yes but i perform test on the testnet. my "test" wallet is able to sync and i succesfully mine 3 blocks.
the problem is: only the built-in miner found me some blocks.
is wolf-pluckminer-generic64 able to find blocks on the tesnet?
List your batch file here. |
|
|
|
Oh, stop it already. Here, let me help.  |
|
|
|
i test wolf-pluckminer-generic64 but i don't find blocks!
accepted 0/3 <booooo> since 20 minutes
the test with the built-in miner gave me 3 blocks in 6 minutes.
is it normal?
From OP: Note: These wallets will NOT sync until launch time. This is intentional. At launch time, they will sync automatically and you can start mining |
|
|
|
From my personal experience, I can tell that Keccak is not vary energy efficient algo. Power usage is little less from the scrypt algo.  I concur, SHA-3 (keccak), is an energy hog and having to use "no-adl": true, just to get a better display response is "no way to go through life, son." I'll sit this one out. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know how two of my rig's can show Nice hash x13 pool as dead when the third rig show's x13 as alive ,,,
all three rigs contain the same gpu's and all three rigs are running on the same password for algo switching
cheers
Happens to me all the time. No idea. |
|
|
|
Really  for 0.5% OMG !!! I am very happy to give those guys what supporting us with nice pools, 2% and sometimes even more, so for 0.5% to make such difference is poor man, that you can not reward somebody's work, then go and make your own pool and see how that will go !!! Yes, really! If another pool wants more hashrate they should lower their fees to be competitive with the other pools. I have no intention of wanting to run a pool. I am rewarding somebody's work, ocminer's. |
|
|
|
Damn, I so badly wanted to mine that, too.  |
|
|
|
|
Lightning chess? Probably 2-1 would be a better choice. Too much lag in your connection and you could lose any advantage. Anyway, I am interested.
|
|
|
|
|
May I suggest the Qubit algo for your POW mining stage. Rare, ASIC-resistant, fewer rigs to rent. Low energy consumption for miners.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got an idea. Why not make it a full POS right now? Oh, wait!...
|
|
|
|
These are the speed variation 1150/1700 и i=22 msi 280x gaming for drivers.
---------------------------------------------------------------
13.12 - 5,45 mhesh/s
14.4 - 5,72
14.6 beta - 5,76
14.6 rc2 - 5,76
14.7 rc1 - 5,76
14.7 rc3 - 5,76
14.9 - 5,40
14.9.1 beta - 5,40
14.9.2 beta - 5,40
14.11.1 beta - 5,40
14.11.2 beta - 5,40
14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0 - 6,12
14.12 Omega - 5,40
after the dissolution 1170/1750 - 6,23 mhesh/s
Which operating system did you use to get those results with the 14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0??? Win 7 64 Well, even though the AMD website says that the 14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0 is for win 8.1 -64, I attempted to install in on win 7-64. It installed but I could not confirm your findings. In fact, I never got close. Maybe someone else can verify and explain their method. No need to install driver. Just put amdocl.dll into miner folder. I still got the worst results with 14.41 rc1. |
|
|
|
These are the speed variation 1150/1700 и i=22 msi 280x gaming for drivers.
---------------------------------------------------------------
13.12 - 5,45 mhesh/s
14.4 - 5,72
14.6 beta - 5,76
14.6 rc2 - 5,76
14.7 rc1 - 5,76
14.7 rc3 - 5,76
14.9 - 5,40
14.9.1 beta - 5,40
14.9.2 beta - 5,40
14.11.1 beta - 5,40
14.11.2 beta - 5,40
14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0 - 6,12
14.12 Omega - 5,40
after the dissolution 1170/1750 - 6,23 mhesh/s
Which operating system did you use to get those results with the 14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0??? Win 7 64 Well, even though the AMD website says that the 14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0 is for win 8.1 -64, I attempted to install in on win 7-64. It installed but I could not confirm your findings. In fact, I never got close. Maybe someone else can verify and explain their method. |
|
|
|
let me guess - win7 x64
I doubt that since 14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0 requires Windows 8.1 (64-bit version), Red Hat Enterprise 6.5 (64-bit version), or Ubuntu 14.04 (64-bit version) |
|
|
|
These are the speed variation 1150/1700 и i=22 msi 280x gaming for drivers.
---------------------------------------------------------------
13.12 - 5,45 mhesh/s
14.4 - 5,72
14.6 beta - 5,76
14.6 rc2 - 5,76
14.7 rc1 - 5,76
14.7 rc3 - 5,76
14.9 - 5,40
14.9.1 beta - 5,40
14.9.2 beta - 5,40
14.11.1 beta - 5,40
14.11.2 beta - 5,40
14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0 - 6,12
14.12 Omega - 5,40
after the dissolution 1170/1750 - 6,23 mhesh/s
Which operating system did you use to get those results with the 14.41 rc1 OpenCL 2.0??? |
|
|
|
About half my cards are HD 7970 and they get 5.3 Mh/s with 1050/1500, I 20, g 1, w 256 using sgminer 5.1 with AMD 14.7r3 drivers
2 R9 280X get 5.6 Mh/s with 1100/1500 , I22 , g 1 w 64 using sph-sgminer_groestl with AMD 14.9 drivers on PIMP 1.7.0 My 4-280x's get 5.55 Mh/s (Hynix) 5.43 (Elpida) at 1100/1500 with the same settings at I 20, w 256 and only pull 600 watts at the wall. Anything with more intensity or higher clock becomes quite inefficient power-wise for me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
