That guy must be colorblind ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) GH/s Miners Round Profit/BTC Exchange r. Difficulty IXC 0.02 1 200 h 49 m 0.47 0.00226727 16384 I0C 86.10 58 0 h 2 m 1.03 0.00169534 2812
Oh noes, I've been trolled ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Btw, you should even post 10 times the same message, instead of only twice
|
|
|
Why? Every Bitcoin fork use this subforum and not their own forum anyway SolidCoin has a clean Forum, no Spam and quite a few active Users: http://solidcointalk.org/ ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) And yet there are tons of solidcoin related posts other here, which was my point Anyway, maybe i0coin needs to release a great huge awesome new release on sept 1st! Why? Well dunno... Solidcoin planned to release his new release on this day, and our beloved nasakioto thought that if he released his own shitty new version on the same day it will bring some glory to it So... As I0coin is a ixcoin fork, why not?
|
|
|
So..they got to keep all the coins that were still held there hey?
I'm not sure whats more shonky - the pool, or the currency itself...
I'll just leave this here GH/s Miners Round Profit/BTC Exchange r. Difficulty IXC 0.02 1 200 h 49 m 0.47 0.00226727 16384 I0C 86.10 58 0 h 2 m 1.03 0.00169534 2812
|
|
|
You have to thank Luke-Jr (pool operator of our sacred Eligius, which put prayers in the blockchain for all our sins) for that shit He deliberately put false timestamp because he wants one of his idea being accepted by the Bitcoin devs A kind of blackmail
|
|
|
Sources within the industry tell me Bitcoin is going to collapse! I say you put all your savings into ixcoin!
I love your sig
|
|
|
but thats because I am not a homosexual and I believe I am normal...
What a point You're a man right? So being a women is not normal? You're white? So... etc... I didn't expected that kind of "explanation" Personally I really don't care what people do as long as everybody is consenting, hetero, homo, or even every kind of weird things i think i can safely say it is less hostile compared to the US. I think that too (maybe not in Italy though, I don't know)
|
|
|
Encryption? Yes Bitcoin has it for months, but you know, that's a feature that is in alpha stage, ie not fully tested, ie we can't fully rely on it. And this is the same you find in your beloved solidcoin
He seems to have implemented it rather smooothly. I don't see anyone on here screaming about having lost their SC wallet because the encryption fucked up. I also note that in the time I was typing this CoinHunter seems about to implement multiple wallet support. Is that also in alpha stage on the Bitcoin client? So because there's no problem during 9 days, we are safe? Intedezting.... https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/showwalletSure coinhunter has some advance. When you have a smaller user base it's easier to implement shiny things instead of critical ones Do you really think bitcoin devs do nothing? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commits/masterRetargeting algo idea? Already in i0coin, days before solidcoin was announced
I gotta call BS on this one. I0coin was a Ixcoin with 0 premined blocks, and a few cosmetic changes. Ixcoin blatantly ripped off the retargeting idea a few days ago. The point is moot anyway, since it truly doesn't matter who has the first usage of an idea in open source, only the best implementation of it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I understand tho, someone has introduced a viable fork to Bitcoin, and made some interesting improvements. Perhaps this will light a fire under some Bitcoin devs to do more and perhaps make a some better and more timely changes. Or perhaps they feel the best way to secure bitcoin is to do their best to stamp out any competitors in their infancy. Quite frankly I am surprised that this child board is even allowed to exist on this forum. And FWIW I have 5 bitcoins and few days worth of mining invested in SolidCoin, and 5 bitcoins and few days worth of mining in I0coin, and 5 bitcoins and few days worth of mining in Ixcoin as well, and several months worth of mining in Bitcoin. Ideally I would like them all to succeed, but I am well diversified if any of them fail. And if they all fail, then lots of people are screwed. The altruism that many senior and hero members are showing by attempting to keep others from using a competing blockchain is truly touching. I honestly didn't think that there were that many people on this forum that cared so deeply about the economic welfare of their fellow human beings. Such paragons of virtue should be held up as examples for the rest of humanity to emulate. The perseverance that they have in continually trying to hammer the same points over and over again is truly awe-inspiring. That they do all of this without any chance of personal gain and out of the goodness of their hearts is truly humbling. [/snark] You call BS? Good for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=36425.msg454938#msg454938solidcoin was released on august 14th? I didn't know When you obviously don't know, please, keep quiet Sure solidcoin has the best implementation, I didn't say it's not the case I was just answering to that, nothing more: Also, the retargeting algo is a good idea
|
|
|
I believe that is what you want anyway though, as you want this crypto currency fork to fail so you can protect your invenstment in Bitcoin.
Oh, and you don't want to protect your invenstment in solidcoin?
|
|
|
I see a single developer who has done more to improve on his blockchain in the last month than the entire core dev team has done on bitcoin in 6 months
Stopped reading You sure haven't lurked enough in the dev forum ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Sorry, I meant to say that he has done more useful changes, or did Bitcoin get wallet encryption when I wasn't looking? Work on that has been going for how many months now? At least as far back as March, if I recall reading those threads correctly. Also, the retargeting algo is a good idea. One of the easiest and (relatively) cheapest attacks on bitcoin would be to quietly buy a *lot* of coins over time and then sell them all, dropping the price to $1 or $2 and then holding it there for a month. A lot of miners would be forced to stop since many require fiat each month to pay their electric bills. Even losing 50% of the network hashrate would be devastating to bitcoin. And dev forums? B-O-RING! Who has time to read about all that coding crap? Just looking at the titles gives most people a headache ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Encryption? Yes Bitcoin has it for months, but you know, that's a feature that is in alpha stage, ie not fully tested, ie we can't fully rely on it. And this is the same you find in your beloved solidcoin Retargeting algo idea? Already in i0coin, days before solidcoin was announced
|
|
|
And you misspelled it AGAIN! I think you should copy the little line after 'go again' and paste it somewhere ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) As a high-ranking Pastafarian, I may have to excommunicate you for that.
Have you been touched yet??
|
|
|
The atheist pool thread deserved to be deleted but these posts must be allowed? Seriously? Of all the hotels Bruce could invite bitcoiners to, why must he choose the flaming gay one? I don't want bitcoin to be associated with flaming gayness. Shortly before this Pattaya thing Bruce associated bitcoin with his salacious, gay lifestyle by inviting bitcoin enthusiasts to a gay hotel in Spain. See this thread. I think this thread is an important and healthy. Bruce's salacious, gay lifestyle spills onto these pages like a smelly, heap of entrails, and we are revolted. We condemn the acts and in so doing we distance ourselves from the man and thus purge our system from something unhealthy. Hmm, Bruce invites people to visit him at Hotel Axel, a gay hotel (no doubt about this). From this we may conclude that Bruce is gay and isn't afraid to admit it. Isn't that homophobia?
|
|
|
It seems that the last thread was "beyond out of the bounds for the mining forum", I hope it's not too off-topic
So here we go again including the original typo, who want to mount a pool to put some pastafarian prayers in the blockchain?
May You All Be Touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
|
|
Remind me again, how many people own solidcoins?
There are 701 users on the bitparking exchange with a balance of solidcoins greater than zero. It doesn't give an indication of actual users since they'll be people who don't use the exchange, and people who have withdrawn their solidcoins so the exchange doesn't hold it, but it may help gauge the size. Falls a bit short of CoinHunter's claim that "10,000 people own solidcoins". I'd really like to know how he extrapolated the other 9,299, but he seems reluctant to say. Easy 1 block every 3 minutes instead of every 10 minutes -> you can multiply by 10/3 -> 2300 users Five reasons to own solidcoins -> 11500 users QED
|
|
|
I found the problem: all the trades between 01:19:14 and now aren't in the api data
If you mean the '/api/t' URL, it's cached at 60 minutes. '/api/t2' is cached at 10 seconds. Thanks Why? Every Bitcoin fork use this subforum and not their own forum anyway
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi740.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fxx50%2Fwillesnille%2FDontFeedTheTrolls.jpg&t=663&c=cH1SkmTsBY1l0g) Report it instead
|
|
|
I meant the data
I found the problem: all the trades between 01:19:14 and now aren't in the api data
|
|
|
It seems somebody doesn't understand irony over here
|
|
|
doublec, your api seems broken
|
|
|
|