this was the last straw for me at an attempt to gamble, even though I believe in the long run I could make it out positive. Some others crashed as well, and I don't want that to be me again in the future. Take this opportunity to learn some statistics: I think it would help you greatly in your life. If you truly believe that your strategy would have been positive in the long run then it is merely a case of Hanlon's razor.  Here, maybe this module will help: Mean (expected value) of a discrete random variableMy nephew tells me that Sal is a pretty good teacher. If he can explain it to a child, anyone can learn. |
|
|
|
While sad it did bust in the short term Let it be known that you would have had to keep your winning streak from before the sudden loss for 16 times as long in order to recoup the losses. You're looking at over 116000 games, and that's not even considering the part where you're statistically losing every single bet. With the 1% house edge, this is the result you're looking at: E(X) 116000 = 4×10 -507 |
|
|
|
Holy shit, this was a fantastic proof of your math, stackgambler. Glad we didn't have to wait months for the proof. Sad about frenchbull and allgasnobrakes tho. Empirical proof was not necessary to see that the mathematical certainty of a house edge results in a long-term loss. Anyone that tells you that you can run a script or some strategy to transform a -ev bet into a +ev bet is lying. Probabilities do not change simply because you bet here or there in different ways: with every single bet, there is a statistical loss, period. |
|
|
|
they claim that i used finnish vpn to hide my real location It's tricky with this VPN rule because the proof from either side (as of now) are merely their statements: Hard to prove the VPN usage because even mentions of common ipv4 addresses can simply be reduced to claims - it would be easy to take the IP from a known VPN node and claim that it was used. Hard to disprove the VPN usage since we don't know the exactness of their methods or the validity of their claims - it is difficult to show evidence of lying unless the data was audited independently or sourced from a third party.
Even discounting the whole ToS change (I still haven't seen any response to my question), it's extremely strange to confiscate a user's funds simply due to VPN usage: is there a problem with keeping your true IP confidential if you are allowed to play and you're providing personal details elsewhere? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
More importantly: did you tell players that you changed the ToS and have them agree to the new terms? Looking for an answer to this question, Ray. What's stopping you from changing the Terms and Conditions page unilaterally at any time to rope in some clauses that let you confiscate funds? |
|
|
|
Who finds any of this acceptable ?
Just lock the threads already !
-snip- Jesus, this is some self-serving cult shit. Guy practically thinks he's the next messiah ready to raise people into cyberspace heaven, chained with their infinite-size blocks to store their consciousnesses |
|
|
|
Well. If tagging account based on deleted posts in the past, I don't think that's objective. Because currently I'm trying to improve my posts quality and not posting unnecessary lately.
Even though it's just a neutral tag. As a bitcointalk member I am really disappointed to be tagged because of my error that occurred in the past, I'm just an easy target if it sort. Did you know that I reported all of those deleted posts? Here, look! There you are!  |
|
|
|
I know we aren't going to change the minds of anyone who has already been indoctrinated. I'm just thinking it might stop more users falling victim to it. If it prevents even a few people from being conned, it can't be a bad thing. I sure would like a welcome message. |
|
|
|
One interesting implication of that 10% rule is that if either team happens to get a good early start or if the skill gap is too large, then their markets have a high risk of being voided.
On a side note i had the exact bet they voided in a 4 fold combo bet which was NOT VOIDED as it was was a smaller bet of the several bets i made. So in a nutshell , the biggest bet you make they will void during the game play LIVE when the bet is winning. Screenshots? |
|
|
|
Or do i miss something? The page has the RTP % on it. |
|
|
|
As explained to the user, bets that vary significantly are (automatically) voided within a 30min period, this is not a new rule, in fact it is enforced for more than 1 year to all users. The system is triggered only on less than 0.1% of all bets placed, and does not apply to live events. Virtually it's very unlikely that a regular user will see it, unless someone is trying to exploit odds's spikes because pre-live odds simply don't vary 10% usually.
Odds that vary for either direction are voided, and not only for the BetBTC's side. It is a 100% automatic process that requires no admin intervention (as on every BetBTC routines, except big withdrawals when admin intervention is called) For transparency's sake, can we have an example of when bets were voided from the odds shifting in either direction? In fact, if you were able to find a zig-zag pattern in the odds where one player's odds were lower and another player's odds were higher by 10% each, then that would give much more credence to your claim of objectivity. |
|
|
|
Can't figure out a good format to deliver the content on the forum directly. For transparency's sake, here are exactly 23000 reports from 2019's reports with the dates stripped - if someone wants me to provide the list with the attached times for further credibility I can do so, but this drops the file size by 50% - I've already provided a short snippet of reports with dates so I don't think it's necessary. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bPPBarEeNdvNhJH9hb24Y3Kp6Xeo6Z_m/view
Use whatever favorite text editor you like to traverse the wave of replies. |
|
|
|
He probably had to work in the circus all year long in his clown suit to buy those 2 DT accounts. You can be proud of that  if you want to discuss personal matters to it in private or in a pm and if you want to post about adkins do it here follow the forum rules
Let's get this straight. codegnome, cutesgirl, gadado, wildan88, MI6, BTCGOLD, imutlinda, aomakun: "DT corruption is why Adkinsbet is being targeted!" Me: "Here's the threads and the evidence. Why are you not responding to them, and instead, attacking people?"
SCAM!!! AdkinsBet scammed me for amount of 196 mBTC in completely blatant way |
|
|
|
it must give you a great feeling that you have a DT status and that you can tag anybody.
muhaha you have created a list of top spammers in your topic while you are the one who give adkinsbet 3 negative trusts with 2 neutral and 1 red i hope you dont forget to add yourself to the list This is pretty contradictory. I gave Adkinsbet the opportunity to respond to the allegations by not tagging them at first. Should I delete the previous feedback so that you can no longer see the history of my generosity towards the site? This is not an adequate response to their issues. Character attacks do nothing but make you look like a shill. If you have read everything that has happened and you still think Adkinsbet is in the right, then you are either a total idiot or a shill, either of which would make the average person untrusting of your opinion. |
|
|
|
All those DT members should be removed from that list, as they do not put enough time and effort into analysing situation and just blaming any new account by fake accusations. All you DTs are crap, BIG BULL CRAP. It's a problem that is part of the mind: Since there are a lot of newbie scammers and detractors, a subconscious bias has probably developed in that people are less trusting of Newbie accounts. Such a bias would make sense if the ideology was turned into, "do not trust anyone," instead of, "do not trust Newbies". The real stick in the mud for this case, though, is the fact that we do not have direct and verifiable evidence: screenshots can be faked, logs can be faked, but in the case where the user showed third-party exported chat logs implicating Vareole? That is sufficient. The forum is extremely friendly to scammers but that is due to the (somewhat, maybe not really) decentralized nature of the trust system - how can you be sure someone is a scammer off of another person's words? |
|
|
|
-snip- Why are you discussing these things outside of the Scam Accusation topic? Solving your problem does not help to spam the ann topic from them. It is much easier to contact them directly or post in the accusation topic. I am sure everybody will understand your frustration, but the way you are doing it now is not gonna help.
The funny thing is that your conspiracy has to grow in size as the number of DT supporters increases: "it's not me who's wrong: it's everyone else! reeeeeeee!" Is it time for me to sling out my conspiracy if we go along with your belief system? Clearly, since codegnome, cutesgirl, and gadado all posted consecutive posts, they must be alts! It's 100% true and I won't show any evidence for my claims because I like to make blanket statements and pretend they are fact!
I'm sure everyone understands your frustration but until you have a sufficient refutation to the seriousness of the issues that Adkinsbet is facing, no one should be gambling here. |
|
|
|
|
0.005 BTC but you gotta keep shouting that you are the real satoshi before every stroke
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
