Check out @zazarb's thread. He's a trusted member here, and I have done multiple deals with him. 🌟🌟✨[SELLING-BUYING BTC @preev+-%] Okpay, PM, Payeer,PP & Escrow service🌟🌟✨His rates are a bit higher than what you'd expect to sell for, but you can trust him, especially as a Newbie.
Obviously, it goes without saying that if you're accepting PP (reversible) as a payment option for your crypto (non-reversible) transaction, then you should only deal with reputable buyers who have positive trust ratings. I've seen too many users here get scammed by working out deals in private, as well, so try to use this thread for transparency. And lastly, don't be impatient. Always assume that someone is out to screw you. |
|
|
|
What type of collateral are you offering? Can you provide pictures of the goods/products that you could sell for collateral? And when you say "300% Return", are you saying that for my loan of $200, you will return $600 in a couple of weeks?
Oh, and how about not spamming the forums with your request?  |
|
|
|
When you copy and paste articles, you should always leave the relevant source that you're copying and pasting from. Otherwise, it's just considered plagiarism, which is grounds for account bans. This was copied from https://medium.com/@BlockchainInnov/blockchain-4-0-is-coming-and-seele-is-leading-it-f88766fd9e32Additionally, your post has nothing to do with the " Marketplace" board. You should consider moving this to " Bitcoin Discussion" or " Development and Technical Discussion". You can move your topic by clicking on the "Move Topic" link at the bottom left of this page:  |
|
|
|
This is my concern who are bounty hunters that have starting to blend or earn in this forum and for me also.
Also sorry for making bad at English but I'll try my best to understand what is in my thought.
As of now, many users are down or disappointed in this merit system because lack of attention in the forum, as you can see many users are suffering how to make some constructive post or making a good post to gain some merit and to be ranked up, up to Member or higher than that. As I follow some other ICO's or projects are currently hiring a member ranked or higher that, then what happen to the jr.member? They have been stuck because they trying to give there best to make a constructive post and not giving them an attention.
As I can see the merit system problem is lack of sendable merit, you can earn merit by meriting your post right, then what happen is when that users is not gaining.
Also about who are now in the higher ranked some other users are kind and give some sendable merit to the other users also, but I must say that focus to the users who are posting constructive post not at all who famous in this forum.
I'm going to be completely honest. I have read your entire post, and I have found nothing substantial about it. You're literally bringing up a discussion that is had DOZENS of times per day. You're not adding anything new, but the fact of the matter is that you're probably going to be offended by reading what I'm writing. Just because you write a couple of paragraphs clearly doesn't mean that it's a good post. Especially if it's a post about the same repetitive shit that's posted day in and day out. I would honestly take the time to answer your post with some recommendations on how to earn merit, but it's obvious that you haven't even done your own research, so why should I allow you to waste my time? Come on. Quit being so lazy. Go learn how to earn some merits, and stop whining about how the merit system isn't working. Edit: I actually don't know what you're trying to say. After re-reading your post, it's not really a whiny one, but rather... You're trying to give advice to others? I actually have no idea what you're trying to say. |
|
|
|
|
Hey suboz, don't get discouraged... There are a bunch of cool mofos here, but unfortunately, it'll take some time to learn which boards/subs to watch out for and which to ignore. Unfortunately "Bitcoin Discussion" is just a breeding ground for spammers with the sole intent to rank up their activity and member ranks. My favorite feature (regarding these shitposters) is the "Ignore" link, found under every user's information in each post. Just clicking on the "Ignore" will now add that user to your ignore list. While it will still show that the specific user has posted, it won't display their content.
Take a look at the challenge that I'm offering (copy and paste the link in my personal text, under my avatar). I'm trying to hold the hands of (mainly) newbies and shitposters to help them learn how not to shitpost, but you'll find some great lower-ranked members there who actually try very hard to be contributive.
Unfortunately, as others have stated, this forum (which just rolled over it's 2-millionth registered user) is filled with members whose sole purposes are to earn money from bounties and campaigns.
If you learn how to start ignoring those users and staying away from their playgrounds (Bitcoin Discussion, Speculation, etc), you'll actually enjoy your experience here. My second biggest tip of advice? Don't be afraid to view each board/sub-board; just because you're not that technical doesn't mean that you won't find some amazing posts in the Development and Technical Discussion board...
Have fun, and PM me if you have any questions!
|
|
|
|
Therefore, We are here to make lucrative development together. But all people are not same. Before starting our Announcement many bounty high rank member contact us to do our bounty work.But we refused many of them & choose wapinter to do our work. Its really sorrow that some of them are trying every single time to make spam about our project. But we believe that who's are working with Megatron will obviously get numerous profit.We would suggest to everyone to report bitcointalk authority about those spamers who's are making the situation harder for ICO in future.
ICOs like yours are the ones that are making the situation harder... Your only defense to the accusation that was brought forth upon you is that your designer used some hair designer? Whatever that means... Look. I get it. Your web designer used a template. And then used stock photos to show your team. But don't you see ANY fault for keeping photos/names of people that do not exist as representatives of your company? This, to me, just shouts " WE ARE A PUMP AND DUMP ICO FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF MAKING MONEY!". Thanks for bringing this to light, @rpi3eu. Kudos. I think this is enough to have kicked off the snowball of doom for Megatron. |
|
|
|
All orders have been delivered!
I am now offering Spotify services for a year as well! I can give 3 vouch copies to anyone who would like to try out Spotify for a year for FREE! ONLY 3 Vouch Copies AVAILABLE! Message me or reply if you want a vouch copy!
I'll take a vouch copy of Spotify, and provide you with weekly updates. I'm assuming that using a VPN for these Spotify accounts shouldn't be a problem, right? Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
Are you just going to ignore users' questions here? I don't want to join your Telegram channel, and if possible, would love for you to answer questions here, considering that you chose to announce your service here.
I'm currently looking for a payment processor that basically offers pass-through payment options for P2P transactions. Can you provide this type of service?
|
|
|
|
What is a "matching engine"? With Andromeda, your customers are instantly connected to our wide array of cryptocurrency trading network. What are your other "trading networks"? Do you have a working example or working client examples? How do you expect someone to drop $100k for the first year without a working model? You offer customization options for iOS; do you have any working examples of this, as well? |
|
|
|
I sometimes spend hours trying to find posts to leave merit. Trying to find intelligent, helpful posts around here isn't the easiest thing to do. I don't think lack of merit is the issue, at least for me.
Guess you're right. The common problem here is that the new members can't achieve those requirements. They don't qualify on getting Merit, but as we can also see that some people can do this right but they've been put onto ignore in their past days by some Merit Givers. If only there are some people who are willing to spend their precious time on finding those quality posts and give it to the Merit Sources then the distribution of Merits would be easy. Like me, I still am not a quality poster but I'll just keep on posting until someone can finally realize that I've been trying my best here.  So I think no need for whining, spamming or even creating such a foolish thread. Just enjoy on posting and have it their way of they give you some Merit or not. Why don’t new members qualify for receiving merit? Your argument is invalid. A lot of my merits have been spent on Members and lower ranks. For the record, I also merit posts that I feel took a lot of time and effort to create, even if I don’t agree with what is being said. Whatever I find as being contributive overall is usually where I spend my merits. |
|
|
|
If you include logic, then a normal person will understand that this topic without reference to fundraising and can not be a scam! you put forward bad accusations in our direction! so I again ask you to apologize.
A scam does not necessarily have to do with money. A scam is, by definition, a dishonest scheme or fraud.  There is also something called the long con, which means that a company or individual will take a much longer time to prepare the mark for getting scammed when the opportunity is just right. Unfortunately for you, this incident will come back to bite you in the butt later, especially when it’s time for you to start raising funds. |
|
|
|
Is ChipMixer.io a domain controlled by you? I saw it mentioned, and was going to correct them as I assumed it was a phishing link. However, at the moment, it just redirects to ChipMixer.com. I don't believe you've ever mentioned it, so I'm thinking it could be a long-con by a malicious actor who wants to build trust on that URL, and switch to phishing when it gets enough traffic?
The only reference I could find by @ChipMixer is stating chipmixer.io is not their main domain. But there is nothing stating that the .io version does not belong to them, so I am assuming that ChipMixer.io is, in fact, owned and controlled by @ChipMixer It would appear that chipmixer.io is currently offline/down...
ChipMixer.com is our main domain. We were under DDoS attack. Tor service was not affected. |
|
|
|
This would be considered spam, and it would violate the rules, potentially leaving your account to get banned. At the very least, your posts would get deleted. 24. Advertisements (including signatures within the post area) in posts aren't allowed unless the post is in a thread you started and is really substantial and useful.
Take a look here for the full rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0Edit: damnit TryNinja, you beat me to it.... |
|
|
|
You would think such a big company knows to which countries they can ship to.
I think you fail to realize that the issue lies with the government of Pakistan, not with Bitmain itself. Bitmain fulfilled their duty in shipping a product that was paid for. The Pakistani government/customs are the ones here who are holding that product hostage. Instances like this can easily provide Bitmain with enough information to put a flag next to this country for future customers, but unfortunately it does take incidents like this in order for them to see that it’s a problem. I don’t see any fault lying with Bitmain for this incident. |
|
|
|
This is not an excuse to call a token a scam, I read a white paper, they are very well thought out and written out and I saw these photos before and they did not seem to embarrass me, I hope the creators will explain why this happened.Therefore, please do not make harsh statements
This is insane, they have fake team member profiles, wrt White Paper, I know people who write elaborate WPs for 5$. and what profiles are you talking about ?? photos on the site  this is not an argument, these photos are defaulted during the creation of the site, perhaps not the technical robots You’re missing the point here. Whether the pics were included as a part of the original template or not, they are now on the live site with the intention of persuading viewers that they are part of the team. This is deceitful, and fits the bill perfectly when it comes to scam behavior. Who cares where the pictures came from? That doesn’t matter. What does matter is that they are claiming to be people that they are not. I don’t care how detailed the whitepaper is. Oversights like this just don’t sit right with many people. Remember, the devil is in the details, and if a developer cannot even remove and replace a couple of stock photos, how can we believe that this coin will even have enough research and development to become successful on a large scale? I dunno about you, but I agree with OP and support his scam accusation due to this costly oversight. It’s extremely shady, if you ask me. |
|
|
|
|
Can you send me your resume? Your English is very good, and I may have some opportunities for you that are long-term given your advanced knowledge of crypto, there could be a possibility for you in my newly-formed company, given your experience. Do you have any experience in project management or product development?
Get at me, and let’s see what kind of experience you have. Cheers, and good luck!
|
|
|
|
Applications for Round 5 are now closed. In total, there are 22 Applicants for Round 5There was one applicant who applied past the deadline (@ansh_848). This user has been added to Round 6's spreadsheet. Good luck, everyone!
One question I did not understand this Winners, please post the links to your post(s) that you believe to be the most meritorious. If the merit sponsors agree, they will merit that/those post(s) to award you for winning this challenge. Post links to my posts? You mean in the same thread here? Yes, this is just to make it easier for the merit sponsors to award you for posts that you feel deserve to be merited.
And again, I'll provide two (2) Merits for the third place in round five (5).
Awesome, thank you, Geraldo!!
Deleting your post was the wrong move in this scenario; it would've been more appropriate to do as you have suggested and simply source the material. You must reference the original author, company or source. We all make mistakes, but were you unaware that plagiarism is frowned upon? I do not wish to go back and forth within Joe's thread, of course Joe has the final say on who participates and places. My opinion has been voiced. Do everyone a favor though, and please stop pressing "Enter"/"Return" after every 5-10 words. It is extremely tough on the eyes and makes your post unpleasant to read. Thank you for the dialogue with user @mohieddine. You hit the nail on the head and represented my thoughts very accurately. With posts such as their existing ones, there is no possible way that they'd be able to place in this challenge, but if they want to enter, it's on them. It takes a few minutes extra of my time, but this challenge exists in order to help shitposters to not become shitposters, so I couldn't just sit here and not allow someone to join because they got a negative feedback rating. While I do agree that plagiarism is one of the worst things that you can do on the forums, I do believe that everyone deserves a second chance. Joe I will no longer have enough Merit to send to the participants for Round 5+. I will (most likely) send Round 4 winners their merit once I get a chance to read their posts. Round 5 I do not have the merit to sponsor any merit rewards. I can maintain my cash sponsorship, however, so only my merit sponsorship(s) will be rescinded. Hopefully by Round 6 I will have accumulated enough merit to sponsor merit again.
Ah, no worries. Please let me know if and when you'll have sMerit available again to continue the merit rewards. Thanks for your continued cash sponsorship! Round 5 did not receive enough participants, so there won't be a cash prize required for 3rd place. Thanks for your continued support, @bill gator!
Joe I will no longer have enough Merit to send to the participants for Round 5+. I will (most likely) send Round 4 winners their merit once I get a chance to read their posts. Round 5 I do not have the merit to sponsor any merit rewards. I can maintain my cash sponsorship, however, so only my merit sponsorship(s) will be rescinded. Hopefully by Round 6 I will have accumulated enough merit to sponsor merit again.
Hello Joe and bill Gator. I have some smerits. I can sponsor the merits for round 5 in bill Gator's place if you need. That's what I'm talking about! Thanks for stepping up, @bitmover! This round would require 2 sMerits in total: 1 for 2nd Place and 1 for 3rd Place. I've updated the top post and Sponsors post
Check behind the sofa cushions. That's where I usually find some stray merits, slippery little suckers.
Oh wow. I did find some behind the cushions, must've fallen out of my pocket one day while I was sitting there. Thanks for the idea suchmoon!  Well, that means that I can maintain my merit sponsorship for sure! So, forget what I said about no longer being able to sponsor merit. I hate to be back and forth, but things change quickly sometimes. bitmover, you can feel free to step in replacement of my merit sponsorship this round if you would like to. I have no problem with this, and I can pick things up next round; just let me and Joe know so we can proceed accordingly. I think the easiest thing to do in this position would be to maintain your merit sponsorship for Round 6, and let bitmover continue to provide merits in your place. lol @ suchmoon, what an awesome way to step up
|
|
|
|
Hey Joe, Its been a great week ahead for quality posts and Meretrix and butka is really great in posting good quality posts. As promised for this week I gave off my 2 merits to butka and Meretrix for their posts. I think you have not read my Edit 1 of my previous post? Anyways I will be giving away merits in definitely until all my smerits are gone. So I don't like to commit myself for 7 or 8 rounds. Can you please update this in the Main topic of yours?
Oh, apologies and much thanks! I'll add it as a "Bonus Prize for Newbies", in addition to 1st, 2nd, 3rd and Consolation. Can you please let me know when you're running low on sMerit so that I can update the top thread and remove your name, if needed? Thank you so much for doing this!! |
|
|
|
APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL TOMORROW (Tuesday)
You may submit your application for Round 5 until Tuesday, April 3 at 9:00PM (GMT -6) Due to my delay, applications for the ongoing round (Round 5) will continue to be accepted until tomorrow (Tuesday, April 3). Make sure to get your applications in by clicking here: https://goo.gl/forms/Gb9AaBRiwjTN4VIs1 |
|
|
|
Round 4: Notes & CritiqueHere are my notes for all of the participants. Please remember that this is my personal opinion, and in no way reflect the views of the moderators, staff, or any other members of this forum. If you don't like it, start your own challenge. These notes can also be seen on the spreadsheet. butka: Look at you! Generating private keys by hand... Your dedication to Bitcoin has REALLY shown through this round, and I'm glad that this forum has a member like you. You've asked all the right questions (designed so that the answers that others leave will help everyone reading, not just you), posted some of your findings and research, provided guides for newbies, and have received criticism very well for your posts. I'm going to brief in stating that you are the model participant of this challenge. The only criticism I have for you is to be careful not to partake in megathreads ("Do you trade crypto?"), as they are designed solely to produce spam for the purpose of ranking up member accounts and activity. I didn't mark you down too much for your post there, as you obviously posted before it became multiple pages, but once you spend some more time here on the forums, it'll become easier to see which topics are posted for the sole purpose of spamming the boards. GREAT job this week! bitmover: Another SOLID week for you. First of all, enjoy your journey into your new sig campaign; bustadice is lucky to have you. I hope you can visit us again in the future. You have some great findings from this week, and I consider you to be a great contributing member to the forums. From privacy to guides, this week shows that you can consistently post great content and be relevant to the areas in which you post in. Great job! vlad230: You have definitely spent a lot of time on the forums this week, and I applaud that! From offering your service of looking out for thoughtful members to suggesting new features for the forum, it's apparent that you've taken a genuine interest in the BCT forums. You've been very helpful this week, and I look forward to seeing more of your posts in the future. flip4flop: While I appreciate that you've branched out of your "comfort zone" of Altcoin Mining boards on the forum, please be careful not to contribute to megathreads with dozens of pages of answers before you. Even if your reply is genuine, chances are that none of the thousands of participants of that thread will every take the time to revisit the thread, especially not the OP. Your post ability is great, but this week, I find that your posts lack overall quality compared to previous weeks. Maybe because you've been busy? I would propose that if it's too difficult to start branching out to other boards, just focus on the ones you're comfortable in. Overall, good posts, but I know you can do better! shahzadafzal: Good posts! It's obvious that English is not your first language, but you do a great job with portraying your message without any hinderances due to language barriers. It shows that you have done a good amount of research for many of your posts, which is a huge plus. You've chosen decent topics to post in, and I'm glad that there weren't any megathreads. I just wish that you would backup your statements just a bit more than posting examples or someone else's quotes. If you make a statement like "you should never trust banks", you should embellish your response with a bit more persuasion. Overall, great round,a nd I look forward to seeing what you produce in the future! r1s2g3: This week, it seems as if you've taken a genuine interest into how the forums work especially with the merit features. It's a good thing, however, because you've chosen the opposite route of members that are just fishing for merits. Your posts are contributive, and you've definitely done a lot of research for many of them for this round! Great job! For the future, I'd love to see you take more of a direction of finding threads that have to do with Bitcoin and Altcoins, rather than just meta and merits. It was hard for me to critique you this week, as the majority of your posts were in those boards. Overall, however, great job. You're definitely above average. dmonrey002: You're obviously familiar with trading, which is always a good addition to the forums. However, I noticed you posted in a megathread, which you should be weary of. While your post may have substance, those threads were only designed to farm member ranks and activity, and your post will easily get overlooked there, ultimately becoming spam for the forums. Feel free to venture about the forums and discover other boards. You've done some great research and showed that you can post some awesome quality posts, so let's see more of that moving forward. You show great potential! Meretrix: Wow. When I learned that you were going to use this account as a fictitious character to base a novel on, I had no idea that your writing ability reached out further than just technical jargon and succint evaluations of bitcoin, this forum, and its members. I'll be honest. When I first started reading Chapter 1, I thought to myself "this is going to be an awkward relationship of love between Bitcoin and Meretrix." and I was right. Can I go as far as calling this a fetish? Here's the thing; I actually can't wait to read the next chapter lol. While this is a great piece of entertainment, and I'm glad that it's being played out and released on the forums, it doesn't flow well with my criteria. While I want to give you high scores, I need to make it fair for others who are posting based on their commitment to my suggestions, so I'm going to follow the same criteria for judging your posts this round. The score does NOT reflect your writing ability, which we all know is, simply put, amazing. charlie137: You've had a few diamonds in the rough this round, but the overall vibe that I got from your posts this round were that of laziness that required minimal thought. A few of your posts are good, but the majority were in topics where your reply would not have made a difference whether you posted or not. In the future, try to add more substance and references to your posts that need them, especially when stating things like "did you tried other browsers? it looks okay on my safari. usually safari is the one you having problems with) also whois returned Brazil" or "keeping a few. after eip #867 and followed events.... its not a blockchain in its meaning". You could easily add just a few more words to those posts to make them substantial versus just one line answers. Overall, you've got great potential, and I look forward to seeing what kind of quality you can pump out in future rounds! Blue Tyrant: Aww, I'm kind of disappointed with the level of quality of your posts this week, but understandably, you did state that you were busy. Although your posts were contributive, they seem a bit lazy, to be honest. I don't have too much to critique, because I know that you know that your posts can be much better than what they've been this week! I hope to see some better content in future rounds. marcelo01: All right... Not bad. You're obviously a newbie, not just to the forums, but Bitcoin in general, and I'm glad that you chose to participate in this challenge. I like where your head is at. Your post quality is very decent, and it's fun to watch the progression of quality throughout the week. While most of your posts are in the Off-Topic board, I gather that's just because you're new here. This week, I want to push you to start looking through the results of the top 5 winners of Round 4, and view their post history. You definitely show potential to being a top-ranked user here; just do a little more research, and try to find boards that you're comfortable with posting in. I know that it can be overwhelming for a newbie, but I can see potential with you. Keep up the great work, and I hope to see your score rise every week! DREWSKIE: While some of your posts have good content, you've chosen to post in megathreads, which ultimately render your replies useless, as those threads are not contributive to the forums. They were designed to farm account ranks, and support members who only wish to rally up their activity in order to rank up. It's unfortunate, because you do have the ability to post relevant content. Just please avoid the megathreads when posting in the future. Try to choose more relevant and topical conversations to become a part of. Daboy_Lyle: You have a lot of blanket statements that are definitive, such as "I have a chart here that will prove that this time is the best to buy bitcoin." but there is no substance or facts to backup that claim. I consider posts like yours as "shit posts". They don't contribute at all to the overall thread, and your post would make no difference whether it was there or not. In the future, please consider spending more time and thought into your posts, and if you plan on stating something "factually", try to back it up with some documentation. kiemnhieutien: With the exception of just a few posts (and obviously the posts in bounties threads), your posts are unsubstantial. The couple of good posts you have, you instruct others about how to join bounties or earn money from the forums, which shouldn't be the sole purpose for joining the forums. If I'm going to be honest, I consider you to be a shit poster, simply because it's obvious that you have spent more time on the threads here designed to earn an income than the ones that are generally about Bitcoin/cryptocurrency overall. If you're serious about wanting to help improve the forums, I'm going to ask you to partake in more discussions related to the crypto industry, rather than just bounty threads and merit threads. Danstan: I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but you're just a little bit above the average shitposter. Your posts are in mainly megathreads or topics that were designed specifically to farm member ranks and activity. The topics you posted in (and one that you created and then abandoned) are completely unsubstantial, and your posts are also non-contributive and show little effort. While it's obvious that some of your posts took a lot of time to write, just remember one thing: Just because you post a lot of text does not mean that your post is substantial. Please try to partake in conversations that are more related to Bitcoin and Altcoins in the future. EzBreezy: Your posts are generic and blanket statements. You haven't researched ANY of your answers, and have provided purely speculative posts (with the exception of your merit abuser post). This is very unhealthy thinking, and you shouldn't post just for the sake of posting, especially when your replies don't have any substance. Try to avoid megathreads, or topics that are based on a question or speculation, as these are filled with spam posts simply designed to farm member ranks and activity. In the future, if you're going to give such speculatively definitive answers, such as "I think both are good because they are all profitable. There are only difference when it comes to working on it investing is just sending your fund...", show some examples of the difference, rather than just stating "both are good". I think it would benefit you to browse around the forums and read more than you post for the time being. Just because you post a lot doesn't mean that any of the posts are good. fortuneteller: Because you're new, it's easy to post in megathreads, as they're designed to look like they're substantial. In reality, they are not, and by contributing to those threads, you're ultimately adding to the logs of spam that we have littering this forum. While I know that it's hard to partake in healthy conversations about bitcoin and crypto as a newbie (to both bitcoin and these forums), I would advise you to start asking questions. The right questions. Stay out of posting in Bitcoin Discussion (while you're more than welcome to read the posts; you MAY find some valuable information in there). I will state that your post quality has gotten a LOT better from the duration of this round; MUCH better than prior to you joining this challenge, but feel free to browse the entirety of the forums, and not just the Bitcoin Discussion sub. newBIeT: You've done what most newbies to Bitcoin and these forums have done. Posting in generic speculative topics and megathreads that are designed to simply farm member activity and ranks. While your posts make sense, they are heavily opinionated and positioned in a way that sounds definitive. You post without providing any kind of references or sources for your statements, which immediately invalidates your opinions. These types of posts are highly non-contributive, and in fact, unsubstancial. Your posts could easily be deleted and still would not shift the direction of the topics they were posted in. Please try to avoid posting generic answers that have already been answered somewhere within the dozens of pages before your answer. This is considered "shitposting", which goes against everything this challenge stands for. Try to hang out in more relevant and topical discussions, and don't be afriad to ask questions if you don't know the answer. Better luck in the future! Lorin: I'm going to be very blunt and direct with you, simply because you're a Full Member and have been here long enough to know this. You are a shitposter. EVERY single one of your posts are in megathreads and your answers are extremely unsubstantial. Your posts have made absolutely no positive difference to the topics they were posted in. If you want to remain in this challenge with the current style that you're posting in, I HIGHLY advise that you take a look at our past winners and model their post quality and history. As it stands, you are the lowest scoring non-disqualified participant in the history of this challenge. If you're serious about wanting to make this forum a better place, let me know. Otherwise, I can assure you that you will never place in any rewarding spots of this challenge. Sellingaccs: I hope you return for Round 5. I wasn't sure if you wanted to remain in this campaign for Round 4 due to your statements throughout the week, and I see that you've applied to a sig campaign. But I would love to see you here; you're welcome to join anytime, @Sellingaccs!
Disqualified ParticipantsMichael CF: You're obviously here on the forums to make money. This is fine, but try to be more contributive in your posts (that are not related to bounties). One line answers are fine, as long as they portray a strong message, and isn't just a repeat of someone else's answer. I'm going to disqualify you this round, as you haven't had enough posts that were gradeable and outside of bounty threads. Oh, and another thing, please do not ever use the word "sir" again in any posts. I know that you view it as a term of respect, but the first world views it as a title that is only used by shitposters. MyLitecoin: Does not qualify. Only 4 posts made this round detector: Does not qualify. Only 6 posts made this round. Wabaman: Does not qualify. Only 6 posts made this round. max2607: Does not qualify. Only 4 posts made this round. yazher: Disqualified. Applied for paid signature campaign during Round 4. samidhu1: Disqualified. Wearing a paid signature. samidhu1: Disqualified. Wearing a paid signature.
Banned Participantszangleerb: Disqualified and banned. 95% of your posts are in bounty threads, and the remaining don't have enough substance to score. Obviously, you're missing the point of this challenge. You are now banned from it, as your ONLY intention was the chance of earning cash. And it's blatantly obvious, given your post history.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
