отнимаем полгода от старта продаж и получаем время когда эти девайсы уже вовсю хуярили в дц на валеру
Нет, в этот раз мы поскромнее  Продаём микросхемы прямо сейчас. У нас у самих их только пока 100 98шт т.к. 2 чипа ребята уже спалили пока его мучили, но 180ГХ с него уже сняли в иммерсий Сроки доставок у нас где-то на вторую половину марта - начало апреля (если не доплатить фабрике за ХотЛот), инженерку поставим к концу февраля тем кто сейчас заказывает. Минимальный заказ на $1М (если прямо от нас), или подождать пока не выставлю в маленьких партиях на моём сайте. |
|
|
|
Neat! Hoping for passive cooling.
btw, these are 30.000x more efficient than my zTex x1.15 in 4 years. Not bad "end of moores law".
Shouldn't that be ~750x more efficient? Also a bit fairer to compare it to gen 1 Avalons, so ~140x more efficient. Ah! The good old Ztex x1.15 boards hashed @ ~200MHash/s while consuming ~10W. Did you know that Bitfury actually made a bitstream for that same FPGA that run @300Mhash/s? So those Ztex figures would be ~50J/GH vs ~0.05J/GH so ~1000 times. We can actually achieve 0.0556J/GH and I have a video that I'm editing right now 11km over Siberia where you will be able to see it. Stay tuned. |
|
|
|
So how we get in on the bitfury action
"
When they are ready to sell em.....probably mid to late 2016 (or even later).After they run em & squeeze out as much BTC as possible from em,then you can buy em  Naah, april unless clock buffers™. |
|
|
|
It will not be "small guys" most likely. If your a company making miners most likely is who they would sell to, the question is what MOQ dogie mentioned is required.
It's really early to tell what will happen. I'm not sure hat will happen if they keep pumping these out, difficulty is going crazy is all we know 100 percent.
Actually quite the opposite. We are focused on maximum distribution on all levels. Minimum order quantity (at least in my shop) will be 1 chip. |
|
|
|
Why is everybody replying on this thread. Doesn't everybody know that Bitfury no longer sells to the public but miners for profit themselves?
Why it's scratches your ass ? At the beginning of 2014, I gave them more than 15 000 euro for hardware . 4 damaged card has over 900 euro, which is currently over 3 BTC. If I had known that the future they not made a guarantee, I'I would not have bought so much. But this support never ansvered http://support.bitfurystrikesback.com/And then I read [quote author=punin link=topic=250249.msg11886410#msg11886410 date=1436972570]
Hi guys!
Was going through the office and noticed still have some M-boards and H-cards left! Anyone interested?
[/quote] Hei Tupsu, I'm sorry that your request for support did not get our attention. When did you send it? I couldn't find it. You'll be the first one to receive a 16nm H-card should we gain enough interest to justify the production. |
|
|
|
 Will be reopening the shop soon! The chip is crazy and amazing. Anyone interested in H-cards with 16nm chips? |
|
|
|
Well, I actually did watch the whole testing process very closely and can confirm that 28nm figure to be empirically derived (I hope my word still has some value on these forums) Empirically derived? What on earth does that mean in the real world of engineering? If you were an engineer at CERN working with subatomic particles with ultra short lifetimes I might understand using this expression, but in our macro world we have voltmeters, ammeters and oscilloscopes that negate the need for 'derivation'. Are you trying to say that that put some figures into a simulator and uses some trial and error to get the result you want? Naturally, you are not answerable to anyone on this forum or indeed any paying customers, so whatever you claim doesn't need to be defended in any way. What I'm saying is we have tested and profiled the 28nm chips extensively and this figure is a real world measured figure, not based on simulation. Hence the wording. |
|
|
|
BitFury (Valery Nebesny) attempted to do async, domino logic 55nm 5 engine scrypt chip and failed.
That's actually incorrect info. You should sack the Mossad agent working for you There are two all important parameters in Bitcoin ASICs:
GH/mm^2 - Capex and J/GH - Opex
Glad you brought that up! GH/mm^2 + J/GH is exactly the game we've been winning since the FPGA era. With extreme design techniques, sub 0.1 J/GH is possible also on 28nm processes, the question is what will be the GH/mm^2 - miner cost.
What also counts is how much money you need to put down to have that chip hashing for you. I believe we're the leader in that as well. Whenever BitFury gives efficiency numbers (J/GH), they never give the all important GH/mm^2 numbers.
Why would we give such revealing information to our competitors? And I don't really understand why the end user even needs to know about this? He cares for $/GH and J/GH and delivery times. GH/mm^2 is engineering porn. Our figures are NSFW When they're selling hosted hash-rate of their 28nm machines to their customers, they claim the machine efficiency is 0.35 J/GH
Source? |
|
|
|
Back on topic, all I said about Bitfury is that no one has actually ever tested their miners who is able to speak about it, and so its hard to really take their repeated claims seriously. If you think I'm paid for PR, why don't you talk to Bitfury's actual PR company or their Head of Global PR. Well, I actually did watch the whole testing process very closely and can confirm that 28nm figure to be empirically derived (I hope my word still has some value on these forums) |
|
|
|
|
Hi guys!
Was going through the office and noticed still have some M-boards and H-cards left! Anyone interested?
|
|
|
|
Hi there, I've started and financed a gallery in south-western Finland, that organizes events and exhibitions to promote local art. We have a webshop that sells high-quality prints of the originals (originals can also be purchased) with Bitcoins. Please come visit us either on-site or by visiting our website! Find a truly special and memorable gift for someone you love and pay with bitcoins! |
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
This is indeed BitFury Groups official new account and the OP message is correct.
@ckolivas no hardware for sale at this time.
@Dogie thanks for pointing this thread out to me!
|
|
|
|
============================================================================================================================================== FRAUD WARNING
There is a growing number of Internet sites using the “BitFury” name, purporting to represent BitFury and positioning themselves as official information resources for BitFury. These fraudulent web sites do not have our permission to represent us. We believe that their sole purpose is to defraud our customers and partners. BitFury reserves the right to take legal action to stop fraudulent activities conducted by dishonest market players. BitFury does not assume any responsibility for potential risks related to the use of any information posted at any non-BitFury web site. These web sites are NOT official information resources for BitFury or its subsidiaries. If you receive any commercial offers from companies whose web site names were made up to resemble the domain names of the BitFury group of companies, please report such facts to us at: [ support@bitfury.org]. The official site of Bitfury is www.bitfury.com or www.bitfury.org. ==================================================================================================================================== |
|
|
|
|
Hi Gazillionear,
Thank you for your interest in our products!
There are currently no active resellers of this product as it's targeted to industrial scale miners and other B2B clients, so unfortunately you won't be able to purchase one at the moment.
Although the BF864C55 is still a very competitive chip when rated by efficiency, I would advice you to wait to see if our next chip would be more suitable for your project.
|
|
|
|
You seem to think lowering voltage can guarantee higher efficiency. Show me some proof. Has it ever occurred to you that chip manufacturers may have already set voltage as low as possible without diminishing returns?
You repeat over and over that it has to work because "physics" and yet in reality there is not a single person with an asic who acheived less than 0.5w/gh at the chip level.
Here's some proof, oh yeah and BTW our chip on 55nm achieved that "less than 0.5W/Ghash" back in june 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Price dropped for M & H-cards
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
