thanks for the update, chat popped up and i had get a new password for some reason.  I followed the process and its running fine now. 

it was stated users just need to place the link and can use signature of their own of their until they decide on an official one.

but if some people want more then a generic link in this signature this one seems to a popular choice
and easy to modify

thanks for the warning, have not received any yet myself.   any ideas how they got your email address?  

but its a sure sign that CT is becoming more well known in the crypto-world. so much that now even the bad guys want a piece of the unicorn  

What your saying about the cumulative result makes sense BUT I have not moved any investments into the 99.0 that were showing negative profit, the top one at 99.0 as been in that edge from the beginning and has not been moved between edges,  the 2nd one at 99 was move up from a lower edge that had receive no game and was at the original 0.01 so no losses or results to carry over there, the last one was also move up from a lower edge as it was not getting any games and had no losses.  so only 2 were moved but all 3 began 99.0 edge at 0.01. The first investment at top in 99.0 did show a small profit for the first 2 days before it completely reversed and is now negative profit,  the only one i had at 99.9 was as i said before was closed by staff when it got low and making a complete loss. 
I would like to invest a larger amount but these results are making me unsure of the system and if its really working as intended.  I never had a result like this on other sites I invested in, they always remain ahead even if only by a small percentage which I assume is because the investment is pooled together by site so that their amount invested equals their share of the house profits of the total across all investors, which of course I expect it to change as investors added or removed.

If the 99.0s I have all reach 0, then what happens, will they also be removed like my 99.9 was?  Either players are extremely lucky and the house is always losing but then as you said others are ahead at the same edge, as my 3 x 99.0 all began in that edge at 0.01, how can it be then these are all showing loss. 


I not sure I understand what you are trying to prevent here?  I can understand and see a need for a fee or method to prevent people exploiting the faucet via investment every few minutes, but don't think a fee should be charged on investments that is unchanged or negative profit and been active for a reasonable period of time. (eg 1 day)

Your example is has not been true for me as i had 3 investment set at 99.0 edge before you made this post, these are my results from 99.0, the top one has been there for about 3 days, the 2nd 2 days, and the 3rd is under 1 day, so how is possible that others using the same edge as me are ahead?  They have all suffered signifigant loss, and if your site has a policy of automatically closing they will never recover, and investors lose completely.  
Unless there is a bug in how investors funds are being pooled or used should not everyone at 99.0 be ahead together if they been invested for a few days?  The investment protection is not working for the edge you recommended.

bigger bets and more whale players for investors means they will have their investment drop to 0 faster and be booted out the bankroll unable to recover when house begins to win again

I cannot even close them now without taking a further loss as the site says you deduct a 0.5% fee to further penalize the investor if they close their investment.  

please explain investment protection as it did not work for me.  I had my investment closed without consent after it suffered 90% loss.  Is it a bug?
 Why are investments not allowed to recover after losses? Investment is worse then playing dice if it only flows one way.   

People shouldn't have to pay for replacements or have to fix an new product themselves. it should work perfectly from the box.  i'm very concerned i'm still waiting to receive my batch 1 prosperoX-1s ordered in Dec, and the number of posts from people claiming they received broken sub standard units is unsettling.  
Its bad enough the delays and being forced to accept an obsolete product, but something that doesn't even work or raises questions if its even safe to plug in and leave running and not going burn the house down or blow a fuse while i sleep...  

well i'm waiting for some explanations about this ^

Is Cinnicoin = Ryno?  either way the staking bug was not fixed so people going in ShadowCoin should be aware the SDC dev has been making false claims perhaps to boost confidence and encourage adoption of his coins.

I noticed the same thing, it is very laggy and slow.   

Another thing i noticed is people placing 0 btc bets, it seems completely pointless when there is a faucet they can claim free satoshis to play with.  Maybe the 0 btc betting is contributing to some of the lag?

Its also PoW/PoS so should have better security against high hashrate pools assuming the PoS has now been implemented and working as intended.  Pool would need both to be the majority hashrate on UTC and the majority owner of UTC to try something naughty i believe.  So pool having a high rate is less of an issue for hybrid coin.  As I understand it the risks are alot higher for coins that are pure PoW like bitcoin with majority hashrate (eg: Cex.io) or for pure PoS coins when exchange owns majority of coins (eg Mintpal and Vericoin), so being and staying PoS/PoW is an understated advantage of UTC. 

One of my favorite features returns for v2

i think it be okay with high number of miners, it would only hurt UTC future if they attempted something malicious with the blockchain and i believe the pool was created by UTC team itself (?) for the purpose of supporting ultracoin so it would be senseless for them to try that.
its a different story for other pools that exist to mine coins for immediate profit and are not part of the UTC team, then definitely it would be a concern if it had too much hashrate.

are you saying the pool cant be trusted?  i dont think you need to worry, if UTC become more profitable to mine, other profit-switching multipools will switch to it or add the option to mine Scrypt ChaCha

not on others, at least not in my experience. on other sites my investment can drop below what i put in and then recover past it when the house starting winning more (also depends on how many others invested and activity), obviously if they get automatically closed then it shuts out that possibility.  But i'm still waiting for an answer from the support to clarify for me.  Support sent me some email about having to close my investment but the email was corrupted and i only see the subject heading, not the message, so waiting for them to get back to me.  Only win88 can really explain so we all know hows its suppose to behave.

you can safely store your cinni in your addresses you owned. bugs are superficial and client side they have no effect on blockchain which is secure, coins don't get lost its the wallet.dat infomation on your addresses that can become incorrect after staking, and people get their coins stuck as wallet.dat attempts to spend coins/inputs that don't exist after PoS.  safe way to use the wallet if you stake your balance is to always use the repairwallet in console before spending cinni.  

You can disable staking/PoS by setting reservebalance in .conf to a higher number then your balance, so coins will never stake.  
if you dont plan on staking this is probably a good idea until the fixed wallet makes an appearance, good news is that you still keep coin age by disabling staking, so even if a new wallet that fixes PoS does not arrive for months, when you renable staking at that time you get the full interest you are entitled to on the balances you have kept from the date you withdrew to that address, which makes alot more sense then keeping them on mintpal for the same time waiting for price jump.

its buggy or I misunderstood how it works.  i invested at 99.99% edge and it completely zeroed in a few hours.  i might have misunderstood but i thought as long as its open it would ride with the house, but seems if your investment is reduced too much from players winning they will close it automatically and you lose completely with no chance to recover when players begin to lose again :\

then only other possibility i can think of is that you tried to spend coins/inputs that no longer existed currently because the wallet that did not have up to date information on the addresses - you said the wallet was not in sync with blockchain so it would had a incorrect balance displayed at the time you tried to spend.

someone else might know another reason for your problem, but afaik if the coins are present in the addresses on blockchain they should now be present in your new wallet.dat.  bitcoins dont cease to exist, they either move to another address or stay where they are.  use blockchain.info and see the balance for each of your addresses then check against your new wallet.dat, it should all match now.

rynomster aka sdcdev is now claiming he fixed the staking bug for Cinni.  such lies  

he didnt fix it, he ignored and then abandoned Cinnicoin and started shadowcoin.

so looking beyond the convention, is there other developments or thoughts on UTC direction? 

haha you would break your hand if you tried