This should be done on the forum, not on some telegram group in which a single person has all the power and can delete/bann anyone whenever he wants. |
|
|
|
Why do I not see him tagged as a signature spammer yet?
Well, xvids's post technically isn't spam because it is posted in Off-Topic in thread about Ice cream  ripplecanavari on the other hand is spamming and this is spam burst:     ...and should be handled by moderator. Reporting these as well. Let's hope they get removed before payday. |
|
|
|
Ah d'acc. Kilo méga etc c'est pour le systeme métrique, et kibi, mébi, gibi etc .... pour les puissances de 2.  Exactement. A mon avis c'est pas des français qui ont créé ces appellations sinon j'imagine bien le fou rire a chaque "bibyte". |
|
|
|
1 bit = 0 ou 1
1 octet = 8 bits
1 Byte = 1 octet = 8 bits
1Ko = 1KB = 1000 octets = 8000 bits
Attention :
1Kb = 1000 bits = 125 octet
Sauf que kilo ça donne k et pas K. Donc en métrique kB, en binaire, KB Ca donne donc 1 bit = 0 ou 1
1 octet = 8 bits
1 Byte = 1 octet = 8 bits
1ko = 1kB = 1000 octets = 8000 bits
1KiB = 1024 octets (lire kibibyte - ISO/IEC 80000)
1KB = 1024 octets (lire Kilobyte - JEDEC memory standards)
|
|
|
|
Le but de ce post est de proposer deux méthodes afin de détecter un plagiat. La pertinence sur ce forum est évidente, mais la méthode peut s'appliquer n'importe où.
1- Avec googleSimple et efficace, effectuer une recherche google, avec ou sans le "site:bitcointalk.org". Avec la recherche aura lieu uniquement sur le forum, sans les termes seront recherchés partout. 
2- SmallseotoolsCet outil se base aussi sur google, mais ne semble pas être limité par le nombre de mots au même titre que la recherche google. Il effectue en effet la recherche phrase par phrase et indique un score de similarité Aller sur : https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/Rechercher ce texte par exemple : Just recently, a news showed how one crypto whale died with his cryptocurrencies worth millions of dollar. No member of the family had access to his private keys and other login details. Are you ready to face the same fate and leave your children or family without having access to your hard earned cryptocurrencies some day to come? Showing your wallet login details to them now can also be risky so what are some of the preparations you are making towards the retrieval of your money when you are gone for life one day?  Cliquer sur Check Plagiarism Voilà le résultat :  L'onglet "matched sources" permet de consulter les pages où le contenu a été trouvé. |
|
|
|
Why do I not see him tagged as a signature spammer yet?
Maybe because it is hardly a valid reason to tag someone... But maybe you are referring to the spreadsheet? |
|
|
|
|
For the 2FA part, theymos adressed it multiple times.
Including this in SMF is a too big challenge. It is included in the new version of the forum however (Epochtalk).
|
|
|
|
I'm gonna repeat myself again then: there's no reason why Bitcoin addresses can't be used to recover accounts, PGP is just useful for different reasons as well as that
But PGP is already accepted for that purpose as well! There is exactly no point in making it mandatory. |
|
|
|
Scam Be Careful, New ANN and bounty thread in the same day and check scam accusation before Invest
Old ETCV website was hacked, we resumed work. That took you some long time to reach out and say this. Either these are the same guys trying to steal more money, or it's a whole other scammer trying to take advantage of it... |
|
|
|
Meanwhile, all PGP clients can already do the job in a standard way, all that's needed is to avoid relying on fingerprints (which is not so hard).
You are repeating yourself. So can all legacy bitcoin clients with any legacy addy. |
|
|
|
Why so afraid?
You are not scaring anybody. You are just fck**g annoying. Like a flee pocking you for hours without being able to stop it, always doing the same thing without any reason besides getting on other people nerves! The fact he wants this to stay on topic is understandable, and after reading your long unnecessary post I am completely agreeing with his opinion on that. The only thing he did was compare how different parameters would influence the trust network as it is today, and he did it well. So why don't you and your superior mind go talk with others of your kind, and leave us retards alone here? Please? |
|
|
|
For the most part I'm good with any of these proposed scenarios. They almost all include the core group of people whose trust ratings and opinions I most value. I can imagine that by shifting to any new standard listed here or otherwise, an entirely new contingency of people will be upset by this or that. So frankly there are no winners in the game of making further changes to the system. Things should just be allowed to mellow out for a while as I believe the dust is still settling from the last implemented changes.
BTW Loyce your criteria for ch2 and ch3 appear to be identical, that may be a typo, otherwise I'm just not getting something.
The difference appears to be activity |
|
|
|
|
That's some work you did here.
It proves what most already knew but at least there is data to back it up now.
Long story short, if someone want to substantially change the face of DT it would need another requirement than merit and/or activity.
|
|
|
|
My thinking is that high rank accounts are actually becoming a little more valuable now that it's more difficult to rank up. You need to put in some real work to do it, people would happily hack an account to cut that out. Imagine if a great poster had their Hero account's password hacked, and they couldn't recover their account because admin wasn't convinced their email wasn't hacked too?
Actually high ranks account are worth way less than before in the sense that they can't make you win easy money anymore now that good paying bounties are nearly extinct. I am pretty sure from what I saw account seller post that the price tag on a legendary account is way down compared to 18 months ago |
|
|
|
PGP is better for those config/standardisation reasons, but Bitcoin's cryptography is arguably more secure. Awkward situation.
I'm sorry I still don't see how keeping your PGP over the years is easier/more convenient than storing a legacy btc addy for that purpose. I get that some people will already have a PGP and this will come at no extra cost/complexity, but then again, I highly doubt most people on this forum are using PGP. However MOST of them do own/still have access to their old legacy addresses. While your proposal would be a nice to have I don't see any point or reason in forcing people into it. So the solution is already here. If you are more confident in keeping your PGP, you are already welcome to stake it. If you like BTC legacy more, stick with that. To me this really is a no brainer. |
|
|
|
|
Username: asche
Post Count: 3130
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 33tS4T3Hiro2WXvU8m4spCnypkJLJ1MGBR
Will change signature immediately if accepted.
|
|
|
|
Using Bitcoin keys is more difficult, you need to get people to use legacy addresses, as there's no message signing standard using segwit addresses. Awkward situation.
And what's the trouble keeping a legacy address? Also it IS possible to sign a message with a segwit address. |
|
|
|
what is about taxation for your crypto profit?
Most payment gateways bill you in bitcoin but change it to fiat immediately. It is taxed as any other coffee would be. Also this is not a private trading income, but a revenue for the company. The tax is calculated based on this, not on what assed has been used. |
|
|
|
|
I don't see the point in using PGP for that specific reason. A specific bitcoin or ethereum addy is perfectly fine for that usage.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
