Haha Idiocracy(great movie)...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAqIJZeeXEc

Cryptohunter has always been helpful by spreading the word on forums among other things. He's very loyal and supportive and he tries to come up with good ideas and keeps the forum alive with interesting questions. Every investor does their part and because of that people find out about the project.

As for the price well after a year or two of running up a few people cash out and it's due for a correction.

"investing is the transfer of money from the impatient to the patient" ~Warren Buffet.

Really these are exciting times.

As for the next update, I was busy doing management a lot last month and now that we have a lot of new people in place I've been able to code more. I've tested the new build for the fork and it looks good. Also I'm working on exotic spend we will be the first wallet in the world to support frozen coins in the GUI. We have people working on block explorers electrum style and various other things. We are running a Facebook campaign and producing a commercial. We have a long list of tasks in Asana and I think we get a lot done. It will pay off. It already has. We have accomplished alot. Look at how far we've come after a couple short years. It's great.

Because if we fix it at $1 then it doesn't also follow Bitcoin price when it goes up.

So it's better to let the peg be dynamic so it goes up slowly with Bitcoin and once Bitcoin crashes we freeze up so we don't crash and then more volume will go into this coin because it's safer than Tether.

What is so interesting is, he has few choices for coins to review. And he chooses BitBay. For those that don't know, Theymos is the owner of Bitcointalk, Bitcoin Reddit and Bitcoin.org

I always figured he didn't like me as he never responded to messages a while back. Yet he has our coin on there to look at. That maybe is a good thing.

His review of ETH is pretty much identical to what I've been saying for years. But it is a gross exaggeration to give them a 1 out of 100. No matter how much I protest about ETH and it's disregard for scaling, they did do completely original and interesting code! He says solidity works like magic and gives it a 1?

I guess they don't call it "altcointalk". Why do I get the feeling he really doesn't like altcoins?

Even at this point to give Bitcoin 100 isn't really true at this point because from an unbiased purely protocol perspective, it doesn't have everything it needs to scale. That is like giving the Alpha of software a better score than the beta or release. But I understand why he did that, after all it has inspired the dawn of an entire industry!

What really I find to be wrong is that he gives Monero a 4 out of 100 and then proceeds to give Bytecoin the ORGINAL a 0 out of 100 saying Monero was worth more and thus deserving of a better score and yet he says that Litecoin is a 0 because its a clone!! So how can the clone of Bytecoin be better than Bytecoin which was responsible for the innovation in the first place?! Just because it's more popular? Is it all about money in the end? By that virtue Dogecoin is better than Namecoin? Life isn't a popularity contest.

So with that said he seems to value decentralization and scalability. Which is great! So he might truly value what we have done here at BitBay and I will explain why.

Everything I have done at this point has been to scale and keep this secure and decentralized.

Double deposit escrow does to law and agreement as to what Bitcoin did to cash. It removes the need for a 3rd party.
Two party escrow benefits almost every industry as agreement is what drives society.
It doesn't bloat the chain at all, it simply leverages multisignature.

Now on one hand he can argue that this is not anything Bitcoin can't do but that point would not be valid because I started in BitHalo and always wanted this to be cross-platform so all coins could use it. This is software, a fully immersive contracting experience totally peer to peer and there is nothing like it in the industry.

The question being does double deposit advance cryptography industry as a whole? You bet! It reveals the way crypto cash can be applied and solve real world problems. This is the first time in history a contract can be enforced without a gun as there is instant karma built into the contract.

The next feature decentralized markets he should like because we don't use the blockchain at all!! We instead use Bitmessage an entirely separate peer to peer protocol that saves messages for a couple days and passes them around groups as users decipher the messages that only apply to them.

The drawbacks to Bitmessage are that it does POW which can't be too easy or too hard so the network is somewhat possible to attack. HOWEVER...

I have proposed to use the Bitbay blockchain using checklocktimeverify to temporarily lock up coins per kilobyte for each message sent. This prevents spam completely!! It scales beautifully. And it unties two previously unrelated protocols. We don't need that yet as Bitmessage is still growing as is our markets but this is our blockchain innovation we have in our pocket.

The next drawback to Bitmessage is it's own bloat however, because networks form groups I think you can easily break the network into pieces because the data is actually trivial and doesn't need to be permanently stored. This means large nodes and server nodes can form groups, users can form smaller groups and they can just relay what is searched for on the markets by taking advantage of whitelists and subscriptions to channels. The anonymity is good because it is impossible to prove you are able to decrypt a message (plausible deniability)

Messages are sent to the markets by a payload and signed hash as well as pastebin for images to relieve bloat on Bitmessage. Thus the message is immutable and the signature outside of the message prevents malleability. But again, this is non-permanent data so it doesn't matter if it's hash is malleable.

The thing that is lovely about 2 party escrow is each party verifies their own half of the deal making hacking impossible.

It scales, it solves a problem and it keeps the ideology in Bitcoin in tact.

So as for the blockchain itself we use proof of stake and he might argue that this is easy to calculate a block in advance to attack. We know this and believe it can be solved by having a more random block selection process. Not so tough.

As for scaling I think two things are needed, first I've spoken about a combination of pruning and checkpoints. If all nodes followed the same protocol and were able to store enough data about the past to prevent spoofing I think the solution is very simple. It's not over-engineered. Maybe a decentralized checkpoint system can be added.

The POS 3 protocol allows spending the stake from P2SH and this means to stake we spend. This allowed us to add voting and by voting we can agree on forks as we did previously in our large community vote. If only Bitcoin held a vote years ago!

Last scaling issue preventing VISA scale is bandwidth and volume of transactions. I have seen the DPOS model where less nodes are chosen to power massive transaction loads. And it works. But it is still centralized and prone to political manipulation. That is why I have played with the idea of sharing the workload among nodes and peers in a deterministic way. As peers might form groups who share the work load similar to a mining pool. If you combine that with DPOS then I think you have something really good. Especially if a good pruning technique is added. You get your VISA scale (maybe).

So what actual blockchain innovations have we done? Well other than a few POS innovations not many. But look at what we have done to AVOID putting unnecessary bullshit on the chain?! To that I say there may be no other coin that can even touch us. We found and developed protocols that allows the decentralized markets. Two entire layers for data combined as one. Then we pioneered a contracting system that has almost unlimited use cases and solves a problem of deception and theft truly stopping those things dead in their tracks. A historical first.

And this has taken me several years to code and accomplish, it wasn't easy. Especially because the temptation to bloat the chain like ETH was there if I wanted it. And unlike Bitcoin or Zcash, I didn't have a big team of coders behind me.

There is an GREAT blockchain innovation on the way, and it is our ace in the hole. The one thing that plagues Bitcoin is the volatility!

We solve that with a DYNAMIC PEG. A "rolling" peg similar to a crawling peg. Some guy chimed in about BitUSD and how the market manipulation makes it a bad long. But with our peg we suffer no such problem because we are only controlling supply/liquidity.

The fact that our peg makes two assets frozen and liquid coins where the frozen coins are only different in speed is a frikkin awesome feature many of our communities favorites. We avoid bloat by having a separate database for tagging and tracking inputs and only report state changes to inputs where obvious liquidity changes are assumed by nodes. Fees are tracked too to avoid the loss of liquidity at a certain range. The idea is pure, simple and really can't get simpler when it comes to market pegs.

The rolling peg needs no third parties, no custodians, no political influence, is fully decentralized and isn't prone to market manipulation

It replaces the market maker with technology. If you allow unlimited changes to the supply daily and unlimited interest then you can even force a hard peg with an algorithm.

For investors we will be doing the changes in supply by voting AND algorithm. This may favor the stakers who can vote but it is going to allow a little speculation and thus interest in the tech itself where a hard peg may go unnoticed.

The peg operates by enforcing it on the time of spending. The frozen coins are not immovable, they are slowed by one month. It is not necessary to use checklocktimeverify to do so as miners will keep track anyways. The "slowed" coins allow for bond like instruments, liquidity swaps which are very similar to trustless loans and futures depending on the motive to swap. This creates in my opinion a massive paradigm shift in the APPLICATIONS of crypto.

So was my innovation a better mathematical crypto algoritm? A zero knowledge proof anon system? A codebase no derived from Bitcoin? No.
But does it revolutionize and pioneer new ideas that have true real world use case? Yes.

Serverless markets, 2 party agreements with no escrow, crawling peg applied to cryptocurrency

Solving major problems of decentralization, agreement/enforcement/contract/bloat, volatility and the ability to emulate large markets from a small market!

To protect the network you can even build a disincentive to lie about a tx because we are forcing nodes to spend to stake and have their input as collateral if they do betray the protocol. This is a Vitalik idea that I was actually fond of.

To scale proposing the following: Pruning, sharing workload, checklocktimeverify funds per byte

The lightning network can also be implemented if needed when made WITHOUT SEGWIT. We would choose not to add segwit because Bitcoin is labeling payments as "True" and thus allowing the miners to control unbelievable power of the protocol at whim. Segwit is a hack that wasn't needed for lightning. As malleability could have been solved by having users sign the txid hash requiring a fork which they were too scared to do. In turn they centralize Bitcoin to the miners and POW is a horrid waste of power, generating more power than entire countries just to generate little hashes.

Lightning network is potentially better with frozen funds like in our crawling peg because that can be used as collateral in the 2 of 2 making it more decentralized in a sense giving access to potentially more holders and links. After all why not make use of the funds not in use?

And the same goes for sharing the stake among nodes. Why not make use of the nodes that aren't doing anything? Here we would have potentially 1000s of nodes wasting their time on hashes when they should be verifying transactions!!

Now based on his (generous?) reviews of other altcoins we shouldn't expect more than a big "0" or maybe he will give us a "-1" because he might mention our past when the founders left us(which has nothing to do with what was accomplished here). And to do so would be to ignore years of blood sweat and tears poured into Halo and we can laugh it off.

Or heck, maybe he really sinks his teeth into what we are doing here and says "Hey, that is pretty cool!" ... a man can dream. It must be nice to be accepted.  

This thread isn't a graveyard, there is always a few comments every day or so. It's just that slack has 1300+ members and they can interact and ask questions not to mention it's useful if they are on the markets.

I think it's funny when people use the terms "pump" for BitBay. Our volume is fairly organic and the price is easy to move in either direction.

But in all honestly, how can anyone consider this a pump. It's a correction at the very least. We had 6 months of slow steady growth wiped out within a few weeks. When you consider someone is literally just giving their coins away at this level. So personally I think we are due for a 100% correction in price.

A re-brand is a double edged sword. It can lose exchange relationships, it can make it so old customers can't find you, it can result in an inferior brand name, or a brand name that doesn't get searched often enough.

That strategy is one we should only capitalize on if all else fails and we are looking for funding or various other reasons like you mentioned. We should think 4th dimensional. Almost every exchange I remember from years ago, is gone! Due to hacks either performed by the owners themselves or etc. We can't assume that the exchange won't get replaced by decentralized exchanges either. Or that we won't make enough funds to buy them out or even partner with them. We have a trustless fiat gateway. Things they might want and need. Co-branding is always a possibility. There isn't necessarily an overlap. It's like being on a Delta Airplane and seeing Delta Faucet. We are in the same industry but do totally different things.

He is confusing the BitBay exchange with the coin.

Anyways the roadmap and details is on the OP. You have to realize that this software already exists, we aren't like the other projects who promise non-existent features. Download the markets client and see for yourself. It's been running for years. Unbreakable contracts decentralized markets etc.

Possible that's why I'm trying to finish the features. It's a bit of a race. We have to try and make sure people don't invest in those. They fake volume and people need to be aware of it.

Hey well you can have custom deposits. You can even have unilateral contracts. However you can't structure 100 to go back to someone if it "blows up" as who would determine that? It would then serve no purpose to add the 100 in the first place other than to make it not liquid.

But yes in general you have the right idea. Remember this is a trust building exercise. If I don't trust you then we set up the 100% deposits. If I do trust you then we set it lower or don't even add it at all.

Realize that if the buyer posts an advance payment for an item with no deposit and the sellers has no deposit, the odds that the seller will blow up the contract is also extremely low. The buyer receiving the item to not release payment is extremely low because he can't get it back. The only thing that arises is an extortion situation which is why there is a time limit and deposits to begin with. But if the parties gain substantial trust on the markets then why not.

Yea I'm a bit of an anarchist. It was after a realization that laws aren't morals. It is not immoral to be outside naked. It is illegal. And yet it is immoral to go after a person who is naked in public, threaten to shoot them if they don't come with you, then throw them in a jail cell. So the irony is cops and military the the immoral ones. Sure there is exceptions like punishing people who murder but even in that case, how can you prove guilt. Why can't people be taught to be peaceful? Why is the world not peaceful. Why is our media pure violence. Most laws are absurd and even more absurd is the method of punishment used. Two wrongs don't make a right, the jury and judge is usually wrong too. Also their judgement is under the authority of man and let all men be liars.

The world could be very beautiful without government. Things were always better in the past. For a man to trade freedom for security he will soon find he has neither.

The peg should be implemented within a year hopefully 6 months... people anticipate Q1 2018 and this will depend on when i get these templates done.

The budget... well since the founders left we have had to fund a lot of things ourselves. Sometimes the community helps and sometimes I fund from my personal Bitcoins. Sometimes I pay BitBay to bounties we have investors who got in early and they chip in. But there is no standard budget. We are volunteer and bounty driven. Sometimes I pay PR and soon we will start a Facebook ad campaign.

People can donate their POS rewards in the market client. That's already a feature. It's voluntary.

Oddly enough new buyers have put down large deposits on large purchase as we have had cash wires where a hefty deposit was done. I have also personally done an arbitrage contract with a big deposit. We have them and so far nobody has complained. Perhaps if this got really big an insurance company would come in for a fee to cover people who can't afford it.

To include a fee on top, why do that? The buyer should get that back. The thing about these contracts is they can be unilateral. So lets say a buyer has no deposit. The seller can guarantee his end of the bargain letting new buyers into the system. This is used for example on a persons "first" coins. But seller may want to do a little KYC first.

To be honest, this takes some getting used to. It's a major paradigm shift.

I did explain why they can't create burner accounts... there is a reputation system. A new buyer would have to put up equal deposit. If there was news of some fool blowing up their money then people would start requesting higher deposits. In some cases they may want additional contact info. And when is the last time you set fire to $4?

A small $4 deposit isn't illogical, paying 5-10% to give your $4 to a middle man is illogical. Here you SAVE 5-10% easy on fees. Why wouldn't they use it. Granted we are not at the point to get "normies" in but crypto is a paradigm shift, be patient. We very well could see it happen.

Paying a fraction of a deposit on an item worth 4x for example they STILL lose. If the item is 100 dollars and they pay 25 dollar deposit you are forgetting the payment is ADVANCED too. So they had 125 in escrow, now they have overpaid 125 for a 100 dollar item. For them to fake build a reputation just to LOSE 25 dollars is totally retarded in my humble opinion. The second they default the next seller would not let them put 25% deposit the next seller would require 100% and if they did it again the next seller would want 200%... this person would go poor fast.

It's like you are trying to justify a person setting fire to their own money. You realize by the time a seller does 10 deals they have already made 100% on the saved fees if they average 10% the item value? The odds that some crazy person would start kamikaze is like not even 1/10,000

I think you aren't realizing there are still industries that NEED this. For example the cash for coins business, they need it. They get accounts frozen by coinbase, paypals reversed on localbitcoins, they have the money to put for a deposit and they need a trustworthy platform. This solves it. Then there is people who want to barter. They need this! Bartering under the bridge of trust, never having to touch fiat with the insurance of DDE. Also Telcom where people need to wire money from one country to another, the headache of escrow. These people have millions of dollars (I know, I've spoke to some)... finding the escrow and bank between countries is a big deal, insurance and other things is a hassle. We just cut out that cost and they get it all back after a short time doing business. It's like a solar panel, the deposit may be high but they start seeing major benefits in the future.

There is something you might not be seeing. The normies are not necessarily our target market. There is tons of niche markets that truly don't have trust and need this. They don't have other options. That is where this can start and it will evolve to get accepted by normies after the benefits are seen.

Also punishing both kids is justice, because in my analogy I made the mistake of putting you are a parent. But remove the parent. If two people lie, there is only 3 people that know, the culprit the victim and potentially god(depending on your beliefs). No judge or lawyer or jury knows, it is an utter waste of state resources, courts are dumb, cumbersome and their judgement are usually wrong. The punishment hardly ever fits the crime and victim-less crimes are consistently prosecuted usually against the innocent. This system solves that. It's meant to work even in absence of governments. It reduces the problem to only include the parties that matter. The two INVOLVED. This is far superior to including an arbiter who knows nothing literally has to guess. You should see that this is the perfect system and can't be improved. I will bet that an e-bay arbiter is wrong at least 50% of the time.

This isn't a platform just for e-bay sales. It's sales of goods, employment, barter, trade etc. This can enable binary options and hundreds of other things.

What is this about inflation? Crypto doesn't inflate.

I'm asking for a billion dollars??!??!? Wow you are totally wrong there. Dude anyone who knows me already knows I really am not even in crypto for the money. I'm in it for these ideologies. We think the project should be higher because of the feature list and that there is so many vapor products on the top 20. That's the only reason. Investors want to do well and it does make me happy seeing them do well.

Nah keep looking like an ass, it's appreciated. It's okay this type of dissent is how people learn. But like I said before. Play devils advocate only if you mean it because I'm not so sure the devil needs any more help. 

Sorry but you initiated with poor etiquette. Regardless I'm happy to answer your questions. Again... I did respond we have had these types of questions before over the years. I'm not sure why I need to whitewash myself or sugar coat everything. This is a great system. Please forgive me if I was uncouth certainly wasn't my intention.

So to respond... there is a rep system. Why would nobody buy an inexpensive item? A small $4 deposit on a $4 item is perfectly fine. We have had tons of items sold this way. Also we have done in practice very large transactions up to 5,000 dollars. Mostly cash deals coins for cash. There is no company you can trust to properly handle cash deals as even Coinbase is known to shut down and confiscate funds. This works, it's peer to peer and makes theft profitless. And we have used it this way, successfully (we really need a testimonial video).

Now lets say you are involved in a 10k deal, even a deposit of 2500 should be no issue here. Everything revolves around the evidence of your previous deals.

For example, lets say you did 10 deals but lost the 11th. Okay so now that shows on the blockchain (not the contract but the explosion and public key)... people will know immediately you lost your last deal. They may require a higher bond. If you lose 2 deals in a row, then they may even demand higher bonds and so forth.

Okay you asked "who foots the bill"... nobody. This ELIMINATES middle men. There is no judge, no juror who by the way are usually wrong and just guess. There is no justice in this world we are trying to bring that back. When a contract blows up BOTH buyer and seller lose funds.

Think of this analogy, both of your children are fighting. One is lying but you can't find out who. So, you punish both. You kindly explain "I know one of you are telling me the truth and I think I know who it is, but this way both of you will know not to lie as it will never favor you. If I was to choose, then I might choose wrong and reward the one who lies so I reward neither in order to never incentivize a lie."

Nobody loses money by having funds in a contract, they get it back when the deal is over. As you said when it is in limbo it's really no big deal because their daily volume of sales will not usually exceed what they have in the bank. Power sellers who sell 1000s of items a year only maybe sell a few items a day, which based on their net would be nothing (probably not even 5% of the money in their bank).

A power seller would probably not be asked for a high deposit either even lessening that burden further. Think of this like a trust building exercise. We find two strangers, one is a thief one is honest. They enter traditional double deposit, the theif has no chance to win with a profit, he concedes to accept it. After the thief has done 1000 deals, well his deposit requirement may cut down to only 10%... but even so, he is STILL losing if he defaults.

There is really no profit incentive to cheat regardless of deposit levels. When I said "go into a DDE contract with me, if you think you have the guts to blow one up I challenge you to" it wasn't meant to put you off. On the contrary, you can see yourself the power of this system and sometimes seeing is believing. I certainly wouldn't blow up a contract(unless I was forced to) and to my knowledge no Bitbay contract has ever blown up.

Whitepaper is here:
https://davtonia.com/blackhalo/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/whitepaper_twosided.pdf

It's not on the site although thanks we should add it, this is my paper from 2014, I've been around for a long time man. BitHalo(my other software) was the first smart contracts on any blockchain a year before Ethereum.

I'm definitely NOT afraid of mimicry let along anything. It's been like this for a while now, we have a working product and it's just a matter of fact that crypto has no chargebacks, there is nobody to save people from theft. We have a solution, I think it should be the industry STANDARD. Consider almost 50% of all bitcoins have been stolen to 3rd party escrow hacks! Finally we have solved a problem challenging mankind for millennia. Do I expect it to change overnight? No, but I've been fighting until my fingers bleed to educate people on it. That is because it's for a cause bigger than myself. This definitely isn't about me. It's about an idea and "Ideas are bulletproof". It's important and it is a proposal to change how things are agreed to. Agreement is the foundation of almost everything in society. If we can just get that to favor honest people it would be an awesome shift in paradigm.

Nobody is really patting anyone on the back. Sure there are some very nice things said here and I fully appreciate it to the highest degree. And yes we have a very bullish and supportive community but they have been around for years. A lot of the people here could answer these questions on their own, they know it by heart.

So don't get the wrong impression my friend. I'm extremely busy and I will come by, answer things and sometimes put a new spin on my answer to show the various perspectives and angles to why this is such an important change. The community can answer these questions and they want to engage in debate (as long as it's not against people who have bad intentions) which I'm assuming your intentions are great. So yes please keep the questions coming. Nobody here is afraid of debate and it keeps us engaged and helps improve the product. Just realize when I'm here responding I'm not coding. So I have to do my job too.

FYI, if I don't answer, I'm busy coding or managing our slack so if someone wants to chime in please do.

They don't put down "double" the money, the term is a misnomer. If you are dealing with someone you don't trust they simply put a bond equal to the item value. If you are buying an item for $4 and don't have $4 for a deposit then you have a bigger problem.

Also you can do custom deposits. I'm sure you know and realize this. If you trust the buyer then let him put down $1 deposit on a $4 item. There is a reputation system and deposits are flexible. This is an attempt to fix a major problem in society. That's why I'm so stubborn. Let's make the world a little better.

An "unscrupulous buyer" who keeps blowing up deals will immediately be noticed(it shows on the chain). After two exploded deals people will start requiring higher bonds. And a fool and his money will soon be parted. He will go broke quick.  These are the types of morons we are attempting to eliminate. It's much better than rewarding him for scamming isn't it? If you want to hop on E-Bay and get a chargeback or an empty box more power to you. The odds of that are many times higher than you losing on this platform.

The only people who argue this are usually people who are difficult to begin with(playing devils advocate really doesn't need a reward, the devil needs no extra help) and the type of people who will find themselves losing on business deals. Also scammers tend to complain about this platform (i wonder why). Honest people need a part of society to trade with each other. That tiny little corner is here. If you are honest and want to join in please do.

If you feel like you can blow up an escrow I will happily join you in an unbreakable contract. We will see if you have the balls to do that.

Hey so the control of price is decentralized. This is a decentralized peg unlike Tether. And this peg can move up and down in price. This is similar to an economic "crawling peg". The idea is the supply is dynamic so unlike Bitcoin with it's inflation we can deflate by freezing coins. This allows us to defend against dumps. This is why so many investors who are economic buffs are so excited about this project.

The whole point of the peg is as demand rises the supply can do so organically. And if a pumper tries to go too far high they will lose if we inflate. So the community collectively controls this by competing for a price they think will fit best. They can vote via algorithm or custom.

We don't know why this isn't top 10 for that matter. We deal with a tremendous amount of adversity and propaganda. However, whatever we face we can overcome with spreading the word and marketing. As you said this is real so why would a vaporware product be above ours must be corrected. Tell friends show people this thing really works.

The BitBay serves as insurance for the deal with double deposit. So there is no reason you can't use these markets and pay in Bitcoin or even Fiat for that matter. We are a much, much better platform than open bazaar because these contracts don't have escrow. OB has to guess when someone lies in a dispute which will mean many sellers and buyers will get burned. We offer a solution to a real world problem... deception. The double deposit contracts force honesty by keeping it to the 2 parties involved with the deposit as the disincentive for breach.

And thanks, those were excellent questions.

Ethereum cut in 2/3 and so did a bunch of other coins. Look at the 3-6 month chart. The altcoin market is still very bullish a lot of new money is coming into Bitcoin.

Okay well you are right. And those two things are on the list. We need fancy graphics, the market table itself can be given a great style. Forms and buttons can be given style. Font's and so much can be altered. I would need a graphics guy to work with our skin in order to do that.

Currently we have the background transparency which looks okay. There is a nice gradient on the menu and various other things so we at least have something to build on.

"Fast sync" is one of the first things on the list. Just realize it will have to be optional because users sacrifice security when trusting a block explorer. Also, if too many people do it, then security is reduced and the chain is easier to attack.

So in order to set that up we would need multiple online block explorers similar to electrum. The next update is exotic spend and the fork, after that is templates. So this is already in my notes.

Hey so whenever a troll shows up, using a brand new account and says things that don't make sense just post the wall of features

http://www.bitbay.market/features

EDIT:
Judging from your earlier post history you claimed to be interested in BitBay...

"Taking an interest in this project.  I've familiarized myself with the client and things seem to work as they should" ~ Preventative.Measures

So why would you say that and a couple posts later say you downloaded it and it doesn't work. Why go from taking an interest to trolling? Sorry I didn't notice your comment history at first.

We have executed 1000s of contracts on this platform what are you even referring to?

Did you accept the Faucet contract with Craig? You asked me about the barrier to entry and I explained it to you.

You claim I'm getting defense however all I did was answer your questions in a cogent manner. I'm the coder okay and you claim I can't finish it alone. But do you realize we are almost done? You don't seem to realize there is very few blockchain coders in the world finding more coders isn't easy.

Thanks and good luck on Sys and everything you do. I wish you the utmost success. I can definitely imagine you are busy beyond all sense however if you ever wanna chat you know where to find me.

Why bother? Because investors deserve the software they came for. It's not a goner if there is a 25-50 million dollar marketcap and 50k to 500k of daily organic volume. We don't fake volume like some of the other coins.

Also the software has the most features of anything else out there. This thing really works. Download it and see for yourself. Can you explain why it's not above Dogecoin? Dogecoin doesn't do anything. Why do so many honest projects fall below vaporware?

Anyways thanks for the good luck.

You have to download Ethereum blockchain to user their service and it's like 100 times the size of ours. We had an issue with Mac sync that was fixed in the recent build.

As for the UI... calling it "horrible" doesn't really tell me anything. We have a wizard, help boxes, tons of things including tutorial videos, templates etc.

What does it need fancy graphics or something? Should it sing to you? I mean in reality people use microsoft word and it doesn't have 3d animations and cater to every graphical need.

There is a difference between UX and UI. Our markets use a table but that's needed for when you change from Sales to Coins for Cash for example or when you switch to auctions. Each category changes the feel of the markets and the columns on the table.

We can get around sync but at the cost of your security and the security of the blockchain. I'm not sure we need that liability. However, it is a good idea and it's considered something to tackle. In BitHalo I don't make users download the chain. The problem is altcoins don't have access to things like API requests for unspent transactions. On chainz they make you get an API key so we need our own block explorer which requires multiple servers so users can know there is know their inputs and values are accurate. This is peoples money we are talking about, it's not a trivial thing.