Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 01:21:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 128 »
421  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Zimstake (ZS) - No IPO / PreMine - SHA-256 - POW/POS - Just for FUN on: April 28, 2014, 11:00:54 PM
guys what do you think on having multi pool ready for the end of mining process???

That would be great, but it's going to be tough if Scifi-Ex and AllCoin are the only listed exchanges.  Not nearly enough volume to support a big multipool.

Has anyone contacted CryptoAltEx?  Wonder if he might be willing to list ZS.  He was pretty cool about the whole SHAcoin debacle.

He was willing to add it but left it for me.
422  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Zimstake (ZS) - No IPO / PreMine - SHA-256 - POW/POS - Just for FUN on: April 28, 2014, 09:43:12 AM
cryptopools crons are now fixed and blocks are now being found on the main chain.

Pool:
zs.cryptopools.com
Exchange:
scifi-ex.com
423  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Zimstake (ZS) - No IPO / PreMine - SHA-256 - POW/POS - Just for FUN on: April 28, 2014, 08:52:58 AM
low fee, reliable, secure zimstake exchange:

scifi-ex.com
424  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [PRE-ANN] Zimstake (ZS) - No IPO / PreMine - SHA-256 - POW/POS - Just for FUN on: April 27, 2014, 04:06:40 PM
now regarding the sell price of ZimStake;

We have ascertained by a test sell on Ahmed's exchange, that 205satoshi/ZIM is wayyyy much lower than people will buy, on account of the exchange owner swiping out the whole test sell with no honour to match the lowest price on his buy order.

HODL.

jeez im really sorry that i want to make a profit on the coins that i bought off the exchange just like any normal person. You know using btc that i own with coins that you listed on the exchange for an ultra cheap price.
425  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [PRE-ANN] Zimstake (ZS) - No IPO / PreMine - SHA-256 - POW/POS - Just for FUN on: April 27, 2014, 02:39:25 PM
ZIMSTAKE has now been added to scifi-ex.com exchange under the BTC/LTC Market's enjoy Smiley
426  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Diamond Coin (DMD) Evolution v 2.0 | NEW wallet, coin mechanics, 50% POS on: April 26, 2014, 09:17:03 PM
Quote
sorry but the OP is wrong. myriadcoin was the first coin with groestl algorithm
No matter who was first. The most important thing that the coin represents. Diamond is a very promising coin. Much more worthwhile than Peercoin and Novacoin

P.s Diamond  is clearly in need of large quantities of trade exchangers.

certainly however i dont agree with lies or misinformation being shown in coins. which has been done. Also i dont agree with how the original devs made DMD after making 6+ other PnD coins
427  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Diamond Coin (DMD) Evolution v 2.0 | NEW wallet, coin mechanics, 50% POS on: April 26, 2014, 08:06:43 PM
sorry but the OP is wrong. myriadcoin was the first coin with groestl algorithm
428  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: P2Pool for SHA3-based currencies (keccak) (PROJECT) [PROGRESS] on: April 26, 2014, 12:54:21 PM
thats all that i changed in stratum to make it support sha3
429  Economy / Services / Re: Selling exchange source code on: April 24, 2014, 11:01:06 AM
i will offer the iceycrypt exchange code in its current state with 0 checking done(i know it ran on my dev instance but i dont code php) for .5 btc to anyone that wants it (you may ask justin or r3wt regarding if i bought the code)

I don't know what iceycrypt is but don't buy anything in any way related to justin or r3wt.  The worst programmers ever and the people behind openex which was hacked many times.

none of my business lol. thats why im offering their code as is.
430  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [MYR] Myriad - Multi Algo - SHA or Scrypt or Qubit or Skein or Groestl on: April 23, 2014, 10:13:55 PM
What is MAMMMP?

I suppose the actual details for what that means is still under wraps?

it's short for MAMMAEMP



obviously.

we cant share yet. but if all goes to plan. lets just say a revolution is coming. Cheesy
431  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 23, 2014, 11:35:01 AM
hmm so maybe it was PoW intefering with it? cause if just minng PoW makes everything work then that must be the issue
432  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [MYR] Myriad - Multi Algo - SHA or Scrypt or Qubit or Skein or Groestl on: April 22, 2014, 01:13:39 PM
i dont believe it does. i had to patch the groestl one to make it stop giving HW errors
433  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] "Cubits" v3 (QBT) Sha256D Pow + Pos on: April 21, 2014, 02:10:33 PM
nothing yet. scifi-ex is undergoing massive work. but it will be done soon
434  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 21, 2014, 01:38:50 PM
so what is happening?


1. was the entire work done by ahmed broken to start with and needs fixing?

2. was his work good but has been exploited?

3. was the cloning of cgb perfect? and cgb can be exploited.



If the work was not done properly then of course it needs to be fixed and free of charge, else the BTC needs to be returned. There is no other way to see it.

If it is not difficult to fix adt2 and add checkpointing and stop it being mined whilst out of sync.... we need to get on to it now.


5BTC is not cheap to clone a coin and it needs to have been done properly.


This effects the entire adt community and we need to know what is happening here?

1) it was done by numerous people who all have experience making coins and i dont believe for a second that either of the 5+ people involved dont know what theyre doing
2) 1 factor causing the issue is the lack of checkpoints, another is the sync issue
3) every coin is exploitable you just need to know how. According to zack there are atleast 2 Time Warped chains which definitely does not help the cause. 
4) I do not know why there is a syncing issue and that will need to be looked into. i looked into the logs and i see nothing so far. the fact that zack does not know of any mac/linux users who use the wallet and exprience the issue also does not help the cause. I'm not willing to do all the lifting here. I previously asked for the current block count and no one gave it to me
435  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 21, 2014, 12:01:54 AM
i could offer support however like i said i have no time. CryptoPools and Scifi-Ex are taking all my time lately. Pile on top of that all the time college takes and then you see how much i actually have to deal with. Someone get me the proper block count as of this moment and ill see what i can do
436  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 20, 2014, 10:53:05 PM
im not asking for a penny. i dont want a penny to do it. its something id be happy to do given i have the time however im too swamped down with work lately
437  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 20, 2014, 02:34:26 PM
me and my friends made the chain and i would gladly accept the fact that we had somehow broken it. BUT mullick also looked over my changes and approved them. I've pointed out that the chain is not checkpointed which in itself is an issue (not one i have caused mind you) so i am free from my responsability. I'm also not willing to have the coins im involved in attacked so for this reason theres nothing i can do

wtf? this is not at all funny. Who threatened you? don't give in to these guys. You are not only effecting zack with this you are actually messing with a lot of investors and miners who do support adt2.

What do you mean the chain is not checkpointed?

there is nothing funny about it. and no one has threatened me directly. however there are rumours of mudda + co threatening others involved in adt which i cannot risk. I have done what i was paid for and to a high standard as was confirmed by mullick and various other experienced coin creators (the team of people with me who made adt v2 have about 10+ coins in our pockets) and there are 0 hard checkpoints in the clients apart from the one protecting the premine. I understand there is the checkpointing server but it is useless when it loses connections which is why checkpoints need to be placed in the code yet this hasnt been done by zack or anyone else to date (im too busy with scifi-ex and cryptopools to do it out of the goodness of my heart im afraid)

why were checkpoints not put in the code? when did you tell zack this?

If muddafudda has not threatened you directly what makes you think he will?

Where is muddafudda?

I want to ask him directly.

1. was he behind this forking?
2. is he threatening adts community over some gripe he has with zack personally?

the fact he showed up right after it happened in this thread with "that's a shame" seems to make it look like he did do it.

Muddafudda answer the questions above and explain if you were involved with this why you consider costing other miners and investors of ADT time and money?

We need to see the end of this kind of dirty tactics.... If these people are too afraid to sort there problems out in person and rather hide behind their computers costing entire communities of people money this needs to see some collective action to stop this.

Running away afraid of these types is not the answer


If his answer is no to those, will you add checkpointing to the chain?  i don't see adt2 on his list of new scam coins to squash for some time. Also his dislike was know for zack back when you fixed it the first time? why the change of heart? 

why if you told zack this whilst making adt2 did it not take place at the time?

Are you saying you believe muddafudda will threaten you and your coins if you help the adt2 community?

I am very interested in hearing more about this.

How much did zack pay for this cgb clone, and how much more will it cost to have this fixed and the checkpointing added into the chain.

How was a pow+pos coin attacked in the first place.

Just because mullick looked over it and said the code was okay does not really mean it was okay... if we don't understand how this coin was attacked. CGB seems fine after all of this time? Are you saying CGB can be attacked in the same way?



checkpointing was not added before due to the chain not exactly being long enough to add stake checkpoints. ill try and get round to adding some but i make no guarantees(free of charge though)
and i told zack yesterday when he asked me for help. and i believe cgb can be attacked like this yes
438  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 20, 2014, 01:09:31 PM
me and my friends made the chain and i would gladly accept the fact that we had somehow broken it. BUT mullick also looked over my changes and approved them. I've pointed out that the chain is not checkpointed which in itself is an issue (not one i have caused mind you) so i am free from my responsability. I'm also not willing to have the coins im involved in attacked so for this reason theres nothing i can do

wtf? this is not at all funny. Who threatened you? don't give in to these guys. You are not only effecting zack with this you are actually messing with a lot of investors and miners who do support adt2.

What do you mean the chain is not checkpointed?

there is nothing funny about it. and no one has threatened me directly. however there are rumours of mudda + co threatening others involved in adt which i cannot risk. I have done what i was paid for and to a high standard as was confirmed by mullick and various other experienced coin creators (the team of people with me who made adt v2 have about 10+ coins in our pockets) and there are 0 hard checkpoints in the clients apart from the one protecting the premine. I understand there is the checkpointing server but it is useless when it loses connections which is why checkpoints need to be placed in the code yet this hasnt been done by zack or anyone else to date (im too busy with scifi-ex and cryptopools to do it out of the goodness of my heart im afraid)
439  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] [very low inflation] on: April 20, 2014, 11:26:38 AM
me and my friends made the chain and i would gladly accept the fact that we had somehow broken it. BUT mullick also looked over my changes and approved them. I've pointed out that the chain is not checkpointed which in itself is an issue (not one i have caused mind you) so i am free from my responsability. I'm also not willing to have the coins im involved in attacked so for this reason theres nothing i can do
440  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RUP] - RupayaCoin ★ India - Pakistan - Indonesia and more ★ on: April 19, 2014, 11:54:12 PM
sab se bada rupayya Cheesy

CryptoPools putting a pool up @ rup.cryptopools.com

Rupayai ko bada banana hai bro, kuch karo  Grin
aha hum kar rahe hai. the pools are moving servers just now so we can put some new ones up and earn some rupayai
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 128 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!