HasherMe, perhaps you can still claim your PART and dump it, that would be a fair compensation, but to get it you will need to go through the trouble of proving you held SDC at some point in time.
Definitely do that! We're doing disbursements for claimants every Wednesday, for example: I'll be posting an update on the claim process but for your benefit here are the current stats from the Community Initiative #1. Thanks for all who donated PART for SDC holders who missed the exchange!
STATUS | SDC | PART | IN-REVIEW | 5,463.90 | 0.00 | IN-PROGRESS | 18,150.66 | 0.00 | DENIED | 1,469.14 | 0.00 | APPROVED | 212,835.30 | 106,417.65 | TOTAL | 237,919.00 | 106,417.65 |
|
|
|
I get an error when i want to send some PART with the wallet from github:
particl-cli sendtoaddress "PuZiSt6d74g9YU6Nh7EC7Y6FDt4RZpDeUn" 0.52 error code: -4 error message: GetChangeAddress failed.
The best help available is on our slack #help channel. Community developers and team members are all there to help with whatever problem you're having. Here's the invite link: http://slack.particl.io
|
|
|
Are votes weighted by user count or by their PART holdings? How PARTs are involved in voting? Can user vote with zero PART? In order to vote you'd need PART. It's a utility/protocol token with many value propositions: - listing privilege (being a vendor)
- passive income (staking coins on a node)
- voting privilege (governance)
What resource and of what amount is required to take down an item? For example, is it like "200 votes from different IPs" or "200 votes from different addresses" or "500,000 staked PART voted against this item"? What is the exact mechanism? The exact mechanism isn't drafted right now as we're researching and vetting means and methods at this point. I could see guidelines being 100% community proposed and voted on using Particl's decentralized voting already built in to ultimately determine mechanisms like this. First we need to nail down the right one that balances security, privacy and usability.
|
|
|
User Vetting (hypothetical example) * The Wikipedia Model: Anyone in the world can become a vendor, set up shop and add/market/sell items. Items that appear illegal or are illegal can be flagged by a user on Particl and voting can take place to vet the item. If enough votes deem this item illegal or unsafe, whatever, the item is removed from the marketplace. How will Particl users see these flaggs or voting bills? Some sort of Push Notification? I have read somewere that this "delist" votings could be tied to "countdown period" you have any more details on that? J.J Remember that this is still hypothetical, as in we're working through models. Listings could begin in a 1 hour holding period let's say. So before they go live they have 1 hour in a holding pin that stakeholders can search through and flag or vote on questionable listings. Thresholds would need to be setup and protocol for informing a vendor if the listing was not allowed to post on the marketplace. Reputation would play a part in this voting scheme too. Users (either vendors or sellers) could remove listings they felt were harmful or dangerous to the integrity of the marketplace platform. Precautions would need to be established to dissuade vendors from playing a long game to built good rep and then sabotage the marketplace, such as listings being able to be removed even if they pass the 1 hour litmus test. Also discouraging teams of people to work together and swing the system. In the Particl Market the seller will pay a fee to list. It's small but it's set up to discourage repeatedly spamming the market with junk listings. Items that appear illegal or are illegal can be flagged by a user on Particl and voting can take place to vet the item. If enough votes deem this item illegal or unsafe, whatever, the item is removed from the marketplace. Are votes weighted by user count or by their PART holdings? How PARTs are involved in voting? Can user vote with zero PART? In order to vote you'd need PART. It's a utility/protocol token with many value propositions: - listing privilege (being a vendor)
- passive income (staking coins on a node)
- voting privilege (governance)
|
|
|
SYS coin and bitbay markets can censor markets, can particl?
Particl market governance will be a mix of inherent guidelines and the rest is owned and vetted 100% by the users. Governance models are being cycled through during development but they'll mostly adhere to these two truths. Inherent Guidelines (example)* Default Categories: The goal of default categories is to eliminate the possibility of having listings show up that would be deemed illegal in 100% of the world. The ability to create new categories for a listing will be available but the vendor would need to agree to a Terms document the Particl Foundation/legal counsel drafts that puts sole responsibility to create new categories on that vendor User Vetting (hypothetical example)* The Wikipedia Model: Anyone in the world can become a vendor, set up shop and add/market/sell items. Items that appear illegal or are illegal can be flagged by a user on Particl and voting can take place to vet the item. If enough votes deem this item illegal or unsafe, whatever, the item is removed from the marketplace. [/list]
|
|
|
help DEV : I was lost (recovery phrase)
Where do I put (PUBLIC KEY) Is there any conversion PUBLIC KEY to recovery phrase I need 24 words to enter the my wallet please help my
Only you are in control of your 24 words. Nobody else in the world has them but you. It's funny how in your OP you don't list BitBay or BlackHalo/BitHalo which was the world's first decentralized markets and it doesn't bloat the chain and scales well.
Considering you guys of course know about us considering you got the idea of double deposit escrow from BlackHalo years ago when Shadowcash started (considering they even asked me to work on it which I declined)
It's all fun and games but if you are gonna list Open Bazaar and other random markets isn't a bit funny that you don't list the most obvious project that predates you?
Heck if you add BitHalo to the mix, we are also coin agnostic.
Bump OP is being redesigned with the latest news, wallets, explorers, exchanges, etc. We can add those decentralized markets on there too It wasn't meant to be all inclusive at the time. Until Particl has a working market it's not really proper to compare it anyways. Words are just words without a product. Hey, thanks... now I can enjoy this project because I think it has a big future Glad you're here!
|
|
|
lol new shadow coin scam still going eh?
Yep. Same ol' shit
|
|
|
Particl Blockchain is LIVE!Thanks to our involved, especially our contributors! PART tokens will be distributed over the course of the first 100-200 blocks (2 min block times) Latest blog post showing how to get started with Particl: https://particl.news/particl-launch-update-july-17th-2017-15ec6d4fd6a8Please be patient, we're going to be overhauling our OP in this announcement thread with the latest Particl stuff now that we're live. Thanks!
|
|
|
I'm no longer owner of the Ohio BITCOIN plates. We turned them in back in 2013 or 2014 because my wife was afraid of being profiled Little 1" BTC stickers still give us street cred with the eagle-eyed Ohioans.
|
|
|
My computer almost exploded when I tried to open .exe file
Had to reboot since my avast antivirus detected it as a threat and then was froze afterwhile.
There's no exe files Testnet doesn't have gui I've probably made a mistake then. Which file I should open ? Here is the following files available into the .tar file, I'm using windows : bench_particle.exe libparticlconsensus-0.dll particl-cli.exe particld.exe particl-tx.exe test_particl.exe particld.exeThere's no exe files Testnet doesn't have gui Correct, however future testnet releases will have GUI. Our GUI on github: https://github.com/particl/partgui
|
|
|
Please update the slack invite. It's down.
Thanks, fixed the link. I have a simple question, Particl will be a decentralized eCommerce platform. The buyer and seller info are all anonymous. Then how to be sure that the seller will send the products to buyer ? and there will be a guarantor?I just a little bit confused.....
Particl Market will have a 2-party trustless escrow based around the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Escrow. We have a good primer for it in our whitepaper: https://github.com/particl/whitepaper/blob/master/decentralized-private-marketplace-draft-0.1.pdfThis is an escrow between 2 parties with no 3rd party moderation or fee. Section IV.c explains the "Insurance deposits" concept that make this possible. Insurance deposits are set by the seller and can range from 0-100% of the value of the item being sold.
|
|
|
There is Openbazaar which now accepts altcoins. There is SYS market. We have Bitbay market.
Why do you think Particl will be something new and successful? I do not see much potential in this project.
Particl can offer trustless 2 person escrow (MAD), privacy via CT, passive income with native token and staking, self-governance via decentralized voting, Native Segwit vs activated Segwit (or no Segwit). Keep in mind the market is 1 component of the Particl platform. Generating a comparison without the market in tester's hands is all speculation until features are actually in front of users. Hope that helps is it traded on exchanges? Mainnet is scheduled for June 30. PART tokens will be distributed then. Just testnet atm
|
|
|
|