I don't know what to make of it, but it doesn't seem irrelevant.
Anyone share their thoughts?

Or a grow room with (cold) LED lights in the winter!

Hehe, a fairly uniform noise without bursts or similar transients actually helps several people in getting and staying asleep, including children with troubled sleep patterns. I used to prepare custom soundscape CDs for my nephews when they were wakeful toddlers.

It's not more than half spam.
It's less than half wit.

Maybe ask mom and dad to put on that funny colorful video on YouTube.
This forum is for the grown-ups, you see.

Now to bed, good boy!
Shall we risk another no-pampers night? My little man will manage eh?
Or will it turn into a stinky mess like last Sunday?

Don't bother replying. I won't be able to read your post, unfortunately.

We're running into outlandishly OT territory. I hope the mod doesn't mind that much, but I have to remind my good friends of serious issues.


Salma Hayek runs in the MILF/GILF category. She's 51. Still quite shapely, don't mean no offense, ma'am, I mean I could make time for you one of these weekends but... sorry, Salma!

Got my buy orders ready to roll. Jimbooooo, you woke up yet?   

Some greed is good, confirmed sources tell me.

Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do.

So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be

3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot).

EDIT: Here's for posterity and reference.

I'm liking this correction a lot. Small enough until now not to be a source of worry, but significant enough to paint a thin layer of reality over our breathtaking bull run. It does look more legit now, doesn't it?

The way I see it, cloud mining is a flawed business model (for the subscribers, not for the sellers).
If mining is indeed profitable, why should they sell a slice of their profit for a fair price?
Either the price is unfair, or it is just a scam.

Of course, they might be selling shares of the mining profit for fiat money immediately needed for maintenance, or for acquiring new gear and so on, but it's a very long shot. I'd imagine they should have their cash flow under check if they're so successful. And I've never heard of current mining gear being sold on credit. On the contrary, it is usually paid before delivery - often much too long before delivery.

TL;DR I reckon you'd be better off investing your subscription fee directly in bitcoin.

They lost my custom for their BCH/S2X support. Are they turning their cloak now that they see failure?

Juvenile karma warriors babble new age mumbo-jumbo-jimbo while improperly addressing their very aware seniors.

Boys will be boys until they aren't. I feel mild about that anyway.

Corn approaching next power of ten - five figures helps with the mildness.

Various harmonious body parts quoted for posterity also help.

Here's for posterity.

Terribly OT, I know, but which ultra-light amp was that? I'm still looking for one that delivers, and I get little joy (power-wise) from my GK.

Well, it depends. Imagine working to build schools for the unschooled in unlucky parts of our planet. Or developing drugs that can save lives. Or assessing wannabe porn stars. It's not only about the money.  

My opinion, based on general life considerations rather than actual financial analysis or pump'n'dump mechanics understanding: Monero has value and its price keeps climbing because it has real use cases. The anonimity it provides can't be matched by Bitcoin as it is now.

However, I think this gap will shrink and possibly shut off completely with L2 and L3 solutions. There are already 2 or 3 technology advances that promise to offer as much anonymity as any other coin. If (when?) that happens, I expect Monero to tank. That would be a medium term move - medium in crypto terms: I'm thinking months, not years. There should be ample time to get out of it gradually as it bleeds value back into Bitcoin.

I am no oracle. This is just my personal, biased opinion.

Ready!

I wish someone with time and a few extra satoshis on their hands would bother to spend a couple of weekends spamming the BCH network, just for the demonstrative lulz.

Strange pattern this weekend: lots of shilling by newbies or outright new accounts, but without the serious pump&dump action we are accustomed to.  Someone out of sync possibly?

On a related note, censoring jbreher's posts was less than wise IMO. He's still an apostate living out of the Grace of Bitcoin, but some of the points he makes contain enough thought to deserve discussion (and civilized flaming, including the occasional f'off).

He can't help it. A media person, you know. That's what they do for a living. The show must go on.

About right, if they sell late enough! 

Thanks. I got some limit buys a little over $4000, just in case.