Lovely, but ssl is forced on that server (cloudflare probably), it auto-redirects you to https. Wonder if cloudflare can fool downforeveryoneorjustme check.
|
|
|
This is a pretty good run for me. a lot of incorrect shares though. :/ Mines are at 107:05 now Pretty sure I got some sick number few days ago, but power shortage resetted the counter.
|
|
|
You can now auto-input values for Fury card on GPU algos.
|
|
|
Table says it all. Thanks for the link
|
|
|
Hey guys! Can somebody tell , what is hash speed for rx470 4 gb for PASC, SIA and DCR on same -dcri ?
I cant decide what to dualmine with eth.
BR...
PASC and DCR are most profitable. SIA is the least profitable. Search my posts on here to find the DCRI Yeah , I saw your post. Now Im getting 170 Mhs ETH + 1700 PASC on 6*rx470 4g . Should i switch to DCR , or its best prof. second coin ? I just dont know how much speed in DCR to use whattomine. BTW , My dcri is 10. Well you just have to run CM with DCR and see what speeds do you get Always use your own hashrate in calculators.
|
|
|
What is going to be the difference? better hashrate? less power?
Thanks for your work @claymore
We are all hoping for 5-10% hashrate boost and 5-10% power reduction Probably will see better results on coins that utlize core, more than mem. Edit: Just checked some test and 5xx are produced in the same process, so power draw will remain the same at same clocks. Disappointed.
|
|
|
No idea if this was posted before but with ETH+PASC/PASL gets with DCR 10. Setting any lower or higher slows down the speeds. Yup, got the same results, running with 10.
|
|
|
12BTC per month, neat. I guess we could learn some C, but noone needs another miner really
|
|
|
Hello, i have two rigs: 1. rig with 5 RX 480 8 GB sapphire nitro OC and today i add one 470 8gb. I make 177 mh, consuption is around 940 w/h( before it was 800w without rx470) 2. rig with 6 sapphire rx470 8 GB nitro OC with anoraks mode bios, i make 164 MHash, but consuption is around 920w/h, which is high if i compere with rig 1. Do you think i can get less power for same hasrate?I mine only ethereum. I was looking on web page what to mine, but there is less power needed for a little less MH. any advice? any custom rom suggestion,which is more power friendly thank you for help On whattomine 470 values are setup with ETH bios mod (I think strap 1500) and 1050 core, 1870 mem, -0.1V undervolt. GPU-z reports 0.9V on core. Link to bios mod: https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/10475/gigabyte-radeon-rx-470-g1-gaming-4gb-28-mhs-bios-mod
|
|
|
I heard Vega 10 Gpu will be around 600$
Is 600 H/s realistic for Vega 10?...of course after some claymore tuning
Thinking about building 2 vega 10 6 gpu rigs
FYI you can get the Fury at $230 that give you 470 sols @ 250 watts. That's 5650 Sols total on a total investment of $2700. The monthly profit is $825 giving you a 3 month ROI, The Vega at $500 a piece will give you an ROI in 8 month. Furys just went out-of stock in Poland and the ones that are available in other countries are like $450+, its crazy. Just 3 weeks ago you could buy one for $350. You have interesting prices there
|
|
|
When pool mining, your share diff should be constant no matter whats the network diff. (It may change a bit, but thats not related to network diff) You will see changes on vardiff, cause logic on pool side keeps adjusting to your sharerate.
|
|
|
There is a 4* ratio between wallet and whattomine wtm calculates nethash from difficulty. Its always an estimate (even for a wallet), but I have to admit the difference is big here. Personally I think this algo needs a better retarget logic. The base block_time should be 5 mins, while we are mostly hovering between 3-4 Edit: Delisting pasl for now, tomorrow will switch it to calculate difficulty from nethash given by wallet (reverse logic, but it seems to work for pasc) Edit2: Logic switched, gathering new stats... (ignore wtm nethash, it will only match when we are at ideal 300s block_time)
|
|
|
Does anyone know why Sapphire is the goto brand for mining? Have a number of Sapphire RX480 (£240) but out of a batch of 12, 2 of them are not that good, constantly crashing. I am thinking of getting the ASUS AMD Radeon RX 480 STRIX 8GB version which is £220. What are the performance compared to Sapphire? I am getting roughly 300h/s on mine.
How about 8GB Asus Radeon RX 480 DUAL OC which is £190
Nitros are a bit lower on voltage than my gigabytes + sapphires have bios switches. Gigabytes come with a 3 year warranty though.
|
|
|
Suprnova found 31 block last day with ~60 GH/s avg speed. So, your estimated earnings should be something about 12.658268 PASL in ideal conditions (i mean that speed estimation is correct and we are measuring day length accurate enough).
What is about pool switching. please don't switch to fairpool permanently, since we have non proportional hashrate now. It will be the best if you will distribute your hashrate to suprnova after tests.
Why `12.658268 PASL` ? I should be getting the same amount of coins from each pool, given my hashrate is the same on both. I have switched a second rig to pasl. Now mining with 540Mhash on suprnova and 490Mhash on fairpool.
|
|
|
EDIT: I checked pool stats. Example: Someone with 333 MH/s earned 21.4007 PASL last day.
This is coming from fairpool? Let me switch over and compare in next 24h
|
|
|
Hm, i had checked all things.
Reply from API: {"blocks": 17248, "supply": 862400.0, "difficulty": 7499.536796971916, "accounts": 86240, "lastreward": 50.0, "hashrate": 199118504000}
So, difficulty is calculated in Bitcoin terms (2 ^ 32 multiplier). What multiplier do you using on the your side for our algo? If you will calculate Hashrate using multiplier 2^32, then for diff 7499.536796971916 it will be 107 GH/s for last block.
"hashrate" field exposed by API is an average hashrate of 50 last blocks.
Yep, you should earn about 43.2 PASL per day with 500 MH/s (250.7 sec avg for last 200 blocks right now).
Currently using `2^32` for both reward and nethash calculation. Hmm so our calculations match (wtm shows about 107 GH/s nethash right now), but somehow I mined on suprnova 4 times less than estimated. The pools luck was negative, but only 108%. No idea whats causing this. Could someone else post their 24h earnings, please?
|
|
|
|