1. More multiculturalism leads to more crime.
This. Again this is noise backed by nothing. So the most multicultural country ever, the USA has high criminality because it's multiethnicity? I hope you are not serious. Now that you are done selectively editing my quote to cherry pick it, do you care to address the rest of my statement or just the part you would like to focus on and pretend it was said in isolation? Doesn't change a thing. What comes behind is not context but a joke of an explanation. |
|
|
|
1. More multiculturalism leads to more crime.
This. Again this is noise backed by nothing. So the most multicultural country ever, the USA has high criminality because it's multiethnicity? I hope you are not serious. |
|
|
|
Dann kannst du dein wallet (das in Metamask importiert/genutzt wird) in Deltabalances anzeigen. Dort siehst du Saldo auf deiner adresse und Saldo auf ED/FD. ich habe bei deltabalances natürlich die metamask adresse abgefragt. wenn eine FD order auslöst gibt es aber keine bewegung für diese adresse... erst wenn ich auf FD per withdraw eine auszahlung starte landet es auf dieser metamask adresse. das ist das problem von dem ich spreche  Nochmal lesen. Habe nichts von einer Bewegung gesagt. Ich sage nur du kannst das Saldo anzeigen das noch auf ed/fd ist. |
|
|
|
Soweit habe ich keine Probleme gehabt.
Was die Orders angeht, da es keine Transaktion gibt beim Order hinzufügen ist das nicht auf der Blockchain zu finden so viel ich weiss.
Falls ein Verkaufsorder durch geht hast du automatisch ETH auf deinem FD account.
Wenn du was kaufst wirst du den token in deinem account haben. Du kannst mit Deltabalances einfach sehen welche tokens einen positiven Saldo auf FD/ED haben.
funktioniert das so wenn man für FD/ED eine eigene ETH adresse verwendet? ich verwende FD per metamask. und da gibt es auf der metamask adresse keine bewegung so lange nicht nicht auf FD auszahle... und ob ich etwas auszuzahlen habe oder nicht sehe ich unter umständen garnicht. weißt du wie ich meine? oder zu kompliziert beschrieben?  Metamask ist ein wallet. Ich habe da einfach meine ETH importiert. Fertig ist. Dann kannst du dein wallet (das in Metamask importiert/genutzt wird) in Deltabalances anzeigen. Dort siehst du Saldo auf deiner adresse und Saldo auf ED/FD. |
|
|
|
|
Soweit habe ich keine Probleme gehabt.
Was die Orders angeht, da es keine Transaktion gibt beim Order hinzufügen ist das nicht auf der Blockchain zu finden so viel ich weiss.
Falls ein Verkaufsorder durch geht hast du automatisch ETH auf deinem FD account.
Wenn du was kaufst wirst du den token in deinem account haben. Du kannst mit Deltabalances einfach sehen welche tokens einen positiven Saldo auf FD/ED haben.
|
|
|
|
And again, there are lot of young prospects, but they always feel short in big tournaments. But a lot of them have big potentials so in the coming years it will be a new generation of tennis greats.
However the day the top 4 goes, the change will be dramatic in tennis world. This is gonna be fun I bet Not sure we will see such close games year to year tho for a while after the current top players retire. |
|
|
|
|
@saint-loup, tu aurais pu le troller en lui disant que tu examinerai sa requête s'il déplaçait son topic dans la bonne section. Le temps qu'il trouve Réputation il aurait abandonné son compte.
La vérité c'est que je ne me fatigue même pas a tagger les newbies. C'est jetable. Il aurait aussi bien pu créer un nouveau compte direct.
|
|
|
|
change over to Green after a 1,500% pump...
You need to learn to count. Even a 1500% won't make that turn green. You need it to grow 50 times so more like 5000% pump. |
|
|
|
D'ailleurs il aurait pas été parmis les DTs on lui aurait rien reproché
Tout à fait. Il a fait le choix de modifier pour ne pas être mis en ~ par plein de monde chez les DT, respecte le. |
|
|
|
You know what it reminds me?Hitler time when people are not allowed to speak publicly about topics which level they don't have or they will get marked.
Lol @ that Godwin point. You seem to be thinking about Hitler a lot. My advice. Stop. This is not relevant at all. He had a human reaction because he was pissed about the shitposting of OP. He agreed to change to neutral because he is decent, reasonable and able to put his ego aside. Can't really say the same about you. |
|
|
|
If you start giving negative feedback even its shown as neutral its a clear abuse.
You should learn to read. He wrote suspected, which it is. Also he put some evidence of his logic in this very thread. |
|
|
|
Ich weiß nicht mal wer diejenigen sind die mich distrusted haben.  Bedeutet wohl das du alles richtig machst  |
|
|
|
Je mets ici en évidence ce topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100675.msg49363316#msg49363316. C'est un guide (en anglais) sur ce qui est red trustable ou pas. Attention, ce n'est pas un guide officiel, ni un guide non-officiel approuvé par la communauté. C'est plus ou moins en construction. Les débats sur la façon de gérer les trusts sont toujours houleux et subjectifs. Prenez ça comme une petite aide en cas de doute. Après vous (les DTs) faites comme vous voulez. Merci pour le lien. Je suis clairement en désaccord sur plusieurs de "ses" règles. C'est plus son avis à lui et une compilation de règles hors contexte que vraiment un truc a suivre je pense. Du coup j'ai posté sur le thread en question. |
|
|
|
|
I kindly disagree with some of your rules.
Alt accounts SHOULD be tagged if the owner tries to hide the fact that they are his alts, or uses them for any purpose linked to eachother.
I don't see anything wrong in tagging someone for ban evasion.
If you are convinced it is the case BUT the evidence is not compelling enough for a ban, you should go for it.
I don't consider taking an account as collateral as a good practice myself. However in some rare occasions I don't see why some people shouldn't do it. Not to actually use the collateral (which would imply selling it afterwards) but to still incentivize the repayment. Of course this depends on the size of the loan.
Users dedicating their time to fight scam and fake ICO are nice and all, but this can actually collude with your rule about making transactions to gain trust. These people should be added to the trust list, not given positive feedback.
Also leaving positive feedback for a successful trade is not a MUST. I myself removed some positive feedbacks when becoming DT1 because they gained too much weight and were actually cancelling out another negative feedback, which I never wanted.
Long story short:
Green Trust if you trust the user
Neg Trust if you think the user shouldn't be trusted.
Everything else should go in the reference.
|
|
|
|
You should read more carefully the OP I think...
I guess good ol' suzanne was thinking to get a quick merit for that post. |
|
|
|
Why Saint-loup feedback's not visible to me by default even he is on DT2  . I had not excluded him. His feedback's showing to me on untrusted feedback's. Am I missing something ? Weird. It appears to me even when adding ;dt. |
|
|
|
~snip~
This is a neutral review. He is expressing his opinion which he is entitled too based on the reference. You won what you came here for, I wouldn't be pushing it. Edit: also the review says "suspected". I am myself convinced that you are an alt too. |
|
|
|
I don't see any reason not to use this header several times [quote author=tbct_mt2 link=topic=5095740.msg49551191#msg49551191 date=1549128180] It doesn't take more space and allows you to be sure all quotes are (or aren't) from the same post/person. I'd say what you are saying is actually a bad practice that shouldn't be used. Any quote should have a reference attached to it, be it another post on this very forum, or a link to the website/book/whatever the quote is taken from. |
|
|
|
~snip~
Was going to say the exact same thing. |
|
|
|
|
Very good tutorial.
Of course this applies the same way if you want to sign your transactions on an offline/airgapped machine and broadcast them later from a possibly compromised device.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
