Well, if they surprise us, then the silence leads to that dramatic effect (rationalizing here)
And if they don't, well the trust on their silence, and future projects, is broken.
This "rationalizing" does not make much sense. They want to sell batch 2 as fast as they can so if they had anything positive to report - they'd be banging that drum, I assure you. The fact that they are not doing it, well I'll let you rationalize some more but I really doubt they are going for the dramatic effect here... Batch 1 mining will sell batch 2 |
|
|
|
|
I don't seem to be finding any p2pool peers.
Can someone tell me the correct P2P_PORT to use? I have tried 48907 and several others mentioned in other threads but still no peers.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not finding any Worldcoin peers with P2P_PORT=23620 are you sure that the correct port?
|
|
|
|
Last post of blackarrow: 9 December 2013
Last post of blackarrow matt: 11 January 2014
Silence is not a good operating strategy, IMHO.
If you bothered to read this thread you would already know the BA forums are at http://ecointalk.net/ not here. kindly point me to the thread where they provide us with information on what is going on wrt tapeout. thanks. what? can't do that? Why not? If you bothered to read this thread you would know they have been silent on tapeout. Try the Production updates pinned thread for progress information. |
|
|
|
Last post of blackarrow: 9 December 2013
Last post of blackarrow matt: 11 January 2014
Silence is not a good operating strategy, IMHO.
If you bothered to read this thread you would already know the BA forums are at http://ecointalk.net/ not here. Secondly, there is no point posting updates unless something has actually changed, it's not like a newspaper where you have daily space to fill. |
|
|
|
BTW. This is fu**ing joke that shit coin like DOGECoin (with no future) have daily volume on Cryptsy 22350 BTC and DEM (with ver good future) daily volume only 7.77 BTC Fu**ing unbelievable.
Dogecoin community raised $30,000 for the Jamaican bobsled team to go to the Olympics: http://www.reddit.com/r/bestof/comments/1vo71d/the_dogecoin_subreddit_raised_30000_for_the/This gains popularity. Perphaps something similar can be done with DEM, but more Germany/Austria/Switzerland oriented ?? DOGE has 200x the market cap of DEM, good luck. That's because people do things with DOGE other than just mine it. |
|
|
|
Marto, how about making board with 2 chip only  Small miner like me can't afford to buy the miner at that price  I agree, I am reluctant to spend more than $1.000 on any given miner atm. |
|
|
|
Website is under maintenance. What is the price? About 1499 EUR I can get several Black Arrow X-1's for that, or a BFL 300GH/s |
|
|
|
The test board is ready
now waiting for the first sample chips to start tests
What's the eta on the sample chips? |
|
|
|
Sorry for being nooby, but I am not generating any hashes:  Currently mining TAG coins. I entered stratum+tcp URL including my username and password. Any ideas? CPU: AMD FX 8150 GPU: Nvidia 760 GTX LMK. cgminer after version 3.7.2 wont mine TAG or any other scrypt coins. |
|
|
|
Which particular problem are you talking about now? The slowdown with erupters (chek2fire confirmed it worked better by running the erupter on a separate hub). Or the crashing at random intervals (which as I said is due to a bug in 3.10.0 from effectively unplugging of the device when conditions are flaky which is fixed in git post 3.10.0).
I took your advice and kept the nanofury away from other usb devices, but that didn't fix the crashing problem. My subsequent tests were with the nanofury alone and I used the usbutils.c file from github. Are there any other files I also needed to replace from github? /EDIT Ok, the plot thickens, the crash occurs after a stratum disconnect when the pool establishes contact again after a failover, normally you would get the testing stability message but it seg faults just before that gets displayed. I tested it on a multi pool that does a short stratum disconnect every 20min when it coin switches, enough to trigger the failover. |
|
|
|
Can't wait to see the power consumption of the Monarch,if history is any indicator,it will be close to 3 times what was announced in 2013  600GH (+ or - 20%!!!!) @ 350 watts is what is advertised....sooo,in theory it could be as high as 700-1050+ watts....which makes it only a little better than an Antminer  3 Antminers @ 180 GH @ 360 watts each=1080 watts @ 540GH & YOU GET THEM NOW....not in March/April/May/June There isn't a chance in hell the Monarch is going to hit those numbers. IIRC the 28nm chip is based off their 65nm chip. I'm sure we can all recall the bASIC vs BFL bet where Josh assured Tom that BFL was going to be at 1W/GH (or less). Turns out their "fully-custom" 65nm design uses an approximate 4.5 W/GH. The 28nm numbers should be good for a laugh. There is always that possibility. We should know this week I would imagine. |
|
|
|
I have a Ubuntu Linux server with all the current updates, running a variety of miners plugged into it on cgminer 3.10.0
I plugged a nanofury NF1 into a usb hub that has a few block erupters in it and the NF1 would only mine at just less than1GH/s.
I removed the block erupters and the NF1 started mining at full speed. Even if I add just one block erupter the NF1 instantly halves it's speed. The block erupter mines at full speed only the NF1 is effected, neither reports any errors that I can see.The power pack for the hub is 2.1Amps so it should be able to handle that, so I think it might be a conflict of some sort.
Erupters run at usb1.1 speed and protocol and perhaps are having some communication interaction making everything work in the same crap manner - depends greatly on how usb hubs manage different speed devices. Try them on separate hubs. Turns out that 3.10.0 is crashing on the nanofury after a random period of time. Even on a separate linux box with nothing else connected. Same setup runs bfgminer fine. I run cgminer in xubuntu 13.10 and with 1 in usb of laptop and the other nanofury in a anker usb hub and i have no crashing problems. In the same hub i have a bifury and a redfury and all run perfect. How strange, I even tried editing the driver and reducing the number of bits in case it was being overclocked too much by default. I have tried Ubuntu 13.10 (on two machines) and Scientific Linux 6.4 and they all do it, my Nanofury is an NF1 as designed by vs3 |
|
|
|
|
They could have made NXT only 90% PoS and not pre-mined.
|
|
|
|
It is amazing that at this point, you could order 600GH (3 antminers) for a similar power draw at nearly the same price (5.7BTC for 3) as a monarch, and they will deliver this week
Misleading nonsense, the antminer S1 is 360watts for 180GH/s you would need over 3 of them to match the Monarch spec. Thegenesisblock.com will tell you that the Antminer S1 if you get it I. January won't make ROI. |
|
|
|
|
Coinex creates what looks like some kind of a memory leak in Firefox.
If, for example, I sit on the mining page, after a matter of minutes Firefox will start to lag, eg. jerky when scrolling etc. even if I am in another window/tab doing something else. If I then close the Coinex tab the problem immediately goes away. Have tested on Window 7 and Mac, both do it.
|
|
|
|
I have a Ubuntu Linux server with all the current updates, running a variety of miners plugged into it on cgminer 3.10.0
I plugged a nanofury NF1 into a usb hub that has a few block erupters in it and the NF1 would only mine at just less than1GH/s.
I removed the block erupters and the NF1 started mining at full speed. Even if I add just one block erupter the NF1 instantly halves it's speed. The block erupter mines at full speed only the NF1 is effected, neither reports any errors that I can see.The power pack for the hub is 2.1Amps so it should be able to handle that, so I think it might be a conflict of some sort.
Erupters run at usb1.1 speed and protocol and perhaps are having some communication interaction making everything work in the same crap manner - depends greatly on how usb hubs manage different speed devices. Try them on separate hubs. Turns out that 3.10.0 is crashing on the nanofury after a random period of time. Even on a separate linux box with nothing else connected. Same setup runs bfgminer fine. |
|
|
|
|
The switch pool is making some interesting choices.
It's basically been mining MOON most of the day, I just noticed MOON was 1.39 score, TAG 1.40, and DOGE 2.69 yet the pool stays on MOON.
|
|
|
|
|
You better hope that BFL don't ship the Monarchs or the BTC diff is going to go through! I guestimate over 30TH/s per wafer.
|
|
|
|
How many dozen pools are their now? Not like we are short of them, everyone trying to make fees from running a pool, classic oversupply. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
