|
Rest in peace Hal.
Thank you for all your contributions. We owe you so much.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys
I'm back in the bitcoin dev world. I'm not sure I'll be able to be as much present as I'd would like starting from 2015.
That's why, now that I have a bit more time, I'm planning to finish newpywallet (or at the very least developing it enough to hand over the development to a trusted developer, but that's not the plan).
The version 0.0.1a4 is expected during September.
|
|
|
|
As I have said several times, and you can prove it to yourself through examination of the foundational scientific writings, the base for ALL understanding that the earth is more than about 25,000 years max, is in ifs and maybes. Check the books written by the scientists who have done that calculations. The say things like, "From this we can surmise that the age of the earth is ... ." The word "surmise" has to do with making an educated guess. The evidence that they use can be interpreted in ways different than the things that they say... even ways that show a young earth. On the other hand, the more we learn about the activity of the earth and the universe, the more we see an ultra-complex machine. What we don't see is any kind of method that explains how this machine was made. ALL examination of the machine itself shows ONLY a slowing down, decaying, erosion, like a pendulum gradually going to bottom dead center. The science books that talk about these things explain it in this way. The idea of evolution entirely contradicts the things that we see happening in nature. Evolution is a guesswork idea that flies in the face of the machinery of the universe gradually wearing down. Evolution says things increase in complexity. It is standard science that things wear out and wear down. There is nothing that shows the opposite. There is no evolution. Machinery is built by a machine maker. The more complex the machinery, the more complex that machine maker. Any one of you, stand there and call a grain of sand into existence out of nothing. Nobody can do it, yet the stuff is here, and the so-called scientific methods suggested for where the stuff comes from are pure guesses. The evidence is overwhelmingly for a God, and a very powerful One.  You're right about this one The only problem is that this "machine maker" is called entropy, not god If you don't agree, do you think that when the Sun creates one deuterium atom from two hydrogen atoms, then god is the explanation? Complete entropy in the universe would spread all the material and energy evenly throughout all space. There would be no stars, no planets, no heavenly bodies, no earthly bodies. All the material would have dissolved into its component energy, and there would be an similarity of existence between all the parts of the universe. Whatever it would be like - we don't know enough about how the dimensions work - it all would be essentially "dead." That's where the universe is headed. If time and the dimensions remain constant until all the material and energy get to this state, it might take untold billions of years for it to happen. Since time and the dimensions are probably in entropy the same as energy and material, it will probably speed up exponentially, until there is what could be called a reverse big bang, and then, nothing but entropy. The point isn't the entropy. The point is, we don't have a clue as to what is powerful enough to set things up, making all things to have existence that is so completely opposite of complete entropy as we see in the universe today. The Big Bang is a proposed idea that is based on so many "ifs" and "maybes" that it is science fiction. There are only two things that fit, based on what we know: 1) we don't know; 2) God. do you think that when the Sun creates one deuterium atom from two hydrogen atoms, then god is the explanation? |
|
|
|
yeah that is basically what i changed, but i thought "private" was the key, not "sec".
thank you!
So it works, right? |
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the bugs
Change
1)
"if (sys.argv)!=2:" to "if len(sys.argv)!=2:"
2)
"r+=addr+';'+label+'\n'" to "r+=k['sec']+';'+label+'\n'"
Edit: I didn't see your post. And I can't open pastebin on my phone (crazy...).
The file only needs private keys, that's why there's no 1privkey. They start with K, L or 5.
|
|
|
|
As I have said several times, and you can prove it to yourself through examination of the foundational scientific writings, the base for ALL understanding that the earth is more than about 25,000 years max, is in ifs and maybes. Check the books written by the scientists who have done that calculations. The say things like, "From this we can surmise that the age of the earth is ... ." The word "surmise" has to do with making an educated guess. The evidence that they use can be interpreted in ways different than the things that they say... even ways that show a young earth. On the other hand, the more we learn about the activity of the earth and the universe, the more we see an ultra-complex machine. What we don't see is any kind of method that explains how this machine was made. ALL examination of the machine itself shows ONLY a slowing down, decaying, erosion, like a pendulum gradually going to bottom dead center. The science books that talk about these things explain it in this way. The idea of evolution entirely contradicts the things that we see happening in nature. Evolution is a guesswork idea that flies in the face of the machinery of the universe gradually wearing down. Evolution says things increase in complexity. It is standard science that things wear out and wear down. There is nothing that shows the opposite. There is no evolution. Machinery is built by a machine maker. The more complex the machinery, the more complex that machine maker. Any one of you, stand there and call a grain of sand into existence out of nothing. Nobody can do it, yet the stuff is here, and the so-called scientific methods suggested for where the stuff comes from are pure guesses. The evidence is overwhelmingly for a God, and a very powerful One. You're right about this one The only problem is that this "machine maker" is called entropy, not god If you don't agree, do you think that when the Sun creates one deuterium atom from two hydrogen atoms, then god is the explanation? |
|
|
|
ah yes, then that is what happened. I did a full wallet dump to json thinking that i could import it all later. I now realize the "import transactions" option is not what i though. Maybe you could add an option to pywallet to import keys from a full wallet dump?  i'll send you a part of the file in PM. thank you. Yeah, I'll add that to the new version I did this, try it out and tell me how it goes Download it into translate.py, then run python translate.py wallet.json That will make a wallet.json.pywalletexport that will (hopefully) be accepted |
|
|
|
Total time logged in: 270 days, 5 minutes.
Date Registered: March 23, 2013, 07:28:14 AM That looks impossible. Do you use auto-refresher? I hate fake stats smh. 12.5 hours per day on the forum, every single day Good one  |
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking about doing a list of bookmarked threads
In "Show new replies to your posts" and "Watchlist" you can't see the threads if you already read all the posts
In this new list you would see them all
|
|
|
|
BTW, how do I see the number of reports and accuracy (other than after I reported a post?) Onkel Paul (100% accuracy as far as I remember  ) You can see them BEFORE you report a post (ie. just click the link, don't validate) |
|
|
|
Hi, i'm having trouble importing my backup keys to my main wallet. I get the following output: http://pastebin.com/ii6SfsWrCan someone help me please? Why don't you import using below command which is used commonly instead of using pywallet? importprivkey bitcoinaddressprivatekey You can only import 1 key at a time. kindly, MZ Because I did the backup with pywallet, so I assumed it would be easy to import it back with pywallet :\ I want to get my labels back too, all the info that is on the backup. Pastebin seems down so I can't see your error messages but I know what you want is possible
I'll look at that as soon as pastebin is up againOk Pastebin works again. It looks like your put the data in the "import transaction" form. Either you made a mistake or there's a big bug in pywallet. I see that your file is "keys.json" but the key export format of Pywallet is not json so maybe you didn't use the correct method. You must export your keys with the "Dump your keys" form. That will make a file full of "1privkey;label". Then you just have to import this file with the "Import keys" form. If I'm right and that your keys are in json format (probably from a wallet dump), just send me a small part of it with all the private keys modified (deleted/emptied/whatever). I'll make you a script to transform keys.json into a usable file. |
|
|
|
|
That would make a lot of colours for the last half-coin
|
|
|
|
If you had said your eyes were set that you couldn't see, you might have an excuse. But now that you say (essentially) that you understand, you are taking responsibility for yourself before God. Better be the right response. Excuse? I've done nothing wrong.  You back to that old fear mongering again? When will the penny drop? Wait a minute, he did not state whose God? If it is mine, Buffer everything you every did is forgiven. Why? Because my God doesn't have 'abstract' rules of what's right and what is not. Well, we are talking about the BIG God. You know, the God Who made nature. There are rules of nature that He set in place that if you don't follow them, you hurt yourself, or even die. The BIG Him  |
|
|
|
DISEASES THAT WE ARE BRINGING ON OURSELVES BY NOT FOLLOWING GOD, OR BY TOTALLY DENYING HIM.
The dark days of attracting more followers by the scaremongering methods are growing short. You'll have to find another angle. Definitely. Be afraid! Be afraid just like you might be afraid of grabbing a knife and stabbing yourself in the stomach. If you don't have enough sense to be afraid, no wonder you have troubling results. Yeah Lol |
|
|
|
It appears from Ezekiel 28...
Hmm. Not sure I give any credit to the book you're talking about.  |
|
|
|
How can you prove something scientifically if it cannot be meassured?
Simple: just don't bother trying to measure it and then shout "it's real" at the person you are trying to "prove" it to! of course for this to "work" you must recalibrate your own internal understanding of the word "scientific", or better yet; not have that understanding in the first place! edit: non sarcastic answer: you can't! A gift for you: http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=2214Good luck |
|
|
|
Perhaps they're on holiday together  Good one |
|
|
|
I tried it Then I puked Seriously though, pretty disappointing I hope the final version will be better |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
