Kako je krenulo ne bi me uopće čudilo, mislim da regulatori općenito teže tome da imaju uvid u bilo kakvu transakciju, neovisno koliko ona zanemariva i mala bila, no dobro, otom potom.
Naravno, pitanje je čisto informativnog karaktera.

Provide some proofs or you are liar. Question marks won't work on me, you just can't hide behind them, this is not some political shitshow, which you are trying to pull here. Trolling quoted for record.

So you didn't read my post and just spamming random words? Spam quoted for record.

It should be evident by now that user Vispilio is trying to move this topic into some kind of political drama, totally not related to topic and one big lie.. My 6 topics are directed towards ban evaders.




So you didn't read thread? Let me quote it for ya:

I (and I am pretty damn sure many many other users) think that you are deep in OG's ass, you are so deep in his ass that I am starting to believe that you are his sockpuppet and I KNOW that everyone can click this link and read transcriptTL,DR: CTRL+F ognasty. Everything is explained very well.

Ok, I did.
But you "were hanging out!", look:


Makes sense, leave your 3 smartphones at home and spend your friend's internet.

Mr. 2011. doesn't know how to edit post or something?

Elaborate "I lost my BTC"



Explanation looks like someone ran their own ponzi on top of another ponzi, regardless who posted this.

Actually, when you reply to someone it shows icon with arrow.

You are looking at wrong declaration, take a look:


So this is just another thread you didn't read?

Source of that or you are making shit up.
What have you been smoking? You are the one who is ignoring the fact that scammer is default trust member https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2050090.0 and his retaliatory nonsensical feedback is pretty much visible on profile of user whose article they stole not to mention that they are evading ban using alt accounts while rule #25 is pretty much clear. Not to mention that another user (who is also default trust 1 member and evading ban) has made scammer and ban evader default trust 2 member. It is not my fault that certain things led to other accounts which I mention in threads #3 - #6, well since I have found them I feel it is correct to point rule breakers, unless you think everyone who made report is creating drama? Unless you think I should create one thread for 6 separated cases?

Only drama I see here is drama you are trying to create with your post, adding some irrelevant things to it and trying to move thread into another direction, read your words again:

This is the drama part, what you are doing here is trying to cause some emotional reaction, to engage more users into unnecessary "fight".

Trying to create more drama:
What this post has to do with this thread? Spam somewhere else.

3 questions, something is not right here.

Your friend couldn't delete or edit that message, they had to send you message on facebook, even thought they have your login details? You don't have smartphone? Who in 2019 this space doesn't have smartphone? This sounds like dog ate my homework excuse.

This is pretty much very simple yes-know question.

@OG have you returned whole amount to depositors? Did pirate return you whole amount, as he claim he did?

@BitcoinStore šuška se da bude KYC na sve transakcije od 1.1.2020.

Samo me zanima da li je to istina ili budu neki novi limiti? Mislim, ovo je zapravo općenito pitanje za mjenjačnice i bankomate.

And yet you said this:

---

It is not that account is banned, user(lets call her Alice) is banned. So if Alice's account, let's call it Quickseller, is banned that means Alice can't use alt account let's call it PrimeNumber7 *cough* *cough*.

While researching merit distribution on one account, search result pointed me to this post:


Vod's website showed that next users are banned:

https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=ugurum15
https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=hasyurt
https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=Biboxax

I think they are evading ban:


Some merits:



EDIT: there is more accounts in post number 2:
walarmorgulus
kartepe

EDIT 2: one more account (post for more details):

---

Local rule: account Quickseller is not allowed to post in this thread, his maybe alt accounts are affected by this rule as well.

I would say valid non-DT feedback matters the same as valid DT feedback, the same goes for "bad" or bad feedbacks but the thing is non-DT feedbacks are "not visible" so not so many users are mentioning them.

"User creates account claiming that his old account was stolen and continue posting from new account while old account becomes inactive after that" is my opinion  

---

"Suddenly everyone is worried when eddie13, when me, when OG, when this, when that"

@Tec's hare, I have read this thread (unlike you) and I can't find where word "everyone" would fit in. Spam your repetitive redundant off topic nonsense somewhere else.

I don't know what timelord wants from you but it would be OK if DT1 member (you) remove or exclude this account from trust list, don't you agree? I have no power over you but you have power over me, see how funny is that 

Ok, I changed title and removed word "trader" from it. I also noticed that you have edited your post, I am not sure is it a question or you are trying to imply something (and I might have idea what you have in mind) but it is probably wrong:

source: https://bpip.org

Please just type here what you had in mind with "*cough* *cough*", I don't want to start another thread just because you are implying something or just trolling. I will accept explanation in PM as well, I promise I won't share it with anyone. You have my word.

Sorry, what I meant to say is, they wanted to buy account (they are account buyer, not trader):
So yes, title is little misleading. You can blame "fat fingers", "cat jumped on my keyboard while typing", "I was abducted by aliens and they forced me to write this" or whatever you want. But that was maybe a month after their registration.

When? Did they use account to sell it? Which account is sold if it is sold?

Account Dammitt
Evading ban - account GalaWan
Evading ban - account Aqualung89

Connection via btc addy 196i9LBuztrqGe6e243MTXbj6k4J2A6b6y, twitter https://twitter.com/FatihBudakfb , ethereum address 0x3a14aFEAC599E7BF7963aDD71efAF55447845b12 & 0xd2964d2816287410B0b3e0f4485BFcbbca5F4FC3


(I believe they messed something while typing btctalk name: Cromwelle)


Account GalaWan used the same addy to claim giveaway:


Account Aqualung89 used twitter https://twitter.com/FatihBudakfb and ethereum address 0x3a14aFEAC599E7BF7963aDD71efAF55447845b12 here:


(note: telegram username Cromwelle)

Also here:


GalaWan used the same twitter here:


Dammitt used the same twitter here:


For this bounty https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2213994.0:


Ethereum address 0xd2964d2816287410B0b3e0f4485BFcbbca5F4FC3 is visible in spreadsheet of that bounty campaign (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lfLxuTZj-KNkLlhxosstD2dxgq8As3AT2m1wb-NtaIY/edit#gid=2076006898):



Aqualung89 used the same address here:


And, account Dammitt:


As usual, if any post disappear, use archive or PM for link.

---

On side note, this is very interesting merit distribution to banned DT member's alt account the_doctor:


source: https://bpip.org

...which is actually irrelevant for this topic, just smaller observation.

Just another not related thing for topic, account Dammitt sent retaliatory -ve to ThePharmacist:

And yet for unknown reason it reminded me of this line (which account goraset placed on my trust wall):


I am not sure why am I posting these not related things  

In that case moderator could merge posts instead removing them but I guess that is on moderator who is handling report.
It is not spam, but imagine if everyone start doing this, for example you reply to few users in 2 posts then another user (lets call them Bob) creates 2 post to reply to your 2 posts then third user replies to your 2 posts and 2 Bob's post making 4 posts in the row and then fourth user reply to everyone creating 8 consecutive posts.

Account saulzaents
Evading ban with account: ap3311

Connected via ethereum address 0x42E7Edae254271b2269F6331D13f0D587ee7a94e

http://archive.is/hDwBq#selection-5413.22-5413.64
In spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dGD5uP4O54ndumclmWkDzX2ESyIIV7P3y6Jwwxz-rk4/edit#gid=0 under #383


Account sauzaents joined twitter bounty and posted this:

In that thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2012574.0, OP posted link to spreadsheet:
Under #136, there is indeed user sauzaents using this address 0x42E7Edae254271b2269F6331D13f0D587ee7a94e which is account app331's ethereum address:



Or here
Edit: ap331 is very likely bought account:

---

On side note, some merit distribution by ban evader DT member goraset's alt account:



Account alpsea is also very  interesting, but this is not relevant for this thread, so I won't mention it any more  



EDIT: OH https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1879076.0 account saulzaents is banned probably because of ban evasion?

Account ugur2222
Account Thyphon
Evading ban with account LordCyclone
Evading ban with account Abyaby --> see YOSHIE's post

Connection via ethereum address 0x1a373693FA775B3d0FbDaF564007C00745D72eC8


(here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5041950.msg46432412#msg46432412 and there are more posts which can be found in ugur2222's post history, PM me in case posts disappear or use archive website to find it)




Connection via ethereum address 0xB4AD5AAbb5bf325F870dC347D79c255dceaA1E88




LordCyclone also used address here and here here.

"Someone" might think that mentioned accounts are maybe trying to frame LordCyclone, but that is not possible, banned account used address at Nov. 11, 2018 while account LordCyclone registered account at December 26, 2018.


There is also some strange merit distribution from ban evading goraset's banned alt account the_doctor:


(source: https://bpip.org)

Extremely likely coincidence, so I won't mention it any more