Hello there,

Can you please be more specific regarding what you are expecting and how you built your list?

I am open to work with you if the project is serious and interesting.
However the information provided for now is rather thin, and the only background you seem to have is (successfully) running the nanogames sig campaign.


Please be more specific regarding this point. You will pay out 50% of the total you are being paid by the project, is that right?

If so, are these 50% only for the management of the translation and moderation team?

Is any part of the payment guaranteed or is all of it depending on amount raised?

Techniquement ça veut dire que la performance va dépasser celle de BTC (croissance prix btc)/(croissance prix ETH)<1

Je pense que ta remarque se base sur le market cap, mais tu es le seul à ne pas avoir compris (ou a le feindre) que ce n'est pas ce dont il parlait.

I'd say everything that is close to a decent amount regarding time spent.

After this everyone has to  decide for himself how much his time is worth.
I value my time at around $30..$100/hour depending on the technicality/difficulty of the task.

Of course to follow up on the 0.5 BTC you are mentioning, this kind of amount would raise a huge red flag (unless it involves days long of testing...).

Offering a free copy is no different then offering a bounty as long as the free copy does have a market value, which it has since the editor is managing to sell some.

If the item has a value FOR the tester is another story.

Yey this is the exact thread I was referring to. Thanks man.

Payment was a few satoshi short...

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/321QAe7mMTBR38Wyzfo9mDqr6Lm3QstJHp

I was wearing signature since this post. Unsure why you have my starting post count at 3181 instead of 3163.

I am not so familiar with IOTA. But I have been involved with IOST lately. Can someone who has knowledge about both projects enlighten me about pros/cons of both?

Thanks

Tbh I don't think you will find any DT who thinks 0.02 eth is enough to make it worth their time trying out your service.

I didn't read all of the thread, but most of it.

Accepting the payment doesn't seem to be binding  regarding your feedback.

So in the end there is absolutely no reason to give a false feedback. The service they are buying is a try out, and an honest feedback.

If you stick to that, it's fine by me.

As it has been said just before, the member is not looking for a Trusted Feedback as in positive trust, just in  review, like some people do for free amazon gifts.
If the amount wasn't so ridiculous, I might consider doing it if paid up front, and with a guarantee of 0 censoring.

If a service a willing to pay for an honest feedback, the service itself should be fairly ok.

However I couldn't be bothered more for 0.02 eth. I would need some time to actually try the service out, which would make the time not worth it at all.

---

Because otherwize nobody would use their service since it is new I guess.

This happens all the time IRL, sometimes it's honest, and sometimes it's BS. I have been a paid tester before, and the payment is simply there because thorough testing takes time. Again someone that is a trusted member of a community will more likely convince more people of the quality of a service if this is what their feedback is saying.

On the other hand, if the service is crap, they also take the risk to destroy their rep at the very start.

I will say that again. As long as everything is public, and the review is honest, where is the issue?

---

in fact it is not.

---

How so?

I have seen numerous times where people where selling techniques or other stuff, where said good was provided for free to a DT to assess it. Can't find the thread again right now.

Some DT's did vouch for the digital good in question. This is no different.

There was also no trust feedback left.

Well he could also try to convince other DT members to Green Trust him.

But again, not going to happen.

Amazing find. This is more than enough.

Will replicate your feedbacks when I get the time to do it.

Again nice catch!

I'm wondering when they will visit this thread and what they will have to say about it 

Guessing you mean bech32

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bech32

Hoping for more luck

Bei diesem Thread geht es lediglich darum zu zeigen das die Vorschläge von manchen totaler Unsinn sind. Diese Vorschläge werden natürlich NICHT zu Änderungen führen.

It's not. At least not with XRP. I have opened a ticket regarding this.

Still getting an invalid amount error.

There is no issue whatsoever to have this on the board.

Leaving a feedback about his behavior is good. You should also add it as a neutral feedback to his profile with this topic as reference.

Juste non.

Not being professional hardly deserves a red tag or anything alike from a DT.

My advice, red tag him yourself if you feel like it.
While I wouldn't ask him to do any job for me, that doesn't mean he is a bad person.

While his excuses are statistically unlikely to be true, shit can also happen.

The fact that you didn't have a contingency ready in case of delay from one translator is a bad  risk management on your side. It is as much his responsibility as it was yours.

I am also really annoyed by his topic with basically wrong guidelines regarding tags, which he keeps bumping as if it was THE TRUTH.

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100675.0

Je te propose d'en parler avec le pape.

Tu as une vision de la religion extrêmement réductrice et limitée. Croire en Dieu ne signifie pas que tu dois déposer ton cerveau et obéir aveuglément à un bouquin vieux de plusieurs milliers d'années (soit disant).

Comme d'habitude je suis persuadé que tu le sais très bien et que tu continues à troller. Ta vision du monde semble être en N&B comme sur tellements d'autres sujets, alors que tous les gens qui t'entourent sont déjà au RGB.



Je pose ça là :


Edit : un autre qui est sympa