Nice  I would prefer if we close this week barely in the red (below $13.5K) for a nicer solid green candle next week. Granted. |
|
|
|
|
Feeble weekend half pump starting?
|
|
|
|
Going down again. The 12k didn't last. Might go now down to 8k according to many forecasts...
Maybe my last limit buy will trigger? At least until I get some fresh burnable fiat... |
|
|
|
middlemen
metals as being a hedge
permissioned ledger or tyranny by default.
Now this is like Roach, but atypically missing any mention of evil Jews. Until some nerd gets into your PC, laptop, mobile and steals your private key, and what than? You are so hardly fucked with your "StoRe of Valu" because all your wealth gone. And what you will do? Go to police? They will tell you same "Gtfo to where you came from"
In proper bank in proper countries you will get your money back and investigation will trigger.
Or even better, when govs decide to block any Crypto activity. That is going to become a fork war of the decade!
Or fuck yourself, if Bitcoin would not be tied to USD and liquidity would not be tied to Banks in one or other way, you would be buying your fucking pizza for 10,000BTC, so fuck off you boy.
I think I'm only ignoring a couple noisy noobs at the moment. You're getting close to first in line among seasoned users. Go on punk, make my day. But let's do it later, shall we? Your coffee break is over, likely you'd better get back to work at your bank desk. |
|
|
|
LOL, when BTC shills understand that their shitcoin as-well can be dump & pump no matter all bright stories abut decentralization, freedom and etc.
What a pathetic community
Is this roach? Don't think so. Writing style doesn't check. Opening "LOL" gives it off straight away. |
|
|
|
We're weak ass ratt hands! Don't sugarcoat our failure.
Nice to see that phrase is taking off. I am a huge supporter, too!  |
|
|
|
Todays trades...
buy btc at 9300 and sell at 11700 (will rebuy)
buy eth at 800 and sell at 1015
buy xrp at 0.92 and sell at 1.38
Tera2, you come across as a bearish troll, or as some would say a nutjob... but for once I have to subscribe. I would be much happier if I'd done that, by 1000 ratt's asses! There's no subscribption. These are completed trades. I wouldnt expect those levels (bottom) to be reached again today or for a while. I sound like a troll because I am always going against whatever the current market sentiment is. Coincidentally these are the same qualities of a good trader. I guess you need to be a troll to trade! And now... for my chainsaw juggling act. Oh gaaaawd!!!!!!  To what low levels have we traversed WO participants? Phew... I was expecting more violence in your retort. Maybe we got away with it only because juggling chainsaws makes for a better show than catching falling knives? Actually, as far as buying when it goes down etc, I must admit that would have been a really good move. My lowest buy hasn't been filled, I haven't sold anything on the little way up, and I didn't have the balls (or shamelessness?) to step into ETH or (God Forbid!) XRP. |
|
|
|
Todays trades...
buy btc at 9300 and sell at 11700 (will rebuy)
buy eth at 800 and sell at 1015
buy xrp at 0.92 and sell at 1.38
Tera2, you come across as a bearish troll, or as some would say a nutjob... but for once I have to subscribe. I would be much happier if I'd done that, by 1000 ratt's asses! |
|
|
|
I misread masterlucs's post. Biodom got it right. bad google translate.
ml says:
Больше 10к не имеет смысла заходить с моей точки зрения.
Better to translate like this:
From my [ml] point of view, it does not make sense to buy above 10K [here].
Заходить as in "open a position". It seems to imply one ought to be flat when buying. My interpretation: he was right as we dropped close to 9K ($9150 on polo) and when he was posting we were at about 11K.
We shall see if we will revisit 9K or even 8K relatively soon. the first phrase indicate to buy like a mofo somewhere here and his prior advice was 9K. Darn it, so far he was right on the money.
Indeed. |
|
|
|
|
I also read Masterluc's last phrase as "Further (down) than 10k makes no sense to me."
Now we're over 10k, but I feel another plunge coming. However, I think the bears will be out of steam soon. I bought some more. Still have a few scraps of fiat to burn. After that, she can start to get back up when she feels like it. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
inanimate kitteh rebound?
Deceased pussy bobbing. EDIT: I have a certain fondness for pussies that bob, especially in certain locations near my own body. I like them still in existence, though. |
|
|
|
|
I've placed a largish limit buy at a fairly low price. I doubt it will get filled, but you never know with crypto, do you?
|
|
|
|
|
So, I guess this is finally Masterluc's expected correction down to 10k.
|
|
|
|
(snip) (snip)
It's the same concept at the basis of PoW: Working must be hard, checking must be easy. And stay easy.
So what is your point here? Do you assert that farmers in Africa are able to run a fully-validating, non-mining wallet client for BTC are fully able to, but are utterly unable to do so for BCH? Again! Simplifying things down to 1/0, "fully able"/"utterly unable" is quite below you. It's a matter of degrees. Come on. I am not a farmer and don't live in Africa, but running a "fully-validating, non-mining wallet client" is possible for me on the BTC chain, albeit not always comfortable bandwidth-wise. It would be nearly impossible for me to do the same on the BCH chain, if the miners would get their shit together and stick to the big blocks they loved so much, rather than jumping wildly from one size to the other. Let's keep this discussion as it is for now and give it a few months, will we? LN is coming. (Hint: a "fully-validating, non-mining wallet client" is what the rest of the world calls a full node.) |
|
|
|
Yes, bitcoin is death indeed Was the death of my 'wage slave' job, I retired yesterday Jan 14th...all due to BTC....living on mining revenue and in HODL mode on BTC and other cryptos... Spent today, puttering around the house doing chores....been a wage slave so long..kinda clueless on how to approach this...retiring early stuff... kinda surreal in fact...., on what to do...I've no clue, yet, in that, once you wake up retired...everything suddenly is OPTIONAL..you need to do that day! ....clueless presently...but I'll figure it out! I'm sure you will. Congrats on making it Searing! |
|
|
|
Do you claim that every BTC user runs a fully-validating, non-mining wallet client (often erroneously referred to as a 'full node')? Do you claim that no BCH user runs a fully-validating, non-mining wallet client? If the answers respectively are not 'yes' and 'yes', then I fail to see what your point is. Neither is purely peer-to-peer, and neither is purely client-server.
Per your rationale, if BTC, say, has 20.000 nodes and BCH has 20 nodes, they are the same, in their neither being pure p2p or pure client/server... yet, if you aren't intellectually dishonest, you realize that there is a big quality difference. Of course jbreher's being intellectually rogueish. He's smart enough to know better. Smart enough to know that nobody of 'normal' means that truly wants to run a fully-validating, non-mining wallet client -- be it BTC or BCH -- is unable to do so. But but... farmers in Africa? But but... the democratic finance that Ver says he dreams of, while Bitcoin forgot it and it's only for the elites? It's the same concept at the basis of PoW: Working must be hard, checking must be easy. And stay easy. |
|
|
|
Do you claim that every BTC user runs a fully-validating, non-mining wallet client (often erroneously referred to as a 'full node')? Do you claim that no BCH user runs a fully-validating, non-mining wallet client? If the answers respectively are not 'yes' and 'yes', then I fail to see what your point is. Neither is purely peer-to-peer, and neither is purely client-server.
Per your rationale, if BTC, say, has 20.000 nodes and BCH has 20 nodes, they are the same, in their neither being pure p2p or pure client/server... yet, if you aren't intellectually dishonest, you realize that there is a big quality difference. Of course jbreher's being intellectually rogueish. He's smart enough to know better. |
|
|
|
Now for Bitcoin, I think value is Sat/byte in ratio to speed perhaps and then contrast it vs other crypto contenders and of course account for mass transactional volume. Does Visa beat Bitcoin for cost, speed and volume, I do think these are the measures to watch for an influence to macro moves in price and market interest.
Q. What's Visa's speed, volume and cost (cost dollars/moved dollars) for uncensored transactions? A. Speed = 0, volume = 0, cost = infinite. Note the costraint: uncensored is key. Different leagues. Apples and oranges. You get juice anyway, but straight up comparison is misleading. |
|
|
|
Here's how that article ends. The big question is why Capital One has made this decision all of a sudden. It is certainly a move that will upset a lot of people and create some negative PR at the same time. While cryptocurrency may still be considered a niche market right now, interest in Bitcoin and altcoins has never been higher. If enough people ditch Capital One because of its aggressive stance toward cryptocurrencies, interesting things may happen in the future. It seems highly unlikely that will be the case, though.
Unlikely or not, the only way I've found effective to deal with a bank is switching to another. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
