"ZERO profit is better than lose"
Ehm. No. It is about risk vs reward. In crypto you have high risk with high reward potential. If you listen to your own advice you will just leave crypto. Don't get your point at all. |
|
|
|
|
The community is waaaaaay to big for a chatbox.
It might be suitable when there are like 10-100 people online on it at the same time, but this number is over 10k, it would be totally unusable.
|
|
|
|
especially regions where bitcoin has not been declared illegal.
What regions are you referring to? |
|
|
|
people still believe him
Nobody does. His prediction have exactly 0 effect on projects or prices. They had an effect once, this time is long gone. |
|
|
|
I just started two days ago nobody paid with bitcoin yet Doesn't have to be now, wise ass. But when he actually does have some data and perspective. |
|
|
|
Genau das meinte ich. War aber dermassen einfach das mit google zu finden das ich keine Lust hatte es nochmal nachzusuchen  |
|
|
|
Address: 3L6VGToduCVfFoKXptihKxFZ9i57aRM6t6
Repayment: 0.05 BTC
Loan Time: 3 weeks (most likely less)
76000 cst token
Dude you are still wearing the signature of a scam project and ask for a basically no collateral loan. What does that tell me about you? |
|
|
|
|
As I have said on another thread...
the market value of an account is not 0.
If the requestor has an account that does have a value on the market (ie Legendary for instance) then they would rather sell the account rather than ask for a loan.
There is no reason why accepting an account as collateral would be a valid reason for a tag as long as said account isn't SOLD afterwards.
Eventhough the account has a value of 0 in the hands of the person lending the money, it does for the requestor. Hence it is a valid incitation for repayment.
I highly doubt your first post is valid, and if another DT tags for that exact reason I would be opposing it.
|
|
|
|
|
As condoras said, you can forget about it without any collateral.
|
|
|
|
they have dozens of Scam Accusations
And this is exactly where this topic should be too. Or in investigation. |
|
|
|
|
McAfee is a joke. This guy has 0 relevance to crypto and to anything anyway.
Maybe he has the bling because of his money, but his influence is close to 0 and so is his knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you give us some insights how many people are using it?
How do you handle it with your bookkeeping? Is it connected to your machine (meaning the one you use for payments in cash/debit card etc)?
|
|
|
|
There is a new attack of high-ranked word spinners.
3 out of 4 being in stake campaign. Just saying |
|
|
|
As usual, might be an edit. |
|
|
|
P.S: Je n'arrive pas à afficher l'image de façon plus "lisible"...
C'est parce qu'il s'agit d'une miniature. Elle existe en grand en pdf ici. En indiquant un numéro de block futur sur etherscan un countdown est généré automatiquement : https://etherscan.io/block/countdown/7280000Estimated Target Date: Thu Feb 28 2019 20:50:28 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale) |
|
|
|
|
Je vais faire mon relou, mais visuellement je préfère largement ce bon vieux SMF haha
Belle initiative d'avoir testé sinon.
J'ai quelques serveurs et VPS qui tournent non stop, si jamais ...
|
|
|
|
|
Trés sympa ce petit recueil.
Par contre faut un sacré VPS pour y stocker l'intégralité de la blockchain bitcoin...
|
|
|
|
|
Tu proposes quoi comme contrepartie pour les prêts de cryptos ?
|
|
|
|
Si tu peux juste remplacer encrypter par chiffrer ... Déjà crypter c'est faux alors ENcrypter, ça fait pleurer ma langue française. Du point de vue de la cryptanalyse, le terme crypter est contesté car ce n'est qu'un faux anglicisme de chiffrer alors que le terme décrypter, quant à lui, signifie « déchiffrer sans posséder la clé secrète ». De plus, le synonyme classique chiffrer prévaut, pour certains, sur le faux anglicisme crypter. |
|
|
|
Habe jetzt gerade kein "direkten" Thread dafür gefunden, aber passt mmn gut zur Cyperkriminaltiät, schützt eure Wallets!! Der Ledger Nano ist gerade bis 21 November in Aktion, vielleicht braucht ja eure Freundin auch einen  ! Ist natürlich auch bei Amazon günstig zu finden . Hardware Wallets nur direkt beim Hersteller beziehen! Niemals über andere Händler. Es kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden, dass sie beim Verkauf über Drittanbieter manipuliert worden sind. Flasch. Sogar Ledger selbst rät nicht davon ab, sondern ermöglicht das prüfen. Ausserdem gibt es ohnehin schon sehr viele Parteien in der Supply Chain. - Der Chip anbieter - Die Ledger angestellten - Der Lieferant - usw. Ob da jetzt eine extra Partei beteiligt ist oder nicht, ist komplett Wurst. Der Hersteller muss auf jedenfall ein Produkt anbieten das gegen solche Angriffe bombenfest ist. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
