
lemme put that in capital
So lemme just explain
~
I have no idea who that was , but She must be a genius.  |
|
|
|
There must be perfectly valid explanation why this address has ~20% transactions to and/or from this group of payed ICO bumping shills...
As explained above, I being engaged with these peoples and activity for very early times of mine on the forum and for short interval too[...] I have agreed my involvement years back for a very short period of time Now hold on a second with that thought. First transaction (From Mysterious01 to you): 732 days 8 hrs ago (Jan-01-2018 12:48:05 PM +UTC) https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2055958f76a4ac83cba148a7a9934887f199e95a1103c04cc31ef65ecbc078ccLast transaction (From you to Mysterious01) 319 days 18 hrs ago (Feb-18-2019 02:04:10 AM +UTC)https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb24c40b43641940656f47f790880c932f20c27c11907a88c90cfd730d4237588That is 413 days, please elaborate "very short period of time". If I counted correctly, there are 9 transactions from you to account Mysterious01 and 56 transactions from account Mysterious01 to you. Elaborate this as well and I might consider to lock thread. (note: I didn't check most other addresses, this is specifically for 0x5aF75BF78984F3e22CFCCcB52BF62f529bCB440b (PDAngel and Mysterious1's addy) and 0x15ba9083b4c96421827ae85d7a7d211f5862fcde (hacker1001101001's addy)
I almost forgot something. OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then. In which campaign have you been then? Weekly post count? Post it or those are just words. IIRC it was KEPLER, as I said I even use to follow those projects I was posting in. Kepler's signature campaign started on January 30., local rule is 10 posts per week (yes, as you said, no twitter and facebook count but you don't have any twitter/face posts as I can see) and there is this rule: "Post will be counted weekly until Tuesday 23:59 forum time."January 30. was Wednesday so: "first week" was between February 1. - February 7. "second week" was between February 8. - February 14. "third week" was between February 15. - February 21. In that period you have posted more or less (if I counted it correctly) 44 post in altcoin [ANN] (few posts are not in [ANN] and then you stopped posting there. That is ~14 posts a week. Between December 31. 2017. and January 30. 2018. you posted cca 166 posts in [Ann] threads. You said several times: I agree I use to post for some time in some ICO threads, but that was the only level on which I could produce content back then to get through the signature post requirements. [...] rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.
As I said, that was the only level of contents I could produce on the forum back then to reach my atlcoin signature bountys post requirements weekly and I read the rules as post in altcoin sections as accepted which encouraged me to stumble over there.
I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.
Your words, not my. Which signature campaign required from you to post ~40 posts per week? Anyway, after this post you turned your story 180 degrees: Ok, yes they were targeted reviews
[...]
Again funny for you, I already agreed I was involved in posting for ICOs and following them even on telegram, which I left when I got to know it is forbidden on the forum.
Right... |
|
|
|
~
Oh, yes, thanks. There was space in signature which I didn't see 0x8308e608449df905f13bc3614e28ec4ba8a65ed9203934ce441217c04df4f1bc68be86776778b 70f3a34bb3179c75f849556a86856ca9079395a61015e6852231c |
|
|
|
10% extra token guaranteed
Would you like to buy some letters from me? I am selling 1000 "A" and each day I will send you 10% (or 100 "A") in your PM. In a year you will have so many "A"s that you will be "A" rich as a fuck. Yes, I have unlimited supply of "A"s. You can sell those "A"'s to other users, just forward my PM and pass ownership to them. You can also withdraw "A"s to paper, if you have printer, of course... It is 100% safe to buy "A"s from me. /s |
|
|
|
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
There is reference, you know... Question for you. Pump and dump/ponzi/whatever coin/token/numbers/air is ok? Why have you created flag against this and this then? What is difference, one has stolen content and team without social media profiles, while X10 doesn't have team, whitepaper, roadmap, algo, wallet, nothing except words "it is 100% safe, invest and you will get 10% daily"! If I start shilling for projects you flagged, would you tag me as a scam promoter or you will say "you are ok, it is ok to share your opinion and shill for scam which I have flagged"? |
|
|
|
~
That's why I elaborated too[...]
Sorry for going off-topic but as you thought I being his alt
It is good that we I mean I elaborated Other things are just part of witch hunts, show me the man I will show you the crime.
Ok, Mini Me, I've tried to verify this: {
"address": "0x15ba9083b4c96421827ae85d7a7d211f5862fcde",
"msg": "Hacker1001101001 Signing in! Proof to @marlboroza.",
"sig": "0x8308e608449df905f13bc3614e28ec4ba8a65ed9203934ce441217c04df4f1bc68be86776778b 70f3a34bb3179c75f849556a86856ca9079395a61015e6852231c",
"version": "3",
"signer": "MEW"
}MEW says "invalid hex string". (can't take screenshot) Etherscan.io showed "Result: Sorry! The Signature Message Verification Failed" ( https://prnt.sc/qivokd) I probably did something wrong Can you sign message with today's date? 3.1.2020.?
to tear apart the repo of another scam buster like me.
Oh, more narcissistic statements. |
|
|
|
What's my given nickname by CH?
Laura? Or was it Thule who said laura? Can't remember any more.
@CH, I will remove all spam, redundant and boring parts of your posts and say something about this:
More diarrhea and deflecting: Yes, lets just pretend this isn't about using the trust system as a tool of retribution and selective enforcement. You know what Stalin always said, find me the man I will show you the crime. What is important is they pretend it is a valid rating even under the flimsiest of pretenses and in spite of a very clear pattern of using the trust system as a tool of retribution to silence opposing opinions.
|
|
|
|
@hacker stop deflecting this thread, if you want to talk about lauda or anything other than this, create thread about lauda or other things.
Ok, yes they were targeted reviews So fake ICO reviews  IIRC it was KEPLER, as I said I even use to follow those projects I was posting in. As I can see it is 10 posts per week requirement, and yet you said this: OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then. And only after involvement in or with ICO bumping group was pointed, you said something different. Funny to put up names for you right. God Bless that guy with a nice life, he left the forum due to the same torcher. Guy tried to escrow $100-200K having long ponzi history repeating "it didn't happened on this forum" and "it happened "long time ago"" and there was some alt account thing going on around him and his family which is/was also involved in some financial pyramid scam activities on youtube so why the hell it is torcher? Besides, you just don't leave place which brings food to your table  Funny that you mentioned it  I see a string of accusations and digging up of my past incidences to tear apart my repo in any way possible. Don't you think you are being a little narcissistic (hmmm...) here? What reputation are you talking about? |
|
|
|
You misunderstood me.
I get your point, I am just making it clear for everyone who will read post, when you say to someone "you sound like.." sometimes some people use it as "you said he/she/it is..", that's all  I had suspected that hacker1001.. was a bought account. IIRC, he kinda came out of nowhere and lent money to marcotheminer.
There is one 7 days old transaction https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa80610a055815e42347614654d4d701770fb306ceec49402e2b4aacdcde56f35Hacker said he is original owner of account so I guess signing message from that ethereum address will clear all doubts (about account owner). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
